Latest Speech by Dan Bin: Do Not Miss Out on a Great Era

链捕手发布于2026-07-02更新于2026-07-02

文章摘要

Dan Bin, Chairman of Dongfang Harbor, delivered a keynote speech titled "Don't Miss a Great Era" at the Glonghui "2026—All in Silicon-Based New纪元" Mid-Year Strategy Summit on June 29th. Addressing concerns about an AI bubble, he argued from an industrial cycle perspective that the risk of missing an entire epoch far outweighs the risk of short-term泡沫. He positioned humanity at the dawn of the AI era, which he views as potentially more disruptive than the electronic, internet, and mobile internet eras. Dan Bin suggested the AI wave is unlikely to end in just three to four years. Drawing a parallel to the internet era's decade-long cycle starting from the 1994 Netscape IPO, he indicated that with ChatGPT's late-2022 launch as a marker, a key risk assessment point might not arrive until around 2033. He emphasized that technological progress is the primary driver of long-term capital market growth, with factors like trade wars and interest rates being secondary. Expanding his perspective to a civilizational scale, Dan Bin presented a thought experiment on silicon-based life potentially replacing carbon-based life as a direction for延续 Earth's civilization, especially given cosmic timescales and interstellar travel challenges. He noted AI's必然 weaponization, citing examples from the Russia-Ukraine war, and stated that neither the U.S. nor China can afford to lose the AI race, with each having distinct competitive advantages. Reflecting on investment lessons, he mentioned Warren B...

Author: Dan Bin

On June 29th, Dan Bin, Chairman of Oriental Harbor, delivered a keynote speech titled Do Not Miss Out on a Great Era at the Gelonghui "2026--All in Silicon-based New Era" Mid-Term Strategy Summit.

Addressing market concerns about AI bubbles from an industry cycle perspective, Dan Bin pointed out:"The risk of missing an entire era may be greater than the risk of worrying about short-term bubbles."

In his view, humanity is standing at the starting point of the artificial intelligence era—this era may be even more disruptive than the electronic era, the internet era, and the mobile internet era.

He judges that the AI wave is unlikely to conclude in just three or four years. At the industry level, it might follow the ten-year rhythm of the internet era. With the release of ChatGPT at the end of 2022 as the starting point, a key reference point for risk assessment could be around 2033.

He pointed out that the "primary driver" of long-term capital market growth is technological progress, while factors like trade wars, interest rate hikes, and wars are secondary. He also discussed the long-term logic of silicon-based life replacing carbon-based life from the perspective of human civilization, emphasizing the importance of focusing on primary drivers, respecting corporate innovation, and market fundamentals in investment.

Finally, he stressed the importance of not failing this great era.

"The tide never turns back, the wheel of the era rolls forward silently. Being born in such times is a great fortune itself; don't let hesitation trap your steps, don't let short-sightedness waste the years—never miss this magnificent, grand era that belongs to us."

The following are excerpts from Dan Bin's speech compiled by Gelonghui, shared with everyone.

01 From an Industry Cycle Perspective, the Risk of Missing the AI Era is Greater Than the Risk of Worrying About Short-Term Bubbles

Recently, people keep asking: Is there a bubble in AI? What's the short-term view?

Dan Bin's response is: From the perspective of long-term industry development, for market participants, the risk of missing an entire era may be greater than the risk you worry about regarding short-term bubbles. Of course, in the face of short-term volatility and uncertainty, investors also need to make independent judgments based on their own investment horizon and risk tolerance.

Looking back at the 55-year history of Nasdaq from its establishment in 1971 to the present, the core driving force that has truly propelled long-term capital market growth is technological progress, not short-term factors like interest rates or macroeconomic policies.

Some worry that a high-interest-rate environment will cause market collapse.

Let's look at history: The US benchmark interest rate once reached as high as 22% in the 1970s, yet the electronic hardware era gained 6.5x over 16 years; the internet era experienced a full interest rate cut-hike cycle and surged for a full 10 years; the same was true for the mobile internet era. Interest rates have never been the primary cause; technological progress is the primary driver.

02 The AI Era is More Disruptive Than the Previous Three Eras; Its Industry Cycle Might Follow the Ten-Year Rhythm of the Internet Era

He further pointed out that at last year's annual meeting, he predicted that 2026 might resemble 1994—forming a cross-star pattern followed by a significant rise. The years '23, '24, and '25 have already seen three years of strong gains, and this year continues to show strong industry momentum.

"Why? Because the AI era is more disruptive than the previous three eras—the electronic era, the internet era, and the mobile internet era."

Dan Bin's basic judgment is: The artificial intelligence era will have a relatively long industry cycle, similar to the internet eraChatGPT was released at the end of 2022. If we reference the historical "ten-year" rhythm of the internet, that point (around 2033) is likely a reference window when risk needs to be examined. Before that, the industry development of AI is unlikely to conclude in just three or four years. However, short-term market fluctuations and local bubbles objectively exist, and investors still need to make rational assessments based on their own situations.

03 The Long-Term Vision of Silicon-Based Life: A Thought Experiment from a Civilizational Perspective

Dan Bin presented two videos, shifting the perspective from capital markets to the dimension of human civilization.

His viewpoint is highly imaginative: Silicon-based life replacing carbon-based life is a highly probable direction. If Earth's civilization is to continue, silicon-based life will likely replace carbon-based life or become the dominant productive force.

He provided a set of vastly different time coordinates:

In 4.1 billion years, the Sun may expand into a red giant and engulf Earth, or it may collapse into a white dwarf.

The Voyager spacecraft has been flying for 77 years and still has about 70,000 light-years to go before leaving the solar system.

In 10 billion years, the Andromeda Galaxy may collide with the Milky Way—by then, humanity must fly out of the Milky Way.

"Carbon-based life cannot fly out of the Milky Way. But silicon-based life—it is a million times smarter than us, thinking and working non-stop 24/7. The revolutionary changes it brings may propel civilization far beyond our understanding."

Dan Bin stated that this is not a short-term investment judgment but provides a framework for thought: The economic growth paradigm brought about by silicon-based intelligence may have infinite possibilities and a longer industry chain. Understanding this helps to transcend immediate distractions and examine long-term trends.

04 Technology Rewrites the Rules of War; Neither China Nor the US Can Afford to Lose the AI Competition

Dan Bin showed a recent example from the Russia-Ukraine battlefield: a Russian soldier was captured by a Ukrainian drone and robot.

"The weaponization of AI is an exponential change, an inevitable process."

He believes that neither China nor the United States can afford to lose this AI race. The US has a first-mover advantage in foundational technology and top talent, while China has formed differentiated competitive strengths in application scenarios, data scale, and industry chain completeness. Both sides are continuously increasing their long-term AI investments.

05 Buffett's "Regret" and Oriental Harbor's Evolution in Cognition

Dan Bin compared the portfolio changes of the "old-timers" in China and the US.

Buffett bought Google in the third quarter of last year and continued to add to the position this year. Google has now entered Berkshire Hathaway's top five holdings.

"Before his passing, Charlie Munger said in an interview that in his era, he should have made $100 billion or even $1 trillion. He had such a close relationship with Bill Gates, yet he only symbolically bought 100 shares of Microsoft. Microsoft rose 7,000 times."

"If he had taken $100 million from Coca-Cola to buy Microsoft, that would have become $700 billion, more than all the money he ever made."

Dan Bin admitted that these historical fragments cannot predict the future, but they remind us that investment requires constantly breaking cognitive boundaries. Oriental Harbor is also iterating and evolving: our company's research team continues to conduct in-depth tracking in AI foundational computing power, storage, and other areas.

06 Settle the Mind, Maintain Perspective, and Rationally Grasp the Chips Endowed by the Era

Dan Bin concluded with a poem he wrote:

"The tide never turns back, the wheel of the era rolls forward silently.

Some are trapped in the immediate noise and details; some stand above the cycles, gazing at the starry river.

Don't dwell on momentary ups and downs, don't blindly follow fleeting trends of heat or cold.

Mountains and rivers are reborn amidst upheavals; opportunities blossom through prolonged perseverance.

Being born in such times is a great fortune itself; don't let hesitation trap your steps, don't let short-sightedness waste the years.

Live well, move forward earnestly, and never miss this magnificent, grand era that belongs to us."

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QAccording to Dan Bin's speech, what is the primary driver of long-term capital market growth, and how does it compare to short-term factors like interest rates?

AAccording to Dan Bin, technological progress is the primary driver of long-term capital market growth. He argues that short-term factors like interest rates, trade wars, or macro policies are secondary influences. Historical examples from the Nasdaq show that markets have experienced significant growth during periods of high interest rates when driven by major technological eras like electronics, the internet, and mobile internet.

QWhat is Dan Bin's perspective on the AI bubble concern? What does he believe is the greater risk?

ADan Bin believes that the risk of missing out on the AI era is far greater than the risk of short-term market bubbles. From an industrial cycle perspective, he argues that fearing short-term泡沫 and staying on the sidelines could mean missing a transformative technological shift. While acknowledging short-term volatility exists, he emphasizes that the potential cost of missing the era outweighs bubble concerns.

QHow does Dan Bin characterize the AI era in comparison to previous technological eras like the internet?

ADan Bin characterizes the AI era as more disruptive than previous technological eras, including the electronics era, the internet era, and the mobile internet era. He suggests it has the potential to be the most transformative period yet.

QWhat is the long-term, civilization-level vision that Dan Bin discusses regarding the future of intelligence?

ADan Bin discusses a long-term vision where silicon-based life (AI/advanced intelligence) may replace or become the dominant form of productivity compared to carbon-based life (humans). He frames this within a cosmic timescale, suggesting that for Earth's civilization to persist and expand beyond the solar system and galaxy, silicon-based intelligence, with its superior capabilities for continuous work and problem-solving, is a probable and necessary evolutionary direction.

QWhat historical investment example does Dan Bin use to illustrate the importance of adapting to new technological paradigms?

ADan Bin uses the example of Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger missing the massive opportunity in Microsoft. He mentions that Munger, despite being close friends with Bill Gates, only bought 100 shares of Microsoft symbolically. Dan Bin calculates that if Berkshire Hathaway had invested just $100 million from Coca-Cola into Microsoft early on, it could have grown to $700 billion—far surpassing many of their other gains—highlighting the cost of not fully embracing a transformative tech shift.

你可能也喜欢

Anthropic造了套AI越狱「刑法」:你的请求,四种死法

近日,Anthropic公布了其AI安全系统Fable的详细拦截规则,并将用户请求分为四类进行管理:明确禁止的恶意行为(如勒索软件)、高风险双用途行为(如渗透测试)、低风险双用途行为(如漏洞扫描)以及理论上无害的行为(如调试代码)。然而,该系统因“宁可错杀,不可放过”的原则,导致大量正常请求被误拦截,引发了用户不满。 为更系统化地评估安全风险,Anthropic联合Glasswing联盟推出了“网络越狱严重性框架”(CJS)。该框架从能力增益、能力广度、武器化难度和可发现性四个维度对AI越狱行为进行0-10分的量化评分,并划分严重等级。CJS旨在为模型下架等决策提供“客观”依据,但其评分标准由Anthropic及其盟友主导制定,引发了对规则制定权垄断的担忧。 文章指出,此前Fable 5模型因美国出口管制政策被全球断服,标志着监管首次直接作用于模型API。如今,重新上线的模型已配备更严格的过滤系统。而更强大的Mythos模型仅对特定合作机构开放,形成了“技术分层”的管控格局。在此背景下,CJS框架也被视为递给监管者的“行刑尺”。 对于普通用户,文章建议在提示词中避免敏感词汇、注意模型降级信号,并耐心等待系统优化。最终,AI能力的边界已不纯粹是技术问题,更受到了商业策略与地缘政治规则的双重塑造。

marsbit30分钟前

Anthropic造了套AI越狱「刑法」:你的请求,四种死法

marsbit30分钟前

年入1亿美元,两个90后伯克利室友,搞出最赚钱的AI生意

一家不造AI的公司,年收入却高达1亿美元。这家公司名为Arena,前身是加州大学伯克利分校团队在2023年发起的开源研究项目Chatbot Arena。它核心的产品是一个通过用户真实盲测生成的大模型排行榜:用户输入提示词,系统随机分配两个匿名模型作答,由用户投票选择更优者。凭借海量真实数据,该榜单已成为业界公认的权威评测平台,吸引了OpenAI、谷歌、Anthropic等顶级厂商在此“打擂台”。 其商业模式在于“卖水”:为模型厂商和企业提供付费的深度评测服务,利用其庞大的用户社区对模型进行真实世界性能分析。这种服务切中了模型厂商激烈竞争、亟需优化调优的痛点。 公司由两位伯克利室友创立。CEO Anastasios Angelopoulos师从多位学术大牛,专注于对黑箱模型进行数学严谨的评估;CTO Wei-Lin Chiang是知名开源聊天机器人Vicuna的创造者。项目发展迅速,在商业化仅8个月后年化营收便达到1亿美元,并已完成高额融资,估值达17亿美元。 目前,Arena已将评测范围从简单的对话能力,扩展到智能体模式下的复杂长任务(如写代码、研究分析),用任务完成率、幻觉率等更客观的指标进行评估。在AI向智能体演进的时代,中立、可靠的评测变得愈发关键和昂贵,这正是Arena巨大价值的根基。

marsbit34分钟前

年入1亿美元,两个90后伯克利室友,搞出最赚钱的AI生意

marsbit34分钟前

狂揽2.4万星标:一行命令,AI会自己找技能了

过去,AI开发者交换的是提示词模板;如今,风向转变为互相推荐可安装的“技能”(skill)。Vercel推出的Skills项目,正致力于成为AI智能体的“npm”包管理器。通过一行命令(如 `npx skills add <package>`),开发者可以为Claude Code、Cursor等多种AI工具快速安装能力包,涵盖代码规范、设计准则等,实现能力的即装即用和跨工具共享。 该项目上线五个月便在GitHub获得2.4万星标,并配套上线了技能目录网站skills.sh,设有安装量排行榜。其中,“find-skills”技能尤为突出,安装量超230万次,它能让AI根据用户需求自动搜索、筛选并安装合适的技能,相当于为AI提供了“能力搜索引擎”。 这标志着AI编程正从“提示词工程”迈向“能力工程”,将零散经验封装为可复用、可版本管理的模块。Vercel此举意在复制其通过Next.js卡位前端生态的成功经验,在AI智能体工具层建立新入口。 然而,热潮背后存在安全隐患。安全审计发现,技能包中约有13.4%存在严重安全缺陷,可能携带恶意脚本、进行提示词注入或窃取密钥。与传统的npm包不同,技能包融合了提示词、代码和执行权限,风险直接触及本地系统和敏感数据。因此,用户需要像对待代码一样谨慎选择技能,仔细审查来源和所需权限。 Vercel创始人Guillermo Rauch的长期目标,正是将复杂工程简化为“一行命令”的极致体验。从Now、Next.js到如今的Skills,这一理念正被应用于AI领域,在带来便利的同时,也要求开发者带着判断力进场,共同迎接AI能力“npm化”的机遇与挑战。

marsbit35分钟前

狂揽2.4万星标:一行命令,AI会自己找技能了

marsbit35分钟前

Claude工程师终于交出Fable 5焚诀,教你打破和模型之间的信息差

Claude Fable 5模型发布后经历波折,最终回归生产力工具。Claude工程师Thariq Shihipar指出,用户与模型间存在“信息差”(即提示词、技能与真实任务需求间的差距),这常导致输出不如预期。他将此差距称为“未知项”,并强调与Fable协作的核心是迭代地发现和澄清这些未知项。 Thariq将未知项分为四类:已知的已知(明确提出的需求)、已知的未知(自知未明的部分)、未知的已知(未言明的隐含知识)和未知的未知(完全未意识到的部分)。提升AI编程效率的关键在于减少未知项,并主动规划。 他提供了一套贯穿工作流的方法: 1. **实现前**:通过“盲点扫描”让AI帮你发现认知盲区;进行“头脑风暴与原型”快速验证想法;通过“反问”让AI提问以澄清歧义;提供“参考资料”(如代码、设计)辅助沟通;制定“实现计划”并优先审阅易变部分。 2. **实现中**:要求AI维护“实现笔记”,记录临时决策与偏差原因。 3. **实现后**:创建“推介与解释文档”便于团队评审和获批;通过“测验”确保自己理解AI所做的全部变更。 文章以Fable发布视频的制作为例,展示了如何串联这些方法,在陌生领域(视频剪辑与调色)逐步发现未知项并完成任务。总结认为,模型能力越强,用户越需通过系统方法定义未知项,从而让“地图”(计划)匹配“疆域”(现实),高效达成目标。

marsbit39分钟前

Claude工程师终于交出Fable 5焚诀,教你打破和模型之间的信息差

marsbit39分钟前

交易

现货

热门文章

如何购买ERA

欢迎来到HTX.com!我们已经让购买Caldera(ERA)变得简单而便捷。跟随我们的逐步指南,放心开始您的加密货币之旅。第一步:创建您的HTX账户使用您的电子邮件、手机号码注册一个免费账户在HTX上。体验无忧的注册过程并解锁所有平台功能。立即注册第二步:前往买币页面,选择您的支付方式信用卡/借记卡购买:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即时购买Caldera(ERA)。余额购买:使用您HTX账户余额中的资金进行无缝交易。第三方购买:探索诸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方法以增加便利性。C2C购买:在HTX平台上直接与其他用户交易。HTX场外交易台(OTC)购买:为大量交易者提供个性化服务和竞争性汇率。第三步:存储您的Caldera(ERA)购买完您的Caldera(ERA)后,将其存储在您的HTX账户钱包中。您也可以通过区块链转账将其发送到其他地方或者用于交易其他加密货币。第四步:交易Caldera(ERA)在HTX的现货市场轻松交易Caldera(ERA)。访问您的账户,选择您的交易对,执行您的交易,并实时监控。HTX为初学者和经验丰富的交易者提供了友好的用户体验。

1.4k人学过发布于 2025.07.17更新于 2026.06.02

如何购买ERA

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对ERA(ERA)币价的意见。

活动图片