Spotify抨击AI音乐,呼吁给人类公平的报酬

币界网Published on 2024-08-10Last updated on 2024-08-10

币界网报道:

Spotify的内容审核受到了审查,因为这家流媒体巨头似乎正在向消费者推荐人工智能生成的音乐。该平台将“验证艺术家”徽章固定在据称不存在的艺术家身上,这些艺术家的deepfake音乐已经播放了数十万次。

Fairly Training的首席执行官、Stability AI的前音频副总裁Ed Newton-Rex抱怨说,这个漏洞威胁到了人类艺术家的流媒体份额。据《快公司》报道,他说:“很明显,这将蚕食支付给真正的人类音乐家的版税和收入流。”。

Spotify敦促禁止未经同意使用AI音乐

虽然Spotify没有取缔人工智能生成的内容,但这位受过良好训练的首席执行官认为这是对人类艺术家的双重偏见。用于制作音乐的人工智能应用程序正在利用人类艺术家的作品,而没有对其进行补偿。

Newton Rex表示:“Spotify不应该直接允许在平台上使用音乐,因为人们严重担心这些音乐会在未经许可的情况下接受其他音乐家作品的培训。”Newton Rex的非营利组织授权人工智能公司进行公平的数据来源。

对于允许的AI音乐,伦理学家认为:

“他们(Spotify)应该给它贴上标签,这样人们就可以选择是否听它……我认为Spotify可能不应该推荐它。”

关于人工智能艺术家的一个危险信号是Spotify之外缺乏在线或媒体存在。一个所谓的假货例子,Jet Fuel&Ginger Ales,有一个经过验证的徽章,每月有414500名听众。

其他例子包括Awake Past 3、Gutter Grinders和所谓的“Citrus Reticulata”标签艺术家Sofia Pitcher、Jefferson Petersen、Zolia Zayas、Alvaro Cantu、Isabella Carpinelli、Diego Tobia、Craig Penry和Saul Deleon等乐队。

在2023年12月至2024年3月期间,据称不存在的Sofia Pitcher每月有3000名听众。她的失踪很可能是Spotify采取警戒行动的结果。

皮彻被删除的专辑《石器时代》由十首器乐歌曲组成,这些歌曲的播放时间从未超过一分半钟。虽然看似概念性的,但她的歌曲标题“Rock”、“Cave”、“Hunter”和“Clan”可能很简单,以至于在主播的注意力范围内犯了错误。

Spotify因推荐AI音乐而受到批评

人工智能被视为“快速赚钱”的一种方式

据《快公司》报道,流媒体专家Enric Calabuig表示,虚假的Spotify标签可能涉及流媒体农业——这是一种在数百个移动终端上分布的高级账户生成自动回放的做法。

Playlist Alert创始人Kieron Donoghue认为AI歌曲的激增是无害的。他说:“这只是一些人试图快速赚钱的例子,就像他们在Spotify上一直做的那样。”。“我不认为这是对任何人生计的威胁。”

随着坎耶·维斯特(Kanye West)和阿姆(Eminem)等主流音乐家转向人工智能来制作更早或更强烈的声音版本,这一趋势成为人们关注的焦点。

Eminem通过Metaphysics复活了他的另一个自我Slim Shady,这是一家在人工智能时代为艺术家提供声音或面部肖像等生物识别数据所有权的公司。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手4h ago

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手4h ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit7h ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit7h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手8h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手8h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit9h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit9h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片