亚马逊的AI驱动的应用程序生成器承诺在没有“专业开发人员”的情况下提供工具

币界网Published on 2024-07-17Last updated on 2024-07-17

币界网报道:

亚马逊网络服务(AWS)最近宣布测试推出App Studio,这是其生成式人工智能编程平台,允许具有基本技术技能的员工只需描述其需要做什么即可构建应用程序,而无需编码。

亚马逊在公告中表示:“在短短几分钟内,App Studio构建了一个可能需要专业开发人员几天时间从头开始构建的应用程序。”并指出,“没有软件开发技能的技术专业人员”可以使用它,“消除了对运营专业知识的需求。”

但资深软件开发人员Rob Howard告诉Decrypt,让技术员工设计和构建应用程序并不是那么简单。

他解释说:“从我们所看到的,人工智能生成的代码可以显著加快软件开发过程,但我们还没有看到真正复制高端专业开发人员所做工作的人工智能生成软件,尤其是对于像这样的企业级软件。”。

Howard在软件开发方面拥有二十多年的经验,是一名技术教育家和人工智能专家。他说,大型组织的需求要求太高,太动态,不能只依赖基于人工智能的模型。

他指出:“我怀疑,在没有软件开发人员任何干预的情况下,这个版本能否实现承诺的目标。”。“随着时间的推移,我们肯定会看到人工智能驱动的软件创建得到改善,但完全消除对高级工程师或软件开发人员参与的需求似乎为时过早。”

Howard继续说道:“特别是对于关键任务、高流量使用或需要高水平正常运行时间、安全性、隐私性或您在企业级软件中所期望的任何其他类型的高级功能的业务功能。”。

他说,他很好奇App Builder是如何发展的。

霍华德说:“我确实认为,我们将继续看到那里的重大改进。亚马逊的这次发布是否是这种改进,还是只是朝着这个方向迈出的一步,还有待观察。”。

他指出,AWS解决方案似乎针对的是对更高级别员工的需求。虽然他们通常有更高的薪水,但他们也更有可能拥有更多的技能、培训和证书。霍华德表示,这种做法与当前的人工智能趋势背道而驰,即努力留住顶尖人才,同时消除入门级职位。

他说:“我们在软件开发行业肯定看到的一件事是,人工智能工具能够完成许多高级开发人员无论如何都不愿做的繁重工作或死记硬背的劳动。”。

霍华德补充道:“亚马逊似乎想让外行在没有开发人员的情况下创建整个仪表板或可视化工具。”。“人工智能编码工具已经取代了初级和入门级的开发人员,但它们还没有真正取代那些高级开发人员的职位。”

与一些企业软件和人工智能平台不同,亚马逊对App Builder不收取每用户许可费。目前,亚马逊AWS客户可以免费使用该服务进行构建,公司只会为员工使用已发布应用程序的时间付费。

据该公司称,App Studio目前仅在其位于俄勒冈州的美国西部AWS区域之一可用。这意味着该区域内的任何用户当前都可以访问和部署该服务。

由Ryan Ozawa编辑。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

"Why DeFi Insurance Remains Unpurchased" explores the paradox of decentralized finance insurance. While DeFi insurance promises automatic, unbiased payouts via smart contracts—eliminating traditional insurers' denial practices—it struggles to attract users. The core issue is economic viability. Premiums are prohibitively high relative to the yields from DeFi protocols. For example, insuring a deposit on Aave or Maple Finance can consume most or even all of the annual yield, leaving returns comparable to or worse than traditional savings. Only the safest protocols, like MakerDAO, offer affordable premiums. Furthermore, the DeFi insurance model is structurally fragile. Unlike traditional insurance where risks are uncorrelated, DeFi risks are highly interconnected (e.g., oracle failures, bridge hacks). A single major exploit can simultaneously threaten multiple protocols, potentially bankrupting the entire insurance pool, which holds only millions against billions in total value locked. The governance model also creates a conflict of interest. In platforms like Nexus Mutual, token holders who vote on claims risk their own capital if payouts are approved, incentivizing denials. Consequently, the market is tiny and shrinking. Nexus Mutual dominates with $81.56 million in assets, but the industry lacks the capacity to cover a catastrophic event like the $292M Kelp DAO hack. Other providers have dwindled or shut down. The article concludes that DeFi insurance faces a "tragedy of the commons": its stability requires widespread adoption, but individual users have no incentive to pay for it, as premiums destroy their yields. Current solutions involve preventative measures like bug bounties and seeking external capital from traditional reinsurance, acknowledging that on-chain capital alone is insufficient to cover on-chain risks.

marsbit3h ago

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片