BlackRock Exec Pressed On XRP ETF: His Answer Raises More Questions

bitcoinist发布于2025-09-27更新于2025-09-27

文章摘要

BlackRock’s global head of digital assets, Robbie Mitchnick, was pressed on the prospect of a spot XRP exchange-traded fund during...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

BlackRock’s global head of digital assets, Robbie Mitchnick, was pressed on the prospect of a spot XRP exchange-traded fund during an interview with Nate Geraci on the “Crypto Prime” podcast.

Will BlackRock Launch A Spot XRP ETF?

While he offered no product reveal, he did spell out precisely how BlackRock is thinking about what could come next after its blockbuster Bitcoin and Ether launches.

Geraci noted on air that he has “publicly predicted that BlackRock would file for a spot XRP ETF and a spot Solana ETF,” then asked how the firm evaluates “future product development around crypto-related ETFs.”

Mitchnick declined to speak to any specific tickers but was explicit about the decision framework: “There’s a lot of factors that go into that decision-making process obviously, but the biggest driver ultimately is our clients… What is the level of investor demand? What is the logic and investment thesis for investors and for our clients around these potential products? What problem are we solving for them?”

He added that BlackRock weighs “market cap, liquidity, [and] maturity,” along with “clarity of investment thesis and overall… portfolio considerations,” describing it as “a constant evaluation process,” not a single point in time.
The exchange came amid a wide-ranging discussion of how quickly BlackRock’s crypto business has scaled and how starkly the firm differentiates Bitcoin from Ether in client portfolios.

BlackRock Exec On Bitcoin Vs. Ethereum

Geraci highlighted the growth figures—“[IBIT] launched in early January 2024. It’s over $85 billion in assets… [ETHA] launched in July… around $16 billion”—and asked whether Ethereum’s trajectory matched expectations after Bitcoin’s record start.

Mitchnick pushed back on early narratives that Ether ETFs were a “bust” only because they were “being compared against the extraordinary record-setting numbers” of Bitcoin, pointing out that ETHA became “the third fastest ETF in history to reach $10 billion.”

Mitchnick drew a bright line between the two assets from a portfolio-construction perspective. Bitcoin, he said, functions for many allocators as “this sort of digital gold type instrument,” a “global scarce decentralized non-sovereign asset” with distinct risk and return drivers.

Ethereum is “a more nuanced, more technical discussion,” effectively “a bet around blockchain adoption and digital assets more broadly,” with competitive dynamics and questions about “value capture in the Ether token versus the activity level on the Ethereum blockchain.” As a result, Bitcoin has seen “much greater penetration” among institutional and wealth advisory channels, while Ether ownership remains “overwhelmingly” in the direct investor segment.

On the gating factors that could unlock the next wave of demand, Mitchnick said it is “still early days” for both institutions and wealth platforms in the United States. Many large firms allow execution-only access, but “the vast majority of advisers… still do not have the ability to make decisions on this on behalf of their clients.”

He described “various stages of approving this” across the wirehouses, including one firm “starting to put it in model portfolios,” and noted that BlackRock’s own model-portfolio team “early in 2025… put IBIT allocations into one of our model portfolios.” For institutions, he argued that further episodes of Bitcoin “decoupling from equities in a… distressed market environment” would be “critical” in cementing its role as a diversifier.

Asked about the SEC’s recent move to approve generic listing standards for commodity-based ETPs—the category that includes spot crypto ETFs—Mitchnick called it “a pragmatic step” that “streamlin[es] the process,” with clear, transparent standards that “support innovation.”

Taken together, Mitchnick’s comments sketched the contours of BlackRock’s next steps without tipping its hand. On an XRP ETF, he didn’t confirm or deny anything—but he gave a clear readout of the bar any new product must clear: credible client demand, a defensible investment thesis, sufficient market depth and maturity, and a well-defined role in diversified portfolios.

At press time, XRP traded at $2.71.

XRP price
XRP price, 1-day chart | Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com
Featured image from YouTube, chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Jake Simmons has been a Bitcoin enthusiast since 2016. Ever since he heard about Bitcoin, he has been studying the topic every day and trying to share his knowledge with others. His goal is to contribute to Bitcoin's financial revolution, which will replace the fiat money system. Besides BTC and crypto, Jake studied Business Informatics at a university. After graduation in 2017, he has been working in the blockchain and crypto sector. You can follow Jake on Twitter at @realJakeSimmons.

你可能也喜欢

伊利诺伊州0.2%加密货币税引发全面法律诉讼

伊利诺伊州一项针对数字资产交易征收0.2%税率的法案,正引发区块链协会和加密创新委员会等组织的全面法律诉讼。起诉方于8月21日向该州地方法院提起诉讼,要求宣布《数字资产税收法》无效并阻止其在2025年1月1日生效。 诉讼的核心争议在于该税的征收方式。与针对资本利得征税的传统方式不同,该法规定,当用户通过数字资产经纪商进行某些操作时,即使交易未产生利润,也需按资产价值缴纳0.2%的税。这意味着单纯的比特币转账、账户间移资或支付托管服务费都可能触发纳税义务,而股票交易、银行转账或实物资产托管却无类似税负。原告指控该税实质上是针对“存储或转移价值的机制”而非经济交易本身。 法案的模糊性带来更多问题。例如,一次加密货币购买可能涉及交易、入账和托管等多个环节,但法案未明确这算作一个还是多个应税事件。对于持续性的资产托管,是按年、按结算周期还是按余额变动来计税也未有界定,可能导致税单金额出现数量级差异。此外,“资产价值”的评估时点、如何准确判定用户身处伊利诺伊州等问题都规定不清,迫使经纪商依赖推测并承担巨大的合规风险及潜在刑事责任。 诉讼还挑战了法案的立法程序。该法案最初仅两页,后在未充分公众讨论的情况下,被扩充为涵盖多主题的1624页庞大议案,数字资产税收部分不足20页。原告认为这违反了州宪法程序,并指控该税歧视电子商务,违背了联邦《互联网税收自由法案》和商业条款。 目前,原告正寻求法院在明年1月法案生效前颁布禁令。此案将成为测试各州能否对数字资产金融活动单独征税的关键一役。

cryptonews.ru32分钟前

伊利诺伊州0.2%加密货币税引发全面法律诉讼

cryptonews.ru32分钟前

交易

现货
活动图片