Today, the Largest Alternative Cryptocurrency Narrowly Avoided a Catastrophe

cryptonews.ru发布于2026-08-12更新于2026-08-12

文章摘要

Today, the Solana network narrowly avoided a catastrophic halt due to a routing error that simultaneously took many validators offline. At its peak, 28.83% of staked SOL became non-transactional, bringing the network within 86% of the critical 33.34% threshold where block finalization would have stopped. While block production continued and a full network outage was averted, the incident highlighted the risk of a "finality halt." The problem originated from a misconfigured default route from a Teraswitch data center in Miami, which was propagated to centers in Europe and Asia-Pacific. This caused traffic loss in 12 locations, including London, Amsterdam, and Singapore. The issue was identified within 10 minutes, but some validators took about 33 minutes to recover fully. Analysis by Marinade Finance revealed significant infrastructure concentration risk. Approximately 118.89 million SOL (over a quarter of the total stake) is hosted within a single autonomous system (AS20326), and about 94% of it went offline during the event. Furthermore, stakes worth around 14.1 million SOL on other platforms were also affected, raising concerns that provider-based concentration metrics may underestimate true correlation risks. The incident resulted in roughly 333 SOL in missed staking rewards for the 90 impacted validators.

Today, the Solana network came close to halting transaction processing due to a routing error that simultaneously disabled multiple validators.

According to data provided by Marinade Finance, at the peak of the event, 28.83% of staked $SOL entered a 'non-transactional' state. The critical threshold for finalizing transactions on the Solana network is 33.34%. Thus, the network reached a point where it could have incurred losses related to the loss of 'finality' if approximately 19.9 million more $SOL had been deactivated.

According to Marinade Finance's post-incident analysis, the network came within about 86% of the threshold at which block finalization would have ceased. Block production continued during the event, which affected around 90 validators, and Solana's operation did not come to a complete halt. However, if the active staking level had fallen below 66.67%, the finalization of new blocks, i.e., their irreversibility, would have stopped.

Therefore, this event is significant not so much as a classic full network outage of Solana, but rather as the network approaching a critical state known as a 'finality halt.' Marinade estimated that the total staking rewards missed by the 90 affected validators amounted to approximately 333 $SOL. For some operators, the outage lasted about 33 minutes.

In Solana, the Problem Was Caused by a Routing Error in a Teraswitch Switch.

The incident was caused by a routing issue within Teraswitch infrastructure. According to the technical analysis conducted, a default route originating from the company's data center in Miami was announced without the necessary specifications. A route reflector in Amsterdam then propagated this route to other data centers in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region.

As a result, some edge routers preferred the erroneous route as a local default route, while the core network considered this route invalid. Loss of valid traffic routes was reported at a total of 12 locations, including London, Amsterdam, Dublin, Frankfurt, Singapore, and Tokyo. North American infrastructure was largely unaffected.

The problem was identified after about 10 minutes, but it took some validators around 33 minutes to return to normal operation.

Marinade's analysis also raised concerns about the risk of congestion in Solana's validation infrastructure.

According to the data provided, autonomous system AS20326 hosts approximately 118.89 million $SOL. This amount constitutes over a quarter of Solana's total staked amount, with about 94 percent of these stakes reportedly offline simultaneously during the incident.

The repercussions of the issue did not end there. Marinade noted that staked amounts totaling around 14.1 million $SOL on other platforms such as Latitude.sh, Limestone, Butterfly Research, and Allnodes were also unavailable at the same time.

The company stated that based on the available data, it is impossible to determine whether the simultaneous impact on these validators was due to reliance on shared infrastructure or if it was a coincidence. However, the incident demonstrated that concentration measurements based solely on hosting provider data may underestimate the true correlation risk.

*This is not investment advice.

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QWhat was the critical threshold for finality in the Solana network, and how close did it come to reaching that point during the incident?

AThe critical threshold for transaction finality in the Solana network is 33.34% of staked SOL becoming inactive. During the incident, the network reached approximately 86% of this threshold, meaning it came very close to losing finality.

QWhat was the root cause of the Solana network's routing incident, and which regions were most affected?

AThe root cause was a routing configuration error in Teraswitch infrastructure. An improperly specified default route from a Miami data center was propagated by a route reflector in Amsterdam, affecting traffic in 12 locations including London, Amsterdam, Dublin, Frankfurt, Singapore, and Tokyo. North American infrastructure was largely unaffected.

QHow much staking rewards were lost by the 90 affected validators during the outage, and how long did it take some operators to resume normal operations?

AThe 90 affected validators collectively lost approximately 333 SOL in staking rewards. For some operators, the downtime lasted about 33 minutes before they could return to normal operation.

QWhat concern did the Marinade Finance analysis raise regarding the concentration of Solana's staking infrastructure?

AThe analysis raised concerns that measurement based solely on hosting provider data may underestimate true correlation risk. It highlighted that Autonomous System AS20326 hosts roughly 118.89 million SOL (over a quarter of the total stake), and about 94% of that stake was offline simultaneously during the incident, showing a high concentration risk.

QDid the Solana network experience a complete halt during this incident? If not, what continued to function?

ANo, the Solana network did not experience a complete halt. Block production continued during the event. The network approached but did not cross the threshold where finalization (the irreversibility of new blocks) would have stopped.

你可能也喜欢

1confirmation:5 个值得重新审视的消费级加密赛道

1confirmation回顾了加密行业中曾失败但可能重新焕发生机的五个消费级赛道。文章指出,成功往往取决于时机,而非创意的新颖性。如今基础设施和用户行为的变化,为这些领域的复兴创造了条件。 首先,互联网原生资产仍有潜力。过去如Cent推文NFT和NBA Top Shot的尝试未能完全捕捉文化时刻,而当前的RWA趋势关注现实资产上链,但创造加密原生、现实世界不存在的资产可能是更大机会。 其次,X-to-Earn模式(如STEPN、Axie Infinity)曾通过赚取而非购买加密货币吸引用户,但不可持续的经济模型是教训。未来关键在于用户赚取并愿意持有的资产价值。 第三,元宇宙概念虽因Decentraland等试图复制现实世界而受挫,但人们在线共处的需求真实存在。下一代数字体验应超越对现实世界的模仿。 第四,DAO未达预期,可能因过度关注治理。像ConstitutionDAO那样简单聚集资金实现共同目标(如购买资产、资助项目)的消费行为更值得关注。 第五,“人即市场”模式(如Friend.tech)屡屡失败,但围绕个人建立市场的需求确实存在。问题在于如何构建市场而不迫使创作者自身成为被交易的产品。 文章总结,下一款爆款应用可能源于过去失败的想法,在当今更成熟的环境中获得新生。

marsbit20分钟前

1confirmation:5 个值得重新审视的消费级加密赛道

marsbit20分钟前

交易

现货

热门文章

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对SOL(SOL)币价的意见。

活动图片