Bank of Korea Urges Bank-Led Won Stablecoin Issuance

TheNewsCrypto发布于2026-02-23更新于2026-02-23

文章摘要

The Bank of Korea (BOK) has urged that the issuance of Korean won-pegged stablecoins should be led by commercial banks, warning that private issuance could undermine monetary policy and create foreign exchange and financial stability risks. In a report submitted to the National Assembly, the central bank described stablecoins as "currency-like substitutes" and emphasized that their rollout must consider broader economic impacts, not just industrial profits. The BOK expressed concerns that stablecoins could be used to circumvent foreign exchange regulations and stressed that non-bank issuers might conflict with Korea’s separation of banking and commerce principles. It recommended that banks, which are subject to strict regulatory standards, should be the primary issuers, with any expansion beyond banks proceeding cautiously after risk assessments. The report reflects ongoing debates among policymakers about who should be allowed to issue won stablecoins and echoes the BOK’s previous warnings on the matter. While acknowledging stablecoins' potential role in the digital asset revolution, the bank proposed structural safeguards, including a bank-focused consortium model and a statutory interagency policy body for oversight. The BOK cited the U.S. GENIUS Act as an example of cross-agency supervision. However, this bank-led approach has faced opposition from industry members, including some policymakers, who argue that clearer rules for issuers could sufficiently mitigate risks.

The central bank of South Korea has allegedly renewed its push to keep Korean won-pegged stablecoin issuance in the hands of commercial banks, alerting policymakers that privately issued digital tokens could diminish monetary policy and create new foreign-exchange and financial-stability risks.

Recently, a report was submitted to the National Assembly Strategy and Finance Committee of South Korea. The Bank of Korea (BOK) mentioned won stablecoins as “currency-like substitutes” and said their rollout must account not only for industrial profits but also for monetary policy, foreign exchange stability and financial risks, as per the report.

The central bank restated concerns that stablecoins could be used to avoid foreign exchange regulations, comprising earlier reporting needs, and claimed that permitting non-bank bodies to issue them independently could conflict with the separation of banking and commerce principles of Korea.

It also mentioned that banks, which are subject to capital, governance and compliance standards, should be allowed first, with any widening beyond banks advancing slowly after risk assessments.

The report lands as policymakers debate a postponed stablecoin framework, with one of the prominent sticking points being who should be eligible to issue won-pegged tokens and how much control banks should hold in any issuing body.

The Echo of Previous Warnings

The bank allegedly stated programmable stablecoins could back the digital asset revolution and function as payment tools, but it also floated structural safeguards, including a bank-focused consortium model and a statutory interagency policy body that could systemise approvals and supervision over regulators.

As per the reports, the Bank of Korea also quoted the GENIUS Act framework of the United States as an example of cross-agency supervision that comprises the Treasury Department, the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

The report reflects its previous warnings, which claim that banks should be heading the introduction for stablecoin issuance since they are so far subject to strict regulatory needs. Although, this approach has witnessed a repulsion from the members of the industry, including some policymakers.

The chair of the Kaia DLT Foundation, Sangmin Seo, has earlier mentioned that the argument for banks heading the stablecoin launch is short on logical foundation. Seo mentioned that setting clearer rules for issuers can reduce risks.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Arthur Hayes Reveals Portfolio Bet on Commodities and Crypto

TagsGenius ACTKoreaStablecoin

相关问答

QWhat is the Bank of Korea's main stance on who should issue won-pegged stablecoins?

AThe Bank of Korea's main stance is that the issuance of won-pegged stablecoins should be led by and kept in the hands of commercial banks.

QWhat are the three main areas of risk the BOK says stablecoin rollout must account for?

AThe three main areas of risk are monetary policy, foreign exchange stability, and financial risks.

QAccording to the BOK report, what principle could allowing non-banks to issue stablecoins conflict with?

AIt could conflict with Korea's principle of the separation of banking and commerce.

QWhich U.S. regulatory framework did the Bank of Korea cite as an example of cross-agency supervision?

AThe Bank of Korea cited the U.S. GENIUS Act framework as an example.

QWho is Sangmin Seo and what was his criticism of the bank-led stablecoin model?

ASangmin Seo is the chair of the Kaia DLT Foundation. He criticized the bank-led model, stating that the argument for banks heading the stablecoin launch is short on logical foundation and that setting clearer rules for issuers can reduce risks.

你可能也喜欢

韩国交易所“大战”监管机构,挑战执法、立法边界

韩国加密行业正与金融监管机构FIU(金融情报分析院)爆发正面冲突。过去FIU通过反洗钱法规对交易所严格处罚,但近期交易所开始通过法律诉讼和行业倡议系统性挑战其监管依据。 首尔行政法院在一审中撤销了FIU对Upbit运营公司Dunamu的部分营业停止处分,认为FIU对违规标准和处罚依据说明不足。法院强调,监管机构实施重罚必须证明交易所在明确规则下存在故意或重大过失。FIU已就此案提出上诉。同样,法院也暂停了FIU对Bithumb的六个月营业停止处分,以避免审理期间造成不可逆的损失。 在立法层面,韩国拟修订《特定金融信息法》,计划将1000万韩元以上加密资产转移一律纳入可疑交易报告范围。行业自律组织DAXA强烈反对,指出该“毒丸条款”可能违反法律保留原则,并将导致STR报告量暴增85倍,淹没真正的高风险信号,反而削弱反洗钱效率。 深层矛盾在于,韩国加密市场活跃但综合监管框架尚未成熟,目前主要依赖FIU的执法。交易所从被动接受转向通过司法和立法程序挑战监管,标志着韩国加密监管进入新阶段,监管规则本身的正当性将受到更严格审视。这场冲突短期内可能升级,但长期或有助于推动韩国建立更成熟、可持续的加密监管体系。

marsbit1小时前

韩国交易所“大战”监管机构,挑战执法、立法边界

marsbit1小时前

50倍存储后,孙宇晨永远在看下一个十年

孙宇晨以拍下巴菲特午餐、吃下天价香蕉等出位行为闻名,也面临SEC诉讼等争议,但其投资眼光常被忽略。早在2016年,他就建议年轻人投资比特币、英伟达、特斯拉等。以英伟达为例,若当时投资1万元,至2026年5月价值约240万元。 2025年底,他预言“存储是新的石油”,随后西部数据分拆的闪迪(SNDK)股价一年内大涨近50倍。当市场狂热追逐存储概念时,孙宇晨已将目光投向更具未来感的赛道:具身智能、无人机、空间计算和太空探索。 他认为,具身智能(如人形机器人)正从执行代码转向“看世界做事”,是AI在物理世界落地的关键。无人机已在军事、农业、物流等领域跑通商业闭环。空间计算(如苹果Vision Pro)旨在让AI理解物理空间,是机器人、自动驾驶等的基础。在太空领域,他本人于2025年乘坐蓝色起源飞船完成亚轨道飞行,并看好太空经济与区块链的结合。 他的投资逻辑是:押注确定性的赛道,两端布局,不赌单家公司。例如在机器人领域,既押注特斯拉(身体/制造),也押注英伟达(大脑/AI芯片);在无人机领域,看好其在军事应用中替代传统装备的趋势;在太空领域,关注即将IPO的SpaceX及其产业链。 孙宇晨将这些趋势串联起来,描绘出一幅“物理AI”改变现实世界运行方式的图景:从工厂机器人到自动驾驶,从无人机蜂群到星际探索。他认为,过去互联网改变了信息流动,而未来AI将重塑物理世界本身。

marsbit2小时前

50倍存储后,孙宇晨永远在看下一个十年

marsbit2小时前

交易

现货
合约

热门文章

什么是 $BANK

银行人工智能:银行业未来的革命性一步 介绍 在科技迅速发展的时代,银行人工智能站在人工智能(AI)和银行服务的交汇点。这个创新项目旨在重新定义金融格局,通过人工智能的力量提升运营效率、安全措施和客户体验。在我们开始探讨银行人工智能的过程中,我们将深入了解该项目的内容、运营动态、历史背景和重要里程碑。 什么是银行人工智能? 从本质上讲,银行人工智能代表了一项变革性倡议,旨在将人工智能融入各种银行运营中。该项目利用人工智能的能力自动化流程、改善风险管理协议并通过个性化服务增强客户互动。 银行人工智能的主要目标包括: 银行功能自动化:通过利用人工智能技术,银行人工智能旨在自动化日常任务,减轻人力资源的负担并提升效率。 增强风险管理:该项目利用人工智能算法预测和识别风险,从而加强对欺诈和其他威胁的安全措施。 个性化银行服务:银行人工智能专注于通过分析客户数据和行为提供量身定制的金融产品和服务。 改善客户体验:实施人工智能驱动的解决方案,如聊天机器人和虚拟助手,旨在为用户提供更人性化的互动,彻底改变客户与银行的互动方式。 凭借这些目标,银行人工智能将自己定位为一个重要参与者,使银行服务更加高效、安全和以用户为中心。 银行人工智能的创造者是谁? 关于银行人工智能创造者的详细信息仍然未知。因此,在现有信息中没有确定的个人或组织。有关项目创立的匿名性引发了各种问题,但并不削弱其雄心勃勃的愿景和目标。 银行人工智能的投资者是谁? 与项目的创造者类似,银行人工智能的投资者或支持组织的具体信息尚未披露。没有这些信息,很难概述可能推动该项目前进的资金支持和机构保障。尽管如此,拥有坚实的投资基础对于在如此创新的领域维持发展至关重要。 银行人工智能如何运作? 银行人工智能在多个创新领域运作,专注于使其与传统银行框架区分开来的独特因素。以下是关键运营特点: 自动化:通过应用机器学习算法,银行人工智能自动化银行内的各种手动流程。这降低了运营成本,使人类员工能够将精力转向更具战略性的活动。 先进的风险管理:将人工智能整合到风险管理实践中,使银行具备准确预测潜在威胁如欺诈的工具,从而确保客户信息和资产的安全。 量身定制的财务建议:通过持续学习客户互动,人工智能系统对用户需求形成细致了解,使其能够在财务决策上提供量身定制的建议。 增强客户互动:利用由人工智能驱动的聊天机器人和虚拟助手,银行人工智能使客户体验更加生动,让用户能够快速解决问题,从而减少等待时间,提高满意度。 这些运营特点共同将银行人工智能定位为银行业的先锋,为服务交付和运营卓越建立新的基准。 银行人工智能的时间线 了解银行人工智能的轨迹需要查看其历史背景。以下是突显重要里程碑和发展的时间线: 2010年代初:人工智能与银行服务的整合构思开始受到关注,银行机构认识到潜在的好处。 2018年:当银行开始使用聊天机器人等人工智能工具进行基本客户服务和风险管理系统以提高安全性时,人工智能技术的实施显著增加。 2023年:人工智能的复杂性继续提高,生成式人工智能被引入用于更复杂的任务,如文档处理和实时投资分析。今年标志着人工智能技术为银行提供的能力的重大飞跃。 2024年至今:截至今年,银行人工智能处于上升轨迹,持续的研究和开发正在进一步提升银行运营的能力。对人工智能应用的持续探索暗示着即将出现的激动人心的发展。 关于银行人工智能的关键点 人工智能在银行业的整合:银行人工智能专注于采用人工智能来简化银行流程并改善用户体验。 自动化和风险管理重点:该项目在这些领域有很强的强调,旨在减轻日常任务的负担,同时通过预测分析增强安全框架。 个性化银行解决方案:通过利用客户数据,银行人工智能能够提供符合个人用户需求的量身定制的银行服务。 对发展的承诺:银行人工智能承诺持续进行研究和开发,确保其适应性和持续的相关性,随着技术的不断发展而演变。 结论 总之,银行人工智能体现了银行业向前迈出的重要一步,通过运用人工智能来重塑操作范式、增强安全性并促进客户满意度。尽管关于创造者和投资者的信息缺如,银行人工智能清晰的目标和功能机制为其持续演变提供了坚实的基础。随着人工智能技术的不断进步并与银行业结合,银行人工智能在未来的金融服务中将对我们理解和互动银行的方式产生重大影响。

125人学过发布于 2024.04.06更新于 2024.12.03

什么是 $BANK

如何购买BANK

欢迎来到HTX.com!我们已经让购买Lorenzo Protocol(BANK)变得简单而便捷。跟随我们的逐步指南,放心开始您的加密货币之旅。第一步:创建您的HTX账户使用您的电子邮件、手机号码注册一个免费账户在HTX上。体验无忧的注册过程并解锁所有平台功能。立即注册第二步:前往买币页面,选择您的支付方式信用卡/借记卡购买:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即时购买Lorenzo Protocol(BANK)。余额购买:使用您HTX账户余额中的资金进行无缝交易。第三方购买:探索诸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方法以增加便利性。C2C购买:在HTX平台上直接与其他用户交易。HTX场外交易台(OTC)购买:为大量交易者提供个性化服务和竞争性汇率。第三步:存储您的Lorenzo Protocol(BANK)购买完您的Lorenzo Protocol(BANK)后,将其存储在您的HTX账户钱包中。您也可以通过区块链转账将其发送到其他地方或者用于交易其他加密货币。第四步:交易Lorenzo Protocol(BANK)在HTX的现货市场轻松交易Lorenzo Protocol(BANK)。访问您的账户,选择您的交易对,执行您的交易,并实时监控。HTX为初学者和经验丰富的交易者提供了友好的用户体验。

1.1k人学过发布于 2025.05.09更新于 2025.05.09

如何购买BANK

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对BANK(BANK)币价的意见。

活动图片