Solana Just Solved Its Biggest Data Problem, Says Helius CEO

bitcoinist发布于2025-10-29更新于2025-10-29

文章摘要

Helius says it has re-engineered how Solana’s historical data is stored and retrieved, introducing a new archival backend and an...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Helius says it has re-engineered how Solana’s historical data is stored and retrieved, introducing a new archival backend and an RPC method that collapses today’s multi-call workflows into a single request.

CEO Mert Mumtaz framed the change in sweeping terms: “today, Solana changes forever… we’ve solved the biggest data/RPC problem that exists,” he wrote, arguing that the status quo—historical queries hitting Google Bigtable—has been “slow,” “expensive,” and “inflexible.”

What This Means For Solana

Mumtaz highlighted the practical pain point every Solana indexer or wallet developer knows: getting the “first tx for a Solana address without looping back endlessly” and pulling the “most recent 100 txs for an address” both require chaining calls and traversals that can balloon into “thousands of RPC calls.” “Not anymore,” Mumtaz said.

At the heart of the release is a Helius-exclusive RPC method, getTransactionsForAddress, backed by a distributed archival storage layer that the company claims is “1,000x faster, more flexible, and more scalable.” Functionally, the method merges today’s common two-step pattern—getSignaturesForAddress to enumerate signatures, then getTransaction to hydrate details—into one call that can return fully decoded transactions, with bidirectional time ordering and range filters by slot or timestamp.

Helius’ documentation spells out that it enables reverse search without back-traversal and supports pagination tuned for large, active accounts. The company also emphasizes that this is not a core Solana RPC addition; it’s a proprietary extension available on Helius nodes, priced at 100 credits per request on Developer plans and above.
Performance claims span both the new method and legacy endpoints, with Helius saying getBlock, getTransaction, and getSignaturesForAddress are now “10x faster,” while the archival system under the hood delivers the headline throughput improvements for historical queries.

The framing is squarely aimed at eliminating Bigtable-bound latency spikes and reducing call counts by “100x” alongside “10x lower latency” and “1000x less code.” Those assertions track with common developer complaints documented across Solana forums about slow historical hydration on busy addresses, but the hard numbers here are Helius’ own benchmarks.

The strategic context matters. Solana’s on-chain activity continues to skew toward high-throughput consumer and payments use cases, which punish inefficient data access patterns.

The launch landed the same day the first US spot Solana ETF went live on the NYSE—Bitwise’s BSOL. According to Bloomberg’s senior ETF analyst Eric Balchunas, BSOL recorded a volume of $56 million on day one. “BSOL’s $56m is the MOST of any launch this year.. More than XRPR, SSK, Ives and $MNU. And what’s amazing is it seeded with $220m. It could have invested seed on Day One, which would have resulted in $280m-ish, would be even more than ETHA’s debut. Strong start either way,” Balchunas wrote.

Another macro backdrop piece: Western Union announced plans to introduce a dollar-backed stablecoin, USDPT, on Solana, issued by Anchorage Digital Bank, with availability targeted for the first half of 2026.

At press time, SOL traded at $195.

Solana price
Solana price remains below the 0.786 Fib, 1-week chart | Source: SOLUSDT on TradingView.com
Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Jake Simmons has been a Bitcoin enthusiast since 2016. Ever since he heard about Bitcoin, he has been studying the topic every day and trying to share his knowledge with others. His goal is to contribute to Bitcoin's financial revolution, which will replace the fiat money system. Besides BTC and crypto, Jake studied Business Informatics at a university. After graduation in 2017, he has been working in the blockchain and crypto sector. You can follow Jake on Twitter at @realJakeSimmons.

热门币种推荐

你可能也喜欢

“AI焚书”,其实是个误解

近期关于“AI焚书”的争议愈演愈烈。媒体报道称,AI公司(如Anthropic)通过亚马逊等项目,大规模采购二手纸质书,进行破坏性扫描(切书脊、高速扫描)以数字化内容,之后处理掉原书,引发了公众对“AI吞噬人类文明”的强烈担忧。 然而,深入分析会发现,事实与情绪之间存在错位。首先,AI公司扫描并销毁的书籍数量(如Anthropic一年数百万本)在整个庞大的二手书市场(仅一家大型书商年销量就数千万本)中占比有限,远未到“吃干抹净”的程度。其次,实体书的销毁不等于知识的消失,其内容被数字化后用于AI训练,反而以新形式留存和活化,这与历史上的“焚书”目的相反。 争议焦点在于AI公司也采购了一些稀有或绝版书。但需厘清:稀缺不等于珍贵,许多绝版书文化价值有限;且书籍作为流通商品,买家(无论是个人还是公司)在合法购得后有权处置。问题在于,若某书真的极具公共文化价值,为何博物馆、图书馆等公共机构未在流通市场抢先保护?将保护责任完全寄望于商业公司的道德并不可靠。 真正的风险在于,AI公司集中采购可能消耗某些本就脆弱的稀缺书目。解决方案应从公共规则层面入手,例如建立珍稀书保护名录、赋予公共机构优先购买权、要求平台对大额采购预警,或强制大规模扫描者贡献书目数据等,而非仅依赖企业自律。 公众对“AI焚书”的强烈反应,深层源于对AI快速发展的复杂矛盾心理:人们越来越依赖AI工具,同时也对其威胁就业、掌控知识源头感到焦虑与愤怒。“切书”这一视觉冲击强的行为,恰好成为汇聚版权忧虑、职业危机感及对科技巨头不信任情绪的符号。因此,当前的舆论浪潮很大程度上是象征意义的宣泄,实际的文化损失可能被高估了。

marsbit18分钟前

“AI焚书”,其实是个误解

marsbit18分钟前

交易

现货

热门文章

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对SOL(SOL)币价的意见。

活动图片