Kyle Samani Is Back: This Time, We're Outperforming CEX in Efficiency!

marsbit發佈於 2026-03-12更新於 2026-03-12

文章摘要

Kyle Samani, former co-founder of Multicoin Capital, has returned to advocate for PropAMM, a breakthrough in market microstructure innovation on Solana. He argues that PropAMM could surpass traditional centralized exchanges (CEXs) in efficiency by hosting market maker algorithms directly on the blockchain, eliminating latency from bidirectional communication between exchanges and market makers. In CEXs, market makers co-locate servers and constantly exchange data with the exchange, leading to delays. In contrast, PropAMM runs algorithms on the same physical hardware as the Solana blockchain, allowing price updates to occur almost instantaneously within the same silicon chip. This reduces latency significantly compared to traditional systems. Currently, PropAMM already offers narrower spreads for SOL-USDC spot trading than major CEXs. Samani expects it to dominate on-chain trading this year, including spots, perpetuals, and prediction markets. Challenges remain in ensuring best execution for takers due to private algorithms and non-deterministic routing, but solutions from aggregators like Jupiter and dFlow are anticipated. Upcoming Solana upgrades—such as higher compute limits, reduced slot times, and lower network latency—will further enhance PropAMM performance, solidifying its advantage over CEXs.

Source:Kyle Samani

Compiled | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina); Translator | Azuma (@azuma_eth)

Editor's Note: The man who knows best how to promote Solana, former co-founder of Multicoin Capital Kyle Samani, who had loudly exited the crypto world not long ago, is back!

Last night, Kyle Samani posted a long Thread on his personal X account. In the post, Kyle Samani once again demonstrated his highly persuasive "promotion" (not derogatory here) rhetoric, using "efficiency"—a weak point in the decentralized narrative—as a breakthrough. He detailed how the PropAMM currently being promoted in the Solana ecosystem will catch up with or even surpass traditional centralized models in efficiency, arguing that PropAMM is one of the most important innovations in market microstructure in recent years, or even decades.

  • Related articles: 《The Man Who Knows Best How to Promote SOL Exits the Crypto World》; 《Is There More to Kyle Samani's Exit?》.

Below is the original content by Kyle Samani, compiled by Odaily Planet Daily.

PropAMM is one of the most important innovations in market microstructure in recent years, and perhaps even one of the most significant in decades.

To help everyone understand this conclusion, let's first look at how market makers (MM) quote prices on traditional centralized exchanges (CEX).

Market makers typically physically co-locate with the exchange. Each market maker runs an algorithm on a server and connects to another server running the exchange's system via a network cable of uniform length (e.g., 50 meters).

A massive stream of data is constantly sent back and forth between market makers and the exchange. Every time a market maker sends an order to the exchange—whether it's a limit order, cancellation, or market order—the exchange must broadcast this information to all other market makers; then, other market makers resend their own orders based on the new information; this cycle repeats indefinitely.

Here is a simple diagram.

Now let's look at how propAMM works on the Solana mainnet.

The beauty of propAMM on Solana is that the blockchain itself directly "hosts" the market maker algorithms. This means the system no longer needs to send billions of messages back and forth between market makers and the exchange; the market-making algorithms will run directly on the same physical machine as the exchange.

The new diagram is as follows. (Yes, only the Solana blockchain is needed!)

There has long been a common view in the cryptocurrency industry that decentralized systems must be slower (have higher latency) than centralized systems because they require communication between global nodes.

But if you think about it differently, on-chain hosted algorithms may actually have lower latency than traditional centralized exchanges in finance.

Why is that? The reason is that the latency required for propAMM to update prices only involves electrons moving within the same physical piece of silicon. For example, if the last market order causes a change in the SOL-USD price, this information is immediately visible to all propAMMs and used to price the next market order. Everything happens within the same piece of silicon; no bidirectional communication between servers is needed.

It's worth noting that propAMM does require frequent oracle updates, but this is not a problem and does not change the overall fact I described above.

The most critical point remains: when the exchange—in this case, the Solana blockchain—directly hosts the propAMM algorithms, the market makers' pricing changes in real-time within the same physical piece of silicon.

propAMM has already become the dominant mechanism for SOL-USDC spot quotes on Solana, with narrower spreads than all major CEXs. I expect this market structure to become the dominant model for on-chain trading this year, including spot, perpetual contracts (perps), and even prediction markets.

The biggest challenge for propAMM is that there is currently no way to ensure that the taker always gets the best execution, because:

  • All propAMM algorithms are not public (which is reasonable, as traditional market-making algorithms are also proprietary);
  • When routing trades between multiple propAMMs, the result is non-deterministic.

However, this problem can be solved. I expect all relevant aggregator teams to launch solutions this year, such as Jupiter and dFlow for spot, and Phoenix for contracts.

Current propAMM is still not fully optimized and is subject to various limitations of the Solana blockchain itself. This year, Solana will roll out a series of major upgrades that will significantly improve propAMM's performance, including:

  1. Higher CU (compute unit) limits per transaction and larger transaction sizes;
  2. Higher CU limits per block;
  3. Alpenglow: reducing slot time from 400ms to 100–150ms;
  4. DoubleZero: reducing global network latency;
  5. Application-controlled execution;
  6. Multiple concurrent leaders.

If propAMM on the Solana mainnet can already offer narrower quotes than all CEXs without these upgrades, imagine how powerful they will become as these upgrades are gradually implemented.

相關問答

QWhat is PropAMM and why does Kyle Samani consider it a major innovation in market microstructure?

APropAMM is a mechanism on Solana where market-making algorithms are hosted directly on the blockchain, eliminating the need for constant bidirectional communication between market makers and exchanges. Kyle Samani considers it one of the most important innovations in market microstructure in recent years, or even decades, because it significantly improves efficiency by running algorithms on the same physical hardware as the exchange, reducing latency and narrowing spreads compared to traditional CEXs.

QHow does PropAMM on Solana achieve lower latency compared to traditional centralized exchanges (CEXs)?

APropAMM achieves lower latency by hosting market-making algorithms directly on the Solana blockchain, which runs on the same physical hardware. This means price updates and order processing occur within the same silicon chip, eliminating the delay caused by network communication between separate servers in traditional CEX setups. Electronic movements within the chip are faster than inter-server data transfers.

QWhat current evidence does Kyle Samani provide to show PropAMM's effectiveness on Solana?

AKyle Samani points out that PropAMM has become the dominant mechanism for SOL-USDC spot quotes on Solana, with narrower spreads than all major centralized exchanges (CEXs). This demonstrates its superior performance in market efficiency and execution quality compared to traditional systems.

QWhat are the main challenges facing PropAMM, and how does Samani expect them to be addressed?

AThe main challenges are ensuring best execution for takers, as PropAMM algorithms are not public and routing between multiple PropAMMs is non-deterministic. Samani expects solutions to be developed by aggregator teams like Jupiter and dFlow for spot trading, and Phoenix for perpetual contracts, within the year to optimize routing and execution.

QWhat upcoming Solana upgrades does Samani mention that will further enhance PropAMM performance?

ASamani mentions several Solana upgrades: higher CU (Compute Unit) limits per transaction and larger transaction sizes, higher CU limits per block, Alpenglow (reducing slot time from 400ms to 100-150ms), DoubleZero (reducing global network latency), application-controlled execution, and multiple concurrent leaders. These will collectively boost PropAMM efficiency and performance.

你可能也喜歡

你天天用的Claude和Codex,Meta内部不让随便用了

今年5月,Meta为其应用AI工程部门的工程师划定了红线:限制内部使用Claude Code和Codex这两款流行的AI编程工具,相关限制至今仍在生效。作为这些工具的主要客户之一,Meta此举并非因其不好用,而是恰恰相反——担心其过于强大和好用。 Meta正在自研名为MetaCode的AI编程助手,旨在替代外部模型以节省成本并掌握核心技术。限制使用外部模型的核心原因,是防止“蒸馏陷阱”:即担忧员工在构建MetaCode的训练数据、编程题库和评测标准时,过度依赖或掺入Claude/Codex的输出。这会导致自研模型在不知不觉中学习对手的“本事”和判断标准,使能力来源模糊,并可能违反与OpenAI、Anthropic等竞争对手的服务条款,引发法律风险。 内部指南明确禁止了可能让外部AI模型“定义能力”的三类任务:不能用其输出来生成测试题目、不能用其分析代码或设计测试点、其生成内容不得进入被测模型的访问环境。仅允许AI处理搭建工作流、整理文件等“打下手”的辅助性任务,且所有AI产出必须经过人工审核。 这一事件揭示了AI行业的一个普遍困境:在利用强大外部工具加速自身研发的同时,如何清晰界定并守护自身模型能力的原创性,避免陷入知识产权与合同风险。随着AI参与创造AI的循环加深,“本事究竟是谁的”这条界线正变得越来越模糊。

marsbit41 分鐘前

你天天用的Claude和Codex,Meta内部不让随便用了

marsbit41 分鐘前

为什么今天我们需要AI内容观?

亚马逊AI动画《朋克鸭》因伦理争议被叫停,折射出AI内容当前面临的困境。2026年AI视频技术取得突破,能产出完整视觉故事,推动短剧和仿真人内容爆发,院线级AI长片加速涌现。然而,AI在影视行业的应用也引发激烈争议,尤其围绕替代真人表演的伦理问题。 AI内容在不同媒介场景中适配度不同。短视频等“文化速食”内容追求快节奏、浅层情绪和免费模式,AI能高效提供海量供给,满足用户碎片化娱乐需求。但进入影视等“文化正餐”领域则面临挑战,因为影视承载着更深的情感表达、艺术创新和社会意义构建功能,其核心价值在于人的独特参与。 AI难以完全替代真人创作的价值。人在创作中的创新能力、劳动付出凝结的生命经验,以及基于真实情感和个性化表达的互动,是文化作品珍贵性的核心。尽管AI能提升生产效率、拉高质量均值,但易导致内容同质化,并可能通过低成本优势挤压人类创作空间,引发侵权和低质内容泛滥的风险。 因此,发展AI内容需要建立明确的边界和规则,即“AI内容观”。其核心原则是:确保AI放大而非挤压人的创作空间;尊重而非掠夺人的创作成果;坚持人在创作中的主导地位与责任;保障AI创作的公开、透明与可溯源。最终目标是让人成为技术的“掌舵者”,在利用AI提升效率的同时,守护文化创作中人的主体性和核心价值,推动AI向善、文化向美。

marsbit1 小時前

为什么今天我们需要AI内容观?

marsbit1 小時前

普朗克被撤稿了?量子之父竟被算法绊了一跤

一篇新发表的论文指出,量子力学奠基人、诺贝尔奖得主马克斯·普朗克发表于1940年和1942年的两篇文章,在斯普林格出版社的数字平台上被标记为“已撤稿”。调查显示,这并非因为学术不端,而是现代出版平台的算法“误伤”。 这两篇文章原是普朗克关于科学哲学的演讲与讨论,发表在当时德国重要的综合期刊《自然科学》上。在20世纪上半叶,这种将演讲内容发表于期刊或文集的做法是科学思想传播的常见方式。然而,现代数字出版平台的系统可能将其识别为“重复发表”或“版权违规”,从而自动添加了撤稿标记。更甚的是,原文在平台上已被替换为空白页,读者需通过互联网档案馆等非营利渠道才能查阅。 此事暴露了历史文献数字化过程中的一个深层问题:当代基于文献计量和版权管理的自动化规则,与前数字时代的科学出版实践发生了错位。诸如“自我剽窃”等现代概念被反向施加于历史文献,导致其可访问性受损,科学记录的完整性面临挑战。在人工智能日益依赖结构化数据库的时代,此类错误标签或内容缺失可能被进一步放大,影响我们对科学历史的准确认知。这提醒我们,数字知识库并非中性镜像,而是受到商业逻辑和平台规则塑造的过滤器。

marsbit1 小時前

普朗克被撤稿了?量子之父竟被算法绊了一跤

marsbit1 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片