Grayscale推出针对去中心化AI协议的新基金

币界网Published on 2024-07-17Last updated on 2024-07-17

币界网报道:

这家著名的加密资产管理公司于7月17日宣布成立Grayscale去中心化人工智能基金有限责任公司,旨在为投资者提供加密生态系统中快速发展的人工智能领域的协议。

该基金将按季度重新平衡,目前拥有一篮子分散的人工智能(AI)加密协议,如Bittensor(TAO)、Filecoin(FIL)、Livepeer(LPT)、Near(Near)和Render(RNDR)。

Grayscale的新去中心化人工智能基金

Grayscale的产品与研究主管Rayhaneh Sharif Askary强调,Grayscale去中心化人工智能基金的最新推出将为在早期阶段投资去中心化AI提供机会。这位高管接着补充道,

“基于区块链的人工智能协议体现了去中心化、可访问性和透明度的原则,灰度团队强烈认为,这些协议可以帮助减轻人工智能技术激增带来的根本风险。”

该基金将针对三个关键领域的融资项目:聊天机器人、生成图像和其他去中心化人工智能应用程序的开发;解决与集中式人工智能相关的问题,例如深度伪造、错误信息和针对机器人的真实性检查;以及支持与人工智能相关的基础设施,包括GPU计算、数据存储、去中心化市场和各种其他服务。

人工智能的集中化风险

Grayscale在其官方新闻稿中指出,该基金首次亮相背后的动机是,人工智能在很大程度上集中于少数几家知名公司,这些公司是推动该技术发展和主流采用的核心。

为了应对持续的技术进步和实际需求,已经出现了几家去中心化的人工智能公司或协议,旨在充分利用人工智能技术的潜力。

资产经理指出,这些实体还解决了与集中化相关的一些局限性和风险。这些去中心化的人工智能计划利用区块链技术来分配所有权和治理权,提供了对人工智能技术的无限制访问,并提高了透明度。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

"Why DeFi Insurance Remains Unpurchased" explores the paradox of decentralized finance insurance. While DeFi insurance promises automatic, unbiased payouts via smart contracts—eliminating traditional insurers' denial practices—it struggles to attract users. The core issue is economic viability. Premiums are prohibitively high relative to the yields from DeFi protocols. For example, insuring a deposit on Aave or Maple Finance can consume most or even all of the annual yield, leaving returns comparable to or worse than traditional savings. Only the safest protocols, like MakerDAO, offer affordable premiums. Furthermore, the DeFi insurance model is structurally fragile. Unlike traditional insurance where risks are uncorrelated, DeFi risks are highly interconnected (e.g., oracle failures, bridge hacks). A single major exploit can simultaneously threaten multiple protocols, potentially bankrupting the entire insurance pool, which holds only millions against billions in total value locked. The governance model also creates a conflict of interest. In platforms like Nexus Mutual, token holders who vote on claims risk their own capital if payouts are approved, incentivizing denials. Consequently, the market is tiny and shrinking. Nexus Mutual dominates with $81.56 million in assets, but the industry lacks the capacity to cover a catastrophic event like the $292M Kelp DAO hack. Other providers have dwindled or shut down. The article concludes that DeFi insurance faces a "tragedy of the commons": its stability requires widespread adoption, but individual users have no incentive to pay for it, as premiums destroy their yields. Current solutions involve preventative measures like bug bounties and seeking external capital from traditional reinsurance, acknowledging that on-chain capital alone is insufficient to cover on-chain risks.

marsbit3h ago

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片