‘Attempts to hijack the CLARITY Act are shameful’: Trump advisor slams banks

ambcrypto发布于2026-03-11更新于2026-03-11

文章摘要

White House advisor Patrick Witt criticizes the banking lobby for opposing the pro-innovation CLARITY Act, calling attempts to turn it into an anti-competition bill "shameful." The dispute centers on stablecoin rewards, which banks argue create an uneven playing field and risk deposit flight, potentially reducing bank lending. Stablecoin issuers view restrictions as a threat to their business model and cite competition with China's digital yuan. Lawmakers propose limiting types of stablecoin reward activities as a compromise, but the bill's future remains uncertain without resolution.

The White House continues to express disappointment with the banking lobby’s hardline against the crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act.

The two industries, the crypto and banking sectors, have failed to reach an amicable agreement on stablecoin rewards. The stablecoin rewards issue has stalled the bill’s progress since early this year.

At a recent bankers’ summit in Washington, the industry maintained a hardline stance against any compromise on the bill, prompting criticism from the White House.

In response, Trump’s crypto advisor, Patrick Witt, said,

“The CLARITY Act must remain a pro-innovation piece of legislation. Attempts to hijack the legislative process and turn it into an anti-competition bill are shameful.”

Bankers’ plea

Witt’s statement followed Rob Nichols, president of the American Bankers Association, an advocacy group, who framed the current dispute as ‘anti-competitive.’

During the Washington summit, Nichols cautioned,

“Our industry welcomes competition and innovation...what we don’t support is an uneven playing field.”

Since last year, the traditional banking sector has maintained that stablecoin rewards will lead to deposit flight and harm the financial system.

The industry argues that the U.S. stablecoin law, the GENIUS Act, created a loophole that allows intermediaries to share yield with users, thereby bypassing the direct reward ban imposed on issuers.

To mitigate this, banks want the ban extended to intermediaries as well. This would mean amending the GENIUS Act or imposing the ban in the CLARITY Act.

However, stablecoin issuers view this as a threat to their business model. In fact, beyond disrupting their model, supporters view stablecoin yield as a national security issue, citing China’s push in the sector with rewards for digital yuan.

Proposed CLARITY Act compromise

Senators have tried to bring the two sides into a compromise on the issue.

During the banks’ summit, Democrat Senator for Maryland, Angela Alsobrooks, stressed that each faction will be ‘just a little bit unhappy’ but will help push for clear rules for the sector.

“We absolutely have to have these protections to prevent the deposit flight, but we’re going to probably have to make some compromises.”

Congressional Research Service (CRS) estimates that the stablecoin yield could reduce bank lending by $65 billion to $1.26 trillion, because the GENIUS Act prohibits lending of stablecoin reserves. The CRS urged banks to offer higher interest rates to depositors to remain competitive.

The compromise lawmakers have been pushing for is to narrow the types of stablecoin activity crypto platforms can allow to receive stablecoin rewards.

However, the banks’ opposition has faced a series of criticisms from the White House for the past few days. As such, the path forward for the CLARITY Act remains uncertain unless the concerned stakeholders resolve the stablecoin yield issue.


Final Summary

  • White House slammed banks for framing the CLARITY Act as an ‘anti-competition’ bill.
  • The banking industry reiterated its concerns about stablecoin yields during a recent meeting.

相关问答

QWhat is the main criticism expressed by Trump's crypto advisor, Patrick Witt, regarding the CLARITY Act?

APatrick Witt criticized attempts to hijack the legislative process and turn the CLARITY Act into an anti-competition bill, stating that such attempts are shameful and that the act must remain a pro-innovation piece of legislation.

QWhy does the banking industry oppose stablecoin rewards according to the article?

AThe banking industry opposes stablecoin rewards because they believe it will lead to deposit flight and harm the financial system, arguing that the GENIUS Act created a loophole allowing intermediaries to share yield with users, bypassing the direct reward ban on issuers.

QWhat compromise have lawmakers proposed regarding stablecoin rewards in the CLARITY Act?

ALawmakers have proposed narrowing the types of stablecoin activity that crypto platforms can allow to receive stablecoin rewards as a compromise to address concerns from both the banking and crypto sectors.

QWhat did the American Bankers Association president, Rob Nichols, say about competition during the Washington summit?

ARob Nichols stated that the banking industry welcomes competition and innovation but does not support an uneven playing field, framing the current dispute over the CLARITY Act as 'anti-competitive'.

QAccording to the Congressional Research Service (CRS), what impact could stablecoin yield have on bank lending?

AThe Congressional Research Service estimates that stablecoin yield could reduce bank lending by $65 billion to $1.26 trillion because the GENIUS Act prohibits lending of stablecoin reserves, and they urged banks to offer higher interest rates to depositors to remain competitive.

你可能也喜欢

专访Michael Saylor:我是说了要卖币,但绝不会是净卖

本文是对MicroStrategy执行主席Michael Saylor的专访摘要。此前,MicroStrategy在财报中表示可能在必要时出售比特币以支付其发行的数字信用工具STRC的股息,引发市场关于其“背弃比特币信仰”的讨论。Saylor在采访中澄清了公司的策略逻辑。 Saylor强调,公司并非成为比特币的“净卖家”。其核心商业模式是通过发行STRC等信用工具筹集资金,并立即将所得资金用于购买比特币。由于比特币长期预期年化升值约30%-40%,其增值速度远超股息支付成本(约11%)。因此,在支付股息时,即便出售部分比特币,公司整体仍会是比特币的净买家。例如,4月份公司通过STRC融资32亿美元购入比特币,而同期股息支出仅约8000-9000万美元,买入远大于卖出。 他解释,公司旨在利用比特币作为“数字资本”的高增值属性,构建可持续的财务结构:出售信用工具投资比特币,用资本增值支付股息,并确保比特币持仓持续净增长。只要比特币年增值超过2.3%(即股息成本率),该模式即可持续。Saylor预计公司未来每季度都将是比特币净买家。 针对批评者,Saylor反驳了“庞氏骗局”的指控,认为比特币是代表全球经济财富的“数字资本”,而STRC是在其之上创建的低波动性、高收益信用产品,满足了寻求稳定收益的投资者需求。 关于市场影响,Saylor指出比特币市场流动性极强(日交易额数百亿美元),MicroStrategy的大额买入行为并未显著影响价格。比特币价格主要由宏观因素驱动。 最后,Saylor表示对比特币的底层逻辑未变,并认为过去一年清晰显示,比特币的“杀手级应用”之一是作为“数字信用”的抵押品。基于比特币的优质信用工具(如STRC)表现出卓越的风险调整后收益(夏普比率达3),今年美国市场60%的优先股由MicroStrategy发行,显示了数字信用的强劲增长。 采访以Saylor童年受科幻小说激励考入MIT的轶事结束。

Odaily星球日报2分钟前

专访Michael Saylor:我是说了要卖币,但绝不会是净卖

Odaily星球日报2分钟前

专访Michael Saylor:我是说了要卖币,但绝不会是净卖

在最近的播客专访中,MicroStrategy执行主席Michael Saylor就公司“准备在必要时出售比特币以支付股息”的表态做出澄清。他强调,这一声明不代表公司会成为比特币的“净卖家”,其核心逻辑是利用比特币作为“数字资本”的增值属性来支撑业务模式。 Saylor解释称,公司通过发行数字信用工具(如STRC)筹集资金,并立即将所得用于购买比特币。由于比特币预期年化升值约30%-40%,公司可以剥离部分资本收益(约11%)作为股息支付。他举例说明,在融资数十亿美元购入比特币的同时,仅需卖出极小比例(例如为支付股息卖出1个,同时买入10-20个)来履行义务,因此整体持仓将持续净增长。关键在于“盈亏平衡率”约为2.3%,只要比特币增值或债务发行比例超过此值,公司就能在支付股息的同时不断累积比特币。 他进一步阐述,比特币的深层价值在于其作为“数字资本”已成为创建优质“数字信用”的基石。基于比特币超额抵押的STRC等工具,提供了高收益和低波动性,吸引了传统金融市场的大量资金。Saylor指出,比特币市场流动性极强,单笔数亿美元的购买难以影响价格,其主要驱动因素是宏观环境和行业基本面。 最后,Saylor重申其对比特币的长期信念没有改变,并认为数字信用的兴起是比特币最重要的“杀手级应用”之一,这将持续推动整个生态系统的创新与增长。

marsbit9分钟前

专访Michael Saylor:我是说了要卖币,但绝不会是净卖

marsbit9分钟前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片