Tether, Galaxy, Ledn Lead Crypto Lending Revival After Billions in Loans Were Wiped Out in 2023

ccn.com发布于2025-04-14更新于2025-04-14

Key Takeaways

  • Tether, Galaxy and Ledn now dominate the centralized crypto lending market, accounting for 90% of CeFi loans.
  • The crypto lending market has recovered since its 2023 crash but remains 43% below its 2021 peak.
  • DeFi remains the sector’s backbone, with Ethereum leading the charge.

The crypto lending industry is on the rebound, clawing its way back after a brutal collapse in 2023 that wiped out billions in loans and shattered confidence in centralized players.

Now valued at $36.5 billion, the market remains well below its all-time high in late 2021 — but signs of resilience are beginning to show.

A new report by Galaxy Digital shows that a new cohort of centralized players — Tether, Galaxy and Ledn — has stepped in to fill the void left by failed lenders like Celsius, Genesis and BlockFi.

The trio accounts for roughly $9.9 billion in outstanding loans, or 90% of the current centralized lending market.

CeFi’s Comeback: Smaller, Sharper, Still Struggling

Centralized finance (CeFi) lenders have bounced back from a low of $6.4 billion in outstanding loans in early 2023 to $11.2 billion today — a 73% rebound.

However, that figure is still nearly two-thirds from the 2021 peak of $29.4 billion when CeFi lending was primarily controlled by the now-defunct trio of Genesis, Celsius and BlockFi.

Their downfall, catalyzed by overleveraged loans and exposure to the collapse of the Terra Luna ecosystem, triggered a liquidity crunch that rippled across the entire industry.

crypto lending market over the years.
DeFi dominates crypto lending. | Credit: Galaxy Research

However, the new wave of CeFi lenders appears more cautious, leaning on stricter lending terms and more conservative strategies. Tether, for example, remains focused on secured loans backed by excess collateral, while Galaxy and Ledn have honed in on institutional clients.

DeFi Reclaims Its Dominance

Despite the CeFi resurgence, decentralized finance (DeFi) remains the primary force in crypto lending.

DeFi now accounts for 63% of total borrowing, up from 33% during the previous bull run. This shift underscores growing confidence in permissionless, transparent protocols — especially in the wake of CeFi’s credibility crisis.

According to Galaxy’s data, DeFi lending platforms now manage over $19.1 billion in outstanding loans across 12 blockchains and 20 platforms — a staggering 10x jump from their Q4 2022 lows. At that time, DeFi borrowing had bottomed out at just $1.8 billion.

Ethereum remains the dominant chain for DeFi activity, hosting $33.9 billion in deposited assets as of March 2025 — far outpacing all competitors.

The sector’s growth is underpinned by smart contracts, which enforce overcollateralization and minimize default risk.

Unlike CeFi, where borrowers can walk away from bad loans, DeFi protocols liquidate positions automatically when collateral thresholds are breached.

Institutions Eye Bitcoin-Backed Lending

With signs of recovery across both CeFi and DeFi, institutional interest is once again growing. Traditional financial players, particularly those focused on Bitcoin financing, are exploring new lending strategies.

Cantor Fitzgerald — a key custodian of Tether’s reserve assets — recently revealed plans to expand into crypto lending, potentially opening the door to more Bitcoin-collateralized loan products from traditional finance firms.

As both centralized and decentralized platforms evolve, the crypto lending landscape in 2025 looks very different from its speculative, loosely governed past.

Whether the market can sustain this newfound stability remains to be seen.

Was this Article helpful? Yes No

你可能也喜欢

Token预算战争:企业AI进入「算账时代」

企业AI正从“是否采用”进入“如何算账”的“Token预算战争”阶段。随着AI推理成本从实验性支出变为持续性运营成本,CEO和CFO开始追问:每一美元token投入究竟创造了什么实际价值? 文章指出,AI的使用量(token消耗)不等于价值。与SaaS时代不同,token账单上涨可能意味着有效工作,也可能源自无效折腾——如低效提示词、无关上下文、模型选择不当或重复重试。关键在于衡量“边际token效用”,即每多花一美元所创造的商业价值。 当前企业面临三大挑战:重试导致成本复合增长、上下文过度供给造成成本飙升,以及任务路由不合理(简单任务误用强大模型)。这使企业难以将token成本与具体业务结果(如替代外包、节省人力或创造收入)清晰关联。 解决问题的核心在于建立“从token到结果的归因层”:记录AI执行轨迹(检索、工具调用、重试、人工干预等),并将推理支出与完成的工作单位(如处理每张发票、每个客诉)挂钩。谁能实现这种归因,谁就能掌控AI资源的分配权,决定哪些工作流值得投入更多算力,哪些应改用更便宜模型或保持人工。 最终,企业AI的下一阶段不再是证明技术能否完成任务,而是判断这些任务是否值得付费。掌握token效用衡量的企业,将赢得这场预算分配的主导权。

marsbit1小时前

Token预算战争:企业AI进入「算账时代」

marsbit1小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片