Advanced Metrics for DeFi Project Analysis

cryptoslate发布于2022-03-09更新于2022-03-09

文章摘要

Data is our best bet to understand the past, present, and future. 

Data is our best bet to understand the past, present, and future. 

In traditional finance, obtaining data is relatively difficult. On the other hand, the blockchain has broken barriers to data, giving everyone access to a giant ledger of information. However, the amount of available data has created another problem: Finding valuable information is complicated.

There are dozens of tools out there to help people analyze DeFi data with a variety of metrics. However, these metrics are mostly quite basic. In this article, we will introduce the most useful metrics as well as the more advanced data available on Footprint Analytics’ upcoming tool, DeFi 360,

Basic Data

  • TVL

TVL is usually the first metric people look at and it reflects the total value of all assets locked by users. TVL growth is often used to judge whether the project is in an upward trend.

Footprint Analytics - TVL Trend
Footprint Analytics - TVL Trend

Footprint Analytics – TVL Trend

TVL is measured in dollars. Since cryptocurrency prices change rapidly, it is difficult to see whether the rise or fall in TVL is due to the price change or the addition of more investments. Therefore, in addition to the TVL, it is also necessary to pay attention to the adjusted TVL.

For example, statistics from Footprint Analytics show that TVL in ETH of Liquity (a lending program that can only lock ETH to lend out stablecoins) is slightly down in the black frame of the chart below, while TVL in USD is increasing. This is due to the rising price of ETH, which creates the illusion that the project is on an upward trend.

Footprint Analytics - TVL in ETH vs USD
Footprint Analytics - TVL in ETH vs USD

Footprint Analytics – TVL in ETH vs USD

Complex projects like Aave and Yearn, which offer both lock and lend functions, complicate the use of TVL as a metric and necessitate combining it with others. 

  • Net Liquidity

Net liquidity refers to the change of inflow and outflow from the previous day or month. The changes can be further analyzed in terms of both inflow and outflow, and whether the main source is user entry or loss.

  • Revenue 

DEX-based protocols cannot be measured by TVL alone since swaps also generate revenue. The ultimate goal of these types of projects is to maximize profitability and revenue reflects their operating results.

Footprint Analytics - Revenue
Footprint Analytics - Revenue

Footprint Analytics – Revenue

Token Data

Most platforms issue governance tokens and some use a two-token model. Token data is somewhat reflective of the market’s acceptance of the platform.

  • Basic Information

The price is the most intuitive metric, and the rise and fall is closely related to the supply and demand in the market. The price is also the fastest metric to be affected when a significant event occurs. For example, Cream faced its second major attack on Oct. 27, losing 130 million. This caused the price of CREAM to fall off a cliff.

Footprint Analytics - Token Price - CREAM
Footprint Analytics - Token Price - CREAM

Footprint Analytics – Token Price – CREAM

For those issuing dual tokens such as MakerDAO and Liquity, monitoring the number of DAIs and LUSDs minted can also reflect the degree of user participation.

The market cap of a token is the multiplication of the price and the circulating supply, reflecting the market value of a project in the DeFi industry.

  • Number of Token Holders & Holding Time

The number of token holders reflects how many users approve of the platform’s token model. Especially important is the number of tokens staked to obtain governance rights, which reflects the platform’s DAO situation.

Holding time shows whether the project attracts more users who believe in the project’s long-term value versus speculators.

  • Utility

Trading volume reflects the activity of a token in the market, and its ratio to market cap is similar to the turnover rate. Higher circulation reflects a token with a higher level of attention, while lower circulation is a token with less attention.

Footprint Analytics - MKR Volume
Footprint Analytics - MKR Volume

Footprint Analytics – MKR Volume

The utility of the token is also worth noting, i.e. whether the token mined is staked on the platform to make use of the governance token, or deposited in other external protocols to capture revenue.

For example, 61% of Liquity’s stablecoin, LUSD, is deposited in its own platform’s Stability Pool. LUSD does not play its role as a stablecoin in circulation compared to DAI’s utility.

Advanced Metrics

  • Pool Data

All DeFi project’s TVLs are made of pools, so finding the reasons behind metrics means examining the pool structure of a given project. For example: pool sizes, TVLs, and volume changes. 

Footprint Analytics - Pools Overview
Footprint Analytics - Pools Overview

Footprint Analytics – Pools Overview

  • User Metrics

The project always revolves around users, and accurate capture of target users is the core of project development. Data classification and layering analysis of users can target quality users more quickly.

  • User Portrait

The overall users can be subdivided into new and active users. New users reflect market expansion, while active users reflect the project’s potential for continuing growth.

Footprint Analytics - Address Overview
Footprint Analytics - Address Overview

Footprint Analytics – Address Overview

The analysis of the change in transaction amount, holding amount, and duration per user enables us to understand the average user quality.

Footprint Analytics - Active Address
Footprint Analytics - Active Address

Footprint Analytics – Active Address

While averages can provide an observation of general trends in user behavior, it is still lacking as a foundation for project implementation. Averages often dilute important data, and a deeper user layering is required to find the real problems and develop the right action plan.

Footprint Analytics - Trading Volume Distribution
Footprint Analytics - Trading Volume Distribution

Footprint Analytics – Trading Volume Distribution

  • User Churn

Whales generate the most value for the platform and developers need to prevent these users from churning. By sorting users, it is possible to create user portraits and focus on big accounts.

Insight into the investment preferences of users can provide a deeper understanding of users, and uncover potential user groups by analyzing all DeFi platforms in which the target users have invested.

Footprint Analytics - Address Investment Protocols Distribution
Footprint Analytics - Address Investment Protocols Distribution

Footprint Analytics – Address Investment Protocols Distribution

Cross Analysis

Cross analysis refers to the comparative analysis of multiple metrics together. Analysts and developers can use it to find correlations between metrics and create business hypotheses. 

For example, if we compare APY with the number of users or with TVL, we can analyze the results to see if the increase in APY is attracting more users.

In another example, an analyst can compare the price of a project with the price of BTC to determine whether price movements are caused by changes in the project’s intrinsic value or larger market forces. 

Footprint Analytics - Token Price (MKR vs BTC)
Footprint Analytics - Token Price (MKR vs BTC)

Footprint Analytics – Token Price (MKR vs BTC)

The Lego attributes of DeFi should not be overlooked either, with the metrics of closely related projects often being an important factor in the movement. For example, Convex helped spur the growth of Curve’s TVL.

Footprint Analytics - Curve VS Convex in TVL
Footprint Analytics - Curve VS Convex in TVL

Footprint Analytics – Curve VS Convex in TVL

Summary

There are many analysis tools on the market, but they usually stop at surface-level metrics. 

For stakeholders to make data-driven decisions, it is crucial to dig deeper and apply advanced analytics to blockchain data. 

Date and Author: 09 February 2022, Simon

Data Source: Footprint Analytics

What is Footprint Analytics?

Footprint Analytics is an all-in-one analysis platform to visualize blockchain data and discover insights. It cleans and integrates on-chain data so users of any experience level can quickly start researching tokens, projects, and protocols. With over a thousand dashboard templates plus a drag-and-drop interface, anyone can build their own customized charts in minutes. Uncover blockchain data and invest smarter with Footprint.

热门币种推荐

你可能也喜欢

SpaceX交易权限现已开放:WEEX上线SPCXON交易对

2026年6月,SpaceX完成了史上最大规模的IPO,但大量投资者因券商限制、开户障碍和地域壁垒而无法参与。加密货币交易所WEEX推出了解决方案SPCXON/USDT现货交易对。SPCXON是一种基于Ondo代币化股票框架构建的产品,旨在为美国以外的合格交易者提供追踪SpaceX经济收益的途径,以USDT结算,交易便捷,无传统券商门槛。 SpaceX IPO定价为135美元,首日收盘接近161美元,随后一度冲高至225美元,公司估值约1.75万亿美元。看涨理由基于星链收入增长、无可匹敌的发射频率以及星舰里程碑。看跌观点则认为,其估值已达营收的90-110倍,且存在流通股稀少和即将到来的内部持股解锁等风险。 需注意,SPCXON提供的是价格敞口,而非股票所有权,不包含投票权和直接股息。其价格可能相对净资产价值出现溢价或折价,交易者需关注价差。 WEEX平台整合了包括SpaceX、MicroStrategy和Micron在内的多种代币化股权产品,用户可在统一账户内交易加密货币和股权敞口。平台还提供高达400倍杠杆的加密货币期货交易。 WEEX成立于2018年,全球用户超过620万,提供超过1200个现货交易对,并设有1000 BTC保护基金。平台亦提供跟单交易和AI工具等功能。 免责声明:本文内容不构成投资建议。

TheNewsCrypto1小时前

SpaceX交易权限现已开放:WEEX上线SPCXON交易对

TheNewsCrypto1小时前

Gate 研究院:加密金融产品掀起“华尔街化”浪潮,是竞争还是融合?

2009年比特币的创世区块暗含对传统金融体系的批判,其理想是建立去中心化、去中介、去银行的点对点金融系统。然而十七年后,比特币现货ETF获批、贝莱德等巨头发行相关产品、CME推出受监管衍生品、RWA(真实世界资产)和代币化国债市场快速增长等现象,显示传统金融正系统性地介入加密资产的发行、定价、托管和分销环节,引发了加密市场是否“华尔街化”的讨论。 文章认为,这并非单方面的吞并,而是加密体系与传统金融的双向融合与互补。加密领域提供无许可开放性、24小时交易和可编程结算,但缺乏合规通道、机构级托管和主流分销网络;传统金融则拥有牌照、信任、资金和渠道,但受限于交易时间、跨境门槛和结算效率。双方正朝彼此的核心优势靠拢。 这种融合体现为两条路径:一是以Gate为代表的加密交易所,逐步从提供代币化美股、CFD差价合约,发展到接入真实股票、港股、韩股交易,成为连接加密账户与传统券商基础设施的前端入口;二是以Robinhood为代表的传统券商,通过收购加密交易所、推出股票代币和建设自有Layer 2,将加密资产和链上代币化产品整合进其平台。两者的共同目标是争夺下一代综合金融账户的入口,让用户在一个界面内交易多种资产。 同时,RWA和链上国债作为资产层的融合正在加速。尽管规模尚小,但代币化国债等产品为链上提供了低波动收益资产,并吸引JP摩根、贝莱德等传统机构参与,测试未来资本市场的底层结算方式。 最终,加密与华尔街并非谁征服谁,而是在共同塑造一个更高效、全球化的统一资本市场。用户未来或将在同一个账户中自由交易比特币、股票、ETF、链上国债等多种资产,体验无缝的跨资产配置。去中心化的理想仍在底层协议中延续,而在应用层,一个融合了双方优势的新金融形态正在形成。

marsbit2小时前

Gate 研究院:加密金融产品掀起“华尔街化”浪潮,是竞争还是融合?

marsbit2小时前

交易

现货

热门文章

加密市场宏观研报:美国“加密货币周”来袭,ETH开启机构军备赛高潮

本周,加密市场迎来两股重磅催化——华盛顿“加密货币周”的立法攻势与以太坊机构布局的密集爆发,共同构成加密行业2025年下半年的“政策拐点”与“资金拐点”。这一轮加密周期的深层逻辑,正从比特币转向以太坊、稳定币及链上金融基础设施。我们认为:美国的政策明朗化+以太坊的机构化扩展,标志着加密行业正进入结构性转正阶段,市场配置的重心亦应逐步从“价格博弈”过渡至“规则+基础设施的制度红利捕捉”。

1.9k人学过发布于 2025.07.17更新于 2025.07.17

加密市场宏观研报:美国“加密货币周”来袭,ETH开启机构军备赛高潮

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对ETH(ETH)币价的意见。

活动图片