Minnesota Moves to Ban Crypto Kiosks Over Fraud

TheNewsCrypto发布于2026-02-27更新于2026-02-27

文章摘要

Minnesota lawmakers are advancing a bill, House File 3642, to ban all cryptocurrency kiosks in the state. This action follows law enforcement testimony linking these machines to a significant increase in elder fraud cases. Officials cited instances where elderly victims lost substantial savings, with one individual sending half her monthly income to scammers. Despite 2024 regulations that imposed consumer protections like disclosure requirements and a $2,000 daily transaction limit, these measures were deemed insufficient to prevent fraud. The proposed ban targets physical kiosks but would not affect online cryptocurrency transactions. This move aligns with a broader national and international trend of increasing oversight on crypto kiosks due to fraud concerns.

Minnesota lawmakers are advancing legislation that would prohibit cryptocurrency kiosks across the state. The proposal follows testimony from law enforcement officials who linked the machines to a surge in elder fraud cases.

Representative Erin Koegel introduced House File 3642 earlier this week. The bill seeks to ban the placement and operation of any virtual currency kiosk in Minnesota. Lawmakers would repeal nearly two dozen statutory provisions that currently regulate the industry.

Koegel told the House Commerce, Finance, and Policy Committee that officers have identified kiosks as a prime tool for scammers targeting vulnerable residents.

Law Enforcement Details Elder Fraud Impact

Woodbury Police Detective Lynn Lawrence described cases in which elderly residents lost significant portions of their savings. One victim on a fixed income completed at least 10 Bitcoin transactions over six months. She sent roughly half of her monthly income to scammers.

Lawrence stated that the victim ultimately required assistance from adult protection services. The woman feared she would lose her housing due to the financial losses.

The Minnesota Department of Commerce reported 70 kiosk-related complaints last year, totaling $540,000 in reported losses. Approximately 48% of affected consumers received partial refunds, averaging 16% of the total loss.

Minnesota currently hosts about 350 licensed kiosks operated by eight to ten companies.

2024 Safeguards Deemed Insufficient

The state introduced regulatory laws in 2024 to control fraud. The laws required the operators to disclose that cryptocurrency is not legal tender and that the transaction is irreversible. The law also required a $2,000 daily limit for new customers and a full refund in specified fraud conditions.

It is now argued that the measures have not prevented scams. Sam Smith, government relations director at the Minnesota Department of Commerce, stated that prior consumer protection efforts have not delivered sufficient results.

House File 3642 would repeal the existing regulatory framework entirely. The ban applies specifically to physical kiosks. Residents would still retain access to online cryptocurrency transactions.

Wider National and International Crackdown

Minnesota’s plan is in line with the regulatory movement. In August, Illinois passed the Digital Asset Kiosk Act, requiring registration of operators, real-time customer support, and a maximum 18% transaction fee.

Globally, New Zealand introduced a country-wide ban on cryptocurrency ATMs in July 2025 as part of anti-money laundering regulations. In Australia, regulators have also moved to broaden their powers to control high-risk financial services, such as crypto kiosks.

Regulators are now recognizing crypto access points as possible sources of fraud. Some argue that education and regulation could be more effective than banning kiosks.

Minnesota lawmakers will continue debating the proposal in committee. If enacted, the state would join a growing list of jurisdictions tightening oversight of cryptocurrency kiosks in response to fraud concerns.

Highlighted Crypto News:

MetaMask Card Goes Live in the U.S., Enabling Crypto Payments with On-Chain Rewards

TagsBitcoin ATMCrypto Bancrypto fraudCrypto Lawpolicy

相关问答

QWhy are Minnesota lawmakers proposing to ban cryptocurrency kiosks?

AMinnesota lawmakers are proposing to ban cryptocurrency kiosks because law enforcement officials have linked them to a significant increase in elder fraud cases, where scammers have used the machines to target vulnerable residents.

QWhat was the financial impact of kiosk-related fraud reported by the Minnesota Department of Commerce last year?

AThe Minnesota Department of Commerce reported 70 kiosk-related complaints last year, totaling $540,000 in reported losses.

QWhat specific safeguards did Minnesota introduce in 2024 to control crypto kiosk fraud, and why are they considered insufficient?

AIn 2024, Minnesota introduced laws requiring operators disclose that cryptocurrency is not legal tender, that transactions are irreversible, impose a $2,000 daily limit for new customers, and provide a full refund in specified fraud conditions. They are deemed insufficient because they have not prevented scams, according to testimony from the Minnesota Department of Commerce.

QHow does the proposed ban in Minnesota fit into a larger regulatory trend?

AMinnesota's proposed ban is part of a wider national and international crackdown. For example, Illinois passed the Digital Asset Kiosk Act with new registration and fee rules, New Zealand implemented a country-wide ban on crypto ATMs, and Australia is broadening its powers to control high-risk financial services like crypto kiosks.

QIf the ban is enacted, will Minnesota residents lose all access to buying cryptocurrency?

ANo, the ban applies specifically to physical kiosks. Residents would still have access to online cryptocurrency transactions.

你可能也喜欢

韩国交易所“大战”监管机构,挑战执法、立法边界

韩国加密行业正与金融监管机构FIU(金融情报分析院)爆发正面冲突。过去FIU通过反洗钱法规对交易所严格处罚,但近期交易所开始通过法律诉讼和行业倡议系统性挑战其监管依据。 首尔行政法院在一审中撤销了FIU对Upbit运营公司Dunamu的部分营业停止处分,认为FIU对违规标准和处罚依据说明不足。法院强调,监管机构实施重罚必须证明交易所在明确规则下存在故意或重大过失。FIU已就此案提出上诉。同样,法院也暂停了FIU对Bithumb的六个月营业停止处分,以避免审理期间造成不可逆的损失。 在立法层面,韩国拟修订《特定金融信息法》,计划将1000万韩元以上加密资产转移一律纳入可疑交易报告范围。行业自律组织DAXA强烈反对,指出该“毒丸条款”可能违反法律保留原则,并将导致STR报告量暴增85倍,淹没真正的高风险信号,反而削弱反洗钱效率。 深层矛盾在于,韩国加密市场活跃但综合监管框架尚未成熟,目前主要依赖FIU的执法。交易所从被动接受转向通过司法和立法程序挑战监管,标志着韩国加密监管进入新阶段,监管规则本身的正当性将受到更严格审视。这场冲突短期内可能升级,但长期或有助于推动韩国建立更成熟、可持续的加密监管体系。

marsbit1小时前

韩国交易所“大战”监管机构,挑战执法、立法边界

marsbit1小时前

50倍存储后,孙宇晨永远在看下一个十年

孙宇晨以拍下巴菲特午餐、吃下天价香蕉等出位行为闻名,也面临SEC诉讼等争议,但其投资眼光常被忽略。早在2016年,他就建议年轻人投资比特币、英伟达、特斯拉等。以英伟达为例,若当时投资1万元,至2026年5月价值约240万元。 2025年底,他预言“存储是新的石油”,随后西部数据分拆的闪迪(SNDK)股价一年内大涨近50倍。当市场狂热追逐存储概念时,孙宇晨已将目光投向更具未来感的赛道:具身智能、无人机、空间计算和太空探索。 他认为,具身智能(如人形机器人)正从执行代码转向“看世界做事”,是AI在物理世界落地的关键。无人机已在军事、农业、物流等领域跑通商业闭环。空间计算(如苹果Vision Pro)旨在让AI理解物理空间,是机器人、自动驾驶等的基础。在太空领域,他本人于2025年乘坐蓝色起源飞船完成亚轨道飞行,并看好太空经济与区块链的结合。 他的投资逻辑是:押注确定性的赛道,两端布局,不赌单家公司。例如在机器人领域,既押注特斯拉(身体/制造),也押注英伟达(大脑/AI芯片);在无人机领域,看好其在军事应用中替代传统装备的趋势;在太空领域,关注即将IPO的SpaceX及其产业链。 孙宇晨将这些趋势串联起来,描绘出一幅“物理AI”改变现实世界运行方式的图景:从工厂机器人到自动驾驶,从无人机蜂群到星际探索。他认为,过去互联网改变了信息流动,而未来AI将重塑物理世界本身。

marsbit1小时前

50倍存储后,孙宇晨永远在看下一个十年

marsbit1小时前

史上最昂贵中期选举背后的亿万富翁们

彭博社分析指出,2026年美国中期选举已成为史上最昂贵的一选战,联邦政治委员会已募集超47亿美元,预计政治广告支出将达108亿美元。亿万富豪成为关键资金力量,其捐款不仅争夺国会控制权,也直接影响与自身利益密切相关的政策走向,如财富税、加密货币与人工智能监管等。 目前巨额资金多流向共和党阵营。顶级个人捐赠者包括:乔治·索罗斯(1.026亿美元)主要支持进步主义事业;埃隆·马斯克(8480万美元)大力支持特朗普阵营及共和党竞选委员会;Jeff Yass(8180万美元)是特朗普MAGA Inc.的最大金主之一,关注择校权等议题;OpenAI联合创始人Greg Brockman夫妇(5000万美元)支持特朗普及人工智能议题。 其他重要捐赠者有:Richard Uihlein(4530万美元)资助保守派议程;风投家Marc Andreessen(4470万美元)和Ben Horowitz(4440万美元)聚焦加密货币与人工智能政策;Miriam Adelson(4260万美元)长期支持特朗普及亲以色列政策;对冲基金大佬Paul Singer(3392万美元)转向支持特朗普对以强硬立场;建材巨头Diane Hendricks(2579万美元)亦是特朗普的坚定支持者。 匿名政治捐款的占比持续攀升。随着11月选举日临近,预计将有更多富豪加入顶级捐赠者行列。这场选举的结果将深刻影响美国未来两年的政策方向。

marsbit1小时前

史上最昂贵中期选举背后的亿万富翁们

marsbit1小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片