Multicoin Co-founder: Is Decentralization Always Slower Than Centralization? PropAMM Is Breaking This Bias

marsbit发布于2026-03-13更新于2026-03-13

文章摘要

In a recent article, Multicoin Capital co-founder Kyle Samani argues that PropAMM (Proactive Automated Market Maker) on Solana represents one of the most significant innovations in market microstructure in decades. It challenges the long-held belief that decentralized systems are inherently slower than centralized ones due to global node communication. In traditional centralized exchanges (CEXs), market makers co-locate servers and engage in constant bidirectional communication with the exchange to update orders, resulting in latency. In contrast, PropAMM runs market-making algorithms directly on the Solana blockchain, eliminating the need for inter-server messaging. Price updates occur within the same physical silicon, drastically reducing latency. PropAMM already offers narrower spreads for SOL-USDC spot trading than major CEXs. Samani predicts it will dominate on-chain trading across spots, perpetuals, and prediction markets in 2024. Current challenges include non-deterministic routing and lack of guaranteed best execution for takers, but solutions from aggregators like Jupiter and dFlow are expected. Upcoming Solana upgrades—such as higher compute limits, reduced slot times, and lower network latency—will further enhance PropAMM performance, solidifying its advantage over traditional systems.

Author: Kyle Samani, Multicoin Co-founder

Compiled by: Azuma, Odaily Planet Daily

Editor's Note: The man who knows how to hype Solana best, Multicoin Capital's former co-founder Kyle Samani, who recently made a high-profile exit, is back!

Last night, Kyle Samani posted a long Thread on his personal X account. In the post, Samani once again demonstrated his highly persuasive "hype" (not derogatory here) rhetoric, using "efficiency"—a weak point in the decentralization narrative—as a breakthrough. He detailed how Solana's PropAMM will catch up with or even surpass traditional centralized models in efficiency, arguing that PropAMM is one of the most important innovations in market microstructure in recent years, or even decades.

Below is the original content:

PropAMM is one of the most important innovations in market microstructure in recent years, and perhaps even one of the most significant in decades.

To help everyone grasp this conclusion, let's first look at how market makers (MMs) quote prices on traditional centralized exchanges (CEXs).

Market makers typically engage in physical co-location with the trading platform. Each market maker runs an algorithm on a server and connects to another server running the exchange's system via a network cable of uniform length (e.g., 50 meters).

A massive stream of data is constantly exchanged between market makers and the trading platform. Whenever a market maker sends an order to the exchange—whether it's a limit order, cancellation, or market order—the exchange must broadcast this information to all other market makers; then, other market makers resend their orders based on the new information; this cycle repeats indefinitely.

Here is a simple diagram.

Now let's look at how PropAMM works on the Solana mainnet.

The beauty of PropAMM on Solana is that the blockchain itself directly "hosts" the market maker algorithms. This means the system no longer needs to send billions of messages back and forth between market makers and the exchange; the market-making algorithms will run directly on the same physical machine as the exchange.

Here is the new diagram. (That's right, only the Solana blockchain is needed!)

There has long been a common view in the cryptocurrency industry that decentralized systems must be slower (with higher latency) than centralized systems because they require communication between global nodes.

But if you reframe the issue, on-chain hosted algorithms could actually have lower latency than traditional centralized financial exchanges.

Why is that? The reason is that the latency required for PropAMM to update prices only involves electrons moving within the same physical silicon chip. For example, if the last market order causes a change in the SOL-USD price, this information is immediately visible to all PropAMMs and used to price the next market order. Everything happens within the same silicon chip; there is no longer a need for two-way communication between servers.

It's worth noting that PropAMM does require frequent oracle updates, but this is not a problem and does not change the overall fact described above.

The most critical point remains that when the trading platform—in this case, the Solana blockchain—directly hosts the PropAMM algorithms, the market makers' pricing changes in real-time within the same physical silicon chip.

PropAMM has already become the dominant mechanism for SOL-USDC spot quotes on Solana, with narrower spreads than all major CEXs. I expect this market structure to become the dominant model for on-chain trading this year, including spot, perpetual contracts (perps), and even prediction markets.

The biggest challenge for PropAMM is that there is currently no way to ensure that takers always get the best execution, because:

· The algorithms of all PropAMMs are not public (which is reasonable, as traditional market-making algorithms are also proprietary);

· When routing trades between multiple PropAMMs, the results are non-deterministic.

However, this problem can be solved. I expect all relevant aggregator teams to launch solutions this year, such as Jupiter and dFlow for spot, and Phoenix for contracts.

Current PropAMMs are still under-optimized and constrained by various limitations of the Solana blockchain itself. This year, Solana will roll out a series of major upgrades that will significantly enhance PropAMM performance, including:

1. Higher CU (Compute Unit) limits per transaction and larger transaction sizes;

2. Higher CU limits per block;

3. Alpenglow: Reducing slot time from 400ms to 100–150ms;

4. DoubleZero: Reducing global network latency;

5. Application-controlled execution;

6. Multiple concurrent leaders.

If PropAMMs on the Solana mainnet can already offer narrower quotes than all CEXs without these upgrades, imagine how powerful they will become as these upgrades are gradually implemented.

Related reading: The Turnaround of Kyle Samani, the "Best Crypto Investor in History," and a Mirror of a Decade Ago

相关问答

QWhat is PropAMM and why is it considered a major innovation in market microstructure?

APropAMM is a mechanism on Solana where market maker algorithms are hosted directly on the blockchain, eliminating the need for constant communication between market makers and exchanges. It is considered a major innovation because it reduces latency by running algorithms on the same physical hardware as the exchange, potentially outperforming traditional centralized systems in efficiency.

QHow does PropAMM achieve lower latency compared to traditional centralized exchanges?

APropAMM achieves lower latency by hosting market maker algorithms directly on the Solana blockchain, allowing price updates to occur within the same physical silicon. This eliminates the bidirectional communication delays between market makers and exchanges in traditional systems, as all operations happen internally on the same hardware.

QWhat are the current challenges faced by PropAMM in ensuring best execution for takers?

AThe main challenges are that PropAMM algorithms are not publicly disclosed (similar to traditional market makers), and trading routing across multiple PropAMMs is non-deterministic, making it difficult to guarantee the best execution for takers automatically.

QWhich Solana upgrades are expected to enhance PropAMM performance in the future?

AKey Solana upgrades include higher CU limits per transaction, larger transaction sizes, increased CU per block, Alpenglow (reducing slot time to 100-150ms), DoubleZero (reducing global network latency), application-controlled execution, and multiple concurrent leaders.

QHow has PropAMM already demonstrated its effectiveness on Solana's mainnet?

APropAMM has become the dominant mechanism for SOL-USDC spot quotes on Solana, offering narrower spreads than all major centralized exchanges (CEXs), showcasing its efficiency and potential to lead on-chain trading in spots, perpetuals, and prediction markets.

你可能也喜欢

当 Google 也要“印股票”造 AI,高估值 Neocloud 的叙事被谁打破了?

近日,Google宣布自2005年以来首次股权融资,计划募集800亿美元。此举并非单纯扩大AI基建产能,而是旨在挑战Nvidia GPU在AI算力市场的主导地位。通过三个连贯动作——发布新一代TPU芯片并向第三方销售、与黑石成立合资公司提供算力服务、启动大规模股权融资——Google正以TPU为核心,同时推进自建数据中心、出售芯片和进军云算力服务,试图重塑算力市场格局。 分析指出,此次融资中仅约500亿美元将直接用于AI基建,其余部分用于覆盖股权激励等行政支出。Google此举反映出其AI资本需求已巨大到必须动用股权工具。相比之下,微软因自研芯片进展缓慢,深度依赖以Nvidia GPU为核心的Neocloud服务商(如CoreWeave、Nebius、IREN),而Google凭借自研TPU,选择了一条自建加对外扩张的差异化路径。 Neocloud“三剑客”短期虽手握大量已锁定GPU合同,现金流无忧,但长期估值叙事已受冲击。其高估值依赖的“AI算力供不应求、Nvidia GPU唯一、大厂自建跟不上”三大前提正被动摇。其中,CoreWeave与Nvidia深度绑定,转型空间最小;Nebius技术栈相对灵活;而由矿商转型的IREN因估值较低、合同扎实,反而显得更稳健。 市场结构正在转变:前沿AI公司开始采用多芯片栈,大厂技术路线分化,资金成本差距将影响长期竞争力。Google以低成本资金入场,若其TPU生态扩张顺利,可能重塑市场格局。后续需关注Google与黑石合资项目的产能落地、TPU能否赢得更多大客户(如Meta、xAI),以及微软会否转向TPU。这些动向将决定Neocloud厂商的未来。

marsbit36分钟前

当 Google 也要“印股票”造 AI,高估值 Neocloud 的叙事被谁打破了?

marsbit36分钟前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片