Crypto Bets On Argentina Inflation Stoke Fears Of Insider Trading On Polymarket

bitcoinist发布于2026-03-17更新于2026-03-17

文章摘要

Argentinian authorities have ordered a nationwide blockade of the crypto prediction platform Polymarket, enforced by regulators and internet providers, following a court ruling that deemed it an unlicensed gambling operation. The move comes after allegations of insider trading emerged when suspicious betting activity occurred just before the release of official inflation data in February. Argentina follows Colombia as the second Latin American country to ban the platform, reflecting a broader global trend of regulators treating prediction markets as gambling rather than financial tools. This could fragment liquidity and push users into less regulated markets.

Argentinian authorities have ordered a full national blockade of Polymarket after it predicted inflation data.

An Authoritarian Crypto Ban?

Argentinian outlets reported this Monday that a court ruling in Buenos Aires ordered a nationwide blockade of Polymarket, one of the largest crypto prediction market platforms globally. The blockade will be enforced via the Ente Nacional de Comunicaciones (ENACOM) and local internet service providers (ISPs), in addition to its removal from Apple and Google app stores. The restriction goes as far as affecting already signed up Polymarket users, another local outlet claims.

Buenos Aires Lottery Regulators (Lotería de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires and the Cámara Argentina de Casinos y Bingos) argue that Polymarket is operating as an unlicensed online gambling platform, not just a neutral "prediction market". This led to a case being brought by the City's Special Prosecutor's Office for Gambling (FEJA) and presided over by Judge Susana Parada.

The Public Prosecutor's Office explained that despite the blocking order having already been issued, the implementation depends on ENACOM notifying all ISP's so the companies can cut off access. Therefore, the full and final implementation will most likely be gradual.

A "Degen Casino" That Played With The Country's Inflation

This drastic ruling follows a suspicious trading scandal in the inflation market back in February, where odds moved around fifteen minutes before INDEC released official CPI data, raising allegations of insider trading by politically connected actors.

The local media has echoed the "degen casino" narrative, arguing that these markets let users place peso‐linked wagers on macro data, elections and high‐profile political outcomes without any Argentine license or KYC/age checks. Clarín claims that, in Polymarket, "it all comes down to betting money on a question that can be answered with a yes or a no":

Polymarket presents itself as a prediction market, but in practice it's a way to bet on almost anything that emerged during the pandemic and gained popularity during the election campaign between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, when the tycoon began promoting these markets because they gave him better results than the polls: 55.5% were literally betting on him.

A Global Trend

Despite some claims that place Argentina as the first country in the region to implement such measures, the truth is that last year Colombia became the first country in Latin America to ban Polymarket. Coljuegos, Colombian gambling regulators, declared the platform ilegal in September 2025 and, similarly to the Argentinian ban, instructed their ISPs to block access to it.

It its worth noting that prediction markets had become a popular way for global crypto traders to price political risk, inflation paths and macro events in real time, often anticipating official data. In line with this, this is not the first clash between Polymarket's and regulatory entities. Besides Colombia, other earlier blocks or investigations have been registered in France, Taiwan and Singapore, in addition to the US regulatory pressure over unregistered derivatives and gambling concerns.

Argentina's move reinforces a growing trend of regulators increasingly treating crypto prediction platforms as gambling first and market infrastructure second, which could fragment liquidity and push activity into friendlier jurisdictions or darker venues.

BTC's price trends reaches $74K on the daily chart, the highest since January. Source: BTCUSD on Tradingview

Cover image from Perplexity, BTCUSD chart from Tradingview

相关问答

QWhy did Argentinian authorities order a national blockade of Polymarket?

AArgentinian authorities ordered a national blockade of Polymarket because they argue it is an unlicensed online gambling platform, not just a neutral prediction market, following a suspicious trading scandal involving inflation data.

QWhat was the suspicious trading activity on Polymarket related to in Argentina?

AThe suspicious trading activity was related to Argentina's inflation data, where odds moved around fifteen minutes before the official CPI data was released by INDEC, raising allegations of insider trading.

QWhich other Latin American country banned Polymarket before Argentina?

AColombia became the first country in Latin America to ban Polymarket, declaring the platform illegal in September 2025 and instructing ISPs to block access.

QHow does Polymarket present itself versus how it is viewed by regulators?

APolymarket presents itself as a prediction market, but regulators view it as an unlicensed online gambling platform that allows users to place wagers on events without proper licensing or KYC/age checks.

QWhat global trend does Argentina's move against Polymarket reinforce?

AArgentina's move reinforces a growing trend of regulators treating crypto prediction platforms as gambling first and market infrastructure second, which could fragment liquidity and push activity into friendlier jurisdictions.

你可能也喜欢

做市商与套利者的两种生存结构

在微观高频交易领域,做市商与套利者是两种长期并存的核心生存结构。本文从风险敞口的角度,对比分析了两者的差异。 做市商通过挂单(Maker模式)提供流动性,以赚取买卖价差为目标,资金利用率高。其风险敞口源于被动成交的不连续性,常形成随机、高频的碎片化库存。这种敞口在价格均值回归期间可能贡献超额利润,但在单边行情下会导致库存积压、亏损放大。 跨所套利者则主要通过吃单(Taker模式)捕捉不同交易所间的价差或资金费率,但名义资金利用率较低,且需支付更高手续费。其风险敞口主要源于交易所间规则不对称(如订单步长不同)、执行延迟等工程层面问题,这类敞口基本属于利润的损耗项。 两者的核心区别在于:做市商是用放弃“成交时间控制权”(出售时间)来换取价差收益和低手续费,其敞口在一定范围内是利润来源;套利者则是以“资金沉没”(出售空间)为代价,换取确定性的空间套利机会,其敞口多为成本。两者都在“执行摩擦损耗”与“残差风险波动”间寻求平衡。 最终,成熟的策略会趋向融合:套利者会使用Maker模式以降低成本,做市商在风控预警时也会采用Taker平仓或对冲。二者都以不同形式的风险敞口,向市场兑换微薄而残酷的确定性收益。

链捕手3小时前

做市商与套利者的两种生存结构

链捕手3小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片