Cardano Founder Blasts Ripple For Playing Dirty With New CLARITY Act, Here’s What He Said

bitcoinist发布于2026-04-01更新于2026-04-01

文章摘要

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has launched a direct attack against Ripple and its CEO Brad Garlinghouse, accusing them of engineering the CLARITY Act to shield Ripple’s interests while harming the broader crypto ecosystem. Hoskinson claims the bill, in its current form, would classify most digital assets as securities by default, forcing projects into a difficult regulatory process. He warns this could expose open-source developers to legal risks and remove protections for DeFi builders. He also criticized the XRP community, alleging years of propaganda have eroded critical thinking. Hoskinson has consistently opposed the bill, suggesting it unfairly benefits XRP. The probability of the CLARITY Act being signed into law has fallen to 51%, down from 78% in early March.

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has launched one of his most direct attacks yet on Ripple and its CEO Brad Garlinghouse, accusing the payments company of engineering the CLARITY Act to eliminate competition while shielding its own interests.

The remarks were delivered during Hoskinson’s most recent weekly rollup on YouTube, where he laid out what he believes is a deeper issue surrounding the bill and how it could change competition across the crypto sector.

Hoskinson Accuses Ripple Of Playing Dirty

According to Charles Hoskinson, the CLARITY Act, in its current form, was crafted with Ripple’s fingerprints on it. He is of the notion that the bill’s structure would classify most digital assets as securities by default, forcing projects to fight their way out of that designation through a regulatory process he warned the SEC could easily weaponize. “They’re trying to pass a bill that hurts the entire ecosystem while they get protected,” he said.

As noted by Hoskinson, if the CLARITY Act is passed, projects would need to prove otherwise, effectively placing the burden of defense on developers and startups from the outset.

Open-source contributors could face legal risks even when they are not directly responsible for how their code is used. He pointed to the legal exposure faced by developers connected to Tornado Cash as an example of what could become standard practice if the CLARITY Act passes in its current form.

He also flagged the removal of existing protections for DeFi developers as a provision that would send a chilling signal across the entire community of crypto developers.

Cardano Founder Says XRP Community Is Incapable Of Critical Thinking

Hoskinson also reserved some of his remarks for members of the XRP community. He accused Ripple directly of conducting a sustained campaign of layer after layer of marketing and propaganda. Furthermore, years of social media consumption, cable news, and yellow journalism have left segments of the XRP community with an inability to think critically.

Hoskinson has been building this argument over several months, and his recent statements tie into a broader pattern of criticism against Ripple and the CLARITY Act.

Back in early March, he noted that the CLARITY Act’s structure effectively labels everything as a security first, creating a system where only a few projects will be spared. He suggested that XRP could be among the assets that receive more favorable treatment under the framework proposed by the CLARITY Act.

His criticism against Brad Garlinghouse has also been very persistent. A notable example is during a January 2026 livestream where he questioned why the Ripple CEO is supportive of advancing the bill despite its perceived flaws.

Polymarket odds of the CLARITY Act being signed into law in 2026 have now fallen to 51%, down from above 78% in early March, following Coinbase’s opposition to a stablecoin yield compromise and the departure of crypto czar David Sacks from his role.

ADA trading at $0.24 on the 1D chart | Source: ADAUSDT on Tradingview.com

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QWhat is the main accusation Charles Hoskinson makes against Ripple regarding the CLARITY Act?

ACharles Hoskinson accuses Ripple of engineering the CLARITY Act to eliminate competition while shielding its own interests, claiming the bill is crafted with Ripple's fingerprints on it.

QAccording to Hoskinson, what would be the default classification for most digital assets under the CLARITY Act?

AAccording to Hoskinson, the CLARITY Act's structure would classify most digital assets as securities by default.

QWhat potential legal risk does Hoskinson highlight for open-source contributors if the CLARITY Act passes?

AHoskinson warns that open-source contributors could face legal risks even when not directly responsible for how their code is used, citing the legal exposure faced by Tornado Cash developers as an example.

QWhat does Hoskinson claim about the XRP community's ability to think critically?

AHoskinson claims that years of marketing, propaganda, and media consumption have left segments of the XRP community with an inability to think critically.

QWhat has happened to the Polymarket odds of the CLARITY Act being signed into law in 2026, and what are the cited reasons?

AThe Polymarket odds of the CLARITY Act being signed into law in 2026 have fallen to 51% from above 78% in early March, following Coinbase's opposition to a stablecoin yield compromise and the departure of crypto czar David Sacks.

你可能也喜欢

Chainlink CCIP 加入央行数字货币试点项目

Chainlink的跨链互操作性协议CCIP正被用于多个央行的数字货币及资产代币化结算试点项目,标志着该协议进入了区块链基础设施领域重要的机构性实验场景。这些试点包括巴西的Drex数字雷亚尔计划、中国香港的Ensemble代币化沙盒网络,以及香港金融管理局的e-HKD+项目(涉及澳新银行的A$DC)。目前这些均为试验阶段,尚未投入商业生产,但具有重要意义,因为它们展示了受监管机构如何测试公共区块链基础设施概念。 央行的试点项目虽然多数不会立即转化为完整生产系统,但揭示了机构正在探索的方向,尤其是互操作性这一核心主题。未来金融体系很可能由多个受监管的网络、支付系统和结算层构成,因此安全可靠的跨链通信与价值传输成为关键基础设施需求。CCIP在这些试点中扮演了跨链消息传递和结算层的角色,用于测试支付对支付结算、跨境资产流动等场景。 对Chainlink而言,参与这些试点有助于强化其机构市场定位,表明其技术正在对可靠性、风险控制要求极高的环境中接受检验。然而,试点不等于正式采用,要实现持续的商业化采用仍需克服监管审批、技术整合和机构协调等多重挑战。整体来看,这反映了资产代币化结算正成为一个重要的机构议题,行业焦点已从简单的资产发行转向互操作性、跨境结算和可编程金融基础设施。

bitcoinist34分钟前

Chainlink CCIP 加入央行数字货币试点项目

bitcoinist34分钟前

XRP账本修订案临近验证节点投票截止日期

XRP Ledger(XRPL)即将进入一项关键验证者投票窗口期,决定是否激活拟议的协议修正案。这凸显了XRPL升级并非仅由开发代码发布驱动,而需经过网络治理流程。 修正案通过rippled发布流程和验证者投票系统推进。与其他XRPL变更类似,拟议修正案需要获得广泛验证者支持才能激活,通常要求达到并维持80%的验证者同意门槛持续一段时间。这一设计旨在确保升级审慎,避免仓促变更,让参与方有充分时间评估新功能。 验证者在XRPL治理中扮演核心角色,其投票决定直接影响协议是否引入新功能,进而塑造未来在支付、资产发行和去中心化交易所等方面的效用。虽然市场注意力常集中于价格波动,但此类协议升级对网络的长期发展更为关键,可能影响智能合约功能、资产特性、交易类型及运行可靠性。 需要明确的是,投票截止日期并不意味着升级必然激活。即使功能已包含在代码版本中,仍需获得足够且持续的支持。验证者可能支持、保留支持或要求更多审查,这是一个健康的决策过程。 对XRP而言,修正案进程之所以重要,是因为其长期价值与XRPL的实用性能紧密相连。协议的进步若能带来更多用例、更好的工具和更强的应用需求,才能真正提升网络效用。因此,当前进展更应被视为基础设施的推进,而非单纯的市场价格信号。 总之,XRPL正进入又一个治理检查点,本次投票将反映验证者对推动下一组协议变更的态度。

bitcoinist48分钟前

XRP账本修订案临近验证节点投票截止日期

bitcoinist48分钟前

交易

现货

热门文章

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对ADA(ADA)币价的意见。

活动图片