Cardano Founder Blasts Ripple For Playing Dirty With New CLARITY Act, Here’s What He Said

bitcoinist发布于2026-04-01更新于2026-04-01

文章摘要

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has launched a direct attack against Ripple and its CEO Brad Garlinghouse, accusing them of engineering the CLARITY Act to shield Ripple’s interests while harming the broader crypto ecosystem. Hoskinson claims the bill, in its current form, would classify most digital assets as securities by default, forcing projects into a difficult regulatory process. He warns this could expose open-source developers to legal risks and remove protections for DeFi builders. He also criticized the XRP community, alleging years of propaganda have eroded critical thinking. Hoskinson has consistently opposed the bill, suggesting it unfairly benefits XRP. The probability of the CLARITY Act being signed into law has fallen to 51%, down from 78% in early March.

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has launched one of his most direct attacks yet on Ripple and its CEO Brad Garlinghouse, accusing the payments company of engineering the CLARITY Act to eliminate competition while shielding its own interests.

The remarks were delivered during Hoskinson’s most recent weekly rollup on YouTube, where he laid out what he believes is a deeper issue surrounding the bill and how it could change competition across the crypto sector.

Hoskinson Accuses Ripple Of Playing Dirty

According to Charles Hoskinson, the CLARITY Act, in its current form, was crafted with Ripple’s fingerprints on it. He is of the notion that the bill’s structure would classify most digital assets as securities by default, forcing projects to fight their way out of that designation through a regulatory process he warned the SEC could easily weaponize. “They’re trying to pass a bill that hurts the entire ecosystem while they get protected,” he said.

As noted by Hoskinson, if the CLARITY Act is passed, projects would need to prove otherwise, effectively placing the burden of defense on developers and startups from the outset.

Open-source contributors could face legal risks even when they are not directly responsible for how their code is used. He pointed to the legal exposure faced by developers connected to Tornado Cash as an example of what could become standard practice if the CLARITY Act passes in its current form.

He also flagged the removal of existing protections for DeFi developers as a provision that would send a chilling signal across the entire community of crypto developers.

Cardano Founder Says XRP Community Is Incapable Of Critical Thinking

Hoskinson also reserved some of his remarks for members of the XRP community. He accused Ripple directly of conducting a sustained campaign of layer after layer of marketing and propaganda. Furthermore, years of social media consumption, cable news, and yellow journalism have left segments of the XRP community with an inability to think critically.

Hoskinson has been building this argument over several months, and his recent statements tie into a broader pattern of criticism against Ripple and the CLARITY Act.

Back in early March, he noted that the CLARITY Act’s structure effectively labels everything as a security first, creating a system where only a few projects will be spared. He suggested that XRP could be among the assets that receive more favorable treatment under the framework proposed by the CLARITY Act.

His criticism against Brad Garlinghouse has also been very persistent. A notable example is during a January 2026 livestream where he questioned why the Ripple CEO is supportive of advancing the bill despite its perceived flaws.

Polymarket odds of the CLARITY Act being signed into law in 2026 have now fallen to 51%, down from above 78% in early March, following Coinbase’s opposition to a stablecoin yield compromise and the departure of crypto czar David Sacks from his role.

ADA trading at $0.24 on the 1D chart | Source: ADAUSDT on Tradingview.com

相关问答

QWhat is the main accusation Charles Hoskinson makes against Ripple regarding the CLARITY Act?

ACharles Hoskinson accuses Ripple of engineering the CLARITY Act to eliminate competition while shielding its own interests, claiming the bill is crafted with Ripple's fingerprints on it.

QAccording to Hoskinson, what would be the default classification for most digital assets under the CLARITY Act?

AAccording to Hoskinson, the CLARITY Act's structure would classify most digital assets as securities by default.

QWhat potential legal risk does Hoskinson highlight for open-source contributors if the CLARITY Act passes?

AHoskinson warns that open-source contributors could face legal risks even when not directly responsible for how their code is used, citing the legal exposure faced by Tornado Cash developers as an example.

QWhat does Hoskinson claim about the XRP community's ability to think critically?

AHoskinson claims that years of marketing, propaganda, and media consumption have left segments of the XRP community with an inability to think critically.

QWhat has happened to the Polymarket odds of the CLARITY Act being signed into law in 2026, and what are the cited reasons?

AThe Polymarket odds of the CLARITY Act being signed into law in 2026 have fallen to 51% from above 78% in early March, following Coinbase's opposition to a stablecoin yield compromise and the departure of crypto czar David Sacks.

你可能也喜欢

美债危机和高收益率背景下,黄金作为“金融保险”的配置价值

本文探讨了在美债危机和高收益率背景下,黄金作为“金融保险”的配置价值。文章认为,美国巨额债务、高收益率环境以及地缘政治风险等因素,削弱了投资者对传统纸币和美元资产的信心,从而凸显了黄金作为无对手方风险的价值储存手段的重要性。 核心驱动力包括:1)黄金与实际利率呈反向关系,当前低实际利率环境提供支撑;2)地缘政治紧张与能源通胀推高避险需求;3)全球央行(尤其是中国央行)持续购金,形成结构性需求;4)投资需求(如ETF)创历史新高。文章回顾了金价从2025年初约2,624美元飙升至2026年1月历史高点5,589美元的历程,并指出当前价格在约4,460-4,523美元区间。 对于投资者,获取黄金敞口的主要途径有:实物黄金、黄金ETF(如GLD、IAU)以及黄金矿业ETF(如GDX)。后者具有杠杆效应,但风险也更高。文章同时提示了黄金面临的风险,包括实际利率大幅转正、美元走强、地缘政治缓和及估值过高等。 最后,文章建议将黄金视为投资组合的保险部分,而非增长型资产,多数情况下配置比例在5%-10%为宜。投资者需密切关注美国实际利率、美伊谈判进展、央行购金数据及关键价格位(如4,500美元和5,000美元),以判断未来走势。在当前宏观环境下,持有黄金的逻辑得到了罕见的基本面支撑。

marsbit47分钟前

美债危机和高收益率背景下,黄金作为“金融保险”的配置价值

marsbit47分钟前

MSTR 与 STRC 的「死亡螺旋」风险有多大?

MicroStrategy(MSTR)近期出售32枚比特币引发市场担忧,其股价及旗下永续优先股STRC价格均出现下跌。文章分析了MSTR、比特币(BTC)与STRC深度绑定的结构,并与已崩溃的LUNA-UST算法稳定币系统进行比较。 核心结论是,尽管MSTR-STRC结构与LUNA-UST在表面上有相似之处(如价格锚定、高收益和潜在的螺旋下跌风险),但两者存在根本差异。STRC的价格稳定依赖于股息率调整和公司信用,而非UST那种直接影响LUNA供给的算法机制。STRC持有人在公司破产时对剩余资产拥有优先追索权,这提供了价格下限支撑,与UST可归零不同。此外,MSTR支付股息的能力依赖于其通过增发股票等方式持续融资,而非UST那种依赖外部协议收益的模式。 目前,MicroStrategy的美元储备仅能支撑约6个月的利息和股息支出,未来融资能力高度依赖市场对比特币的信心以及其股价表现。文章指出,只要比特币价格不跌破约2.63万美元,优先股股东本金损失风险较低;且公司净杠杆率仅11%,因债务导致破产的概率很小。 未来六个月被视为关键期。若比特币市场能在此期间触底回暖,MicroStrategy或能通过健康去杠杆重启其资本运作引擎。总体来看,MSTR-STRC发生类似LUNA-UST那种灾难性“死亡螺旋”的概率极低,但其可持续性仍取决于市场信心和未来半年的融资环境。

Foresight News1小时前

MSTR 与 STRC 的「死亡螺旋」风险有多大?

Foresight News1小时前

交易

现货
合约

热门文章

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对ADA(ADA)币价的意见。

活动图片