Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

marsbit发布于2026-07-10更新于2026-07-10

文章摘要

Goldman Sachs Report: China's AI Models at an Inflection Point China's open-source/open-weight large language models (LLMs) have reached performance parity with top global proprietary models, according to a Goldman Sachs report. This is driven by architectural innovations and higher parameter efficiency, allowing Chinese models to achieve comparable capabilities at 2%-10% the parameter size and significantly lower cost. The market is evolving into a two-tiered structure: a high-end segment (e.g., GLM5.2, Qwen3.7 Max) with premium pricing and a low-end, price-sensitive segment for global SMEs and individual users. Key points: * **Cost & Performance:** Innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) enable high performance with smaller models. Projects like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained on domestic hardware, highlight progress in tech self-sufficiency. * **Open-Source Strategy:** Most Chinese players use open-source/open-weight models for flexibility and ecosystem growth. However, Goldman notes this may underreport actual deployment and revenue. A shift toward "open-weight + community license" models with revenue sharing (e.g., MiniMax) could improve monetization. * **Market Shift & Global Expansion:** Enterprise AI adoption is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI-first." International expansion, especially in non-US markets, is a major growth driver. Chinese models are increasingly available on global platforms like AWS Bedrock and Microsoft Copilot. * **Competitive...

Author: Wall Street News

China's AI large models are standing at a historic inflection point. Goldman Sachs believes that the intelligence performance of China's open-source/open-weight large models is approaching the world's top proprietary models, with rapid adoption by domestic enterprises and global SMEs, thereby creating a data flywheel effect that will further drive model iteration and upgrades.

According to Chasing Wind Trading Desk, Goldman Sachs' latest report points out that this evolutionary trajectory can be summarized as 'from DeepSeek's cost-efficiency moment last year to Zhipu GLM's model intelligence moment this year.' A team led by Goldman Sachs analyst Ronald Keung systematically evaluates four core questions in this 50-page report: how Chinese AI models achieve high performance at low cost, why the open-source path is chosen and how to monetize it, where the core addressable market lies, and who will be the long-term winners.

In assessing the competitive landscape, Goldman Sachs introduced a "competitive positioning framework" based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, and concluded accordingly that in the foundational text model field, Zhipu (initiating coverage) and DeepSeek (unlisted) have the strongest positioning; in the multimodal field, ByteDance (unlisted) leads. Goldman Sachs simultaneously maintains its Buy ratings on MiniMax and Kuaishou.

Achieving More with Less, Efficiency Wins

China's large models can achieve performance close to their US counterparts at a far lower cost, with the core lying in the dual breakthrough of architectural innovation and parameter efficiency.

The Goldman Sachs report points out that the parameter scale of Chinese open-source models generally ranges from 200 billion to 1.6 trillion, only 2% to 10% of the world's top models, mainly due to restricted access to high-end computing power. Meanwhile, innovations like the Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture and sparse attention mechanisms have reduced the actual activated parameters to only 3% to 5% of the total parameters, significantly lowering training and inference costs.

At the specific model level, DeepSeek V4 Pro has 1.6 trillion parameters, Zhipu GLM5.2 has 0.7 trillion, and MiniMax M3 has 0.4 trillion.

Goldman Sachs attributes the recent leap in coding capabilities of Chinese models to the synergistic effects of data filtering, reinforcement learning post-training, and other factors. On June 27, DeepSeek launched the speculative decoding framework DSpark, already deployed in the online services of V4-Flash and V4 Pro, which increases generation speed per user by 60% to 85% (V4-Flash) and 57% to 78% (V4 Pro) without changing model weights or output quality.

Meituan's release of LongCat 2.0 on June 30 is regarded by Goldman Sachs as a significant milestone in the self-sufficiency of China's AI infrastructure—it's China's first open-source 1.6 trillion parameter MoE model fully trained and deployed based on 50,000 domestic compute cards. Goldman Sachs believes this proves the feasibility of a localized hardware stack during the compute-intensive pre-training phase, holding profound significance for China's AI models to reduce reliance on foreign high-end chips.

A Bifurcating Market, the Strong Get Stronger

Goldman Sachs describes the Chinese AI model market as forming a "two-tier structure" and identifies two ARR-maximizing quadrants.

In the high-end market, top models represented by Zhipu GLM5.2 and Alibaba's Qwen3.7 Max are priced at about $1 per million tokens, which is 5 times that of low-end models, with estimated inference gross margins around 10% to 20%. In comparison, US top models are priced at $4 to $8 per million tokens; Chinese high-end models are only 10% to 25% of that price, yet can maintain positive gross margins thanks to a lower parameter activation ratio.

In the low-end market, models oriented for agent tasks are priced as low as $0.06 to $0.2 per million tokens, opening up markets among price-sensitive global SMEs and individual users. MiniMax derives 60% to 70% of its revenue from overseas. Notably, DeepSeek has announced the introduction of peak/off-peak pricing for the V4 series from mid-July, with peak rates twice the off-peak rate, with a blended pricing of about $0.35 (V4 Pro) and $0.12 (V4 Flash) per million tokens.

Goldman Sachs forecasts that Chinese AI model API and subscription revenue will grow from an estimated 35 billion yuan in 2026 to 879 billion yuan in 2030, corresponding to daily token consumption increasing from 35 trillion to 460 trillion, an approximately 25-fold increase.

Open-Source Strategy: Widespread Penetration, Monetization Path Awaits Upgrade

The Goldman Sachs report details the strategic logic behind the widespread adoption of open-source/open-weight routes by Chinese AI models and their monetization limitations.

The core advantages of the open-source strategy lie in deployment flexibility and community ecosystem. Alibaba's Qwen series, DeepSeek, Zhipu's GLM, and MiniMax's M3 all adopt open-source or open-weight methods, with ByteDance's Seed model being a major exception, following a fully closed-source proprietary route. The open-source model allows flexible deployment both within and outside mainland China and accelerates iteration through community feedback.

However, Goldman Sachs points out that the ARR numbers disclosed by open-source model companies likely significantly underestimate the actual deployment scale and revenue potential. Taking Zhipu as an example, its ARR target for the end of 2026 is $1 billion, but the actual global deployment volume of GLM5.2 will far exceed the token volume and revenue through Zhipu's own API channels—Alibaba Cloud's Bailian MaaS platform can directly host the open-source GLM5.2 model without paying Zhipu any fees.

Goldman Sachs expects the industry to gradually shift from pure open-source (MIT license, completely free) to an "open-weight + community license" model—where commercial use requires signing a revenue-sharing agreement with the model company. MiniMax's M series has pioneered this model. Goldman Sachs believes this transition will significantly improve the unit economics for AI model companies, as they can benefit from revenue-sharing agreements with platforms like AWS Bedrock and Alibaba Cloud Bailian without bearing the inference compute costs themselves.

From 'Token Maximization' to ROI Priority

Goldman Sachs characterizes international market expansion as the most important upside for Chinese AI models, especially in non-US markets.

Goldman Sachs' US research team estimates that by 2030, agent AI will drive a 24-fold increase in global token consumption to 12 quintillion tokens per month, with enterprise agents contributing a 55-fold growth and consumer agents contributing a 12-fold growth. In global (excluding China) markets, Chinese AI models have already achieved significant token share growth due to performance improvements and price advantages.

The Goldman Sachs report notes that the global enterprise AI usage paradigm is undergoing a fundamental shift from 'token maximization' to 'ROI priority'. The former prevailed from late 2025 to early 2026, where enterprises equated high token consumption with organizational productivity; the latter focuses more on clear task boundaries, daily active agent count, backend process automation, and actual output. Data from a Jellyfish AI engineering trends study shows that heavy AI users in enterprises consume 10 times the tokens but only increase output by 2 times.

At the channel level, Alphabet's Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform and Amazon's AWS Bedrock already offer hosting services for Chinese AI models like DeepSeek, MiniMax, Moonshot, GLM, and Qwen. According to the Wall Street Journal, Microsoft's CEO recently stated that Microsoft is considering hosting a version of DeepSeek in Copilot as an optional low-cost model, emphasizing that if DeepSeek is hosted, the model would run within Microsoft's cloud ecosystem, ensuring customer data remains within Azure.

Who Are the Long-Term Winners?

Goldman Sachs constructed a three-dimensional competitive positioning framework to evaluate each player's long-term winning probability with quantitative metrics, with the core formula being: ARR scale × gross margin advantage + financial strength.

The Pricing Power dimension examines release speed (compared to previous generation and same-level models), LMArena Arena score (based on large-scale blind user evaluations), and blended pricing level per million tokens.

The Cost Advantage dimension examines throughput (tokens per second), cache hit rate, parameter activation ratio, and inference gross margin. The Financial Strength dimension examines cash on hand, net cash as a percentage of total assets, and valuation multiples.

In the field of foundational text models, Goldman Sachs identifies Zhipu (initiating coverage, Neutral rating, target valuation $110 billion) and DeepSeek (unlisted) as having the strongest positioning, with both excelling in pricing power and cost advantage. The overall implied valuation of independent AI model companies exceeds $200 billion.

In the field of multimodal/video generation, ByteDance leads with Seedance. According to LatePost and 36Kr reports, Seedance has a gross margin as high as 70%, with an ARR run rate already exceeding $2 billion. Kuaishou's Kling and MiniMax's Hailuo/upcoming H3 models are also favored by Goldman Sachs, expected to benefit from functional breakthroughs in video generation and LLM integration and healthy pricing due to tight supply in the second half of 2026.

Goldman Sachs maintains a Buy rating on MiniMax with a target price of HK$860, citing its M3 model being in the ARR-maximizing quadrant of high token volume and attractive pricing, and its current valuation being only 13 times its ARR at the end of 2026, showing a significant discount compared to the valuation multiples of Chinese and global peers, with risk-reward skewed to the upside.

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QAccording to the Goldman Sachs report, which Chinese companies are identified as the strongest players in the foundational text model space?

AAccording to the Goldman Sachs report, Zhipu (首次覆盖) and DeepSeek (未上市) are identified as the strongest players in the foundational text model space, excelling in both pricing power and cost advantage.

QWhat key architectural and efficiency innovations have enabled Chinese AI models to achieve performance close to top global models at significantly lower costs?

AKey innovations enabling Chinese models' cost efficiency include architectural advances like Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) and sparse attention mechanisms. These innovations reduce the percentage of activated parameters during training and inference to only 3% to 5% of the total parameters, dramatically lowering costs. Chinese models also typically use smaller total parameter sizes (2% to 10% of top global models) due to constraints on accessing high-end compute.

QHow does Goldman Sachs describe the current market structure for Chinese AI models and the key characteristics of its high-end and low-end segments?

AGoldman Sachs describes the Chinese AI model market as forming a "two-tiered structure." The high-end market includes top models like Zhipu GLM5.2 and Alibaba Qwen3.7 Max, priced around $1 per million tokens (about 10-25% of US top models), with estimated inference gross margins of 10-20%. The low-end market targets price-sensitive global SMEs and individuals, with models priced as low as $0.06 to $0.2 per million tokens.

QWhat challenges and evolution paths does Goldman Sachs highlight for the open-source/ open-weight business models adopted by many Chinese AI model companies?

AGoldman Sachs notes that open-source models' reported ARR likely significantly underestimates actual deployment scale and revenue potential, as models can be hosted on third-party platforms (e.g., Alibaba Cloud Bailian) without direct payments to the model creator. The industry is expected to evolve from pure open-source (MIT license, free) towards an "open-weight + community license" model, where commercial use requires a revenue-sharing agreement. This shift, pioneered by MiniMax's M-series, is predicted to significantly improve unit economics for model companies.

QWhat is the three-dimensional competitive positioning framework used by Goldman Sachs to assess long-term winners, and which company leads in the multimodal/video generation space according to it?

AGoldman Sachs uses a three-dimensional framework evaluating: 1) Pricing Power (release speed, LMArena scores, pricing level), 2) Cost Advantage (throughput, cache hit rate, parameter activation ratio, inference gross margin), and 3) Financial Strength (cash on hand, net cash to assets ratio, valuation multiples). According to this framework, ByteDance (未上市) leads in the multimodal/video generation space with its Seedance model, reportedly boasting 70% gross margins and an ARR run-rate exceeding $2 billion.

你可能也喜欢

大模型蒸馏时代结束:Fable 5.1改写API,彻底切断蒸馏后路

轰轰烈烈的大模型蒸馏时代面临终结。2026年9月2日,Anthropic发布了Claude Fable 5.1,对API规则进行了堪称史上最严格的反蒸馏改造。 核心改动是锁定了“思考块”——即AI在输出最终答案前的内部推理过程。此前,非法蒸馏者通过在多轮对话中篡改思考块前后的上下文(如系统提示或历史消息),能诱导模型泄露其底层逻辑。Fable 5.1引入了“上下文一致性验证”:若API检测到客户端传回的思考块与原始生成它的上下文有任何不一致,将直接报错拒绝服务。对于确需修改上下文的合法开发者,系统提供“非严格模式”,但在此模式下所有思考块将被静默删除,模型将失去先前推理记忆。 Anthropic此举事出有因。过去一年,工业级规模的非法蒸馏滥用猖獗,攻击者使用海量虚假账户和自动化脚本,通过“上下文注入”等技术“催眠”模型以提取核心能力。这导致了严重的“能力与安全脱钩”:蒸馏出的小模型继承了顶尖模型的智能,却绕过了耗费巨资构建的安全护栏与价值观对齐,可能被用于生成恶意代码或危险内容,构成巨大风险。 新规将分阶段执行,首先适用于2026年8月31日后创建的新API账户,现有老账户及消费端普通用户暂不受影响。受影响的开发者需调整代码逻辑,确保上下文完全一致或使用非严格模式。Anthropic明确,该机制未来将适用于所有账户。 新规也为合法开发者带来意外好处:由于强制上下文一致性,API服务器可实现高效的提示词缓存,从而大幅降低响应延迟和调用成本。 此次更新标志着行业分水岭,依靠套取API数据“走捷径”的训练方式将被彻底堵死。

marsbit46分钟前

大模型蒸馏时代结束:Fable 5.1改写API,彻底切断蒸馏后路

marsbit46分钟前

刚刚,Claude首次证明费马大定理,清华姚班大神出手了

近日,人工智能领域取得一项突破性进展。由清华姚班毕业生、哥伦比亚大学助理教授彭天翼带领的Anthropic研究团队,利用其AI模型Claude,在11天内完成了对费马大定理的首次端到端机器验证证明。 费马大定理是一个困扰数学界超过350年的著名数论难题,直到1995年才由英国数学家安德鲁·怀尔斯给出复杂的人类证明。此次Claude的工作并非发现新证明,而是将现有证明“形式化”——即把人类可读的数学论证转化为计算机可严格验证的代码。 整个证明过程基本由AI自主完成。Claude生成了约1300万行代码,定义了超过3万条可验证定理(其中2.95万条被最终采用),消耗了约600亿Token的计算资源。其生成的代码规模是目前全球最大数学定理库Mathlib的五倍以上,并仅依赖于三条最基础的数学公理。 成功的关键在于团队开发的全新平台“Prove2Me”。该平台通过定理任务树、陈述与证明分离、自然语言索引等技术,有效协调了几十个Claude智能体进行高效、并行的协作,克服了大模型常见的“健忘”和逻辑混乱问题,使大规模形式化证明成为可能。 这一成果获得了数学界的积极评价。有专家认为,这是现代数学文献自动形式化的重要一步,未来可用于检查现有数学成果中的错误,并验证AI生成的数学结论。该技术也展示了潜力:在后续测试中,仅用3个普通账号和3天时间,就完成了另一数论定理“维诺格拉多夫三素数定理”的形式化。 研究团队强调,AI的目标并非取代数学家,而是彻底改变数学工作的方式。通过提供强大的自动验证工具,AI有望终结数学证明中长期存在的“不确定性”,让数学家能更专注于创造性的思考,并将“附带机器可验证代码”可能成为未来数学论文的新标准。 此次突破标志着AI在深层次逻辑推理和复杂系统协作方面取得了显著进展,为数学及其他科学领域的自动化验证开启了新的可能性。

marsbit49分钟前

刚刚,Claude首次证明费马大定理,清华姚班大神出手了

marsbit49分钟前

Raoul Pal:为什么传统投资组合已然失效?

Raoul Pal指出,传统投资组合(包含债券、黄金、房地产、指数基金)在当今宏观环境下已然失效。其核心原因在于,全球经济增长高度依赖债务扩张,导致货币供应量以约每年8%的速度增长,加上日常通胀,投资者需要实现年化约11%的收益率才能维持购买力不缩水。 逐一评估主流资产:债券收益固定但无法对冲货币贬值;房地产抗贬值能力已大不如前;黄金能保值但难以创造新增财富;标普500指数在过去十年超级牛市中勉强达标。真正能持续超越11%收益基准的,只有科技资产与加密资产,因其遵循用户渗透的S型增长曲线,具备长期复利潜力。 传统分散配置失效,是因为这些资产现在都受同一宏观变量(流动性)驱动,不再提供真正的风险对冲。真正的资产配置不应只看标的数量,而应将资金集中于具有长期增长潜力的赛道。对于加密资产,底层公链作为基础设施,比押注单一应用更具确定性和增长空间。未来AI智能体作为经济参与者,将催生对可编程货币和链上结算的巨大真实需求。 投资者需正视风险:避免全仓单一资产、严禁使用杠杆。建议分层布局,保留部分传统资产以求安心,配置一部分资金于高成长性资产,并长期持有。最终,跑赢11%的基准线关乎的不仅是财富数字,更是获得人生选择权和财务自由的关键。

marsbit2小时前

Raoul Pal:为什么传统投资组合已然失效?

marsbit2小时前

交易

现货

热门文章

如何购买S

欢迎来到HTX.com!我们已经让购买Sonic(S)变得简单而便捷。跟随我们的逐步指南,放心开始您的加密货币之旅。第一步:创建您的HTX账户使用您的电子邮件、手机号码注册一个免费账户在HTX上。体验无忧的注册过程并解锁所有平台功能。立即注册第二步:前往买币页面,选择您的支付方式信用卡/借记卡购买:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即时购买Sonic(S)。余额购买:使用您HTX账户余额中的资金进行无缝交易。第三方购买:探索诸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方法以增加便利性。C2C购买:在HTX平台上直接与其他用户交易。HTX场外交易台(OTC)购买:为大量交易者提供个性化服务和竞争性汇率。第三步:存储您的Sonic(S)购买完您的Sonic(S)后,将其存储在您的HTX账户钱包中。您也可以通过区块链转账将其发送到其他地方或者用于交易其他加密货币。第四步:交易Sonic(S)在HTX的现货市场轻松交易Sonic(S)。访问您的账户,选择您的交易对,执行您的交易,并实时监控。HTX为初学者和经验丰富的交易者提供了友好的用户体验。

3.9k人学过发布于 2025.01.15更新于 2026.08.06

如何购买S

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对S(S)币价的意见。

活动图片