Solana Nearly Halted Finalization Due to an Outage

cryptonews.ru发布于2026-08-12更新于2026-08-12

文章摘要

On August 12th, a routing failure at infrastructure provider TeraSwitch caused approximately 90 Solana validators, representing 28.83% of staked SOL, to go offline simultaneously. This brought the network dangerously close to the 33.34% threshold at which transaction finality would halt, stopping the blockchain. The incident, highlighted by Marinade Finance, lasted about 33 minutes before routing was restored. The affected validators missed out on roughly 333 SOL in rewards during the downtime. The event underscored significant risks from infrastructure concentration, as TeraSwitch alone managed validators with 27.34% of the total staked SOL prior to the outage. Marinade Finance stated it would revise limits on validator distribution across autonomous systems and data centers to improve resilience. Some major operators, like Coinbase, already distribute infrastructure across multiple providers with backup servers to mitigate such single points of failure. The incident echoes a 2022 event where provider Hetzner, hosting ~40% of validators, disconnected nodes, though the network remained operational.

On August 12, due to a routing failure at infrastructure provider TeraSwitch, validators accounting for 28.83% of staked $SOL went offline simultaneously. This brought the network close to the 33.34% threshold at which it would have stopped finalizing transactions. This was reported by the Marinade Finance project team.

1/ Solana got 86% of the way to a halt this morning and it barely registered anywhere.
28.83% of staked $SOL went delinquent. Finality stops at 33.34%.
We added up the rewards lost across all 90 affected validators. 333 $SOL. pic.twitter.com/EEC2gYwQgz

— Marinade 🛡️ (@MarinadeFinance) August 12, 2026

The incident affected about 90 validators. The autonomous system TeraSwitch AS20326 accounted for 118.9 million $SOL, or 27.34% of the network's total stake. During the outage, 94% of that amount went offline simultaneously.

The critical level was ultimately not reached. Routing was restored after approximately 33 minutes, and the validators returned to the network. During the downtime, they missed out on about 333 $SOL in rewards.

Outage Highlights a Significant Problem

Marinade called the incident an example of infrastructure concentration risk. The project will review the limitations on distributing validators across autonomous systems, data centers, and backup infrastructure.

The problem existed even before this incident. As of July 22, TeraSwitch served validators with approximately 27.1% of staked Solana tokens. It was followed by UAB Cherry Servers (12.7%) and Latitude.sh (11%).

Source: Validators Solutions.

Some major operators already distribute their infrastructure across multiple providers. In its Q1 report, the Coinbase exchange stated that 13 of its validators operate via TeraSwitch, with another 10 via Latitude.

For each, the company also uses a backup server in a different location. The trading platform's team explained such a setup as necessary to limit the impact of a single provider's failure.

Recall that in November 2022, German hosting provider Hetzner turned off servers with Solana nodes. At that time, its infrastructure supported about 40% of validators with roughly 20% of the total staked coins. The network continued to operate.

In January 2026, the number of active Solana validators dropped to 800 — the lowest level since 2021. At the peak in 2023, there were over 2,500.

end-content

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QWhat happened to the Solana network on August 12th, and what was the critical threshold almost reached?

AOn August 12th, a routing failure at infrastructure provider TeraSwitch caused approximately 90 validators with 28.83% of staked $SOL to go offline simultaneously. This brought the network close to the 33.34% delinquency threshold, beyond which transaction finality would have stopped.

QWho reported the incident, and what financial impact did it have on the affected validators?

AThe incident was reported by the Marinade Finance team. The affected validators lost an estimated 333 $SOL in staking rewards during the approximately 33 minutes of downtime.

QWhat core issue within Solana's infrastructure did this incident highlight according to Marinade Finance?

AAccording to Marinade Finance, the incident highlighted the risk of infrastructure concentration. They plan to review limits on validator distribution across autonomous systems, data centers, and backup infrastructure.

QWhat was the market share of TeraSwitch in Solana staking before the incident, and who were the next largest providers?

AAs of July 22nd, TeraSwitch hosted validators with approximately 27.1% of staked Solana tokens. The next largest providers were UAB Cherry Servers (12.7%) and Latitude.sh (11%).

QHow does Coinbase mitigate the risk of a single infrastructure provider failure for its Solana validators?

ACoinbase mitigates this risk by distributing its validators across multiple providers (e.g., 13 via TeraSwitch and 10 via Latitude) and operating a backup server in a different location for each validator.

你可能也喜欢

1confirmation:5 个值得重新审视的消费级加密赛道

1confirmation回顾了加密行业中曾失败但可能重新焕发生机的五个消费级赛道。文章指出,成功往往取决于时机,而非创意的新颖性。如今基础设施和用户行为的变化,为这些领域的复兴创造了条件。 首先,互联网原生资产仍有潜力。过去如Cent推文NFT和NBA Top Shot的尝试未能完全捕捉文化时刻,而当前的RWA趋势关注现实资产上链,但创造加密原生、现实世界不存在的资产可能是更大机会。 其次,X-to-Earn模式(如STEPN、Axie Infinity)曾通过赚取而非购买加密货币吸引用户,但不可持续的经济模型是教训。未来关键在于用户赚取并愿意持有的资产价值。 第三,元宇宙概念虽因Decentraland等试图复制现实世界而受挫,但人们在线共处的需求真实存在。下一代数字体验应超越对现实世界的模仿。 第四,DAO未达预期,可能因过度关注治理。像ConstitutionDAO那样简单聚集资金实现共同目标(如购买资产、资助项目)的消费行为更值得关注。 第五,“人即市场”模式(如Friend.tech)屡屡失败,但围绕个人建立市场的需求确实存在。问题在于如何构建市场而不迫使创作者自身成为被交易的产品。 文章总结,下一款爆款应用可能源于过去失败的想法,在当今更成熟的环境中获得新生。

marsbit20分钟前

1confirmation:5 个值得重新审视的消费级加密赛道

marsbit20分钟前

交易

现货

热门文章

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对SOL(SOL)币价的意见。

活动图片