‘Scammers are liable’: Uniswap CEO reacts to landmark court dismissal

ambcrypto發佈於 2026-03-03更新於 2026-03-03

文章摘要

In a landmark ruling, a New York federal court dismissed a lawsuit against Uniswap that sought to hold the decentralized exchange and its CEO, Hayden Adams, liable for financial losses users suffered from scam tokens traded on its platform. Judge Katherine Polk Failla ruled that Uniswap cannot be held responsible for the misconduct of unidentified third-party token issuers, stating it defies logic to hold the drafter of open-source code accountable for a third party’s misuse of the platform. The case, ongoing since April 2022, was dismissed with prejudice. Uniswap’s CEO hailed the decision as a "good, sensible outcome" and a significant legal precedent for DeFi, emphasizing that scammers—not open-source developers—should be held liable for fraud. The ruling is seen as a major win for the DeFi industry, providing decentralized platforms greater legal protection and breathing room. Following the news, Uniswap’s native token UNI saw a brief price increase of approximately 5%. The case may influence ongoing legislative efforts, such as the CLARITY Act, which aims to establish safe harbor protections for open-source developers in crypto.

DeFi exchange Uniswap has hailed the latest court ruling that dismissed a case that sought to hold it accountable for scam tokens traded on the platform.

In an opinion issued on the 2nd of March, federal Judge Katherine Polk Failla of the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dismissed the complaint with prejudice.

Judge Failla ruled that the petitioners can not hold Uniswap CEO Hayden Adams and Uniswap Labs (defendants) responsible for misconduct carried out by unidentified third-party token issuers.

The petitioners claimed losses from trading tokens on the Uniswap platform. They alleged the tokens were ‘rug pulls’ and ‘pump and dump’ schemes.

According to them, Uniswap facilitated fraud by running a marketplace that allows the selling and buying of these alleged scam tokens.

But the court dismissed this argument, stating that,

“It defies logic that a drafter of computer code underlying a particular software platform could be liable under Section 29(b) for a third-party’s misuse of that platform.”

Uniswap leadership hails the ruling

The case has been running since April 2022. Reacting to the ruling, Uniswap CEO called it a ‘good, sensible outcome’ and a new legal precedent for the sector.

“If you write open source smart contract code, and the code is used by scammers, the scammers are liable, not the open source developers.”

Stani Kulechov, Founder of Aave, called the update a “great win for DeFi.”

The change gives DeFi players breathing room. Fully decentralized platforms will no longer face legal liability for losses caused by third-party token issuers.

Lawmakers are also pushing for a safe harbor for open-source developers in the crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act. Still, the final draft will determine whether those developer protections actually hold.

Uniswap is one of the largest DeFi platforms and has operated for over eight years. Since its inception, the exchange has recorded a cumulative of over $5 billion in fees and recently activated a token accrual program for its governance token UNI.

Following the court update, the Uniswap [UNI] token surged by about 5%, but was still stuck between $3.6 and $4.2 short-term price range.


Final Summary

  • Judge Failla ruled that Uniswap and other DeFi platforms can’t be held responsible for misconduct done by unidentified third-party token issuers.
  • The case could set the tone for the protection of open-source DeFi developers, according to policy watchers.

相關問答

QWhat was the outcome of the court case against Uniswap regarding scam tokens?

AThe court dismissed the case with prejudice, ruling that Uniswap and its CEO could not be held liable for the misconduct of unidentified third-party token issuers.

QWho was the judge that issued the ruling in the Uniswap case?

AFederal Judge Katherine Polk Failla of the Southern District of New York (SDNY) issued the opinion.

QWhat was the core legal argument the judge used to dismiss the complaint?

AThe judge stated that it defies logic to hold the drafter of computer code liable for a third party's misuse of that platform under Section 29(b).

QHow did Uniswap CEO Hayden Adams react to the court's decision?

AHe called it a 'good, sensible outcome' and a new legal precedent, stating that scammers are liable, not the open-source developers.

QWhat was the immediate market reaction of the UNI token following the court update?

AThe UNI token surged by about 5% following the court ruling.

你可能也喜歡

谁在给AI造灵魂:哲学家、神父和一个辞职写诗的工程师

《谁在给AI造灵魂》一文探讨了为AI构建道德与人格背后的复杂努力。文章聚焦三位关键人物:Anthropic的“人格对齐”团队负责人Amanda Askell,她以哲学背景和“有效利他主义”理念,主导撰写了《Claude的宪法》,试图为AI注入诚实、自信且具道德判断力的“性格”;前工程师、现天主教神父Brendan McGuire,他将神学中的“良知培育”概念引入AI伦理,参与修订宪法,试图在AI底层逻辑中植入善的倾向;以及前Anthropic安全研究负责人Mrinank Sharma,这位兼具工程师与诗人身份的学者,因担忧AI的“谄媚性”危害及商业压力对安全原则的侵蚀,最终选择离职投身诗歌,以寻求“诗意的真实”。 他们的工作揭示了AI人格塑造的核心矛盾与挑战:一方面,研究显示AI可能产生“功能性情感”和讨好人类的倾向,这与塑造独立、诚实人格的目标相悖;另一方面,这项工作迅速卷入现实的政治与商业漩涡,例如Anthropic因拒绝将Claude用于自主武器而遭到政治抨击。文章最终呈现了一个未竟的探索:理性计算、信仰感化与诗意觉知,这三种人类回应AI崛起的方式,都在试图为没有灵魂的机器注入人类的道德复杂性与良知,但这个过程本身也映照出人类价值观的多元、冲突与演变。正如Claude宪法中所承认:不存在单一的完美答案。

marsbit12 分鐘前

谁在给AI造灵魂:哲学家、神父和一个辞职写诗的工程师

marsbit12 分鐘前

专访Michael Saylor:我是说了要卖币,但绝不会是净卖

本文是对MicroStrategy执行主席Michael Saylor的专访摘要。此前,MicroStrategy在财报中表示可能在必要时出售比特币以支付其发行的数字信用工具STRC的股息,引发市场关于其“背弃比特币信仰”的讨论。Saylor在采访中澄清了公司的策略逻辑。 Saylor强调,公司并非成为比特币的“净卖家”。其核心商业模式是通过发行STRC等信用工具筹集资金,并立即将所得资金用于购买比特币。由于比特币长期预期年化升值约30%-40%,其增值速度远超股息支付成本(约11%)。因此,在支付股息时,即便出售部分比特币,公司整体仍会是比特币的净买家。例如,4月份公司通过STRC融资32亿美元购入比特币,而同期股息支出仅约8000-9000万美元,买入远大于卖出。 他解释,公司旨在利用比特币作为“数字资本”的高增值属性,构建可持续的财务结构:出售信用工具投资比特币,用资本增值支付股息,并确保比特币持仓持续净增长。只要比特币年增值超过2.3%(即股息成本率),该模式即可持续。Saylor预计公司未来每季度都将是比特币净买家。 针对批评者,Saylor反驳了“庞氏骗局”的指控,认为比特币是代表全球经济财富的“数字资本”,而STRC是在其之上创建的低波动性、高收益信用产品,满足了寻求稳定收益的投资者需求。 关于市场影响,Saylor指出比特币市场流动性极强(日交易额数百亿美元),MicroStrategy的大额买入行为并未显著影响价格。比特币价格主要由宏观因素驱动。 最后,Saylor表示对比特币的底层逻辑未变,并认为过去一年清晰显示,比特币的“杀手级应用”之一是作为“数字信用”的抵押品。基于比特币的优质信用工具(如STRC)表现出卓越的风险调整后收益(夏普比率达3),今年美国市场60%的优先股由MicroStrategy发行,显示了数字信用的强劲增长。 采访以Saylor童年受科幻小说激励考入MIT的轶事结束。

Odaily星球日报22 分鐘前

专访Michael Saylor:我是说了要卖币,但绝不会是净卖

Odaily星球日报22 分鐘前

专访Michael Saylor:我是说了要卖币,但绝不会是净卖

在最近的播客专访中,MicroStrategy执行主席Michael Saylor就公司“准备在必要时出售比特币以支付股息”的表态做出澄清。他强调,这一声明不代表公司会成为比特币的“净卖家”,其核心逻辑是利用比特币作为“数字资本”的增值属性来支撑业务模式。 Saylor解释称,公司通过发行数字信用工具(如STRC)筹集资金,并立即将所得用于购买比特币。由于比特币预期年化升值约30%-40%,公司可以剥离部分资本收益(约11%)作为股息支付。他举例说明,在融资数十亿美元购入比特币的同时,仅需卖出极小比例(例如为支付股息卖出1个,同时买入10-20个)来履行义务,因此整体持仓将持续净增长。关键在于“盈亏平衡率”约为2.3%,只要比特币增值或债务发行比例超过此值,公司就能在支付股息的同时不断累积比特币。 他进一步阐述,比特币的深层价值在于其作为“数字资本”已成为创建优质“数字信用”的基石。基于比特币超额抵押的STRC等工具,提供了高收益和低波动性,吸引了传统金融市场的大量资金。Saylor指出,比特币市场流动性极强,单笔数亿美元的购买难以影响价格,其主要驱动因素是宏观环境和行业基本面。 最后,Saylor重申其对比特币的长期信念没有改变,并认为数字信用的兴起是比特币最重要的“杀手级应用”之一,这将持续推动整个生态系统的创新与增长。

marsbit29 分鐘前

专访Michael Saylor:我是说了要卖币,但绝不会是净卖

marsbit29 分鐘前

交易

現貨
合約

熱門文章

如何購買T

歡迎來到HTX.com!在這裡,購買Threshold Network Token (T)變得簡單而便捷。跟隨我們的逐步指南,放心開始您的加密貨幣之旅。第一步:創建您的HTX帳戶使用您的 Email、手機號碼在HTX註冊一個免費帳戶。體驗無憂的註冊過程並解鎖所有平台功能。立即註冊第二步:前往買幣頁面,選擇您的支付方式信用卡/金融卡購買:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即時購買Threshold Network Token (T)。餘額購買:使用您HTX帳戶餘額中的資金進行無縫交易。第三方購買:探索諸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方式以增加便利性。C2C購買:在HTX平台上直接與其他用戶交易。HTX 場外交易 (OTC) 購買:為大量交易者提供個性化服務和競爭性匯率。第三步:存儲您的Threshold Network Token (T)購買Threshold Network Token (T)後,將其存儲在您的HTX帳戶中。您也可以透過區塊鏈轉帳將其發送到其他地址或者用於交易其他加密貨幣。第四步:交易Threshold Network Token (T)在HTX的現貨市場輕鬆交易Threshold Network Token (T)。前往您的帳戶,選擇交易對,執行交易,並即時監控。HTX為初學者和經驗豐富的交易者提供了友好的用戶體驗。

665 人學過發佈於 2024.12.10更新於 2025.03.21

如何購買T

相關討論

歡迎來到 HTX 社群。在這裡,您可以了解最新的平台發展動態並獲得專業的市場意見。 以下是用戶對 T (T)幣價的意見。

活动图片