Advanced Metrics for DeFi Project Analysis

cryptoslate发布于2022-03-09更新于2022-03-09

文章摘要

Data is our best bet to understand the past, present, and future. 

Data is our best bet to understand the past, present, and future. 

In traditional finance, obtaining data is relatively difficult. On the other hand, the blockchain has broken barriers to data, giving everyone access to a giant ledger of information. However, the amount of available data has created another problem: Finding valuable information is complicated.

There are dozens of tools out there to help people analyze DeFi data with a variety of metrics. However, these metrics are mostly quite basic. In this article, we will introduce the most useful metrics as well as the more advanced data available on Footprint Analytics’ upcoming tool, DeFi 360,

Basic Data

  • TVL

TVL is usually the first metric people look at and it reflects the total value of all assets locked by users. TVL growth is often used to judge whether the project is in an upward trend.

 Footprint Analytics - TVL Trend
 Footprint Analytics - TVL Trend

Footprint Analytics – TVL Trend

TVL is measured in dollars. Since cryptocurrency prices change rapidly, it is difficult to see whether the rise or fall in TVL is due to the price change or the addition of more investments. Therefore, in addition to the TVL, it is also necessary to pay attention to the adjusted TVL.

For example, statistics from Footprint Analytics show that TVL in ETH of Liquity (a lending program that can only lock ETH to lend out stablecoins) is slightly down in the black frame of the chart below, while TVL in USD is increasing. This is due to the rising price of ETH, which creates the illusion that the project is on an upward trend.

 Footprint Analytics - TVL in ETH vs USD
 Footprint Analytics - TVL in ETH vs USD

Footprint Analytics – TVL in ETH vs USD

Complex projects like Aave and Yearn, which offer both lock and lend functions, complicate the use of TVL as a metric and necessitate combining it with others. 

  • Net Liquidity

Net liquidity refers to the change of inflow and outflow from the previous day or month. The changes can be further analyzed in terms of both inflow and outflow, and whether the main source is user entry or loss.

  • Revenue 

DEX-based protocols cannot be measured by TVL alone since swaps also generate revenue. The ultimate goal of these types of projects is to maximize profitability and revenue reflects their operating results.

 Footprint Analytics - Revenue
 Footprint Analytics - Revenue

Footprint Analytics – Revenue

Token Data

Most platforms issue governance tokens and some use a two-token model. Token data is somewhat reflective of the market’s acceptance of the platform.

  • Basic Information

The price is the most intuitive metric, and the rise and fall is closely related to the supply and demand in the market. The price is also the fastest metric to be affected when a significant event occurs. For example, Cream faced its second major attack on Oct. 27, losing 130 million. This caused the price of CREAM to fall off a cliff.

 Footprint Analytics - Token Price - CREAM
 Footprint Analytics - Token Price - CREAM

Footprint Analytics – Token Price – CREAM

For those issuing dual tokens such as MakerDAO and Liquity, monitoring the number of DAIs and LUSDs minted can also reflect the degree of user participation.

The market cap of a token is the multiplication of the price and the circulating supply, reflecting the market value of a project in the DeFi industry.

  • Number of Token Holders & Holding Time

The number of token holders reflects how many users approve of the platform’s token model. Especially important is the number of tokens staked to obtain governance rights, which reflects the platform’s DAO situation.

Holding time shows whether the project attracts more users who believe in the project’s long-term value versus speculators.

  • Utility

Trading volume reflects the activity of a token in the market, and its ratio to market cap is similar to the turnover rate. Higher circulation reflects a token with a higher level of attention, while lower circulation is a token with less attention.

 Footprint Analytics - MKR Volume
 Footprint Analytics - MKR Volume

Footprint Analytics – MKR Volume

The utility of the token is also worth noting, i.e. whether the token mined is staked on the platform to make use of the governance token, or deposited in other external protocols to capture revenue.

For example, 61% of Liquity’s stablecoin, LUSD, is deposited in its own platform’s Stability Pool. LUSD does not play its role as a stablecoin in circulation compared to DAI’s utility.

Advanced Metrics

  • Pool Data

All DeFi project’s TVLs are made of pools, so finding the reasons behind metrics means examining the pool structure of a given project. For example: pool sizes, TVLs, and volume changes. 

 Footprint Analytics - Pools Overview
 Footprint Analytics - Pools Overview

Footprint Analytics – Pools Overview

  • User Metrics

The project always revolves around users, and accurate capture of target users is the core of project development. Data classification and layering analysis of users can target quality users more quickly.

  • User Portrait

The overall users can be subdivided into new and active users. New users reflect market expansion, while active users reflect the project’s potential for continuing growth.

 Footprint Analytics - Address Overview
 Footprint Analytics - Address Overview

Footprint Analytics – Address Overview

The analysis of the change in transaction amount, holding amount, and duration per user enables us to understand the average user quality.

 Footprint Analytics - Active Address
 Footprint Analytics - Active Address

Footprint Analytics – Active Address

While averages can provide an observation of general trends in user behavior, it is still lacking as a foundation for project implementation. Averages often dilute important data, and a deeper user layering is required to find the real problems and develop the right action plan.

 Footprint Analytics - Trading Volume Distribution
 Footprint Analytics - Trading Volume Distribution

Footprint Analytics – Trading Volume Distribution

  • User Churn

Whales generate the most value for the platform and developers need to prevent these users from churning. By sorting users, it is possible to create user portraits and focus on big accounts.

Insight into the investment preferences of users can provide a deeper understanding of users, and uncover potential user groups by analyzing all DeFi platforms in which the target users have invested.

 Footprint Analytics - Address Investment Protocols Distribution
 Footprint Analytics - Address Investment Protocols Distribution

Footprint Analytics – Address Investment Protocols Distribution

Cross Analysis

Cross analysis refers to the comparative analysis of multiple metrics together. Analysts and developers can use it to find correlations between metrics and create business hypotheses. 

For example, if we compare APY with the number of users or with TVL, we can analyze the results to see if the increase in APY is attracting more users.

In another example, an analyst can compare the price of a project with the price of BTC to determine whether price movements are caused by changes in the project’s intrinsic value or larger market forces. 

 Footprint Analytics - Token Price (MKR vs BTC)
 Footprint Analytics - Token Price (MKR vs BTC)

Footprint Analytics – Token Price (MKR vs BTC)

The Lego attributes of DeFi should not be overlooked either, with the metrics of closely related projects often being an important factor in the movement. For example, Convex helped spur the growth of Curve’s TVL.

 Footprint Analytics - Curve VS Convex in TVL
 Footprint Analytics - Curve VS Convex in TVL

Footprint Analytics – Curve VS Convex in TVL

Summary

There are many analysis tools on the market, but they usually stop at surface-level metrics. 

For stakeholders to make data-driven decisions, it is crucial to dig deeper and apply advanced analytics to blockchain data. 

Date and Author: 09 February 2022, Simon

Data Source: Footprint Analytics

What is Footprint Analytics?

Footprint Analytics is an all-in-one analysis platform to visualize blockchain data and discover insights. It cleans and integrates on-chain data so users of any experience level can quickly start researching tokens, projects, and protocols. With over a thousand dashboard templates plus a drag-and-drop interface, anyone can build their own customized charts in minutes. Uncover blockchain data and invest smarter with Footprint.

你可能也喜欢

三年之后:回看 2023 年我对 ChatGPT 的判断

作者王健硕在2026年5月回看其于2023年3月对ChatGPT做出的二十条预测,并借助AI代理进行验证。整体看,其大方向判断多正确,但细节和程度常有偏差。 **看对的方面:** - **技术架构**:准确预测RAG(检索增强生成)将成为解决知识更新和幻觉的主流方法,以及LUI(自然语言用户界面)将催生巨大新产业。 - **发展趋势**:预见到“机器人网络”和新的agent寻址系统将出现,中国能快速做出可用大模型并缩小与顶尖差距。 - **本质认知**:正确指出ChatGPT没有意识,图灵测试仅测表象;判断其是巨大进步但非AGI,且短期内不会造成整体失业潮。 **看错或看偏的方面:** - **具体数据错误**:关于GPT-4有100T参数的传闻完全错误。 - **绝对化判断**:断言LLM“不可能”自己学好数学被后来模型在IMO夺金证伪;认为AI生成内容可“规避”版权,实则引发史上最大侵权赔偿。 - **价值与成本误判**:认为价值终落应用层,但最大赢家是算力层(如英伟达);模型成本“5-10亿封顶”的估算严重偏离实际。 - **社会影响误读**:认为ChatGPT的“加权平均”特性可能促进“世界大同”,但实际AI正走向个性化,并可能制造新信息茧房。 **总结规律:** 1. 预测机制和方向比具体数字更可靠。 2. 倾向于高估短期变化速度,低估长期影响程度。 3. 容易忽略问题内部的“分布”差异(如失业影响集中在年轻群体)。 4. 留有餘地、分层表述的判断更经得起时间检验。 5. 一些根本性争议,三年时间仍不足以给出定论。 这次复盘旨在为未来的判断立下更审慎的规矩。

marsbit5小时前

三年之后:回看 2023 年我对 ChatGPT 的判断

marsbit5小时前

三年之后:回看 2023 年我对 ChatGPT 的判断

2023年3月,在GPT-4发布前,作者王健硕对ChatGPT的未来做出了二十项预测。三年后的2026年,他使用AI agent对这些判断进行回顾验证,评估其准确性。 **主要看对的方面:** 1. **RAG成为主流**:预测通过外部检索而非修改模型来解决知识更新和幻觉问题,这已成为行业标准架构。 2. **LUI(自然语言界面)兴起**:预测自然语言交互将催生巨大新产业,Agent、MCP协议等发展印证了这一点,但LUI是与GUI共存而非取代。 3. **机器人网络与新寻址系统**:预测Agent将自动协作并需要新寻址方式,MCP、A2A等协议正朝此方向发展。 4. **中国能做出可用大模型**:预测中美模型差距会迅速缩小,事实如此,但真正领先的国内厂商与其当初点名不同。 5. **AI无意识与图灵测试本质**:核心判断“AI无意识,图灵测试仅测表象”基本成立,但“绝无意识”的绝对论断被后续研究置于灰区。 **看错或看偏的方面:** 1. **GPT-4参数数量**:所传“100T参数”严重错误,实际约为1.8T。 2. **LLM的数学能力**:诊断“数学差需外挂工具”正确,但“不可能自行学会”的结论被后续“推理模型”在IMO夺金证伪。 3. **价值捕获**:预测价值在应用层,但现实中算力层(如英伟达)捕获了最大利润,模型层反而亏损。 4. **版权问题**:判断“生成物可能无法登记版权”正确,但认为能“规避侵权”则错误,已出现巨额侵权赔偿案例。 5. **信息茧房与世界大同**:机制上AI会将观点向众数平均,但AI正快速走向“千人千面”的个性化,可能制造新茧房而非消解极化。 6. **大模型成本**:预测“局部战争”和玩家涌入正确,但“5-10亿美元封顶”的成本估算与前沿训练实际花费严重不符。 **总结规律:** 1. 判断**方向和机制**比具体数字、程度更可靠。 2. 倾向于**高估短期变化速度,低估长期能力上限**。 3. 容易忽略**问题内部的分布差异**(如总量正确但部分群体受损)。 4. **留有餘地、分层表述**的判断更经得起时间检验。 5. 一些根本性争论,**三年时间不足以给出最终答案**。 这次回顾表明,在快速变化的领域,把握大方向比追求精确预测更重要,同时需警惕绝对化表述并承认认知的局限性。

链捕手8小时前

三年之后:回看 2023 年我对 ChatGPT 的判断

链捕手8小时前

交易

现货
合约

热门文章

加密市场宏观研报:美国“加密货币周”来袭,ETH开启机构军备赛高潮

本周,加密市场迎来两股重磅催化——华盛顿“加密货币周”的立法攻势与以太坊机构布局的密集爆发,共同构成加密行业2025年下半年的“政策拐点”与“资金拐点”。这一轮加密周期的深层逻辑,正从比特币转向以太坊、稳定币及链上金融基础设施。我们认为:美国的政策明朗化+以太坊的机构化扩展,标志着加密行业正进入结构性转正阶段,市场配置的重心亦应逐步从“价格博弈”过渡至“规则+基础设施的制度红利捕捉”。

1.7k人学过发布于 2025.07.17更新于 2025.07.17

加密市场宏观研报:美国“加密货币周”来袭,ETH开启机构军备赛高潮

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对ETH(ETH)币价的意见。

活动图片