A $300 Used Mining Rig Mined a $230,000 Bitcoin Block

marsbit发布于2026-06-02更新于2026-06-02

文章摘要

A $300 used desktop Bitcoin miner, the Avalon Nano 3S, defied astronomical odds—roughly 1 in 149 million—by solo mining a block worth approximately $232,000 in May 2026. This occurred amidst a mining landscape dominated by industrial-scale operations with exahash-level computing power, where the tiny miner's share of the global network hash rate was a minuscule 0.00000067%. The miner achieved this not by connecting directly to the Bitcoin network, but through a solo mining pool service like Braiins Solo, which handles technical logistics while allowing individual miners to claim the full block reward if their machine succeeds. The event highlights the extreme lottery-like nature of solo mining today, where the expected return for most participants is deeply negative. However, it also demonstrates that Bitcoin's original Proof-of-Work design principle—where any participant, regardless of size, has a non-zero chance to validate a block and earn the reward—remains technically intact. This preserves a symbolic, though highly improbable, "back door" for individual miners in an era otherwise defined by centralized industrial mining power.

Author: Hashrate Insights

A $300 desktop mining rig, quiet enough to sit directly on a desk.

But on the afternoon of May 30, it suddenly mined a Bitcoin block worth $230,000.

The odds were 1 in 149 million, on par with winning the lottery jackpot.

Yet, when major mining pools dominate the hashrate, this exception precisely proves that Satoshi Nakamoto's design is still alive.

I. A Hand Warmer That Mined $230,000

At 4:27 PM Eastern Time on May 30, 2026, Bitcoin block height 951,771 was mined by an unknown address.

The block reward was 3.1404 Bitcoin, worth approximately $232,000 at the time.

The machine that mined it was a Canaan Avalon Nano 3S, with a hashrate of 6.68 TH/s, power consumption of 140 watts, and a retail price of $250 to $300.

It's so small it can fit in a desk drawer, and its noise level is similar to a desktop computer.

Many people buy it for fun, turning it on in winter to both mine a bit of coin and warm their hands, earning it the nickname "Bitcoin hand warmer" in the industry.

But the winning miner didn't actually have just one machine.

He had a "small fleet": 2 Avalon Mini 3s plus 12 Avalon Nano 3S units, with a total hashrate of about 147 TH/s.

Based on this total hashrate, the expected winning cycle for his entire fleet should have been 127 years.

Who could have imagined winning now, and the winner being that most unremarkable single machine with 6.68 TH/s?

That single machine, accounting for only about 4.5% of the fleet's total hashrate, carried away 100% of the reward.

It's like someone holding a handful of lottery tickets, and the winning one turns out to be the one they casually gave to someone on the street.

But how can a little toy on a desk outperform industrial mining farms?

II. Facing an Aircraft Carrier

First, it must be clarified that this event made the news precisely because it's almost impossible to happen.

Because Bitcoin mining in 2026 is long past the era of "playable with a single computer."

The hashrate battlefield today consists of warehouses, hydropower stations, and massive mining farms sprawling across the deserts of Texas.

Industrial-grade mining rigs start at 200 TH/s per unit, and a large mining farm can easily stack 100 EH/s (EH is one million times TH).

The total network hashrate is currently about 1,000 EH/s.

That $300 small machine accounted for only about 0.00000067% of the total network hashrate.

In contrast, publicly listed companies directly dwarf it, with Bitdeer's self-mining hashrate around 65.5 EH/s and MARA Holdings around 72.2 EH/s.

For example, a MARA data center is equivalent to about 10.8 million Nano 3S units running simultaneously.

Comparing a retail miner to these giants isn't like an ant versus an elephant; it's an ant versus an aircraft carrier.

So why do some people still mine solo (not pooling, mining alone)?

"If you join a large pool to split rewards, your tiny hashrate might earn less in a day than the electricity cost," an industry insider said. "So you might as well gamble: either go to zero or get rich overnight."

It's not that they don't want to earn steadily; it's that the door to steady earnings has long been closed.

But since the probability of a solo miner finding a block is so incredibly low, who left a path for retail miners to still sit at the table?

III. A Backdoor Left for Retail Miners

There's a point many people get wrong that needs clarification here.

This lucky winner wasn't truly "connecting a single machine directly to the Bitcoin network"; he used Braiins Solo, a mining pool specifically serving solo miners.

Traditional mining pools are like "crowdfunding": everyone contributes their hashrate, and when a block is found, the reward is split according to contribution.

Solo pools are like "custody": the pool handles connecting you to the network and technical details, but if your machine happens to solve the block, the entire reward goes to you, with the pool taking only a small service fee.

In essence, solo pools set up a ring for retail miners, giving you the qualification to stand in the same arena as the giants. Even though your punch is the size of their fingernail.

Platforms like CKPool, Braiins Solo, and Public Pool are, to some extent, the last "civilian passage" in the Bitcoin world.

However, over the past year, solo miners have mined approximately 22 blocks, with a total reward of about 69.24 Bitcoin. On average, that's less than 2 blocks per month.

So scarce that every win floods Reddit and Twitter.

Therefore, some industry insiders have a cold view of this passage.

Solo mining is essentially buying a lottery ticket, meaning the vast majority of people will end up with nothing.

So, is this backdoor left for retail miners safeguarding decentralization, or is it creating an illusion of "everyone has a chance"?

IV. How Much of Satoshi's Original Vision Remains

In 2008, Satoshi Nakamoto wrote a sentence in the Bitcoin whitepaper: "One CPU one vote."

The idea was that this system should give every ordinary participant a voice.

Seventeen years later, "one CPU one vote" has become "one EH/s one vote."

An ordinary player's CPU can't even afford the admission ticket.

But now, this $300 machine's win precisely proves that Satoshi's design isn't dead.

Bitcoin's Proof of Work mechanism, in simple terms, means whoever calculates the answer that meets the rules first gets the reward.

It doesn't recognize identity, capital, or scale; it only recognizes the result.

Whether you're a multi-million-dollar mining farm or a single small machine in some geek's bedroom, the rules are impartial.

If your answer hits the target first, the $230,000 is yours.

Yet, looking at the probability, buying a $300 machine for solo mining results in a negative expected return, and a significantly negative one at that.

The winner is merely at the most extreme tail end of the probability distribution, a point almost invisible.

▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌

If a million people imitated him, 999,999 would lose their investment.

But the existence of that 0.0001% is precisely the most fascinating aspect of the Bitcoin system.

It doesn't promise returns to ordinary people, but it also doesn't shut ordinary people out.

The door is still open. It's just that behind the door lies a cliff, and also the starry sky.

相关问答

QWhat is the central paradox highlighted by the story of the $300 mining rig?

AThe story highlights the paradox between the extreme centralization of modern Bitcoin mining, dominated by industrial-scale operations, and the core design principle of Satoshi Nakamoto's Proof of Work, which theoretically still gives even the smallest miner a non-zero chance to win a block reward.

QHow did the solo miner with the small $300 machine actually connect to the Bitcoin network to have a chance at mining a block?

AThe miner did not connect directly to the Bitcoin network. He used a solo mining pool service, specifically Braiins Solo. This service handles the technical complexities of connecting to the network, but if the miner's own machine successfully solves a block, the full reward (minus a small fee) goes entirely to that individual miner, unlike traditional pooled mining where rewards are shared.

QAccording to the article, what is the primary economic reality for most individuals who try solo Bitcoin mining with small rigs?

AFor the vast majority of individuals, solo mining with small, low-hashrate rigs is economically irrational. The expected return is negative and a significant loss, akin to buying a lottery ticket with extremely long odds. The article states that if a million people imitated the lucky miner, 99.9999% of them would lose their investment.

QWhat key shift in Bitcoin's consensus mechanism does the article describe, from Satoshi Nakamoto's original vision to the present day?

AThe article describes a shift from Satoshi Nakamoto's original principle of 'one CPU one vote' to the current reality of 'one Exahash (EH/s) one vote.' This means influence and reward probability are now overwhelmingly concentrated in the hands of those with massive, industrial-scale computing power (hashrate), rather than distributed among average participants with standard CPUs.

QWhat symbolic role does the 'solo mining pool' play in the contemporary Bitcoin ecosystem, as suggested by the article?

ASolo mining pools like Braiins Solo are portrayed as a symbolic 'backdoor' or the last 'commoner's path' for individual enthusiasts. They technically allow anyone to participate directly in block discovery, thereby preserving a token link to Bitcoin's decentralized ideals. However, the article questions whether they truly safeguard decentralization or merely create an illusion of opportunity, given the vanishingly low odds of success.

你可能也喜欢

TechFlow 情报局:芯片股单日蒸发万亿美元,比特币跌破 6 万美元,美伊冲突升级

科技情报摘要:宏观波动与AI进展交织 市场因强劲非农数据遭遇剧烈震荡。美国5月非农就业新增17.2万,远超预期,重燃加息担忧,导致美股、加密市场和芯片股同步暴跌。费城半导体指数创六年最大单日跌幅,芯片股市值蒸发逾万亿美元;比特币跌破6万美元,技术指标显示超卖程度已达2020年疫情暴跌水平。与此同时,消费品巨头CEO警告美国消费者正在耗尽积蓄,与强劲就业数据形成矛盾信号。地缘政治方面,美伊冲突升级,美军拦截伊朗导弹并打击其雷达站,霍尔木兹海峡持续受阻,引发原油供应与通胀忧虑。 AI领域进展与争议并存。Anthropic发布报告称AI已能参与改进自身研究流程,引发对递归自我改进(RSI)的讨论。另一方面,Claude被指在协助开发rsync代码库时引入了更多bug,引发关于AI编程工具利弊的争论。此外,研究出现新转向,有发现认为思维链(chain-of-thought)在某些场景会降低性能,研究者正尝试训练“内隐推理”模型。DeepSeek V4 Flash在本地部署测试中表现惊艳,GitHub Copilot也开放了自定义端点,支持连接本地模型。 其他要闻包括:Gemma 4量化版在AMD GPU上运行良好;谷歌被曝每月向SpaceX支付9.2亿美元用于AI训练算力;微软内部文件显示其希望AI产品让用户“上瘾”引批评;标普500指数维持规则,拒绝将SpaceX、OpenAI等未盈利的AI独角兽纳入。

marsbit9分钟前

TechFlow 情报局:芯片股单日蒸发万亿美元,比特币跌破 6 万美元,美伊冲突升级

marsbit9分钟前

我用了一年,才看清 Agent 支付扎心的真相

我用了一年时间深入研究Agent支付领域,发现当前市场存在诸多扎心现实。总体来看,真正的、大规模的需求尚未形成,初创公司面临结构性问题。 首先,在Agent对商户的“代购式商业”方面,用户体验存在根本缺陷。对于需要视觉比价的大多数商品(如服装、电子产品),纯文本对话界面远不如传统电商界面直观高效。虽然AI在理解需求和比价指令上表现不错,但无法替代并排浏览、挑选的体验。商户目前接入主要是出于“防御性”的“Agent引擎优化”考虑,担心未来落后,而非当前有实际客流。外卖等高频低决策场景有潜力,但受限于平台未开放API和过高的推理成本。另一个突破口是帮助用户处理复杂、体验差的购物流程(如叠加优惠、非母语操作),但这需要强大的B2C分发渠道,而这是巨头的优势。 其次,在Agent对API(机器间调用服务)方面,虽然存在机器间支付场景,但当前开发者大多已通过预付额度等方式解决小额支付问题。更深层矛盾在于,主流SaaS供应商的商业模式依赖大额企业合同,不愿支持极小额、临时性的API访问。新兴协议更适合服务长尾、小众的需求,但这个市场的付费意愿和规模有限。 第三,Agent对Agent的商业模式目前几乎完全停留在理论层面,尚未产生有意义的交易量。虽然这是一个需要专用结算基础设施的长期愿景,但与当前市场脱节。 相比之下,Agent对金融是目前唯一存在既有需求和付费意愿的类别。将AI嵌入基金经理、财务团队等现有工作流是自然演进,并能创造全新能力(如实时监控、自动调仓)。但该领域竞争激烈,受严格监管,老牌机构拥有显著优势。 文章最后指出,行业巨头因资金充足和防御心态仍在投入建设,但对初创公司而言,时间线至关重要。真正的机遇不在于单纯的支付层,而在于解决“协同”这一更宏大的问题——即如何协调Agent与人类的工作、验证成果并进行结算。大规模协同将自然催生结算机制,解决协同问题的公司终将吞并支付业务。经过一年探索,作者团队已将方向转向一个市场需求真实存在、增长迅速且尚未被充分服务的新领域。

链捕手1小时前

我用了一年,才看清 Agent 支付扎心的真相

链捕手1小时前

Claude Opus 4.8 找到一个 45 亿美元的 Bug,AI时代正在批量生产黑客

一名安全研究员使用AI模型Claude Opus 4.8在Zcash加密货币的隐私协议Orchard中发现了一个严重的“无限增发”漏洞,导致其市值短时间内蒸发约45亿美元。这一事件并非由Anthropic公司最尖端但受限的Claude Mythos模型完成,而是由已公开发布、进入日常工具的普通模型实现的,凸显了AI正在将发现高危漏洞的能力“民主化”和“廉价化”。 AI降低了漏洞挖掘的门槛,带来了双重影响:一方面,它催生了大量由AI生成的虚假或低质量安全报告,如同“注意力DDoS”攻击,消耗着本就人力匮乏的开源维护者精力;另一方面,它也能更快地找出那些隐藏多年、以往需要专家耗费巨大成本才能发现的真实漏洞。我们的数字世界一直建立在存在诸多潜在缺陷的代码之上,过去的“安全”在相当程度上源于发现成本高昂。 然而,能力的扩散并未带来责任的均摊。网络安全行业本就面临巨大的人才缺口,尤其是在复杂分析和应急响应层面。当AI让攻击和漏洞报告变得泛滥时,修复漏洞、守护系统的人力链条却变得更加紧张。破坏可以被自动化脚本轻易复制,但重建信任与安全仍需依赖稀缺的专业人力进行艰苦、细致的修复工作。 AI时代揭示了一个现实:我们习以为常的平稳数字生活,并非理所当然,而是依赖于一条脆弱的人力协作防线在持续对抗风险。未来真正的挑战或许不是找到漏洞,而是是否有足够的人愿意并能够修复它们。

marsbit1小时前

Claude Opus 4.8 找到一个 45 亿美元的 Bug,AI时代正在批量生产黑客

marsbit1小时前

交易

现货
合约

热门文章

加密市场宏观研报:《GENIUS Act》法案取得重大进展,BTC突破历史新高,后市全新展望

2025年5月22日,比特币价格正式突破11万美元大关,创下历史新高。在政策面、宏观经济、资金面与投资者结构共同作用下,一场结构性牛市浪潮正在展开。而此轮上涨背后的核心驱动,是美国《GENIUS稳定币法案》的实质性进展以及多项利好的叠加。本文将从政策端突破、宏观环境转向、链上与ETF资金结构、交易行为演化,以及重点受益赛道五大维度,全面解析此轮BTC再创新高的深层逻辑,并前瞻下半年市场的潜在趋势。

1.6k人学过发布于 2025.05.22更新于 2025.05.22

加密市场宏观研报:《GENIUS Act》法案取得重大进展,BTC突破历史新高,后市全新展望

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对BTC(BTC)币价的意见。

活动图片