Solana Market Analysis: $2.8B Revenue Milestone Fuels Bullish Case Despite Recent Pullback

bitcoinist发布于2025-10-09更新于2025-10-09

文章摘要

Solana (SOL) slipped to $221 at press time, down 3.9% in the last 24 hours after failing to hold above...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Solana (SOL) slipped to $221 at press time, down 3.9% in the last 24 hours after failing to hold above $230. The move follows a quick retrace from this week’s $238 high and a break below the 100-hour MA near $225.

Near term, traders are watching $218–$212 as the first support band (deeper bids near $210–$215), while $230–$235 caps rebounds, with a heavier $245–$250 supply zone above.

If bulls reclaim $230 on strong volume, momentum could re-target $245; a daily close below $212 risks a slide toward $200. Despite the dip, SOL continues to print higher-lows on the multi-week trend, keeping the broader uptrend viable.

Solana SOL SOLUSD

SOL's price trends sideways on the daily chart. Source: SOLUSD on Tradingview

$2.8B Annual Solana Revenue Supports Fundamental Strength

Beyond price, Solana’s fundamentals are flashing green. A new analyst report tallies $2.85 billion in annualized on-chain revenue over the past year, $240 million per month on average, peaking at $616 million in January during the memecoin frenzy.

Trading platforms are the flywheel, contributing 30% ($1.12B), with apps like Photon and Axiom at times generating $260M in a single month. Thanks to sub-$0.01 fees and high throughput, Solana’s revenue run-rate has outpaced Ethereum’s early-cycle trajectory and coincides with 1.2–1.5 million daily active addresses.

DeFi metrics back the story; $13B TVL, 6x YoY growth in stablecoin volumes, and >$500M in tokenized RWA activity signal of durable, non-speculative usage. Upcoming performance upgrades (e.g., Firedancer) aim for dramatic latency and throughput gains, reinforcing the network’s moat for high-frequency DeFi.

Institutional Access, SOL ETFs, and the Q4 Setup

Institutional participation is also expanding on multiple fronts. Public balance sheets reportedly hold $4B in SOL, while staking-enabled trust products and pending U.S. spot SOL ETF applications (from issuers including Fidelity, VanEck, Grayscale, Franklin Templeton, 21Shares, and Bitwise) could unlock the next leg of demand.

Several filings face October deadlines, and prediction markets handicap a very high probability of approval by year-end. In the near term, price may remain choppy as leverage resets across crypto, but Solana’s revenue scale, user growth, and pipeline of upgrades provide a sturdy backdrop.

For traders, the roadmap is straightforward: hold $218–$212 to preserve the bullish structure; flip $230, then $245, to revive momentum. For long-term investors, the multi-billion-dollar revenue milestone and rising institutional rails keep the $300+ debate alive once risk appetite returns.

Cover image from ChatGPT, SOLUSD chart from Tradingview

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

你可能也喜欢

三年之后:回看 2023 年我对 ChatGPT 的判断

作者王健硕在2026年5月回看其于2023年3月对ChatGPT做出的二十条预测,并借助AI代理进行验证。整体看,其大方向判断多正确,但细节和程度常有偏差。 **看对的方面:** - **技术架构**:准确预测RAG(检索增强生成)将成为解决知识更新和幻觉的主流方法,以及LUI(自然语言用户界面)将催生巨大新产业。 - **发展趋势**:预见到“机器人网络”和新的agent寻址系统将出现,中国能快速做出可用大模型并缩小与顶尖差距。 - **本质认知**:正确指出ChatGPT没有意识,图灵测试仅测表象;判断其是巨大进步但非AGI,且短期内不会造成整体失业潮。 **看错或看偏的方面:** - **具体数据错误**:关于GPT-4有100T参数的传闻完全错误。 - **绝对化判断**:断言LLM“不可能”自己学好数学被后来模型在IMO夺金证伪;认为AI生成内容可“规避”版权,实则引发史上最大侵权赔偿。 - **价值与成本误判**:认为价值终落应用层,但最大赢家是算力层(如英伟达);模型成本“5-10亿封顶”的估算严重偏离实际。 - **社会影响误读**:认为ChatGPT的“加权平均”特性可能促进“世界大同”,但实际AI正走向个性化,并可能制造新信息茧房。 **总结规律:** 1. 预测机制和方向比具体数字更可靠。 2. 倾向于高估短期变化速度,低估长期影响程度。 3. 容易忽略问题内部的“分布”差异(如失业影响集中在年轻群体)。 4. 留有餘地、分层表述的判断更经得起时间检验。 5. 一些根本性争议,三年时间仍不足以给出定论。 这次复盘旨在为未来的判断立下更审慎的规矩。

marsbit3小时前

三年之后:回看 2023 年我对 ChatGPT 的判断

marsbit3小时前

三年之后:回看 2023 年我对 ChatGPT 的判断

2023年3月,在GPT-4发布前,作者王健硕对ChatGPT的未来做出了二十项预测。三年后的2026年,他使用AI agent对这些判断进行回顾验证,评估其准确性。 **主要看对的方面:** 1. **RAG成为主流**:预测通过外部检索而非修改模型来解决知识更新和幻觉问题,这已成为行业标准架构。 2. **LUI(自然语言界面)兴起**:预测自然语言交互将催生巨大新产业,Agent、MCP协议等发展印证了这一点,但LUI是与GUI共存而非取代。 3. **机器人网络与新寻址系统**:预测Agent将自动协作并需要新寻址方式,MCP、A2A等协议正朝此方向发展。 4. **中国能做出可用大模型**:预测中美模型差距会迅速缩小,事实如此,但真正领先的国内厂商与其当初点名不同。 5. **AI无意识与图灵测试本质**:核心判断“AI无意识,图灵测试仅测表象”基本成立,但“绝无意识”的绝对论断被后续研究置于灰区。 **看错或看偏的方面:** 1. **GPT-4参数数量**:所传“100T参数”严重错误,实际约为1.8T。 2. **LLM的数学能力**:诊断“数学差需外挂工具”正确,但“不可能自行学会”的结论被后续“推理模型”在IMO夺金证伪。 3. **价值捕获**:预测价值在应用层,但现实中算力层(如英伟达)捕获了最大利润,模型层反而亏损。 4. **版权问题**:判断“生成物可能无法登记版权”正确,但认为能“规避侵权”则错误,已出现巨额侵权赔偿案例。 5. **信息茧房与世界大同**:机制上AI会将观点向众数平均,但AI正快速走向“千人千面”的个性化,可能制造新茧房而非消解极化。 6. **大模型成本**:预测“局部战争”和玩家涌入正确,但“5-10亿美元封顶”的成本估算与前沿训练实际花费严重不符。 **总结规律:** 1. 判断**方向和机制**比具体数字、程度更可靠。 2. 倾向于**高估短期变化速度,低估长期能力上限**。 3. 容易忽略**问题内部的分布差异**(如总量正确但部分群体受损)。 4. **留有餘地、分层表述**的判断更经得起时间检验。 5. 一些根本性争论,**三年时间不足以给出最终答案**。 这次回顾表明,在快速变化的领域,把握大方向比追求精确预测更重要,同时需警惕绝对化表述并承认认知的局限性。

链捕手5小时前

三年之后:回看 2023 年我对 ChatGPT 的判断

链捕手5小时前

交易

现货
合约

热门文章

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对SOL(SOL)币价的意见。

活动图片