Anthropic Claude AI应用程序在16周内实现了100万美元的收入

币界网Published on 2024-08-22Last updated on 2024-08-22

币界网报道:

Anthropic的Claude AI聊天机器人在推出16周后,从其iOS和Android移动应用程序中获得了100万美元的收入。Appfigures的数据显示,近一半的收入来自美国市场。

尽管Claude AI花了16周的时间才达到这一里程碑——与OpenAI的ChatGPT相比,后者仅用了3周时间——但它的表现仍然优于一些竞争对手。根据同样的数据,微软Copilot在19周内达到了100万美元,而Perplexity的移动应用程序花了22周的时间。

Anthropic Claude AI的移动应用程序难以给人留下深刻印象

Claude AI的推出与其首个100万美元收入之间的四个月差距反映了该应用程序的冷淡反应。在第一周,该应用程序在iOS和Android上的全球下载量仅为15.7万次。这远低于ChatGPT在美国iOS上的前五天达到的48万次下载量。

尽管有一些改进,但Claude AI应用程序并没有达到Anthropic的期望。在美国的iOS应用程序中,Claude的下载量排名第95位,收入排名第68位。这些数字明显低于分别排名第1和第26位的ChatGPT。

人工智能应用收入(来源:Appfigures)

鉴于大多数应用程序下载和订阅来自美国,排名不佳凸显了与ChatGPT相比,消费者对Claude的需求较低。分析师解释说,这可能是由于各种原因造成的,包括与OpenAI相比,Anthropic的品牌认知度较低,以及几家拥有类似产品的公司对人工智能市场的饱和。

然而,对于Claude移动应用程序来说,未来的情况可能会变得更糟。大多数手机制造商已经计划将人工智能功能直接集成到他们的设备中,这可能会消除用户获取另一个移动人工智能应用程序的需要。例如,苹果计划推出Apple Intelligence,让iPhone用户通过Siri直接访问ChatGPT。

人工智能初创公司的收入与支出不匹配

与此同时,Anthropic从其移动应用程序中获得的微薄收入表明,尽管花费了数十亿美元的资源,但人工智能初创公司通常很难产生收入。该公司价值180亿美元,预计今年将花费约27亿美元开发其产品。这与报道的6700万美元的预期收入相去甚远。

然而,这并不是目前唯一一家超支的人工智能企业。即使是人工智能的后代OpenAI,预计今年也将损失高达50亿美元,并可能在12个月内用完现金。The Information的一份报告称,这家初创公司将花费约70亿美元用于培训其人工智能模型,同时再花费15亿美元用于工资。

尽管这些公司在人工智能上投入了大量资金,但由于许多人担心在人工智能竞赛中落后,支出不太可能很快停止。至于利润,行业专家认为它即将到来。先锋全球首席经济学家乔·戴维斯最近写道,人工智能的前景是真实的。

他说:

“我们的研究表明,人工智能驱动的劳动生产率激增的可能性在45%至55%之间。在这种情况下,我们认为,2028年至2040年间,美国经济将以约3.1%的实际(经通胀调整的)年增长率增长。中间的几年反映了对技术进行额外投资的必要性,以及他们获得回报的时间。”

然而,他补充说,人工智能有大约40%的可能性无法达到与支出相匹配的收益预期。因此,投资者需要管理他们对人工智能回报的预期,特别是在短期内。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

As Bitcoin falls below $60,000, the author reflects on the relationship between AI and Bitcoin, seeing them as two sides of the same coin. In the AI era, the cost of generating content has plummeted, making fake text, images, and videos increasingly easy and cheap to produce. This has led to a fundamental shift: while AI dramatically lowers the cost of information production, it also undermines trust and authenticity online. What becomes truly valuable is not more content, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This perspective offers a new lens for Bitcoin. Its massive energy consumption, often criticized as wasteful, is reinterpreted. While AI burns energy to enhance "capability" and efficiency, Bitcoin burns energy to produce "verifiability." Its purpose is not to be trusted but to enable a system where no trust in intermediaries—banks, platforms, or developers—is needed. Every transaction and the entire ledger's history is secured by cryptography and a decentralized network of nodes, making it independently verifiable. AI cannot forge a transaction on the Bitcoin network because the system is designed for proof, not generation. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance: the printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce. Today, AI is the new printing press, reducing content creation costs to near zero. Blockchain, and Bitcoin as its pioneer, may be the modern equivalent of double-entry bookkeeping—a foundational technology for verifying digital asset ownership and historical records without centralized authorities. Thus, AI and blockchain are not competitors. AI lowers the cost of creation; blockchain lowers the cost of verification. In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may lie not in more content, but in independently verifiable facts. Whether the market will reprice Bitcoin accordingly remains uncertain, but its core value proposition as a "machine for producing verifiability" becomes strikingly relevant.

marsbit21m ago

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

marsbit21m ago

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

Author: Sevclub, Seven Research Amid Bitcoin's recent drop below $60k, the author reflects on a growing sense that AI and Bitcoin are two sides of the same coin. Today, encountering any content triggers a new default question: "Was this made by AI?" The cost of generating convincing text, images, and video is now negligible. While the internet lowered information *distribution* costs, AI is crashing information *production* costs to near zero. The consequence is a flood of content where truth and falsehood are increasingly indistinguishable. In this environment, what becomes truly valuable is not more information, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This reframes the common criticism that Bitcoin "wastes electricity." AI consumes power to produce "capability" (e.g., more powerful models). Bitcoin consumes power to produce something else: "verifiability." Bitcoin's core purpose isn't about belief or trust in any institution, developer, or even its creator. It's about enabling independent verification. Every bitcoin's origin, every transaction, and the integrity of the entire ledger are secured by mathematics, cryptography, and a global network of nodes. AI can fabricate convincing media, but it cannot falsify a transaction on the Bitcoin network. The expended energy makes篡改历史 (tampering with history) prohibitively expensive, purchasing a globally verifiable ledger. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance. The printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce—one enabled creation, the other verification. Today, AI is the new printing press, driving content production costs toward zero. The question becomes: what is this era's "double-entry bookkeeping"? Blockchain appears to be the leading candidate. It doesn't verify which news is true or which image is real, but it provides a foundational layer for independently verifying asset ownership and historical records in the digital realm without centralized authorities. Therefore, AI and blockchain are not in competition. AI lowers the cost of *generation*. Blockchain (and Bitcoin as a prime example) lowers the cost of *verification*. One creates, the other proves. Whether Bitcoin ultimately succeeds remains uncertain, facing potential challenges from quantum computing, regulation, and technical evolution. However, the author now sees it less as a "machine for making bitcoin" and more as a "machine for making verifiability." In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may no longer be "more content," but "more independently verifiable facts." Whether the market will price this accordingly is a separate question.

链捕手30m ago

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

链捕手30m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片