Crypto Market Structure Bill Paused: Senate Banking Cancels Markup

bitcoinist发布于2026-01-15更新于2026-01-15

文章摘要

The Senate Banking Committee has postponed the markup of a crypto market structure bill following opposition from Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, who argued the current draft is "materially worse than the status quo" and would effectively ban tokenized equities, restrict DeFi, and stifle innovation. Committee Chairman Tim Scott described the delay as a tactical pause to continue bipartisan negotiations, emphasizing the goal of establishing clear rules to protect consumers and national security. The move has split the crypto industry, with firms like a16z, Circle, and Ripple expressing support for the legislative effort, while others, including Bitwise Asset Management, sided with Coinbase's stance that "no bill is better than a bad bill." Despite the setback, key figures like Galaxy Digital's Mike Novogratz remain optimistic about a eventual compromise, noting ongoing good-faith discussions among lawmakers. The total crypto market cap was $3.22 trillion at the time of reporting.

The Senate Banking Committee has pulled the scheduled Thursday markup of its crypto asset market structure bill after a late-stage flare-up with Coinbase, freezing what had looked like a tightening path toward action. The pause lands at a sensitive moment for Washington’s crypto negotiations: industry heavyweights are publicly splitting over the Senate draft even as lawmakers insist bipartisan talks are still alive.

Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott (R-S.C.) said Wednesday the committee will postpone the markup “as bipartisan negotiations continue,” framing the delay as tactical rather than terminal. “I’ve spoken with leaders across the crypto industry, the financial sector, and my Democratic and Republican colleagues, and everyone remains at the table working in good faith,” Scott wrote on X. “As we take a brief pause before moving to a markup, this market structure bill reflects months of serious bipartisan negotiations and real input from innovators, investors, and law enforcement.”

Scott positioned the bill as a foundational framework rather than a narrow industry carveout. “The goal is to deliver clear rules of the road that protect consumers, strengthen our national security, and ensure the future of finance is built in the United States,” he added.

Coinbase Breaks Ranks Late

The immediate catalyst was Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, who said the exchange “can’t support the bill as written” after reviewing “the Senate Banking draft text over the last 48hrs.”

Armstrong argued the draft contains multiple provisions he says would be “materially worse than the current status quo,” contending that it amounts to “a defacto ban on tokenized equities,” includes “DeFi prohibitions” that expand government access to financial records and erode privacy, and would “stifl[e] innovation” by weakening the CFTC relative to the SEC.

He also pointed to “draft amendments” he said “would kill rewards on stablecoins,” warning the changes could allow banks to “ban their competition.” Armstrong’s bottom line was blunt: “We’d rather have no bill than a bad bill.” Still, he struck a conciliatory note about process and odds of a compromise, adding he was “quite optimistic” that continued work could produce “the right outcome.”

That posture split the difference between hard opposition to the text and support for continued negotiations,an important distinction as the markup process is typically where senators offer and vote amendments.

Crypto Industry Split

Coinbase’s stance quickly triggered a counter-response from other major crypto firms and advocacy groups backing the Senate Banking GOP’s push. Support was voiced by a16z, Circle, Kraken, The Digital Chamber, Ripple, and Coin Center, coalescing into a public front aimed at keeping momentum intact despite the delay.

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse cast the bill as overdue but directionally positive. “While long-overdue, this move by @SenatorTimScott and @BankingGOP on market structure is a massive step forward in providing workable frameworks for crypto, while continuing to protect consumers,” he wrote. He said Ripple would remain engaged, adding: “We are at the table and will continue to move forward with fair debate. I remain optimistic that issues can be resolved through the mark-up process.”

Meanwhile, Tim Draper said Armstrong’s opposition is justified, arguing the Senate compromise “is worse than no bill at all” and suggesting that “the banks have been meddling.”

Ryan Rasmussen, Head of Research at Bitwise Asset Management , called the current CLARITY Act draft broadly harmful, listing tokenization, stablecoins, DeFi, privacy, builders, users, investors, and innovation, and concluded that the industry would “rather have no bill than a bad bill.”

White House Crypto Czar David Sacks urged the industry to treat the delay as a narrow window to align rather than an opening to splinter. “Passage of market structure legislation remains as close as it’s ever been,” Sacks wrote. “The crypto industry should use this pause to resolve any remaining differences. Now is the time to set the rules of the road and secure the future of this industry.”

Galaxy Digitall’s CEO Mike Novogratz struck a more optimistic tone, saying: “While the crypto bill might be delayed to keep working on it, I am very confident that a bill will get done soon. I have spoken to over 10 senators on both sides of the aisle in the past 24 hrs and I believe they all are working in good faith to get something done. Always gets tense at the end.”

At press time, the total crypto market cap stood at $3.22 trillion.

Total crypto market cap needs to overcome the 20-and 50-week EMAs, 1-week chart | Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

相关问答

QWhy did the Senate Banking Committee postpone the markup of the crypto market structure bill?

AThe Senate Banking Committee postponed the markup to allow more time for bipartisan negotiations to continue, as stated by Chairman Tim Scott, who framed the delay as tactical rather than terminal.

QWhat were Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong's main objections to the draft bill?

ABrian Armstrong argued the draft bill contained provisions that would be 'materially worse than the current status quo,' including a de facto ban on tokenized equities, DeFi prohibitions that expand government access to financial records, and measures that would stifle innovation by weakening the CFTC relative to the SEC.

QWhich major crypto firms and advocacy groups publicly supported the Senate Banking GOP's push for the bill?

ASupport for the bill was voiced by a16z, Circle, Kraken, The Digital Chamber, Ripple, and Coin Center.

QWhat was the overall sentiment of Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse regarding the bill?

ABrad Garlinghouse viewed the bill as a long-overdue but massive step forward, calling it a positive framework for crypto that protects consumers, and he remained optimistic that issues could be resolved through the mark-up process.

QHow did White House Crypto Czar David Sacks advise the crypto industry to respond to the delay?

ADavid Sacks urged the industry to use the pause as a narrow window to resolve remaining differences and align, rather than splinter, emphasizing that this is the time to set the rules of the road and secure the industry's future.

你可能也喜欢

霍斯金森否认退出卡尔达诺的传闻:'我不会离开'

卡尔达诺创始人查尔斯·霍斯金森在6月4日的直播中否认了关于他将离开生态系统的传言,称自己只是减少公开沟通,并非辞职。此前他在X平台发布的“休息一下”帖子引发了社区担忧。 霍斯金森在直播中表示,他决定远离社交媒体主要是因为X平台上的毒性环境已难以忍受。他分析了自己近期帖子的约130条回复,发现近三分之一充满敌意、辱骂或污言秽语,部分甚至显示出有组织的攻击迹象。他认为在这种环境下进行有意义的交流几乎不可能。 他强调自己并未离开卡尔达诺,仍致力于包括RealFi、比特币可编程化、Midnight等项目的研究与开发工作。但他明确表示,自己的热情并非推动ADA价格上涨以满足投机者,他从未将此视为自己的职责。 霍斯金森描述了“两个卡尔达诺”的现状:一方面,自2021年以来协议、工程基础、去中心化和研究栈取得了显著进步;另一方面,市场价格表现导致批评者称该项目失败。这种差距造成了“认知失调”,他认为社区需要解决这个问题。 他呼吁生态系统需要做出改变:放弃以X为主要讨论场所、重新思考建设者激励、调整部分管理文化,并制定一个新的路线图以凝聚共识。他特别批评了卡尔达诺基金会,称其治理结构是自己职业生涯中“最糟糕的错误”,社区缺乏对其董事会、优先事项和人员的有效问责机制。 霍斯金森表示将暂时远离公开视频、采访和社交媒体,继续专注于Midnight的工作。他计划进行反思和恢复,未来再提出关于卡尔达诺发展的建议,范围可能从渐进式改革到更彻底的变革。他强调自己的底线是必须得到尊重和尊严,只愿留在能确保这一点的沟通渠道中。

bitcoinist4小时前

霍斯金森否认退出卡尔达诺的传闻:'我不会离开'

bitcoinist4小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片