2025's New Crypto Unicorns: 8 Companies Across Payments, AI, and Other Sectors Make the List

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-21Last updated on 2026-01-21

Abstract

In 2025, despite a severe market downturn with a 41% drop in funded projects, eight crypto companies achieved unicorn status (valued over $1 billion), reflecting key industry trends. **Nous Research** focuses on decentralized AI, raising $50M at a $1B valuation led by Paradigm. **RedotPay**, a Hong Kong-based stablecoin payment firm, raised over $194M across three rounds, processing $10B+ annually. **Kalshi**, a compliant prediction market platform, raised $1.85B, reaching a $11B valuation, with trading volume surging 1108% to $23.8B. **Lighter**, a decentralized perpetual exchange, raised $68M at a $1.5B valuation and launched its token LIT. **Flying Tulip**, an all-in-one DeFi protocol by Andre Cronje, raised $200M with unique investor redemption rights. **Sygnum**, a regulated Swiss crypto bank, raised $58M, exceeding a $1B valuation. **Tempo**, a high-performance Layer-1 for payments developed by Stripe and Paradigm, raised $500M. **Zama**, a privacy protocol using fully homomorphic encryption, raised $57M at a $1B+ valuation and conducted a token sale. These companies highlight growth in AI, payments, DeFi, and privacy solutions amid a challenging market.

Author: Hu Tao, ChianCatcher

In 2025, the primary market of the crypto industry experienced its harshest winter in years. Although the total funding amount showed growth due to the halo effect of a few giants like Binance, the number of funded projects declined for the fifth consecutive year, with only 902 projects, a drop of 41%.

However, even in such a market environment, several crypto companies have become new crypto unicorns (with a valuation reaching $1 billion) based on their outstanding products and technology. These eight companies are Lighter, Tempo, Kalshi, Zama, Sygnum, Nous Research, Flying Tulip, and RedotPay. They constitute the most representative group of "new unicorn samples" in the crypto industry for 2025, reflecting the latest preferences and trends in the capital market.

Nous Research

Nous Research is a research-focused company concentrating on the integration of artificial intelligence and decentralized technology, dedicated to exploring large model training, inference, and collaboration mechanisms in a decentralized environment. Nous is building a fully open AI technology stack. Through its pre-training network Psyche, it allows anyone to meaningfully participate in the development of cutting-edge intelligence and contribute their idle computing power.

In April 2025, Nous Research announced the completion of a $50 million funding round at a valuation of $1 billion, led by Paradigm. Previously, Nous had raised approximately $20 million in seed funding from investors including Distributed Global, North Island Ventures, and Delphi Ventures.

RedotPay

RedotPay is a Hong Kong-based payment technology company built on stablecoins, integrating blockchain solutions with traditional banking and financial infrastructure, aiming to provide inclusive finance for the unbanked population. RedotPay is committed to using crypto assets for real-world consumption and payment scenarios. Its product system revolves around the exchange, clearing, and payment experience between crypto assets and fiat currency.

RedotPay completed three funding rounds in 2025: $40 million, $47 million, and $107 million, with its valuation exceeding $1 billion in the second and third rounds. RedotPay also stated that its annualized payment volume has exceeded $10 billion, its current annualized revenue is over $150 million, and it is operating profitably.

Kalshi

Kalshi is a compliance-oriented prediction market company that allows users to price probabilities and hedge risks around macroeconomic events, political events, and real-world outcomes. Unlike most decentralized prediction markets, Kalshi has chosen to operate within a regulatory framework since its inception, building prediction markets as a compliant financial instrument.

In 2025, Kalshi completed three funding rounds: $185 million, $300 million, and $1 billion, with its valuation reaching up to $11 billion. Investors included Sequoia Capital, a16z, Paradigm, etc. In 2025, Kalshi's trading volume reached $23.8 billion, a year-on-year increase of 1108%, making it one of the fastest-growing companies in the industry.

Lighter

Lighter is a decentralized perpetual contract trading platform that aims to provide the performance of a centralized exchange while remaining fully decentralized by combining on-chain verification with a high-throughput matching engine. The protocol uses its own Layer 2 infrastructure to minimize gas fees, achieve instant settlement, and provide auditable proof for every transaction.

In November 2025, Lighter announced the completion of a $68 million funding round at a valuation of $1.5 billion, led by Founders Fund and Ribbit Capital. At the end of the year, Lighter officially launched its token LIT, which was subsequently listed on mainstream exchanges like Robinhood and Coinbase; its current FDV is $1.6 billion. Lighter also launched spot trading functionality.

Flying Tulip

Flying Tulip is an intelligent trading protocol founded by DeFi pioneer Andre Cronje. It integrates spot trading, derivatives, lending, money markets, a native stablecoin (ftUSD), and on-chain insurance into a single cross-margin system, eliminating the need to transfer funds across different protocols.

In September 2025, Flying Tulip announced the completion of a $200 million seed funding round at a valuation of $1 billion. Participants included Brevan Howard Digital, CoinFund, DWF Labs, FalconX, Hypersphere, Lemniscap, Nascent, Republic Digital, Selini, Susquehanna Crypto, etc.

Compared to all other funding projects, Flying Tulip established a redemption clause for its investors: all primary market participants (including private and public sales) have the right to on-chain redemption, allowing them to burn $FT at any time and redeem the principal of their invested assets (e.g., ETH). Redemption payments will be settled automatically by程序, funded by a segregated on-chain redemption reserve established from the raised capital.

Sygnum

Sygnum is a regulated Swiss crypto bank that provides institutional and high-net-worth clients with services such as digital asset custody, trading, staking, and structured financial products. Its core positioning is to provide a compliant gateway for traditional finance clients to enter the crypto market.

In January 2025, Sygnum raised $58 million in a strategic funding round, achieving a post-money valuation exceeding $1 billion and entering unicorn status. In May last year, former CFTC chairman Christopher Giancarlo also joined Sygnum as a senior policy advisor.

Tempo

Tempo is a high-performance Layer 1 blockchain designed for payment scenarios, co-developed by Stripe and Paradigm in mid-2025. Tempo supports all major stablecoins and can provide high-throughput, low-cost global transactions for any commercial use case.

In October 2025, Tempo announced the completion of a $500 million funding round led by Thrive Capital and Greenoaks. In December, Stripe and Paradigm announced the launch of the Tempo blockchain testnet, with many traditional finance giants like Kalshi, Klarna, and UBS officially announcing partnerships.

Zama

Zama is a cryptographic privacy protocol that adds a layer of confidentiality to public blockchains. It develops fully homomorphic encryption (FHE), a technology that allows data to be processed without decryption. This can be used to create private smart contracts on top of public, permissionless blockchains, where only specific users can see transaction data and contract state.

In June 2025, Zama announced the completion of a $57 million funding round at a valuation exceeding $1 billion, led by Pantera Capital and Blockchange. In the second half of the year, Zama successively launched its testnet and mainnet. On January 21st, Zama initiated an on-chain token sale through CoinList and its own auction application, with a minimum fully diluted valuation (FDV) of $55 million, using a sealed-bid Dutch auction structure, allocating 12% of its total token supply of 11 billion tokens.

Related Questions

QWhat are the main areas of focus for the 8 new crypto unicorns in 2025?

AThe 8 new crypto unicorns in 2025 are distributed across areas including payments (e.g., RedotPay, Tempo), artificial intelligence (Nous Research), prediction markets (Kalshi), decentralized finance/trading (Lighter, Flying Tulip), regulated crypto banking (Sygnum), and privacy protocols (Zama).

QWhich company achieved a unicorn valuation with a $5000 million funding round led by Paradigm in April 2025?

ANous Research achieved a $1 billion valuation with a $50 million funding round led by Paradigm in April 2025.

QWhat is the unique feature of Flying Tulip's investment terms for its investors?

AFlying Tulip's unique feature is a redemption clause for all primary market investors, allowing them to burn the $FT token at any time and redeem their principal investment (e.g., in ETH) from an on-chain redemption reserve funded by the capital raised.

QWhich payment-focused company, based in Hong Kong, reported an annualized payment volume exceeding $10 billion and achieved profitability?

ARedotPay, a Hong Kong-based payment technology company, reported an annualized payment volume exceeding $10 billion and achieved profitable operations.

QWhat technology does Zama use to enable privacy on public blockchains, and how did it conduct its token sale?

AZama uses Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) technology to enable privacy on public blockchains. It conducted its token sale through a sealed-bid Dutch auction on CoinList and its own auction application, allocating 12% of its total 11 billion token supply.

Related Reads

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

On June 15, 2026, Li Auto unveiled details of its self-developed chip, Mahe M100, for its new L9 Livis model. CTO Xie Yan stated the goal was not just a faster chip, but a fundamentally different one, targeting the chip architecture itself. While competitors like NIO, Xpeng, and Huawei highlight TOPS (computing power) figures for their self-developed chips, Li Auto’s Mahe M100 focuses on redesigning the underlying architecture. It employs a "dynamic data flow architecture" to address memory bandwidth bottlenecks in large model inference, claiming up to 3x the effective computing power of Nvidia's Thor U for its specific workloads and a 40% reduction in latency. The chip's design was peer-reviewed and accepted at ISCA 2026. However, this performance is highly optimized for Li Auto's own VLA2.1 algorithm, meaning it may not generalize as well to other tasks. Li Auto aims to achieve full-stack in-house development with Mahe M100, covering chip, compiler, OS, AI algorithms, and domain controller—a level of vertical integration few competitors match. Beyond the chip, CEO Li Xiang introduced a new strategic narrative: the "embodied intelligent vehicle," defined as an integration of an EV, a professional driver, an AI computer, and a life assistant. This shifts competition from features like large screens to systemic AI capabilities. A key commitment was that Li Auto's Mahe VLA autonomous driving model will match Tesla's FSD V14 by Q4 2026, with specific OTA milestones set for July, September, and December. Financially, Li Auto faces pressure with declining revenue and vehicle gross margins since Q4 2025, while maintaining high R&D investment (approx. ¥12B in 2026, 50% AI-related). Its 2026 sales target is 550,000 vehicles, up from 406,000 in 2025. The new L9 Livis garnered over 10,000 pre-orders in two weeks. The effectiveness of these strategic moves—new products, OTAs, and the novel chip architecture—will begin to show in Q3 2026 financial results, with the year-end FSD V14 benchmark being the ultimate test.

marsbit15m ago

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

marsbit15m ago

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

The Year of AI Applications: Blindly Saying "Yes" While Ignoring Risks? A Software Development Log Goes Fully Open Source. AI-generated code harbors risks hidden within seemingly correct programs, potentially leading to data leaks or asset loss. The open-source project "Narwhal AI Code Risks," from Peking University's Narwhal-Lab, compiles real-world cases, early warning signs, and typical risk pathways. Its goal is to help developers identify potential hazards early and avoid repeating past mistakes. In 2026, code is generated faster than ever but deployed with less scrutiny. The danger often lies not in glaring errors, but in code that appears normal—syntactically correct, passing all checks—yet introduces subtle but critical flaws like non-existent dependencies, excessive permissions, or exposed databases. A stark example is the Moonwell cbETH oracle incident. A configuration file error, where a cryptocurrency price was set to ~$1.12 instead of ~$2,200, slipped through 28 checks and a pull request signed by both AI (Claude, Copilot) and human developers. This "semantic deviation" resulted in a loss of $1.78 million. The risk is that AI can produce functionally valid code that is semantically wrong for the business context. As AI moves beyond simple code completion to modifying configurations, installing dependencies, and operating via autonomous agents, it traverses longer, less traceable paths within software engineering, blurring traditional boundaries and oversight points. The Narwhal AI Code Risks project structures information into three layers: `/cases` for documented real-world incidents, `/inferred` for early warning signals, and `/scenarios` for clear, generalized risk patterns not yet tied to specific events. This aims to create a lasting, public record to prevent collective amnesia about past AI-coding pitfalls. Risks are categorized into seven areas: Software Supply Chain (e.g., recommending fake packages), Code-Level Vulnerabilities (e.g., reintroducing path traversal bugs), Cloud & Infrastructure Misconfiguration (e.g., overly permissive settings), Agent Risks (from autonomous tool execution), Vertical Domain Risks (e.g., in finance, healthcare), Intellectual Property & Compliance issues, and Human Factors (like over-reliance on AI output). The project's core value is transforming isolated incidents into reusable knowledge—a foundational resource for developers to spot similar issues, for security researchers to build upon, for toolmakers to create detection rules, and for the community to contribute new findings. As AI integration accelerates, this open-source "logbook" serves as a crucial navigational aid, charting past errors to help future projects steer clear of the same traps.

marsbit16m ago

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

marsbit16m ago

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation is built on its three core businesses: Starlink (profitable, 60% of revenue), rockets (driving down launch costs), and AI (a major investment area). This creates a financial cycle: Starlink funds rocket development, which enables low-cost launches for AI hardware, generating future revenue. This cycle fuels annual capital expenditures of tens of billions, flowing to a vast supply chain. Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like NVIDIA (GPU/CUDA ecosystem), Eutelsat (critical radio spectrum), Filtronic (specialized amplifiers), Materion (strategic beryllium), and STMicroelectronics (antenna chips). The second group consists of hard-to-replace suppliers due to high switching costs, such as Honeywell (flight control), Carpenter Technology (specialty alloys), Hexcel (carbon fiber), Broadcom (data exchange), and Linde (industrial gases). The third group comprises high-volume, cost-critical suppliers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Key names include Wistron NeWeb (primary manufacturer) and several A-share companies like Shenzhen Sunway (connectors), Pies New Materials (forgings), Western Superconducting (alloys), and Yingliu (castings). Other niche players include Trimble (timing), Astronics (power distribution), and CTS (thermal management). The article argues that investing in these suppliers, rather than SpaceX stock directly, offers an alternative opportunity. The rationale is threefold: procurement is just beginning to scale, SpaceX's IPO brings new transparency to its supply chain, and the situation mirrors early stages of past "super terminal" ecosystems like Apple or Tesla. While risks exist (commodity cycles, geopolitical factors, technology shifts), the core thesis is that SpaceX's massive, ongoing procurement will translate into reliable revenue for its key suppliers, regardless of its own stock price volatility.

marsbit1h ago

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

marsbit1h ago

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

**Title: The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who Benefits from Musk's Annual $100 Billion Capital Expenditure?** This article argues that investors seeking to benefit from SpaceX's growth might find greater opportunities in its supply chain rather than directly investing in the company itself, drawing parallels to historical successes with Apple, Tesla, and NVIDIA suppliers. **SpaceX's Business Model & Cash Flow:** SpaceX generates revenue from three main areas: 1. **Starlink:** Its profitable core, earning $11.3B in 2023 (60% of revenue), funding other ventures. 2. **Rockets (Falcon/Starship):** Requires $3B+ in annual R&D but achieves the world's lowest launch costs. 3. **AI:** Currently unprofitable (-$6B+ in 2023), investing heavily in ground-based supercomputers (220,000 GPUs) and future orbital data centers. The cycle is: Starlink profits → fund cheaper rockets → low-cost launches deploy AI hardware → AI compute rentals generate future revenue. This cycle drives annual procurement spending of tens of billions of dollars. **The Supply Chain Beneficiaries:** Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability: **1. Nearly Irreplaceable (High Barriers to Entry):** * **NVIDIA:** Powers the Colossus supercomputer; its CUDA ecosystem creates immense switching costs. * **Eutelsat (SATS):** Controls critical radio spectrum for satellite communications; holds a ~3% stake in SpaceX. * **Filtronic (FTC):** Supplies millimeter-wave signal amplifiers for Starlink satellites; SpaceX constitutes 83% of its revenue. * **Materion (MTRN):** Global leader in beryllium production, a strategic material used in Starship structures. * **STMicroelectronics (STM):** Supplies phased-array antenna chips for Starlink satellites. **2. Replaceable, but Switching Cost is Prohibitively High:** * **Honeywell (HON):** Provides flight control and inertial navigation systems with decades of certification. * **Carpenter Technology (CRS):** Manufactures ultra-pure specialty steel alloys for Raptor engines. * **Hexcel (HXL):** Supplies custom carbon fiber composites developed over a decade with SpaceX. * **Broadcom (AVGO):** Manages high-speed data switching. * **Linde Group:** Supplies industrial gases (liquid oxygen/nitrogen) from facilities built near SpaceX launch sites. **3. High-Volume, Cost-Critical Manufacturing:** Focuses on mass-producing components like Starlink user terminals (target: 30 million units). * **Key Players:** Wistron NeWeb (6285, primary terminal manufacturer), several Chinese A-share companies (e.g., Sunway Communication, PAX New Materials, Western Metal Materials, Yingliu Co.), and smaller US firms like Trimble (TRMB, timing systems). **Why Now?** Three factors make the supply chain opportunity timely: 1. **Volume Ramp-Up:** SpaceX plans 100 launches in 2026, aims for 30 million Starlink terminals, and will deploy AI data centers, meaning procurement will accelerate. 2. **Increased Transparency:** The IPO provides public financial data, allowing investors to track supplier order growth. 3. **Historical Precedent:** The current phase is likened to Tesla's early mass-production stage (circa 2018), suggesting a long growth runway for suppliers. **Conclusion:** The article posits that while investing in SpaceX stock is betting on Elon Musk's ambitious vision at a high valuation, investing in its established suppliers is a bet on the tangible, recurring revenue from its massive procurement budget, which is largely decoupled from day-to-day stock price volatility.

链捕手1h ago

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片