$43K BTC flipping support? Not anytime soon, according to derivative metrics

Cointelegraph发布于2022-03-23更新于2022-03-24

文章摘要

Bitcoin (BTC) showed strength on March 22, posting a 5% gain and testing the $43,000 resistance. The move liquidated over $150 million worth of leverage short positions, those betting on a declining price using futures contracts.

Bitcoin (BTC) showed strength on March 22, posting a 5% gain and testing the $43,000 resistance. The move liquidated over $150 million worth of leverage short positions, those betting on a declining price using futures contracts.
Some Twitter analysts attribute the price improvement to the Do Kwon, the co-founder of blockchain protocol Terra. During a recent Twitter Spaces conversation with analyst Udi Wertheimer, Kwon revealed his plans to back the TerraUSD stablecoin with Bitcoin.
Terra's co-founder said "the current clip that we have to buy Bitcoin is about $3 billion and will add to that," causing markets to get agitated on March 21 when some observers attributed a $125 million Tether (USDT) transaction to Kwon. 
Margin traders are still going long
Margin trading allows investors to borrow cryptocurrency to leverage their trading position, increasing returns. For example, one can buy cryptocurrencies by borrowing Tether and increasing their exposure.
On the other hand, Bitcoin borrowers can only short the cryptocurrency as they bet on its price declining. Unlike futures contracts, the balance between margin longs and shorts isn't always matched.

OKEx USDT/BTC margin lending ratio. Source: OKExThe above chart shows that traders have been borrowing more BTC recently, as the ratio decreased from 15 on March 20 to the current 7.5. Even though the data remains bullish as the indicator favors stablecoin borrowing, it reached the lowest level since March 9. Considering crypto traders are usually bullish, a margin lending ratio below 3 is deemed unfavorable. Thus, the current level remains positive, just less confident than two days ago.
Option markets did not shift recently
Currently, it's somewhat difficult to discern a direction in the market. Still, the 25% delta skew is a telling sign whenever arbitrage desks and market makers overcharge for upside or downside protection. The 25% delta skew compares similar call (buy) and put (sell) options. The metric will turn positive when fear is prevalent because the protective put options premium is higher than similar risk call options.
The skew indicator will move above 8% if traders fear a Bitcoin price crash. On the other hand, generalized excitement reflects a negative 8% skew.

Bitcoin 30-day options show 25% delta skew: Source: Laevitas.chAs displayed above, we exited the 8% "fear" mode on March 9 and entered a neutral area since then. Still, Tuesday's 5% rally was not enough to shift the options skew to a neutral-to-bullish zone.
Despite the not-so-positive indicator from Bitcoin options, these arbitrage desks and market makers will be forced to reverse bearish positions once the price breaks $45,000 and changes the current trend.
The OKX margin lending rate showed pro traders reducing their bullish bets after a 13% BTC price rally in 10 days, so derivatives data provides a slightly bearish view. For this reason, expecting a pump above $43,000 right now seems a bit too optimistic.

你可能也喜欢

万字解析:从10美元到290美元,MRVL靠「不做GPU」赢了整个AI时代

Marvell Technology(MRVL)股价从2016年不到10美元涨至2026年的290美元,涨幅达30倍,核心在于其独特定位:不做GPU,而是专注于AI时代的“连接”基础设施。 公司业务分为三块:一是光互连(光DSP),在400G以上数据中心光模块市场占约70%份额,技术护城河深;二是定制AI芯片,为Amazon等云巨头设计XPU,拥有18个项目、750亿美元潜在收入;三是以太网交换芯片与企业存储,提供稳定现金流。 CEO Matt Murphy上任后大幅改革,砍掉非核心业务,收购Inphi(光DSP)、Cavium、Celestial AI(光子织网)等公司,聚焦数据中心,并绑定大客户获得长期订单。 英伟达投资20亿美元战略入股,认可Marvell在AI互连生态的价值。市场常将Marvell视为“小Broadcom”,但两者本质不同:Marvell在光DSP是领导者,而定制芯片业务虽毛利率较低,但随规模扩大有望改善。 主要风险包括:丢失Amazon Trainium3订单、客户集中度高、毛利率天花板、英伟达既是伙伴也是潜在竞争者、内部人士减持及供应链产能压力。但公司光互连技术优势显著,结合PEG约0.6的估值,仍有增长空间。 本质上,Marvell抓住了AI基础设施从“堆算力”转向“建系统”的趋势。在AI集群规模不断扩大、数据流动需求激增的背景下,“连接”的价值日益凸显,而Marvell正处在这一核心位置。

marsbit11分钟前

万字解析:从10美元到290美元,MRVL靠「不做GPU」赢了整个AI时代

marsbit11分钟前

AI中转站引发知乎热议:便宜Token背后,用户真正担心什么?

知乎上关于“AI中转站与便宜Token”的讨论引发广泛关注,焦点从单纯的工具选择转向了深层的成本与信任问题。 用户首要担忧的是模型真实性。AI中转站被类比为“AI版黄牛”,技术门槛不高,但上游来源常不透明,存在“模型掉包”风险。由于大模型输出具有随机性,普通用户难以辨别自己是否真的在使用所付费的旗舰模型,这本质上是一种信息不对称交易。 其次,便宜Token的性价比需要理性看待。其“低价感”常源于与官方API按量价的对比,若与官方订阅套餐、国产模型或免费额度相比,未必总是最优。讨论强调用户应先明确自身需求——是偶尔使用还是高频调用,再选择合适渠道。 便宜Token的来源复杂,既可能有批量采购、缓存优化等合法路径,也可能涉及订阅拆分、地区价差套利甚至更灰色的渠道。这种混合供给导致服务稳定性和余额风险难以评估。真正的成本计算需涵盖模型真实性、服务稳定性和数据安全。 数据安全成为核心关切,尤其在AI编程、Agent和企业应用场景中。经过中转站的prompt、代码、业务文档和密钥可能面临泄露风险。对于企业,这还涉及商业秘密、数据合规与供应商审查等治理问题。 讨论形成的普遍共识是:AI中转站可用于低敏感、可替代的任务(如公开资料总结、简单测试),但不建议作为默认入口,尤其不能用于处理敏感数据或接入生产环境。实用建议包括:避免大额充值、分散风险、定期测试模型、做好数据脱敏。 这场讨论揭示,当AI能力按Token计价时,用户为节省调用费用,可能潜在地牺牲了信任与安全。随着AI更深度融入工作流,明晰请求路径、模型来源与数据流向变得至关重要。

marsbit41分钟前

AI中转站引发知乎热议:便宜Token背后,用户真正担心什么?

marsbit41分钟前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片