Solana Trading Halted at 86%, with 28% of Stakes Remaining Inaccessible

cryptonews.ru发布于2026-08-12更新于2026-08-12

文章摘要

On Wednesday, August 12, the Solana network came within 14% of a complete outage, narrowly avoiding a crash after 28.83% of staked $SOL fell out of consensus. The issue stemmed from a payment delay at hosting provider Teraswitch, which affected several data centers and caused nearly 90 validators to go offline. Had the unaccounted staked $SOL reached 33.34%, the network would have halted. The incident, which lasted 33 minutes, was resolved after Teraswitch engineers identified and isolated a problematic router. During the outage, validators missed approximately 333 SOL in rewards, valued around $25,600, with losses absorbed by operators, not stakers. Major validators like Helius were affected, though services like laine and Cogent Crypto recovered smoothly. This near-miss occurred just two days after Solana marked 30 months of uninterrupted uptime, a streak previously broken by a five-hour outage in February 2024. Network reliability improvements, including QUIC transport, priority fees, and the launch of the independent Firedancer client in late 2025, are designed to prevent single points of failure. Solana's status page continues to report 100% uptime for the past 90 days.

On Wednesday, August 12, the Solana network came within a step of a complete halt, approaching a crash by just 14%, after 28.83% of the $SOL staked in the network fell out of consensus.

An overdue payment on a Teraswitch server, reported by the Marinade Finance staking platform, could have ended Solana's 30-month uninterrupted uptime streak. However, the network reached only 86% of that threshold.

If the volume of unstaked $SOL in the network had reached the 33.34% mark, Solana would have crashed, and the network would have gone offline.

Why Does the Solana Network Crash?

Solana stops finalizing blocks when more than one-third (33.34%) of all $SOL tokens staked in the network become invalid. Invalidity occurs when a network validator suddenly drops out of the consensus participant list.

The network approached the 33.34% trip point, reaching 28.83%, after which the situation began to stabilize.

According to Marinade, the overdue payment affected 90 validators, who lost 333 $SOL in rewards while being offline. Ironically, with $SOL priced at $76.9 at the time of this Cryptopolitan report, the entire Solana network could have been temporarily halted due to a $25,600 anomaly.

Since the crisis was averted, Solana's official status page still shows 100% cluster uptime over the past 90 days. The last full network halt occurred on February 6, 2024, and lasted approximately five hours.

How Was the Fix Applied?

According to Teraswitch's network status page, "customers on the LON1, AMS1, AMS2, AMS3, DUB1, DUB2, FRA2, SGP1, SGP2, TYO1, TYO2, and TYO3 stations experienced loss of access to internet resources, as well as to Teraswitch's internal backbone networks between the affected stations. Other stations in North America were not affected".

The statement also says that as a response measure, the company intentionally excluded MIA1 (Miami, Florida) from the backbone network.

The incident, which Marinade said was "barely recorded anywhere," was resolved after Teraswitch engineers "identified a corrupted route within 10 minutes of its start and removed MIA1 from the backbone network to stop further propagation".

Teraswitch clarified that "the affected sites switched to their local default routes, and service was restored at 04:16:15 UTC".

Which Solana Validators Went Offline?

Out of 74 validators tested by Marinade, only three recovered without issues: laine by Solana Strategies and Cogent Crypto, as well as Lion3d.

The rest of the validator pool temporarily failed for the duration of the episode. Solana's second-largest validator, Helius, was unavailable throughout the entire 33-minute outage.

Regarding the lost 333 $SOL in rewards, Marinade stated that operators would absorb the losses, and staking participants would not bear any losses.

Solana's Uptime Streak Almost Came to an End

Just two days before this near-crash incident, Solana had been running without interruption for 30 consecutive months. Back then, the root cause was a bug in the LoadedPrograms JIT cache, which caused validators to repeatedly recompile data until consensus stalled on a single block, as reported by Solana Compass. Anza patched the bug, and the network resumed operation after five hours.

The rationale for reliability is based on three changes implemented in 2023 and 2024: the QUIC transport layer with stake-weighted quality of service to limit spam, a priority fee market which now accounts for roughly 88% of daily fee revenue, and Firedancer, an independent validator client that Jump Crypto launched on the mainnet in late 2025.

The launch of a second client means a bug in one piece of code can no longer halt the entire network.

end-content

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QWhat was the main reason the Solana network nearly experienced a complete outage on August 12?

AThe network neared a complete outage because 28.83% of the staked $SOL tokens became out of consensus due to a payment delinquency incident affecting many validators, brought on by a network anomaly at the hosting provider Teraswitch.

QWhat is the critical threshold of non-finalizing stake that would cause the Solana network to halt completely?

AThe Solana network would halt and stop finalizing blocks if more than one-third, specifically 33.34%, of all staked $SOL tokens become non-finalizing.

QHow did the hosting provider Teraswitch resolve the network anomaly that caused the incident?

ATeraswitch engineers identified a corrupted network route within 10 minutes of its start and removed the MIA1 (Miami) station from their backbone network to stop its propagation. Affected sites switched to their local default routes, restoring service.

QWhat were the consequences for the validators that went offline during this incident, and who bore the cost?

ANinety affected validators lost approximately 333 $SOL in rewards while they were offline. According to Marinade Finance, the node operators absorbed these losses, and stakers did not incur any penalties.

QAccording to the article, what key change implemented in late 2025 helps prevent a single software bug from stopping the entire Solana network?

AThe launch of Firedancer, an independent validator client from Jump Crypto, in late 2025. Having a second, independent client means a bug in one piece of code can no longer bring down the entire network.

你可能也喜欢

1confirmation:5 个值得重新审视的消费级加密赛道

1confirmation回顾了加密行业中曾失败但可能重新焕发生机的五个消费级赛道。文章指出,成功往往取决于时机,而非创意的新颖性。如今基础设施和用户行为的变化,为这些领域的复兴创造了条件。 首先,互联网原生资产仍有潜力。过去如Cent推文NFT和NBA Top Shot的尝试未能完全捕捉文化时刻,而当前的RWA趋势关注现实资产上链,但创造加密原生、现实世界不存在的资产可能是更大机会。 其次,X-to-Earn模式(如STEPN、Axie Infinity)曾通过赚取而非购买加密货币吸引用户,但不可持续的经济模型是教训。未来关键在于用户赚取并愿意持有的资产价值。 第三,元宇宙概念虽因Decentraland等试图复制现实世界而受挫,但人们在线共处的需求真实存在。下一代数字体验应超越对现实世界的模仿。 第四,DAO未达预期,可能因过度关注治理。像ConstitutionDAO那样简单聚集资金实现共同目标(如购买资产、资助项目)的消费行为更值得关注。 第五,“人即市场”模式(如Friend.tech)屡屡失败,但围绕个人建立市场的需求确实存在。问题在于如何构建市场而不迫使创作者自身成为被交易的产品。 文章总结,下一款爆款应用可能源于过去失败的想法,在当今更成熟的环境中获得新生。

marsbit20分钟前

1confirmation:5 个值得重新审视的消费级加密赛道

marsbit20分钟前

交易

现货

热门文章

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对SOL(SOL)币价的意见。

活动图片