The Ethereum Foundation is Dead, The Era of Ethereum's Pluralistic Organizations Has Dawned

marsbit發佈於 2026-07-10更新於 2026-07-10

文章摘要

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has announced the dissolution of its Protocol Support Team, marking a significant organizational shift. This move, described as the largest layoff in EF's history with a 20% staff reduction, follows a major internal restructuring announced in late June. The restructuring, which EF framed as necessary to streamline for future challenges, has drawn criticism for its perceived cold execution. Concurrently, several new independent non-profit organizations have emerged, founded by former EF members. These include Ethlabs, a research and development lab, and Ethereum Institutional, which focuses on promoting institutional adoption of Ethereum. Their rise is seen as both filling roles vacated by EF's downsizing and signaling a fragmentation of the Ethereum ecosystem's leadership. Amidst these changes, EF is also integrating advanced AI tools into its security operations. The security team has begun using AI agents to conduct red-team testing, which has already uncovered vulnerabilities in Ethereum's code. While EF states that AI complements rather than replaces human researchers, this technological shift hints at potential future reductions in human-centric roles within the organization. The article posits that these developments—massive layoffs, the exodus of key personnel like former Executive Director Xiaowei Wang, the rise of rival organizations, and AI integration—collectively point to a decline in EF's central authority. Once the undisputed lead...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Wenser (@wenser 2010 )

Last night, the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Support Team officially announced its dissolution. Prior to this, Wang Xiaowei, co-executive director of the Ethereum Foundation, who was seen as "one of the representative figures of the EF's organizational reform," had also officially resigned. So far this year, at least 8 senior personnel have left the Ethereum Foundation.

Alongside the organizational and personnel changes, there is the functional replacement and encroachment on the Ethereum Foundation's role by non-profit independent organizations such as ETHLabs and Ethereum Institutional; there is also the technical progress, like the EF's security team recently using AI agents for red team testing of the ETH network and discovering real vulnerabilities.

As ETH's price faces wave after wave of industry scrutiny, what lies before the Ethereum Foundation are the more complex and diverse contradictions and tests following its internal reform. Related to this is the divisive transformation that the leading body of Ethereum is directly confronting.

The Ethereum Foundation Enters an Era of Decline: The Rise of Multiple Contenders, Talent Drain, and the AI Transformation

The Ethereum Foundation (hereinafter referred to as EF) has long been criticized for its rigid structure, decision-making by a few, organizational value, and actions affecting market sentiment through token sales. Criticism of the EF within the Ethereum community is particularly fierce. Not long ago, Bankless founder David Hoffman even went so far as to "sell his final ETH holdings" to express his dissatisfaction with the EF, urging the Ethereum community to build the ecosystem in their own way.

Now, the formal dissolution of the EF's Protocol Support Team is like a thunderclap, fully exposing the internal contradictions and crisis of division within the EF organization to everyone. It is noteworthy that this round of organizational changes is particularly different from the organizational changes initiated by Ethereum founder Vitalik last year—this is a thorough personnel purge, also seen as 'the largest round of layoffs since the EF's establishment,' not merely changes among some leadership personnel as before.

When the Ethereum Ecosystem Leader Chooses to Sever Its Tail to Survive: The Course of EF's Major Layoffs

It all begins with the official announcement "New EF Structure" officially released by the EF on June 23.

In this lengthy article spanning thousands of words, the EF distinguished its new organizational structure into layers: Protocol, Access, User, Community, and Institutional. It later explained that "this organizational restructuring involves laying off 54 people, representing 20% of EF's membership." What feels even more disheartening is that the announcement begins by stating: "Through this process, we have obtained the structure, activities, and personnel necessary to execute the critical tasks we will soon face." In other words, the laid-off personnel and departments are considered obsolete, unnecessary, and without value.

It must be said that the EF, which has always presented itself as a research-oriented organization and an ecosystem leader with a scholarly demeanor, has for the first time revealed a冷酷 aspect of its organizational management.

Schematic diagram of the new EF structure

The Dissolution of the EF Protocol Support Department Becomes a Significant Marker of EF's Organizational Split

It is worth mentioning that the work of the EF Protocol Support Department leaned towards infrastructure construction, primarily responsible for coordinating the Ethereum protocol development process, including organizing and coordinating core developer meetings, tracking Ethereum network upgrades, supporting EIP progression, running the Ethereum protocol, etc. Now, its main functions have been allocated to the Protocol layer part of the EF.

Coinciding with the day the EF announced its new structure, Ethlabs, a non-profit R&D lab co-founded by 5 former EF researchers, was officially announced. This organization aims to promote Ethereum as the settlement layer for the global economy and has received support from a series of investment institutions, Ethereum ecosystem projects, independent individuals, and EF members, including Ethereum co-founder Joe Lubin (Chairman of Sharplink, founder of Consensys), ETH treasury company BitMine (Ethereum treasury company under Tom Lee), Sharplink, and crypto investment firm SNZ.

List of ETHLabs community participants (Source: Official account)

On July 1st, Ethereum Institutional, co-founded by former EF members David Walsh, Marius Smith, and Matthew Dawson, was officially unveiled.

This organization's main concept is "Ethereum's Institutional Finance Application Plan," dedicated to promoting the institutionalization and institutional-grade application of Ethereum, its secondary layers, applications, and the entire ecosystem. Simultaneously, the organization emphasizes its collaboration with Ethlabs, Etherealize, and the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance, responsible for institutional demand对接 and explaining Ethereum's value proposition to banks; Ethlabs focuses on translating related demands into technical products. As a non-profit independent institution, Ethereum Institutional will provide free consulting related to Ethereum applications for banks and asset management companies.

A week later, Ethereum Institutional announced the commencement of core team recruitment, focusing in the coming weeks on hiring for roles such as Institutional Business Development (Institutional GTM), Marketing & Community Operations, and technical positions like Solutions Architect, Technical Project Lead.

Thus, the EF layoff turmoil formally concluded with the emergence of two major non-profit independent organizations and the dissolution of the Protocol Support Department, also drawing an imperfect full stop to the "internal organizational transformation" personally pushed by Vitalik last year. Beyond the organizational-level split and the loss of top talent like Executive Director Wang Xiaowei, the EF also faces the impact of AI technology.

The Era of AI Attack and Defense Begins, Upgrades in EF Security Team Testing

Yesterday, researchers from the EF Protocol Security Team stated in a blog post that they have deployed a series of AI agents to test software dependencies within the Ethereum ecosystem, searching for vulnerabilities in cryptographic systems, protocol code, and smart contracts.

Vulnerabilities discovered by the AI agents include a remotely triggerable panic issue in the libp2p gossipsub peer-to-peer layer used by Ethereum consensus clients. This issue has been fixed and disclosed on Github as CVE-2026-34219.

Researchers stated that the AI agents were organized into specialized roles such as reconnaissance, searching, gap filling, and verification to find potential attack paths, reproduce failures, and verify their applicability to production code. The EF stated that AI has not replaced security researchers but has changed the way of working, enabling the team to cover a far greater scope than manual review, but requiring researchers to exercise more cautious judgment over a large number of seemingly credible conclusions.

Considering today's news of the official launch of the GPT 5.6 model, the future maintenance of Ethereum protocol security will likely be jointly handled by AI models and EF security researchers. Moreover, although the EF currently mentions that "AI has not replaced researchers," with the continuous development and evolution of AI models, personnel in the EF security team and even across the entire organizational structure may be further reduced in the future. In other words, the EF will also face the test of AI models on its organizational structure and the fulfillment of its functions.

Summary: The EF Organizational Reform Phase Concludes, Might It Become an Ecosystem Mascot in the Future?

In January of last year, we systematically analyzed the EF's organizational reform in the article "Vitalik Fires the First Shot of 'Reform', Where is the Ethereum Foundation Heading?" Back then, Vitalik was still ambitiously and forcefully pushing for EF organizational reform; in May of this year, after more than a year of organizational renewal, Vitalik surprisingly changed his tune, stating that "the Ethereum Foundation should not be the center of the ETH ecosystem and will shift towards a smaller, long-termist approach."

It must be said that as ETH has grown into an asset worth hundreds of billions, the EF, this official ecosystem organization established for nearly a decade, has also entered the awkward position of being "a large ship hard to turn." No wonder Vitalik previously declared—"will no longer write regular blog posts and has decided to try writing some science fiction on the topic of decentralized governance."

As former EF researcher and Ethlabs member Ansgar Dietrichs said earlier this month in a podcast, "After five years of failing to break through $5,000, ETH still lacks a clear value narrative."

Currently, it seems the EF can hardly shoulder the banner of "revitalizing the Ethereum ecosystem and driving a breakthrough in ETH's price." Future large-scale adoption and institutional-grade investment may have to be hoped for from organizations like ETHlabs, Ethereum Institutional, and Etherealize.

Perhaps, in the not-too-distant future, playing the role of an "ecosystem mascot" would be more suitable for the EF.

Recommended Reading

Ethereum in a "Mid-Life Crisis," Analyzing Its Development Performance from a Data Perspective

Given: ETH = Nokia, Find: Ethereum = iOS?

Ethereum is 'Sick,' Are These Three Prescriptions the Right Cure?

Where is the Road? A Brief Analysis of the 3 Major Abstract Problems Facing the Ethereum Ecosystem

Listing Ethereum's Seven Deadly Sins, Who Can Play the "Divine Comedy of Salvation" for It?

Where Lies Ethereum's Orthodoxy? A Detailed Explanation of the "Cryptocurrency Masterpiece" in Vitalik's Mind

Ethereum's Tenth Anniversary: Revisiting ETH's Journey of Changing Hands, The Resurgence of Token Centralization

Are L2s a Detour for Ethereum?

Bankless Founder Liquidates ETH Holdings, Collective Disillusionment with Ethereum Faith

熱門幣種推薦

相關問答

QWhat significant organizational change was announced by the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Support Team, and what was its broader implication?

AThe Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Support Team announced its formal dissolution. This event is seen as a major indicator of internal conflict and a splitting crisis within the EF, marking one of its largest rounds of layoffs to date.

QAccording to the article, what are the names and primary goals of the two new non-profit independent organizations that emerged following the EF restructuring?

AThe two new organizations are Ethlabs and Ethereum Institutional. Ethlabs aims to promote Ethereum as a global economic settlement layer. Ethereum Institutional focuses on driving the institutionalization and enterprise-level application of Ethereum and its ecosystem.

QHow has the Ethereum Foundation's security team incorporated AI, and what was a key outcome of this integration?

AThe EF security team deployed a series of AI agents to test software relied upon by the Ethereum ecosystem, searching for vulnerabilities. A key outcome was the discovery of a remotely triggerable panic issue in the libp2p gossipsub library (CVE-2026-34219), which has since been patched.

QWhat shift in perspective did Vitalik Buterin reportedly express regarding the Ethereum Foundation's role, as mentioned in the article's conclusion?

AVitalik Buterin shifted from actively pushing for organizational reform to stating that the Ethereum Foundation should not be the center of the ETH ecosystem and should move towards a smaller, more long-termist approach. The article suggests he may even see a future where the EF plays more of a 'mascot' role.

QWhat criticism from within the Ethereum community towards the EF is highlighted in the article, and who exemplified this sentiment?

AThe EF has been criticized for its rigid structure, decision-making by a few, organizational value, and market-affecting sell-offs. Bankless founder David Hoffman exemplified this sentiment by selling his remaining ETH holdings to express dissatisfaction and encouraging the community to build independently of the EF.

你可能也喜歡

大模型能写出工业级优化算法吗?MIT提出FrontierOR给AI设下考场

麻省理工学院等机构的研究者推出了FrontierOR基准,用于评估大语言模型(LLM)设计大规模优化算法的能力。该基准不同于传统测试建模或调用求解器的任务,重点考察LLM能否像运筹学(OR)专家一样,针对复杂工业问题结构,自主设计出可扩展、高效且高质量的算法,例如分解、启发式搜索或混合策略。 FrontierOR包含180个源自OR学术文献的真实任务,并筛选出50个更具挑战性的“Hard”子集。评测采用两阶段流程:首先生成的算法需通过小实例的可行性预筛,然后在工业级规模的大实例上评估其解质量、速度及综合质效(QTE)。 实验结果显示,顶尖模型如GPT-5.3、Claude Opus 4.6等,在代码可执行性上已接近上限,但要在Hard任务上生成同时满足高质量和高速度的算法仍很困难。分析表明,能力较强的模型已减少基础建模错误,失败模式转向搜索深度与策略设计不足。此外,研究测试了三种自演化框架(如CORAL),发现通过迭代优化,LLM生成的算法性能可显著提升,在部分最难任务上QTE指标能从0.15提升至0.50。 这项工作标志着LLM-for-OR的研究重心正从“能否建模”转向“能否设计算法”,为开发能自主设计优化算法的AI智能体指明了方向,未来可能在供应链、能源、交通等领域实现更智能的决策支持系统。

marsbit1 小時前

大模型能写出工业级优化算法吗?MIT提出FrontierOR给AI设下考场

marsbit1 小時前

交易

現貨

熱門文章

什麼是 $S$

理解 SPERO:全面概述 SPERO 簡介 隨著創新領域的不斷演變,web3 技術和加密貨幣項目的出現在塑造數字未來中扮演著關鍵角色。在這個動態領域中,SPERO(標記為 SPERO,$$s$)是一個引起關注的項目。本文旨在收集並呈現有關 SPERO 的詳細信息,以幫助愛好者和投資者理解其基礎、目標和在 web3 和加密領域內的創新。 SPERO,$$s$ 是什麼? SPERO,$$s$ 是加密空間中的一個獨特項目,旨在利用去中心化和區塊鏈技術的原則,創建一個促進參與、實用性和金融包容性的生態系統。該項目旨在以新的方式促進點對點互動,為用戶提供創新的金融解決方案和服務。 SPERO,$$s$ 的核心目標是通過提供增強用戶體驗的工具和平台來賦能個人。這包括使交易方式更加靈活、促進社區驅動的倡議,以及通過去中心化應用程序(dApps)創造金融機會的途徑。SPERO,$$s$ 的基本願景圍繞包容性展開,旨在彌合傳統金融中的差距,同時利用區塊鏈技術的優勢。 誰是 SPERO,$$s$ 的創建者? SPERO,$$s$ 的創建者身份仍然有些模糊,因為公開可用的資源對其創始人提供的詳細背景信息有限。這種缺乏透明度可能源於該項目對去中心化的承諾——這是一種許多 web3 項目所共享的精神,優先考慮集體貢獻而非個人認可。 通過將討論重心放在社區及其共同目標上,SPERO,$$s$ 體現了賦能的本質,而不特別突出某些個體。因此,理解 SPERO 的精神和使命比識別單一創建者更為重要。 誰是 SPERO,$$s$ 的投資者? SPERO,$$s$ 得到了來自風險投資家到天使投資者的多樣化投資者的支持,他們致力於促進加密領域的創新。這些投資者的關注點通常與 SPERO 的使命一致——優先考慮那些承諾社會技術進步、金融包容性和去中心化治理的項目。 這些投資者通常對不僅提供創新產品,還對區塊鏈社區及其生態系統做出積極貢獻的項目感興趣。這些投資者的支持強化了 SPERO,$$s$ 作為快速發展的加密項目領域中的一個重要競爭者。 SPERO,$$s$ 如何運作? SPERO,$$s$ 採用多面向的框架,使其與傳統的加密貨幣項目區別開來。以下是一些突顯其獨特性和創新的關鍵特徵: 去中心化治理:SPERO,$$s$ 整合了去中心化治理模型,賦予用戶積極參與決策過程的權力,關於項目的未來。這種方法促進了社區成員之間的擁有感和責任感。 代幣實用性:SPERO,$$s$ 使用其自己的加密貨幣代幣,旨在在生態系統內部提供多種功能。這些代幣使交易、獎勵和平台上提供的服務得以促進,增強了整體參與度和實用性。 分層架構:SPERO,$$s$ 的技術架構支持模塊化和可擴展性,允許在項目發展過程中無縫整合額外的功能和應用。這種適應性對於在不斷變化的加密環境中保持相關性至關重要。 社區參與:該項目強調社區驅動的倡議,採用激勵合作和反饋的機制。通過培養強大的社區,SPERO,$$s$ 能夠更好地滿足用戶需求並適應市場趨勢。 專注於包容性:通過提供低交易費用和用戶友好的界面,SPERO,$$s$ 旨在吸引多樣化的用戶群體,包括那些以前可能未曾參與加密領域的個體。這種對包容性的承諾與其通過可及性賦能的總體使命相一致。 SPERO,$$s$ 的時間線 理解一個項目的歷史提供了對其發展軌跡和里程碑的關鍵見解。以下是建議的時間線,映射 SPERO,$$s$ 演變中的重要事件: 概念化和構思階段:形成 SPERO,$$s$ 基礎的初步想法被提出,與區塊鏈行業內的去中心化和社區聚焦原則密切相關。 項目白皮書的發布:在概念階段之後,發布了一份全面的白皮書,詳細說明了 SPERO,$$s$ 的願景、目標和技術基礎設施,以吸引社區的興趣和反饋。 社區建設和早期參與:積極進行外展工作,建立早期採用者和潛在投資者的社區,促進圍繞項目目標的討論並獲得支持。 代幣生成事件:SPERO,$$s$ 進行了一次代幣生成事件(TGE),向早期支持者分發其原生代幣,並在生態系統內建立初步流動性。 首次 dApp 上線:與 SPERO,$$s$ 相關的第一個去中心化應用程序(dApp)上線,允許用戶參與平台的核心功能。 持續發展和夥伴關係:對項目產品的持續更新和增強,包括與區塊鏈領域其他參與者的戰略夥伴關係,使 SPERO,$$s$ 成為加密市場中一個具有競爭力和不斷演變的參與者。 結論 SPERO,$$s$ 是 web3 和加密貨幣潛力的見證,能夠徹底改變金融系統並賦能個人。憑藉對去中心化治理、社區參與和創新設計功能的承諾,它為更具包容性的金融環境鋪平了道路。 與任何在快速發展的加密領域中的投資一樣,潛在的投資者和用戶都被鼓勵進行徹底研究,並對 SPERO,$$s$ 的持續發展進行深思熟慮的參與。該項目展示了加密行業的創新精神,邀請人們進一步探索其無數可能性。儘管 SPERO,$$s$ 的旅程仍在展開,但其基礎原則確實可能影響我們在互聯網數字生態系統中如何與技術、金融和彼此互動的未來。

178 人學過發佈於 2024.12.17更新於 2024.12.17

什麼是 $S$

什麼是 AGENT S

Agent S:Web3中自主互動的未來 介紹 在不斷演變的Web3和加密貨幣領域,創新不斷重新定義個人如何與數字平台互動。Agent S是一個開創性的項目,承諾通過其開放的代理框架徹底改變人機互動。Agent S旨在簡化複雜任務,為人工智能(AI)提供變革性的應用,鋪平自主互動的道路。本詳細探索將深入研究該項目的複雜性、其獨特特徵以及對加密貨幣領域的影響。 什麼是Agent S? Agent S是一個突破性的開放代理框架,專門設計用來解決計算機任務自動化中的三個基本挑戰: 獲取特定領域知識:該框架智能地從各種外部知識來源和內部經驗中學習。這種雙重方法使其能夠建立豐富的特定領域知識庫,提升其在任務執行中的表現。 長期任務規劃:Agent S採用經驗增強的分層規劃,這是一種戰略方法,可以有效地分解和執行複雜任務。此特徵顯著提升了其高效和有效地管理多個子任務的能力。 處理動態、不均勻的界面:該項目引入了代理-計算機界面(ACI),這是一種創新的解決方案,增強了代理和用戶之間的互動。利用多模態大型語言模型(MLLMs),Agent S能夠無縫導航和操作各種圖形用戶界面。 通過這些開創性特徵,Agent S提供了一個強大的框架,解決了自動化人機互動中涉及的複雜性,為AI及其他領域的無數應用奠定了基礎。 誰是Agent S的創建者? 儘管Agent S的概念根本上是創新的,但有關其創建者的具體信息仍然難以捉摸。創建者目前尚不清楚,這突顯了該項目的初期階段或戰略選擇將創始成員保密。無論是否匿名,重點仍然在於框架的能力和潛力。 誰是Agent S的投資者? 由於Agent S在加密生態系統中相對較新,關於其投資者和財務支持者的詳細信息並未明確記錄。缺乏對支持該項目的投資基礎或組織的公開見解,引發了對其資金結構和發展路線圖的質疑。了解其支持背景對於評估該項目的可持續性和潛在市場影響至關重要。 Agent S如何運作? Agent S的核心是尖端技術,使其能夠在多種環境中有效運作。其運營模型圍繞幾個關鍵特徵構建: 類人計算機互動:該框架提供先進的AI規劃,力求使與計算機的互動更加直觀。通過模仿人類在任務執行中的行為,承諾提升用戶體驗。 敘事記憶:用於利用高級經驗,Agent S利用敘事記憶來跟蹤任務歷史,從而增強其決策過程。 情節記憶:此特徵為用戶提供逐步指導,使框架能夠在任務展開時提供上下文支持。 支持OpenACI:Agent S能夠在本地運行,使用戶能夠控制其互動和工作流程,與Web3的去中心化理念相一致。 與外部API的輕鬆集成:其多功能性和與各種AI平台的兼容性確保了Agent S能夠無縫融入現有技術生態系統,成為開發者和組織的理想選擇。 這些功能共同促成了Agent S在加密領域的獨特地位,因為它以最小的人類干預自動化複雜的多步任務。隨著項目的發展,其在Web3中的潛在應用可能重新定義數字互動的展開方式。 Agent S的時間線 Agent S的發展和里程碑可以用一個時間線來概括,突顯其重要事件: 2024年9月27日:Agent S的概念在一篇名為《一個像人類一樣使用計算機的開放代理框架》的綜合研究論文中推出,展示了該項目的基礎工作。 2024年10月10日:該研究論文在arXiv上公開,提供了對框架及其基於OSWorld基準的性能評估的深入探索。 2024年10月12日:發布了一個視頻演示,提供了對Agent S能力和特徵的視覺洞察,進一步吸引潛在用戶和投資者。 這些時間線上的標記不僅展示了Agent S的進展,還表明了其對透明度和社區參與的承諾。 有關Agent S的要點 隨著Agent S框架的持續演變,幾個關鍵特徵脫穎而出,強調其創新性和潛力: 創新框架:旨在提供類似人類互動的直觀計算機使用,Agent S為任務自動化帶來了新穎的方法。 自主互動:通過GUI自主與計算機互動的能力標誌著向更智能和高效的計算解決方案邁進了一步。 複雜任務自動化:憑藉其強大的方法論,能夠自動化複雜的多步任務,使過程更快且更少出錯。 持續改進:學習機制使Agent S能夠從過去的經驗中改進,不斷提升其性能和效率。 多功能性:其在OSWorld和WindowsAgentArena等不同操作環境中的適應性確保了它能夠服務於廣泛的應用。 隨著Agent S在Web3和加密領域中的定位,其增強互動能力和自動化過程的潛力標誌著AI技術的一次重大進步。通過其創新框架,Agent S展現了數字互動的未來,為各行各業的用戶承諾提供更無縫和高效的體驗。 結論 Agent S代表了AI與Web3結合的一次大膽飛躍,具有重新定義我們與技術互動方式的能力。儘管仍處於早期階段,但其應用的可能性廣泛且引人入勝。通過其全面的框架解決關鍵挑戰,Agent S旨在將自主互動帶到數字體驗的最前沿。隨著我們深入加密貨幣和去中心化的領域,像Agent S這樣的項目無疑將在塑造技術和人機協作的未來中發揮關鍵作用。

948 人學過發佈於 2025.01.14更新於 2025.01.14

什麼是 AGENT S

如何購買S

歡迎來到HTX.com!在這裡,購買Sonic (S)變得簡單而便捷。跟隨我們的逐步指南,放心開始您的加密貨幣之旅。第一步:創建您的HTX帳戶使用您的 Email、手機號碼在HTX註冊一個免費帳戶。體驗無憂的註冊過程並解鎖所有平台功能。立即註冊第二步:前往買幣頁面,選擇您的支付方式信用卡/金融卡購買:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即時購買Sonic (S)。餘額購買:使用您HTX帳戶餘額中的資金進行無縫交易。第三方購買:探索諸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方式以增加便利性。C2C購買:在HTX平台上直接與其他用戶交易。HTX 場外交易 (OTC) 購買:為大量交易者提供個性化服務和競爭性匯率。第三步:存儲您的Sonic (S)購買Sonic (S)後,將其存儲在您的HTX帳戶中。您也可以透過區塊鏈轉帳將其發送到其他地址或者用於交易其他加密貨幣。第四步:交易Sonic (S)在HTX的現貨市場輕鬆交易Sonic (S)。前往您的帳戶,選擇交易對,執行交易,並即時監控。HTX為初學者和經驗豐富的交易者提供了友好的用戶體驗。

2.0k 人學過發佈於 2025.01.15更新於 2026.06.02

如何購買S

相關討論

歡迎來到 HTX 社群。在這裡,您可以了解最新的平台發展動態並獲得專業的市場意見。 以下是用戶對 S (S)幣價的意見。

活动图片