Hoskinson Blasts Ripple CEO Garlinghouse In Fresh Public Rant

bitcoinist发布于2026-01-19更新于2026-01-19

文章摘要

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson criticized Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse in a video on January 18, 2026, for supporting the US Clarity Act, which Hoskinson argues would expand the SEC's authority and harm the crypto industry. He claimed the bill, with 137 amendments, would treat all new projects as securities by default, forcing them to seek regulatory relief. Hoskinson called this worse than the current regulatory uncertainty, accusing Garlinghouse and others of compromising too easily. He warned that passing a flawed bill would make meaningful change nearly impossible, citing the long-standing Securities Exchange Act of 1933. Hoskinson also expressed concerns about the industry moving toward custodial wallets, KYC, and reversible transactions, which he believes betray crypto's original revolutionary ethos. At the time of reporting, XRP was trading at $1.95.

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson took aim at Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse in a January 18, 2026 video, criticizing what he framed as an industry push to accept the US Clarity Act on terms that would expand the Securities and Exchange Commission’s authority over new projects.

Speaking on Jan 18, Hoskinson used a wide-ranging monologue on market fatigue, industry morale, and the mission behind Cardano and Midnight to zero in on a regulatory flashpoint: a bill he described as swollen by “137 amendments” and tilted toward the SEC. In his telling, the proposal would force crypto projects to “go beg and plead” for relief, with “all new projects” treated as securities by default.

Why Hoskinson Blasted Ripple CEO Garlinghouse

Hoskinson argued that the outcome would be a strategic own-goal, worse, in his view, than the policy uncertainty the industry has been trying to escape. “How is that any better than what Scary Gary [Gensler] gave us under Biden?” he said, referring to the SEC’s enforcement action against the crypto industry under former US President Joe Biden, before extending the critique to lobbying and political dealmaking more broadly.

Hoskinson’s sharpest remarks came when he cited unnamed industry figures he suggested are urging compromise, then called out Garlinghouse directly. “Still got people like Brad [Garlinghouse] saying well it’s not perfect but we just got to get something,” he said. “You know, it’s better than no clarity. Hand it to the same people who sued us. Hand it to the same people who put us out of business, who subpoenaed us, who put us in jail. That’s better. That’s what we fought for.”

He then framed the decision as effectively irreversible once legislated, invoking the long life of US securities law to argue that a flawed framework would calcify. “And tell me, how do we change it? Like we changed the Securities Exchange Act of 1933,” Hoskinson said. “93 years later, have we been able to change it? No. You pass it, you own it forever. Sorry, Brad. It’s not better than chaos. Take the chaos and fight for what’s right. Fight for integrity.”

While the Garlinghouse jab was the most explicit, Hoskinson placed it inside a larger narrative: that crypto’s purpose is being reduced to a lobbying-driven contest for acceptable market access rather than an attempt to redesign how value and identity are handled online.

He argued that the industry is at risk of normalizing a world of “custodial wallet” defaults, pervasive KYC, and reversible transactions, outcomes he associated with legacy power structures rather than the original “revolution” ethos.

“I didn’t sign up to hand the revolution to 15 banks,” he said, describing a future where transactions can be “frozen at a whim.” Hoskinson linked those concerns to a broader critique of technological surveillance and what he called the loss of individual “agency,” suggesting the industry’s incentive structure is pulling leaders toward comfort and access rather than confrontation.

The remarks landed amid a separate thread in his talk: a rebuke of what he called “toxic learned hopelessness” in crypto discourse. Hoskinson said he had stopped using X/Twitter, still broadcasting, but not reading or engaging—arguing that constant outrage and demands for instant announcements distort how long negotiations and product development actually work.

At press time, XRP traded at $1.95.

XRP falls into the red support zone again, 1-week chart | Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com

相关问答

QWhat was the main criticism Charles Hoskinson directed at Brad Garlinghouse in his January 18, 2026 video?

AHoskinson criticized Garlinghouse for advocating to accept the US Clarity Act despite its flaws, arguing that compromising with a bill that expands SEC authority and treats all new projects as securities by default is worse than regulatory chaos.

QAccording to Hoskinson, what negative outcomes would the proposed regulatory framework lead to for the crypto industry?

AHoskinson argued it would force crypto projects to beg for relief, treat all new projects as securities by default, normalize custodial wallets, pervasive KYC, and reversible transactions, ultimately handing control to traditional banks and allowing transactions to be frozen at a whim.

QWhy does Hoskinson believe that passing a flawed regulatory framework would be effectively irreversible?

AHe invoked the long life of US securities law, specifically referencing the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 which hasn't been changed in over 93 years, arguing that once such a framework is passed, the industry would be stuck with it forever.

QBeyond criticizing Garlinghouse, what broader concern did Hoskinson express about the crypto industry's direction?

AHe expressed concern that the industry's purpose is being reduced to a lobbying-driven contest for acceptable market access rather than a revolution to redesign how value and identity are handled online, and that leaders are being pulled toward comfort and access rather than confrontation.

QWhat did Hoskinson say about his own engagement with social media platform X/Twitter?

AHoskinson stated that he had stopped using X/Twitter in terms of reading or engaging with content, though he still broadcasts, due to what he called 'toxic learned hopelessness' and the distortion that constant outrage and demands for instant announcements create.

你可能也喜欢

助记词:12个词,介于你与失去一切之间的鸿沟

种子短语,通常由12或24个标准字典中的单词组成,并非打开远程资金账户的登录凭证,它本身就是数字钱包的数学体现。通过BIP39标准算法,这些单词可转换为主私钥,并派生出所有关联的比特币地址。没有备份数据库或客服能帮助恢复它,谁掌握了这些词,谁就完全控制了所有资产。 一月的盗窃案正是因此发生,并非利用技术漏洞,而是通过社会工程学手段——诱骗受害者在错误位置输入了12个单词。随后,约1.39亿美元比特币和1.53亿美元莱特币在几分钟内被转移和转换。监控团队虽成功冻结了部分资金,但这凸显了种子短语一旦泄露,资金极难追回。 12个单词提供了约128位的巨大熵值,其组合数天文数字,暴力破解在现实中不可能。真正的风险在于信息泄露:如果部分单词通过照片、云备份或诈骗手段泄露,安全性的衰减并非线性,而是呈断崖式下降。例如,已知7个单词,破解时间会从已知6个单词的千年量级骤降至不足一年。 BIP39中的校验和功能主要用于检测输入错误,防止因笔误导致创建出空钱包,而非防御恶意攻击。 与备受瞩目的数亿美元盗窃案相比,更大量、更悄无声息的损失源于人们自行丢失访问权限。据估计,高达23%已挖出的比特币因忘记短语、备份损毁或持有人离世而无继承人等原因永久丢失。这揭示了种子短语的本质:它不是可重置的密码,而是资产所有权的唯一且不可恢复的终极证明。记录错误会安全地失效,部分泄露会导致安全性崩溃,而完全丢失则意味着背后的比特币对任何人而言都不复存在。

cryptonews.ru12分钟前

助记词:12个词,介于你与失去一切之间的鸿沟

cryptonews.ru12分钟前

交易

现货
活动图片