The Launch Event Became a Make-up Ceremony? Why Hasn't Pools.trade Spawned a High-Market-Cap Meme Coin Yet?

marsbit发布于2026-08-07更新于2026-08-07

文章摘要

Uniswap's new token launchpad, Pools.trade, debuted on Robinhood Chain but was overshadowed by pre-launch trading, raising fairness concerns. Despite generating over $150M in pre-launch volume and becoming a top platform by daily trade volume, it has failed to produce a high-market-cap meme coin. Key features include Instant and Crowd Launch modes, with a low 0.25% transaction fee (vs 1% on rivals), most of which is auto-reinvested into liquidity. However, its top two tokens by market cap, FRONG (~$7M) and POOLS (~$1.8M), were both minted days before the official announcement, leading to accusations of insider advantage ("sniping") and dampening community enthusiasm. The article concludes that while Pools.trade has Uniswap's infrastructure and Robinhood Chain's hype, a perceived lack of a fair launch has prevented a breakout meme coin. Success may hinge on the next token with a compelling narrative and a clean, uncontested launch.

Author | Asher(@Asher_ 0210)

The 'P Army' had already memed hard even before the Pools.trade frontend officially opened.

At 00:00 on August 5th, with a 24-hour countdown to the official launch of Uniswap's Pools.trade beginning. During this countdown period, the community found the platform's early-deployed contracts ahead of time, directly trading the already-issued tokens on-chain. By the time the Pools.trade frontend officially opened, these early contracts had already accumulated over $150 million in trading volume.

Regarding this, Uniswap founder Hayden Adams stated that the massive volume of early transactions forced the team to re-adjust the website and data indexing, simultaneously making it compatible with both test and final version contracts, which disrupted the originally planned launch schedule.

This sense of disarray shown by a DeFi veteran like Uniswap felt somewhat 'amateurish,' yet the trading data was undeniably high. Dune data shows that on August 5th alone (the frontend didn't officially open until the morning of August 6th Beijing time, with most of this volume generated pre-launch), Pools.trade trading volume reached $99.1 million, accounting for approximately 54.2% of the total trading volume on the Robinhood Chain token launch platform that day, far exceeding the previously top-ranked Pons for two weeks.

Pools.trade: The Token Launch Platform Introduced by Uniswap Itself

Project Overview

Pools.trade is a token launch platform launched by Uniswap Labs on Robinhood Chain. Officially positioned as a Meme coin launchpad, users can create new tokens, discover new coins, and trade—all on the same page. Each token has a fixed total supply of 1 billion tokens, ultimately entering Uniswap v4 with liquidity permanently locked.

Tokens launched on Pools.trade are immediately integrated into the Uniswap web interface, wallet, Launches page, and Trading API, reaching MetaMask, Ledger, and multiple DEX aggregators. Compared to new platforms starting from scratch to find trading entry points, Pools.trade launched with Uniswap's ready-made user base and distribution channels.

Two Launch Methods

Pools.trade offers Instant Launch and Crowd Launch modes, respectively:

  • Instant Launch: Launch immediately. After the creator fills in the name, ticker, image, and description, the token opens for trading directly. The price fluctuates with market buying and selling, with no minimum market cap requirement or fixed end time.
  • Crowd Launch: Employs a four-hour launch window. Participants submit budgets in advance, with orders executed progressively throughout the remaining time—typically the earlier the participation, the lower the price. After the launch ends, if the token's FDV reaches $10,000, it enters trading; if it fails to meet the threshold, all participating funds are refunded. This mode primarily aims to reduce the impact of bot front-running and bundle transactions at launch.

The Platform's Most Prominent Feature: Trading Fees Only a Quarter of Pons and Flap

Pools.trade does not charge additional launchpad fees. Each transaction incurs a 0.25% Uniswap v4 pool fee. If the creator enables the fee split, 0.05% goes to the creator, and 0.20% is automatically reinvested into the permanently locked liquidity pool. Uniswap Labs does not take a share.

Trading fees for both Pons and Flap are 1%. Calculating with $10 million in trading volume: Pools.trade generates $25,000 in fees, with the token creator receiving $5,000; Pons generates $100,000 in fees, and based on a 70% creator share, the token creator would receive $70,000.

Pools.trade lowers transaction costs and keeps most of the fees within the liquidity; Pons and Flap offer higher direct income incentives for token creators. The former benefits trading more, while the latter provides more direct motivation for creators.

For a detailed introduction, recommended reading: "Uniswap Launches Token Launch Platform Pools.trade, Reshuffling the Robinhood Launchpad Ecosystem?".

Only Two Tokens Surpass $1 Million Market Cap, Early Minting Raises Fairness Concerns

Compared to the impressive number of token launches and platform trading volume, Pools.trade has not yet produced a high-market-cap Meme coin. As of now, only two tokens on Pools.trade have a market cap above $1 million, namely FRONG and POOLS; additionally, tokens with a market cap above $400,000 include HOOKR, UNIPEG, CHWDR, and PosM.

FRONG: Market Cap Once Touched $18 Million

FRONG is currently the highest-market-cap Meme on Pools.trade. At 00:00 on August 5th, Uniswap's official Twitter account began the 24-hour countdown for Pools.trade's launch, posting a video of a frog "playing" by a pond.

After the tweet was posted, the community quickly noticed the frog-themed Meme coin—FRONG—issued through the Pools.trade early contract and began to view it as the platform's mascot concept coin. Driven by this FOMO sentiment, FRONG's market cap briefly touched $18 million.

However, FRONG had already been minted via contract before Uniswap even started the Pools.trade launch countdown. On-chain records show that FRONG was minted and a trading pool was established as early as July 30th, five days before Uniswap's countdown announcement; related contracts were even deployed roughly three weeks prior, at that time with no indication of affiliation with Uniswap or Pools.trade.

As this time gap was discovered, questions arose about the fairness of FRONG's launch, and its market cap rapidly retreated from its highs. Even after Pools.trade officially launched yesterday at 00:00, FRONG did not receive strong community enthusiasm, its market cap remaining below $10 million, currently reported at around $7 million.

POOLS: Market Cap Once Broke $4 Million

POOLS, currently the second-highest market cap token on Pools.trade, shares a similar situation with FRONG—it was also a Meme coin minted before the platform's official launch.

Compared to FRONG's "frog mascot" narrative, POOLS's logic is more direct—its name matches the platform, so the community treated it as the Pools.trade concept coin. Its market cap once exceeded $4 million before falling back to around $1.8 million.

FRONG relied on the "frog mascot" narrative, POOLS on the platform's namesake—both should have had higher market cap expectations. However, both faced diminished community FOMO sentiment due to the "insider trading" controversy arising from early minting, resulting in market caps below $10 million.

The most fundamental logic of Meme coins is that everyone wants to believe they are starting from the same line. Once fairness is questioned, even the best token narrative struggles to sustain spontaneous community propagation. This is perhaps why Pools.trade, despite impressive data, has yet to produce a high-market-cap Meme coin.

However, Uniswap stands behind Pools.trade, and Robinhood Chain is one of the most discussed public chains for Memes at the moment. Currently, the platform lacks not for traffic, but for a new narrative that is intriguing enough and free from "insider trading" controversy. The first "speedrun" on Pools.trade might not be far off.

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QWhat was the main reason why Pools.trade's launch did not go as planned according to the article?

AThe main reason was that the community discovered and started trading tokens on the early deployed contracts before the official front-end launch, generating over $150 million in volume and forcing Uniswap to scramble to adjust the site and data indexing, disrupting the planned launch schedule.

QWhat are the two token launch modes offered by Pools.trade?

APools.trade offers two modes: Instant Launch (immediate token creation and trading with no minimum market cap or fixed end time) and Crowd Launch (a 4-hour launch window where orders are filled progressively, with a $10,000 FDV threshold for the token to go live post-launch).

QHow does the transaction fee structure of Pools.trade compare to platforms like Pons and Flap?

APools.trade charges a 0.25% fee per transaction (0.05% to the creator and 0.20% auto-reinvested into the permanently locked liquidity pool), while Pons and Flap charge a 1% fee, which offers creators a higher direct revenue share.

QAccording to the article, why haven't any high-market-cap meme coins emerged on Pools.trade despite its high volume?

AThe primary reason is that the early high-profile tokens like FRONG and POOLS were minted before the official platform announcement, leading to 'fair launch' controversies and 'rat warehouse' accusations, which severely dampened community FOMO and trust, undermining their potential for sustained growth.

QWhat key advantage does Pools.trade have over new token launch platforms, as mentioned in the article?

APools.trade's key advantage is that it launches with immediate access to Uniswap's existing user base, distribution channels, and integrations (like the Uniswap web interface, wallet, Launches page, Trading API, MetaMask, Ledger, and DEX aggregators).

你可能也喜欢

代币投资的“死亡率”:95%的项目跑输比特币,73%最终回撤超90%

**代币投资的“死亡率”:95%项目跑输比特币,73%最终回撤超90%** 一项对2020年1月至2026年6月期间、首次流通市值突破5000万美元的1972个代币的研究显示,加密货币代币投资成功率极低。截至2026年6月,仅有4.1%的代币表现跑赢比特币,拥有至少24个月历史的代币中,该比例更是降至1.7%。样本代币从达标时点算起的收益中位数亏损达97%,73%的代币最终价格从高点回撤超过90%。 市场结构呈现金字塔形态:小市值代币数量持续扩张,而大市值代币阵营自2021年11月见顶后不断萎缩。截至2026年6月,市值高于2.5亿美元的代币仅剩102个,不足2021年峰值时的三分之一。 研究发现,代币的表现持续恶化。后续批次的代币下跌速度更快、幅度更深。例如,上市满24个月时,2024年批次中86%的代币相对入场价下跌超90%,而2020年批次该比例仅为18%。同时,代币的上涨潜力急剧收缩。2020年批次代币价格中位数曾最高涨至入场价的5.1倍,而2023年之后批次的代币价格中位数从未超过其达标价格,非对称的收益风险特征基本消失。 在极少数跑赢比特币的代币中,中心化交易所(CEX)代币占比异常突出。在长期跑赢样本中,交易所代币占比高达32%,而其仅占长期总样本的2.1%,胜率显著高于其他类别。这类资产通常拥有持续的手续费现金流和回购销毁机制。 此外,市场因子分析显示,自2022年后,动量效应发生反转。过去三个月表现最好的代币,其后续表现反而显著差于表现最差的代币,高动量与高波动率成为后续表现不佳的预测指标。 报告结论指出,对于二级市场投资者而言,比特币应作为默认业绩基准,广泛配置山寨币的历史表现远不如直接持有比特币。投资代币需认识到近乎归零是常态结果,并应谨慎对待新上线项目,避免追逐近期强势标的。行业机会可能更多集中于极少数能产生现金流、并通过机制(如回购)回馈持有者的资产。

marsbit1小时前

代币投资的“死亡率”:95%的项目跑输比特币,73%最终回撤超90%

marsbit1小时前

交易

现货

热门文章

如何购买CAP

欢迎来到HTX.com!我们已经让购买Cap(CAP)变得简单而便捷。跟随我们的逐步指南,放心开始您的加密货币之旅。第一步:创建您的HTX账户使用您的电子邮件、手机号码注册一个免费账户在HTX上。体验无忧的注册过程并解锁所有平台功能。立即注册第二步:前往买币页面,选择您的支付方式信用卡/借记卡购买:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即时购买Cap(CAP)。余额购买:使用您HTX账户余额中的资金进行无缝交易。第三方购买:探索诸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方法以增加便利性。C2C购买:在HTX平台上直接与其他用户交易。HTX场外交易台(OTC)购买:为大量交易者提供个性化服务和竞争性汇率。第三步:存储您的Cap(CAP)购买完您的Cap(CAP)后,将其存储在您的HTX账户钱包中。您也可以通过区块链转账将其发送到其他地方或者用于交易其他加密货币。第四步:交易Cap(CAP)在HTX的现货市场轻松交易Cap(CAP)。访问您的账户,选择您的交易对,执行您的交易,并实时监控。HTX为初学者和经验丰富的交易者提供了友好的用户体验。

689人学过发布于 2026.06.26更新于 2026.06.26

如何购买CAP

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对CAP(CAP)币价的意见。

活动图片