Kalshi and Polymarket Face Scrutiny as Lawmakers Target Death-Related Betting Markets

TheNewsCrypto发布于2026-03-02更新于2026-03-02

文章摘要

Prediction markets Kalshi and Polymarket are under scrutiny from U.S. lawmakers after users placed large bets on events connected to U.S. strikes on Iran, including contracts related to the potential death of Iran’s Supreme Leader. Over $529 million was traded on related Polymarket contracts. Six Democratic senators have urged the CFTC to ban such death-related prediction contracts, citing ethical and national security risks. Kalshi’s CEO defended the platform, though the company later admitted to unclear contract wording and issued refunds. Polymarket, which operates offshore with fewer regulations, saw some users profit $1 million from well-timed bets. The situation highlights ongoing regulatory challenges in the prediction market industry.

Prediction market platforms like Kalshi andPolymarket are facing pressure after users placed larger bets on the events connected to the U.S. strikes on Iran, which include contracts linked to the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei. According to the reports, more than $529 million was traded on the Polymarket contracts related to the timing of the strikes. Kalshi’s market is asking whether Khamenei has generated over $50 million in trading volume.

Lawmakers Demand Regulatory Actions

Six Democratic senators have urged the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to ban prediction contracts that are linked to or correlate with a person’s death. In a letter to CFTC Chairman Michael Selig, the senators argued that such markets pose a serious ethical and national security risk.

Tarek Mansour, Kalshi CEO, defended the platform, stating that Kalshi does not list contracts directly tied to death and designs rules to prevent users from profiting from someone’s death. However, confusion emerged over how the Khamenei contract was settled. Under Kalshi’s official rules filed with the CFTC, which are to be settled at the last traded price before Khamenei’s death.

Kalshi later admitted the wording was unclear. The company announced it would refund all the trading fees from the market and fully reimburse traders who placed bets after Khamenei’s death.

Polymarket, which operates outside U.S. regulations and only requires a crypto wallet to trade. Blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaos reported that six newly created accounts made about $1 million in profit by correctly betting on the strike date. Some of these bets were placed just hours before the attack occurred. This debate highlights how prediction markets should be regulated. Kalshi operates under U.S. oversight by the CFTC, while Polymarket operates offshore with fewer restrictions.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Hong Kong and Shanghai Authorities Integrate Cargo Data on Blockchain

TagsCrypto MarketCryptocurrency

相关问答

QWhat is the main reason Kalshi and Polymarket are facing scrutiny from lawmakers?

ALawmakers are scrutinizing them because users placed large bets on events connected to U.S. strikes on Iran, including contracts linked to the death of Iran's Supreme Leader, which they argue pose serious ethical and national security risks.

QHow much trading volume was generated on Polymarket contracts related to the timing of the U.S. strikes on Iran?

AMore than $529 million was traded on the Polymarket contracts related to the timing of the strikes.

QWhat specific action did six Democratic senators demand from the CFTC regarding prediction markets?

AThey urged the CFTC to ban prediction contracts that are linked to or correlate with a person's death.

QHow did Kalshi respond to the confusion over the settlement of its Khamenei contract?

AKalshi admitted the wording was unclear, announced it would refund all trading fees from that market, and fully reimburse traders who placed bets after Khamenei's death.

QWhat key difference in regulation is highlighted between Kalshi and Polymarket?

AKalshi operates under U.S. oversight by the CFTC, while Polymarket operates offshore with fewer restrictions and only requires a crypto wallet to trade.

你可能也喜欢

SBF提出新代币偿还FTX受害者,但这可能实现吗?

摘要:据报道,正在服刑的FTX创始人萨姆·班克曼-弗里德(SBF)近期表达了通过发起一个新的代币项目来偿还FTX受害者的个人愿望。这一说法因极具话题性而引发关注,但其与法律现实存在巨大差距。 核心信息点: * 这只是SBF的个人希望,并非一个积极的、可行的计划。 * 背景是,美国上诉法院已于2026年6月12日维持了对SBF的25年刑期判决。 * 目前没有任何经过验证的、在法律上可行的代币项目存在。 文章分析指出,作为一名正在服长期刑期的重罪犯,SBF在运营公司、筹集资金、发行证券或管理代币项目方面面临显而易见的法律障碍。即使他个人相信新方案能偿还受害者,法院、监管机构、债权人或破产管理人也不太可能允许。 该言论之所以仍受关注,是因为FTX倒闭是加密货币历史上的标志性事件,任何关于偿还受害者或新计划的提及都会触动市场记忆。这同时也引出了一个更广泛的行业问题:失败的平台能否利用代币来弥补损失?在FTX的案例中,法律和声誉障碍远高于普通的重组故事。 因此,本文的立论点不应是SBF将推出代币,而应强调他个人幻想与法律现实之间的张力:即便司法系统已做出严厉判决,他仍 reportedly 设想一条基于代币的偿还路径。任何实际的偿还过程,仍将严格遵循法律程序、破产结构和债权人追偿机制,而非一个来自监狱牢房的想法。

bitcoinist26分钟前

SBF提出新代币偿还FTX受害者,但这可能实现吗?

bitcoinist26分钟前

贝莱德以BITA为代码推出备兑看涨比特币ETF

贝莱德推出了一款新的比特币ETF产品——iShares Bitcoin Premium Income ETF,交易代码为BITA。与单纯的现货比特币基金不同,该产品采用备兑看涨期权策略,旨在通过出售期权获得权利金收入,并向投资者提供每月派息,为寻求加密相关收益但不愿直接使用DeFi或离岸借贷产品的投资者提供了新选择。 这种策略意味着产品在比特币横盘或震荡市场中可能表现更佳,但在比特币价格快速上涨时,其收益可能会落后于单纯的现货持有。这并非产品缺陷,而是其设计核心:贝莱德将比特币波动性打包成一种收入策略,为更保守或注重收益的投资者提供了更接近传统期权ETF的产品形式。 BITA的推出表明比特币ETF市场正迅速超越单纯的现货产品,进入策略多样化阶段,如赚取溢价收入、对冲和结构化敞口等。这标志着比特币正逐渐被视作可整合进更广泛基金架构的市场要素,而不仅仅是孤立资产。 该产品主要吸引那些已接受比特币投资逻辑,但希望在经纪账户内获得更平滑、以收益为导向产品的投资者,以及寻求在不单纯依赖价格升值的情况下讨论比特币敞口的投资顾问。它并非现货比特币或IBIT的替代品,而是一种不同的工具。关键在于投资者是否理解其收益与上涨潜力之间的权衡。

bitcoinist2小时前

贝莱德以BITA为代码推出备兑看涨比特币ETF

bitcoinist2小时前

日本加息,为什么全世界都在紧张?

日本央行在2026年6月将政策利率提升至1%,这是自1995年来的首次。尽管1%的利率在主要经济体中并不高,但由于日本长期充当全球最低成本融资中心的特殊角色,此次加息引发了全球市场的广泛关注。 过去二十余年,日本近乎零的利率环境催生了大规模的日元套利交易。国际资本以极低成本借入日元,转而投资于全球高收益资产,如美国科技股和新兴市场债券,这为全球资产价格上涨提供了重要的流动性基础。日本加息意味着这一廉价资金源头开始收紧,可能引发全球资本的去杠杆化调整。 日本长期维持超低利率,源于其人口老龄化、长期通缩和高额政府债务等结构性约束。然而,疫情后全球通胀传导、国内工资持续增长(近年春斗涨薪均超5%)以及日元贬值压力,共同推动其货币政策转向。 市场担忧的核心并非当前1%的利率水平,而是日本持续三十年的超宽松货币政策框架发生根本性转变的趋势。这种变化将重塑全球套利交易的逻辑和风险资产的定价基础。不过,决定全球资本最终流向的关键,仍在于美日之间的利差变化。如果未来美联储进入降息周期而日本继续加息,两者货币政策差异的收窄可能对国际资本市场产生更深远的影响。 简言之,日本加息标志着全球最重要的低成本融资来源进入正常化进程,这可能引发建立在廉价日元资金之上的全球资本配置体系进行深度重估。

marsbit4小时前

日本加息,为什么全世界都在紧张?

marsbit4小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片