Mining Companies' High-Stakes Bet on AI: Valuations Enter a Phase of Divergence, Uphill Battle Ahead

marsbit发布于2026-06-20更新于2026-06-20

文章摘要

Crypto miners are facing increasing pressure amid weak digital asset markets, pushing many to pivot towards AI infrastructure as a new growth avenue. Leveraging existing assets like power resources, land, and cooling systems, miners can convert facilities for AI compute at lower costs. This transition narrative has fueled significant stock rallies, with some miners' shares outperforming Bitcoin year-to-date. Market valuations have diverged, with pioneers like CoreWeave reaching a multi-billion dollar valuation, while others lag. The shift is driven by AI's explosive demand for data centers and compute, with clients willing to pay premiums for power and space. However, the transformation is capital-intensive, requiring massive funding for GPU procurement and facility upgrades, with an estimated short-term funding gap of $50 billion. Miners are raising capital through convertible bonds, Bitcoin sales, and securing long-term AI contracts to finance the build-out. While AI offers greater long-term potential than mining, success hinges on execution, timely project delivery, and securing quality tenants, moving the valuation focus from power capacity to cash flow and return metrics.

Author: Nancy, PANews

As crypto assets continue to experience weakness and decline, crypto mining companies are facing increasingly severe survival pressures. In search of new growth avenues, more and more mining companies are accelerating their shift into the AI arena. This transformation narrative has quickly gained favor in the capital markets, leading to significant stock price increases for many mining firms, with some even reaching new all-time highs.

However, while the AI business injects new growth potential into mining companies, the massive capital expenditures, ongoing funding requirements, and lengthy return cycles behind it are pushing these firms into another battle of capital consumption. At a time when the profitability of mining operations remains under pressure, this high-stakes gamble of transitioning to AI is testing the financial strength and execution capabilities of mining enterprises.

Stock Prices Outperform Bitcoin Significantly, Mining Companies' Valuations Enter a Divergence Phase

Mining companies are transforming into landlords of computing power in the AI era.

With the profit margins for Bitcoin mining continuously narrowing and some mining companies even falling into losses, the AI boom has fueled a sharp surge in global demand for data centers, power resources, and GPU computing power. An increasing number of mining companies are accelerating their pivot towards AI infrastructure, seeking new growth curves.

For mining companies, this transition offers inherent advantages. Over the years, to meet the demands of large-scale mining, they have amassed critical assets such as abundant power resources, land reserves, substation access capabilities, and mature cooling and heat dissipation systems. Compared to data center operators starting from scratch, mining companies only need to upgrade and retrofit their existing facilities to quickly enter the AI infrastructure market, catering to AI computing power demands at a lower cost and with a shorter cycle.

Since last year, the pace of mining companies transitioning to AI has noticeably accelerated. Some miners have decisively scaled back or even exited traditional mining operations, fully shifting to AI computing and data center operations; others have retained part of their mining business but are gradually reallocating resources and capital expenditure focus towards the AI sector. Today, several mining companies have grown into significant players in AI infrastructure construction.

Looking at the timing of transition, CoreWeave, Applied Digital, and Bitdeer began laying out AI computing and data center businesses as early as 2022-2023, among the earlier movers in the industry; while mining firms like Iris Energy, Terawulf, Hut 8, Riot Platforms, and Bitfarms began to fully ramp up AI infrastructure construction in 2025, coinciding with the AI industry's rapid expansion cycle.

In terms of stock performance, the market has shown considerable recognition for the AI transition narrative of mining companies. The 11 mining companies have seen an average year-to-date gain of 75.97%, significantly outperforming Bitcoin over the same period, with most hitting new highs after their transition. Among them, Bitfarms (129.62%), Hut 8 (131.87%), Terawulf (118.68%), and Riot Platforms (93.71%) have been particularly standout performers, benefiting from this wave of AI infrastructure revaluation.

In terms of market capitalization, mining companies have shown clear divergence. As a representative of successful transition, CoreWeave's market cap has reached $62.855 billion, far exceeding other miners and setting a new valuation benchmark for the industry; Iris Energy, Terawulf, Hut 8, Applied Digital, and Riot Platforms form a tier with market caps between $10 billion and $20 billion; companies like MARA Holdings, Core Scientific, Bitdeer, CleanSpark, and Bitfarms remain in the sub-$5 billion range. This divergence stems not only from first-mover advantages but also reflects the market's differentiated pricing based on each mining company's AI strategy execution capabilities, client resources, and data center deployment progress.

However, from a fundamental perspective, most mining companies are still in the heavy investment phase of their AI transition. Although the latest quarterly earnings reports of many miners show revenue growth, overall profitability remains under pressure. On one hand, volatility in the value of crypto asset portfolios weighs on profit performance; on the other hand, the construction of AI data centers requires massive capital expenditures, with costs for power expansion, infrastructure development, and procurement of equipment like GPUs continuously increasing, driving up operating costs and leaving most mining companies yet to escape a loss-making state.

It is noteworthy that despite generally pressured earnings performance, the stock prices of related mining companies have still risen significantly, indicating that the current market focus is not on short-term profitability but rather on the growth potential of mining companies as operators of next-generation computing power infrastructure.

Mining Companies' Survival Battle Escalates, AI Transition Requires Overcoming Multiple Hurdles

The downturn in the Bitcoin market is making the survival environment for mining companies increasingly severe.

Data from Capriole Investments shows that as of June 18, the average production cost for Bitcoin is approximately $63,707, with power costs around $50,965, resulting in a miner profit margin of only 17.45%. Over the past 30 days, miner profit margins have contracted by 47.8%. Meanwhile, data from the Luxor Hashrate Index also shows that as of June 18, the daily revenue per 1 TH/s of hashrate has dropped to $0.032, a significant decline from $0.053 during the same period last year.

As mining revenues continue to shrink, many mining companies have had to sell Bitcoin to maintain cash flow, further increasing survival pressure on small and medium-sized miners, and mining resources are accelerating their concentration towards top players. Currently, the three major mining pools—Foundry USA, AntPool, and F2Pool—collectively account for 59% of the global network's hashrate share. In comparison, in 2022, the top three Bitcoin mining pools collectively accounted for only 44% of the hashrate share.

Although traditional mining operations are struggling, the explosive growth in demand for AI data centers is also driving a market re-evaluation of mining companies' value. VanEck points out in its latest research report that the most valuable assets of mining companies are not their mining rigs, but rather their power resources, substation access capabilities, land reserves, and data center infrastructure—precisely the scarce core resources most needed by the current AI industry. Because AI clients are willing to pay electricity and rental rates far higher than those of traditional mining operations, AI infrastructure is expected to become the primary growth engine for mining companies over the next decade.

According to a report from research firm Bernstein, hyperscale cloud providers, AI cloud service providers, and chip companies have announced over $90 billion in AI infrastructure partnerships, involving approximately 3.7 GW of power capacity. Currently, the pursuit of power resources has become the core of AI infrastructure competition, with Bitcoin mining companies collectively controlling over 27 GW of planned power capacity. In some parts of the United States, the cycle for securing new 1 GW power connections can be as long as 50 months, making existing mining sites important landing spots for AI data center expansion.

However, the transition to AI is far from an easy path. VanEck states that the market is still in the early stages of the AI transition, with enterprise valuations primarily measured based on Gross Energized Power. Mining companies that have signed AI leases generally receive higher valuation premiums, while projects still in the planning stage struggle to gain market recognition. Future industry valuation logic will gradually shift from "power capacity" to "project delivery capability," eventually returning to core metrics such as cash flow, return on capital, and tenant quality. Currently, the industry has only delivered about 25% of its signed capacity. The ability to complete AI data center construction on time and within budget will become a key factor determining enterprise valuation.

VanEck also emphasizes that AI tenant quality will directly impact the valuation levels of mining companies. Clients like Microsoft, Amazon, and Google—hyperscale cloud providers—can bring more stable cash flows and lower financing costs, while smaller GPU cloud service providers correspond to higher operational risks and capital costs.

Meanwhile, the enormous funding required for the transition is testing the financial strength of mining companies. VanEck estimates that mining companies transitioning to AI infrastructure still face massive capital expenditure needs, with a short-term funding gap of approximately $50 billion and long-term capital requirements potentially reaching $221 billion.

Under immense financial pressure, many mining companies have begun raising funds through various methods. For instance, miners like Iris Energy, TeraWulf, Bitfarms, and CleanSpark have raised capital through issuing convertible bonds, attracting investors with low coupon rates and future conversion potential; while companies like Core Scientific, Terawulf, MARA, Bitdeer, and Riot Platforms have chosen to sell off or even liquidate part of their Bitcoin reserves to continually fuel their AI transitions.

Additionally, many mining companies are beginning to secure future revenue by signing long-term AI or high-performance computing (HPC) contracts, thereby obtaining project financing support and reducing overall operational risks. For example, CoreWeave reached a $6 billion AI cloud services cooperation agreement with Jane Street; IREN secured a $9.7 billion AI cloud computing contract with Microsoft; Hut 8 signed data center leasing agreements totaling $9.8 billion; and Bitdeer is collaborating with Norway's DCI to build the country's largest AI data center project.

For mining companies, AI currently offers a development path with far greater imagination space than traditional mining operations. However, this transition is not a simple switch from mining to selling computing power; it is essentially a long-term competition centered on capital, resources, and execution capabilities.

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QWhat are the main challenges cryptocurrency mining companies face when transitioning to the AI infrastructure sector?

AThe main challenges include significant capital expenditures, continuous financial investment, prolonged return periods, intense competition for capital, resources, and execution capabilities, and the need to transition from a valuation based on 'power capacity' to 'project delivery capability' and ultimately to core financial metrics such as cash flow and capital returns.

QWhy are cryptocurrency mining companies considered to have natural advantages in transitioning to AI infrastructure?

AMining companies possess key assets like extensive power resources, land reserves, substation access capabilities, and mature cooling systems built for large-scale mining operations. This allows them to upgrade existing facilities to enter the AI infrastructure market more quickly and at a lower cost compared to starting from scratch.

QHow has the stock market performance of mining companies transitioning to AI compared to Bitcoin's performance?

AThe stock prices of mining companies transitioning to AI have significantly outperformed Bitcoin. The average year-to-date increase for 11 such companies was 75.97%, far exceeding Bitcoin's performance during the same period. Many saw their stock prices reach new highs following their AI transition announcements.

QAccording to the article, what is the new basis for valuing mining companies that are pivoting to AI, and how might this evolve?

ACurrently, valuation is primarily based on 'Gross Energized Power.' However, it is expected to shift towards 'project delivery capability' and eventually return to core financial indicators like cash flow, return on capital, and the quality of AI tenants or clients secured by the company.

QWhat methods are mining companies using to finance their expensive transition into AI infrastructure?

AMining companies are raising funds through various methods, including issuing convertible bonds (e.g., Iris Energy, TeraWulf), selling or liquidating part of their Bitcoin reserves (e.g., Core Scientific, Riot Platforms), and securing large, long-term contracts with AI or HPC clients (e.g., CoreWeave, Hut 8) to lock in future revenue and facilitate project financing.

你可能也喜欢

谷歌AI人才接连流失,是压力测试还是“讣告”前奏?

谷歌接连失去三位顶级AI人才:工程副总裁、Transformer架构提出者之一Noam Shazeer加入OpenAI;DeepMind副总裁、AlphaFold核心人物John Jumper加入Anthropic;对话式AI先驱Daniel De Freitas的动向也引人关注。这些流失触及了Transformer、对话式AI和科学AI等关键领域,引发市场对谷歌竞争力的担忧。 然而,将此事视为谷歌的“讣告”可能为时过早。这更应被看作一次压力测试。人才流失本身反映了谷歌仍是AI顶级人才的核心储备库,正因其重要才成为竞争对手IPO前夜的重点挖掘对象。 谷歌的优势在于其远超单一模型的“全栈”能力:拥有自研TPU、云基础设施、Gemini等模型矩阵,以及搜索、YouTube、安卓等覆盖数十亿用户的终端产品,构成了强大的集成生态和分发网络。此外,谷歌通过巨额投资和云服务与Anthropic等对手形成深度绑定,在“AI淘金热”中同时扮演“掘金者”和“卖水人”的角色。 尽管面临创新者困境,核心搜索业务转型挑战以及大公司决策迟缓等问题,但谷歌正通过积极整合Gemini、重塑搜索体验、战略性收购(如Character.AI)等方式应对。AI竞赛是长期游戏,谷歌凭借其技术栈、资源与生态,仍是少数有能力在多层面参与竞争的公司。当前的动荡是一次严峻考验,但并非终局。

marsbit2小时前

谷歌AI人才接连流失,是压力测试还是“讣告”前奏?

marsbit2小时前

交易

现货
合约

热门文章

加密市场宏观研报:原油飓风、AI巨浪与比特币的十字路口

全球金融市场正经历一场由地缘冲突引发的系统性重估:霍尔木兹海峡封锁导致原油一度暴涨30%,G7紧急释放储备后涨幅收窄,滞胀风险取代通胀成为核心担忧,美元成为“唯一避风港”并逼近100大关,亚太及美股遭遇“黑色星期一”全线重挫;AI领域则冰火两重天,国家发改委提出“十五五”末10万亿规模目标,OpenClaw项目火爆推动概念股狂飙;比特币在宏观风暴中跌破70000美元关键防线。

591人学过发布于 2026.03.12更新于 2026.03.12

加密市场宏观研报:原油飓风、AI巨浪与比特币的十字路口

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对AI(AI)币价的意见。

活动图片