It’s Time To Return to Crypto’s Roots – Don’t Trust, Verify

dailyhodl发布于2022-12-21更新于2022-12-21

文章摘要

Retail investors have also had their trust betrayed, as their exchange deposits now hang in the balance.

After exchanging heated tweets in a public quarrel with Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao, FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried confirmed the crypto industry’s worst fears on November 11, 2022, announcing a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy filing for FTX International, FTX US and Alameda Research.

To make matters worse, the estimated $6 billion liquidity gap that prompted the filing was largely a product of SBF’s less-than-ethical operations leveraging client deposits on his regulated CEX (centralized exchange) to fund high-risk trading on behalf of his cohorts at Alameda.

The multi-billion-dollar meltdown has left much of the crypto space in shambles, with big industry players across the space – mostly recently, Genesis Trading and BlockFi – announcing their exposure to the FTX-Alameda contagion daily.

Retail investors have also had their trust betrayed, as their exchange deposits now hang in the balance.

Harsh indeed, FTX’s foul play and subsequent death spiral have not come to pass without imparting valuable lessons, albeit expensive ones. November’s market woes have served the entire crypto community an emphatic reminder – leaving one’s core principles astray in the pursuit of profits will not yield meaningful progress, especially in the long term.

Here’s the big takeaway – nothing is trustless or decentralized unless it operates on-chain, where transparency reigns paramount, and reserves, AUM (assets under management) and community governance votes can be monitored and confirmed in real-time.

In retrospect, it was inevitable

There is no greater clarity than that provided by hindsight. Nonetheless, in an industry where the long-term viability of PoS (proof-of-stake) consensus has been debated relentlessly in the lead-up to the Ethereum merge, it is almost inconceivable that mass market platforms with opaque governance models, off-chain reserves, and near-zero community involvement accrued unrivaled brand recognition and multi-billion-dollar customer deposits.

Although the largest to date, FTX’s unconscionable insolvency is only the most recent in a year-long chain of CeFi (centralized finance) bankruptcies that have included centralized industry giants 3 Arrows Capital, Voyager Digital and Celsius Network.

That we even find ourselves in a circumstance where longstanding CEXs like Binance are releasing on-chain proof-of-reserves to the public for the first time is a sign that as a collective, we in the crypto community have truly lost the plot.

If ever there is a time (and an opportunity) for a radical recalibration of sorts, it’s now.

Don’t trust – verify

Fortunately, SBF’s billion-dollar mass market betrayal offers much wisdom to be gleaned. In full, objective verification must remain a prerequisite – or even better, a replacement – for trust.

In other words, when verification cannot be performed, trust cannot be granted. In three words, don’t trust –verify.

This is the crucial axiom crypto should have internalized long ago, and it will continue to resurface with interest every time it’s neglected.

Such is the quintessential value proposition of public key cryptography and the related cryptographic proofs that power decentralized ecosystems and empower their users. More importantly still, we must internalize that there is no substitute for on-chain verification because it encompasses every use case cryptocurrency stands to offer.

Crypto’s value proposition – revisited

Money, finance, unique artwork and even privacy tools already exist – yes, audio files and video clips too. Crypto’s decentralized ecosystems do not bring anything into the world that does not already exist.

They merely present infrastructure and a universal ruleset that level the playing field and remove the need to entrust superpowers to opaque, centralized entities. The long-term benefits of decentralized systems are certainly profound, but the pathway to realizing them is gradual, systemic and unsexy.

This is the great gift and curse of decentralized systems – that their powers are only as potent as the discernment of their users.

Taking your cryptocurrency to CeFi for yields is like taking your spouse to McDonald’s for prime cuts – at best you are buying a promise in-name-only, and one with red flags galore. Worse yet, if you hang around too long, it’s only a matter of time before you endure untenable consequences.

Decentralization in black and white

Unless decentralized systems liberate users from forced dependence on centralized entities and third parties, they serve no purpose whatsoever.

Bitcoin provides decentralized money. Ethereum provides decentralized financial tools. Monero enables decentralized private transactions. Sans decentralization, there is no value added to society at large.

CeFi and CEXs are merely legacy financial institutions that have adapted their business models to support digital native assets and instructed their marketing departments to assimilate the Web 3.0 lexicon.

Their reserve management and risk appetite are not beholden to on-chain code or community governance. And rather critically, they are not eligible for the rescue intervention and backstopping traditionally provided by central banks.

Imagine Citibank over-leveraging client funds in the 2007 subprime debt market without access to the printing press at the Federal Reserve. There would be only one inevitable outcome – insolvency and dissolution.

A call to action – getting our priorities straight

As blockchain-based ecosystems stand today, performance remains a primary hurdle to adoption, and that’s okay. That’s simply the cost of decentralization in 2022.

Compromising on the components – technical, financial or otherwise – that are responsible for decentralization renders our ecosystems no different from the imbalanced and exploitative legacy financial system we designed them to replace.

For those of us who see the bigger picture, it is our responsibility to temper our desire for mainstream media penetration and adoption with a steadfast commitment to decentralization – to replace trust with verification.

Should we be successful in this prerogative, there are no limits to the creative ingenuity and innovation this space is capable of producing.

Perhaps optimistic, I submit that it is not far-fetched that a renewed commitment to crypto’s founding principles may lead us to a renaissance of sorts in the years ahead. The exposure of FTX might just be the wake-up call the crypto community needed to realign with its original mission.

热门币种推荐

你可能也喜欢

可投可不投,我们就不投:一个 VC 穿越四个周期后的九年复盘

做了九年投资,IOSG创始人Jocy复盘发现,成功创始人各有精彩,但失败者却惊人相似。基于上百个项目经验,他总结出六类应避开的创始人画像: **创始人特质类:** 1. **情绪不稳定型**:压力下陷入情绪对抗,而非解决问题。 2. **缺乏饥饿感/有退路型**:身后有安全网,在至暗时刻难以全情投入、做出最优选择。 3. **失控的Ego型**:包括“精装修执行机器”(擅长已知最优解但缺乏应变)和“教授型创始人”(技术深但商业弱或不听建议),或有严重路径依赖。 **项目结构类:** 4. **Token优先,而非产品优先**:将代币仅视为融资工具,与核心业务价值脱离。 5. **没有清晰的资本退出策略**:融资时说不清未来里程碑与投资人回报路径。 **此外,还有一项关键定价因素:** 6. **未经历完整周期型**:未亲历完整牛熊的创始人容易低估市场压力,对其投资需谨慎并控制额度。 反过来,他们青睐的创始人具备:对问题的深度痴迷;二次创业经历与非共识远见;善于沟通且有受控的野心;坚韧的意志力与贝叶斯更新思维;以及全球化视角、主动破局能力和卓越判断力。 文章最后给出三条给创业者的保命建议:**现金流重于叙事**;**谨慎发币,因其是百万美元级的沉重负债**;**敬畏市场流动性,懂得择时**。投资机构的核心纪律是:可投可不投,就不投。穿越周期的秘密不在于神判断,而在于一次次果断按下“不投”的按钮。

Foresight News9分钟前

可投可不投,我们就不投:一个 VC 穿越四个周期后的九年复盘

Foresight News9分钟前

扎克伯格的Meta进军预测市场,推出Arena平台

预测市场正成为数字经济中增长最快的领域之一,Meta(原Facebook)计划通过一个名为Arena的独立平台进入这一赛道。该平台将由首席执行官马克·扎克伯格指定的内部团队开发,独立于Facebook、Instagram等核心产品运营。这意味着Meta将与Polymarket、Kalshi等主要预测市场平台展开直接竞争。 Arena并非Meta首次尝试预测类产品:2020年该公司曾推出预测工具应用Forecast,该应用在新冠疫情初期受到关注,但于2022年关闭。据悉,Arena初期将采用积分游戏模式,而非真实货币投注,但Meta未来可能引入变现机制,从而打开更大的市场空间。 近年来,预测市场迅速发展,用户可对选举、经济指标、体育赛事等结果进行预测,其市场化的预测方式常比传统民调或专家观点更为准确。尤其在2024年美国总统大选周期推动下,行业交易量大幅增长,今年总规模估计约达1300亿美元。这股热潮也吸引了更广泛的关注,例如特朗普媒体集团已宣布计划通过合作将预测市场整合至Truth Social平台。 Meta旗下应用拥有约35.6亿日活用户,凭借其巨大的用户基础,即使只有少量用户参与Arena,也可能极大推动预测市场的普及。对于现有平台而言,Meta的入局既加剧了竞争,也进一步验证了预测市场的商业模式。若Arena成功推出,预测市场有望从小众金融实验走向主流数字活动。

TheNewsCrypto25分钟前

扎克伯格的Meta进军预测市场,推出Arena平台

TheNewsCrypto25分钟前

SemiAnalysis 万字拆解长鑫存储:500 亿美元营收,超级周期里的 IPO

长鑫存储即将在科创板上市,有望成为中国史上最大的半导体IPO。公司成立于2016年,通过收购破产的德国DRAM厂商奇梦达的专利与技术文档起步,并吸引了包括奇梦达、美光等公司的顶尖人才。在合肥市政府“耐心资本”近十年的持续输血与产业链支持下,长鑫于2025年首次实现年度盈利。 2026年,长鑫业绩迎来爆发式增长,一季度单季营收达73亿美元,预计全年营收可能超过500亿美元。这主要得益于当前DRAM行业的“超级周期”带来的价格上涨,而非市场份额的显著提升。按产能计,长鑫已是全球第四大DRAM厂商,并正在快速逼近美光。 然而,公司在高端HBM(高带宽内存)领域面临巨大挑战。其HBM技术仍不成熟,良率远低于行业巨头,且当前将稀缺产能分配给利润率更高的大宗DRAM产品在商业上更为合理。但由于美国出口管制限制先进HBM对华销售,中国对AI算力自主可控的强烈需求可能推动长鑫未来不得不加速HBM产能布局。 此次IPO计划募资约295亿元人民币,主要用于现有DRAM产能升级与研发,并未明确提及HBM项目。其复杂的股权结构显示,国有资本合计持股超过30%,是公司的核心支持力量。分析认为,当前IPO估值可能被显著低估。随着阿里巴巴等国内核心客户兼股东的支持,长鑫在国内市场需求方面具备独特优势,但与三星、SK海力士和美光的竞争将愈发激烈。

marsbit29分钟前

SemiAnalysis 万字拆解长鑫存储:500 亿美元营收,超级周期里的 IPO

marsbit29分钟前

从Corning到Ciena,AI光通信链条里的10倍股机会

本文分析了AI数据中心背景下,光通信产业链的投资机会。随着数据传输从800G向1.6T、3.2T升级,铜缆面临物理极限,光通信因距离更远、发热更低、能耗更小成为必然选择。文章指出,最大的投资机会往往在于整个产业链中不可或缺的供应商,而非单一明星公司。 文章重点梳理了产业链关键环节的代表公司: 1. **光纤与玻璃层**:**康宁(Corning)** 作为核心供应商,凭借技术优势获得Meta、亚马逊等巨头长期大额订单,其利润增速远超收入增长,显示定价权与规模效应。 2. **互连层**:**安费诺(Amphenol)** 通过并购扩张,在AI服务器连接器市场增长强劲,利润率提升且估值相对合理。**Credo Technology** 则扮演铜缆与光通信的桥梁角色,增长迅速但客户集中度高,风险较大。 3. **系统层**:**Ciena** 是相干光学龙头,其技术能让现有光纤承载更多数据,订单积压强劲,但估值已较高。 4. **上游材料与测试**:**AXT** 提供光激光器关键材料磷化铟晶圆,具有稀缺性,但面临中国出口管制等高风险。**VEO Solutions** 作为测试设备“卖铲人”,业务不受具体技术路线影响,随着光设备需求爆发而增长。 最后,文章提及了专注于光子学的主题ETF(代码FOTO)作为一键配置选择,但提醒其成立时间短、规模尚小。总结认为,铜转光是确定趋势,投资机会将沿整条光子产业链扩散。

marsbit41分钟前

从Corning到Ciena,AI光通信链条里的10倍股机会

marsbit41分钟前

交易

现货
合约

热门文章

加密市场宏观研报:《GENIUS Act》法案取得重大进展,BTC突破历史新高,后市全新展望

2025年5月22日,比特币价格正式突破11万美元大关,创下历史新高。在政策面、宏观经济、资金面与投资者结构共同作用下,一场结构性牛市浪潮正在展开。而此轮上涨背后的核心驱动,是美国《GENIUS稳定币法案》的实质性进展以及多项利好的叠加。本文将从政策端突破、宏观环境转向、链上与ETF资金结构、交易行为演化,以及重点受益赛道五大维度,全面解析此轮BTC再创新高的深层逻辑,并前瞻下半年市场的潜在趋势。

1.7k人学过发布于 2025.05.22更新于 2025.05.22

加密市场宏观研报:《GENIUS Act》法案取得重大进展,BTC突破历史新高,后市全新展望

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对BTC(BTC)币价的意见。

活动图片