Tyler Winklevoss Criticized Gensler on Crypto Rules, Innovation

TheCryptoTimes发布于2025-09-19更新于2025-09-19

Tyler Winklevoss, one of the co-founders of Gemini, has criticized former SEC Chair Gary Gensler following his recent interview on CNBC. In the interview on September 18, Gensler disclosed that the SEC tackled nearly 100 fraud cases during his tenure. He stood firm on his strict approach to cryptocurrency, emphasizing that protecting investors was his main focus. 

On the contrary, Winklevoss responded by commenting that Gensler’s methods have somewhat inhibited innovation and growth of the crypto sector.

Gensler argued that most crypto trading relies on hype and momentum rather than solid fundamentals. He excluded Bitcoin from this assessment but labeled thousands of other tokens as highly speculative. 

“Investor protection remains at the core of the SEC’s mission,” Gensler stated. Despite this, many in crypto believe his policies stifled progress and created unnecessary friction between regulators and innovators.

Winklevoss vs. Quintenz Clash

Besides his criticism of Gensler, Winklevoss is also embroiled in a feud with Brian Quintenz, former CFTC head and Trump nominee. The dispute erupted publicly when Quintenz shared private messages from Winklevoss on X. 

In the messages, Tyler blasted the Biden administration for what he called “seven years of lawfare trophy hunting” targeting Gemini. He demanded Quintenz’s help in reversing these pressures.

Critics quickly weighed in, framing the conflict as personal rather than policy-driven. “It’s a total temper tantrum. This is about wanting revenge and wanting to punish people,” said Lee Reiners of Duke University. The clash is surprising, given Quintenz’s reputation as a pro-crypto policymaker.

Amid the tensions, Tyler remains bullish on Bitcoin. In a separate CNBC interview last week, he predicted Bitcoin could reach $1 million if it disrupts gold’s market share. “We think Bitcoin is gold 2.0,” Tyler said. 

He emphasized that mainstream adoption is still in its early stages and believes a tenfold price increase is possible within the next decade.

Tyler Winklevoss’ clashes with regulators show how divided U.S. crypto policy has become and may influence crypto innovation.

Also Read: Crypto.com Adds Sei Network Custody for SEI Token Security


Mobile Only Image

热门币种推荐

你可能也喜欢

您会惊讶地发现,WeChat 和 Telegram 在架构层面竟如此不同

微信与Telegram在架构层面有着根本性的差异,主要体现在数据存储、功能设计和生态开放度上。 **数据存储方式**:Telegram提供无限云端存储,所有消息历史在各设备间自动同步。微信则采用本地存储,消息在服务器交付后不保留,因此更换设备需通过特定功能迁移,且桌面版必须依赖手机在线确认才能登录。 **功能设计差异**:在频道讨论方面,Telegram为帖子自动关联评论区,实现一体化讨论。微信的公众号文章评论需经发布者审核才可显示,缺乏与文章直接关联的讨论系统,用户交流需跳转至聊天或小程序。文件传输上,Telegram支持最大2-4GB的文件,微信则限制为200MB,大文件需借助“文件传输助手”或第三方服务。 **开发与生态**:Telegram的Bot API完全开放免费,开发门槛低。微信小程序生态庞大(活跃数量超480万),但属于封闭系统,需经过审核、认证,甚至提供商业许可才能使用部分API,准入要求更高。 **支付整合**:微信支付深度融入中国日常生活,覆盖绝大多数线下场景及公共服务,替代了现金和银行应用。Telegram没有内置的法定货币支付系统,主要通过第三方机器人实现支付功能,尤其侧重加密货币,这反映了其去中心化理念,但在传统金融基础设施完善的地区,限制了其作为日常金融工具的应用。 **安全考量**:文章未深入讨论加密机制。Telegram提供端到端加密的私密聊天选项,而微信聊天信息不采用端到端加密。值得注意的是,微信将通讯与支付高度集成于单一界面,理论上扩大了潜在的攻击面。有数据显示,仅2025年初新加坡就记录了数百起涉及仿冒微信等支付平台员工的诈骗案件,损失巨大。这引出一个技术问题:当通讯与支付功能在同一个应用内结合得越紧密,聊天安全漏洞可能带来的代价就越高。 总结而言,两者代表了不同的平台哲学:微信构建了一个深度融入现实经济的封闭但高度集成的生态系统;而Telegram则围绕开放协议、灵活数据存储和低开发者门槛进行设计。这种架构选择决定了各自的目标用户和使用场景。

cryptonews.ru4小时前

您会惊讶地发现,WeChat 和 Telegram 在架构层面竟如此不同

cryptonews.ru4小时前

交易

现货

热门文章

如何购买ONE

欢迎来到HTX.com!我们已经让购买Harmony(ONE)变得简单而便捷。跟随我们的逐步指南,放心开始您的加密货币之旅。第一步:创建您的HTX账户使用您的电子邮件、手机号码注册一个免费账户在HTX上。体验无忧的注册过程并解锁所有平台功能。立即注册第二步:前往买币页面,选择您的支付方式信用卡/借记卡购买:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即时购买Harmony(ONE)。余额购买:使用您HTX账户余额中的资金进行无缝交易。第三方购买:探索诸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方法以增加便利性。C2C购买:在HTX平台上直接与其他用户交易。HTX场外交易台(OTC)购买:为大量交易者提供个性化服务和竞争性汇率。第三步:存储您的Harmony(ONE)购买完您的Harmony(ONE)后,将其存储在您的HTX账户钱包中。您也可以通过区块链转账将其发送到其他地方或者用于交易其他加密货币。第四步:交易Harmony(ONE)在HTX的现货市场轻松交易Harmony(ONE)。访问您的账户,选择您的交易对,执行您的交易,并实时监控。HTX为初学者和经验丰富的交易者提供了友好的用户体验。

1.5k人学过发布于 2024.03.29更新于 2026.06.02

如何购买ONE

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对ONE(ONE)币价的意见。

活动图片