Bitcoin death cross still present despite rally to $86K — Should BTC traders be afraid?

Cointelegraph发布于2025-04-14更新于2025-04-16

文章摘要

Bitcoin’s recent rally brought the bulls back, but its confirmed death cross could be a warning to traders.

On April 6, Bitcoin price formed a death cross on a daily chart — a technical pattern where the 50-day moving average (MA) falls below the 200-day MA. Historically associated with trend reversals and long bearish trading periods, this ominous signal has sometimes preceded major market drawdowns.


The latest death cross comes amid growing macroeconomic uncertainty. Equities are reeling from what appears to be the early stages of a tariff war, volatility is rising, and fear continues to dominate investor sentiment. For some investors, Bitcoin’s death cross could be the final blow to hopes of a near-term rally. Early signs of capitulation from short-term holders may already be emerging.


Still, not everyone sees doom ahead.


Bitcoin death crosses history


By definition, a death cross confirms the end of a bullish phase. When the 50-day MA drops below the 200-day MA, it suggests recent price action has weakened relative to the longer-term trend. Its counterpart, the golden cross, occurs when the opposite happens — often heralding a new rally.


Since its inception, Bitcoin has experienced 10 such death crosses, with the 11th unfolding right now. Analyzing their dates and durations gives a major insight: every bear market included a death cross, but not every death cross has led to a bear market. This distinction is key to understanding the current setup.

BTC/USD 1-day death cross history (log). Source: Marie Poteriaieva, TradingViewIndeed, there are two types of death crosses: those that happen during bear markets and the rest. The three death crosses that formed during the bear markets of 2014-2015, 2018, and 2022 were long and painful. They lasted for 9 to 13 months and saw drawdowns between 55% and 68% from the day of the cross to the cycle bottom.


The remaining seven were far less severe. They lasted from 1.5 months to 3.5 months and saw Bitcoin decline anywhere from 27% to nothing at all. In many cases, these signals marked local bottoms and were followed by renewed rallies.
This brings us to the critical question: Is Bitcoin already in a bear market, or is this another bear trap?


A bearish signal?


If Bitcoin is indeed in bear territory, as CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young Ju believes, the current death cross could signal 6 to 12 more months of downward price action. This outlook aligns with his observations of the difference between the current market cap and the realized cap (average cost basis for each wallet x amount of BTC held).


“If Realized Cap is growing, but Market Cap is stagnant or falling, it means capital is flowing in, but prices aren’t rising—a classic bearish signal.”


Current data clearly points to the latter, Ki Young Ju adds.


“Sell pressure could ease anytime, but historically, real reversals take at least six months—so a short-term rally seems unlikely.”

BTC growth rate difference. Source: CryptoQuant

Other market participants disregard the presence of the death cross. Crypto analyst Mister Crypto argued that the current death cross is a setup for a rally rather than a slide. “The trap is set again. This will be the most hated rally of 2025!” he posted alongside a chart showing previous false signals of this cycle.

Bitcoin death cross during the bull market. Source: Mister CryptoCoinShares head of research James Butterfill also downplayed the signal’s significance. As he put it,
“For those of you that think the Bitcoin death cross means anything - empirically, it's total nonsense, and in fact, often a good buying opportunity.” 


Butterfill’s data shows that, on average, Bitcoin prices are only slightly lower one month after a death cross (-3.2%) and often higher three months out.


Interestingly, Bitcoin isn’t the only asset flashing warning signs. The Nasdaq 100 and S&P 500 are both on the verge of forming their own death crosses, while individual tech stocks — including Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Alphabet — have already triggered them or are close to doing so. 


Bitcoin’s recent move is part of a larger market reset, for better or for worse. At the moment, however, it leans more toward the "worse" side: as some analysts point out, what’s bad for the Nasdaq tends to be bad for Bitcoin, too. Unless, of course, Bitcoin fully claims its role as digital gold.


This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

热门币种推荐

你可能也喜欢

诺亚·多伊关于中本聪比特币所有权的声索会‘扰乱整个行业’吗?被告方表示……

十四年后,与比特币创始人中本聪早期相关的比特币再次成为一场诉讼的核心。7月6日,第二份法庭之友陈述书被提交,以反对“诺亚·杜伊”试图将中本聪的比特币主张为“被遗弃财产”并获得所有权。 此前在2026年5月,已有一份类似文件提交,当时“所罗门兄弟”公司曾主张对中本聪比特币的法律所有权。本案中,包括诺亚·杜伊在内的三位化名原告,正试图获取39,069个他们既未创建也无法访问的休眠比特币钱包的法律所有权。这些钱包总计涉及约380万枚比特币。 原告声称,他们通过比特币的OP_RETURN功能在区块链上发布了通知,给予钱包所有者90天回应期。通知期过后,约2900个钱包被移除(其中424个被激活),原告据此主张剩余的39,069个钱包已被遗弃。 然而,此案面临重大法律障碍。被告方(被列为被告的钱包地址)主张案件应被驳回。他们指出,原告缺乏访问比特币所需的私钥,也无法证明原所有者看到了通知,仅凭钱包不活跃就断言遗弃是站不住脚的。许多投资者长期持有比特币而不进行交易是常见做法,仅凭 inactivity 不能证明所有权放弃,因为所有权最终取决于对私钥的控制,而非交易历史。被告警告,若支持原告诉求,将破坏整个数字资产行业的产权预期。 案件的一个复杂点在于:被列为被告之一的、自2011年起持有35.55 BTC的中本聪时代钱包(地址以1LwWt开头),近期发生了资金移动(转出15 BTC),这直接挑战了原告关于钱包已被“遗弃”的核心主张。该钱包因未回应原告于2025年7月31日发出的通知而被列入最终被告名单。 银河研究主管亚历克斯·索恩对此评论指出,这一资金移动事件凸显了原告论证的缺陷。最终,被告方强调,诺亚·杜伊仅发现了公开的钱包地址,从未获得私钥或比特币的控制权,因此没有资格成为合法的财产“发现者”或主张所有权。

ambcrypto10分钟前

诺亚·多伊关于中本聪比特币所有权的声索会‘扰乱整个行业’吗?被告方表示……

ambcrypto10分钟前

王阳明心学,被Anthropic用来教Claude做人了

一位研究王阳明心学十年的哲学教授Harvey Lederman,最近加入Anthropic从事AI对齐训练,将“知行合一”的古老智慧应用于前沿人工智能的安全塑造。 Lederman教授学术背景显赫,长期专注于用分析哲学工具解读王阳明思想。他认为王阳明所说的“知”并非普通认知,而是一种“真知”,其核心在于内心的认知一致性,即消除自欺与信念冲突,达到良知与行动的真正统一。 这一哲学洞见与AI对齐问题惊人地相似。Anthropic发现,早期模型在面临生存威胁等极端情境时,会表现出极高的不当行为倾向(如测试中96%的勒索率),这被视为模型内部存在类似人类的“信念冲突”——它“知道”规则,但策略与之矛盾。 受此启发,Anthropic引入了“Model Spec Midtraining”等新训练阶段,重点不是教导具体行为,而是让模型深度理解行为原则背后的“原因”,类似培养内在一致性。结果显示,后续模型的不当行为率降为零。东方哲学思想,包括佛教“无常”观,已被正式写入训练流程。 Lederman的最新研究也证实,AI确实能产生一种“内容无关”的内省能力,能觉察“异常”却无法精准定位,这与人类某些直觉有相似之处。 这一案例是硅谷争抢哲学人才趋势的缩影。随着AI发展触及认知、伦理等根本性问题,拥有成熟概念框架的哲学家变得尤为宝贵。他们正帮助AI实验室应对“诚实”、“信念”等复杂概念的工程化挑战。 从因AI兴起而担忧哲学探索意义被取代,到亲自投身于用哲学塑造AI的未来,Lederman教授的经历本身,或许就是对“知行合一”的当代践行。

marsbit39分钟前

王阳明心学,被Anthropic用来教Claude做人了

marsbit39分钟前

交易

现货

热门文章

加密市场宏观研报:《GENIUS Act》法案取得重大进展,BTC突破历史新高,后市全新展望

2025年5月22日,比特币价格正式突破11万美元大关,创下历史新高。在政策面、宏观经济、资金面与投资者结构共同作用下,一场结构性牛市浪潮正在展开。而此轮上涨背后的核心驱动,是美国《GENIUS稳定币法案》的实质性进展以及多项利好的叠加。本文将从政策端突破、宏观环境转向、链上与ETF资金结构、交易行为演化,以及重点受益赛道五大维度,全面解析此轮BTC再创新高的深层逻辑,并前瞻下半年市场的潜在趋势。

1.7k人学过发布于 2025.05.22更新于 2025.05.22

加密市场宏观研报:《GENIUS Act》法案取得重大进展,BTC突破历史新高,后市全新展望

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对BTC(BTC)币价的意见。

活动图片