U.S. Treasury Backs Down Narrative That Hamas Relied on Crypto to Fund Terrorism

CoinDeskPolicy发布于2024-02-13更新于2024-02-14

文章摘要

The Treasury's top official on terrorism, Brian Nelson, said Hamas and other groups still prefer traditional financing, and crypto isn't figuring into their funding in a big w...

  • U.S. Treasury Undersecretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence Brian Nelson testified on Wednesday that terrorist group Hamas has received very little support in digital assets countering earlier reports that it got tens of millions in crypto.
  • Still, he said his office is focused on the threat from digital assets and asked Congress to help provide more tools.

Just after Hamas' terrorist attacks in Israel last year, crypto took blame for helping fund such brutal killing. While the prominent media reports were later bashed by cryptocurrency experts, the U.S. Department of the Treasury's top official on terrorism financing confirmed to lawmakers on Wednesday the situation was blown out of proportion.

While the Wall Street Journal in October had tied tens of millions of dollars in crypto payments to Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and others, citing a blog post by analytics firm Elliptic that was later edited, the account represented a misunderstanding of what assets actually fell into the hands of terrorists.

"We don't expect the number is very high," said Brian Nelson, the Treasury's undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence, in testimony before the House Financial Services Committee.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Journal had largely revised the initial reporting after blockchain analytical firms Elliptic and Chainalysis offered data to refute it. Even after that reassessment, lawmakers such as Sens. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) continued to use the data in arguments to support legislative efforts to saddle the crypto industry with strict rules in the name of national security.

"To be clear, Hamas is using crypto in relatively small amounts compared to what's been widely reported," Rep. Tom Emmer (R-Minn.) prompted Nelson at the Wednesday hearing.

"That's our assessment," Nelson answered, additionally clarifying that those groups have their eyes on other methods of support.

"We also assess that terrorists still prefer, frankly, to use traditional products and services," he said. The Treasury has targeted a number of businesses and regional financial firms with sanctions, accusing them of offering such aid.

Emmer asked the Treasury official to more formally correct the record about the relationship between digital assets and terrorism, noting "we have senators who are legislating on these false figures."

Advertisement
Advertisement

Despite Nelson's answers to Emmer, he'd said in his earlier, prepared remarks that the government is "focused on disrupting these groups’ ability to leverage digital assets."

"To root out illicit finance by players in virtual asset markets and forums, we need additional tools and resources," Nelson argued, saying he's eager to work with Congress on that.

Edited by Nikhilesh De.

你可能也喜欢

AI 巨头的「Token 补贴大战」,快打完了吗?

AI巨头间的“Token补贴大战”正趋于白热化,但这场竞争的性质和可能结局与互联网时代的补贴战截然不同。 目前,OpenAI和Anthropic等公司的订阅套餐存在巨额补贴,高端套餐用户享受到的Token价值可能是其付费的数十倍。这种“逆向定价”旨在用亏损绑定重度用户和开发者。然而,与滴滴、美团等通过补贴建立用户锁定效应的模式不同,AI Token的切换成本极低——用户几乎可以无成本地在不同AI模型间迁移。这意味着补贴无法构筑护城河,一旦停止,用户可能迅速流失。 竞争格局呈现结构性不对称。谷歌凭借每年超3000亿美元的广告收入,拥有可持续补贴Token的“印钞机”,而OpenAI和Anthropic则依赖融资,未来上市后将面临盈利压力。Google Ventures创始人Bill Maris指出,谷歌完全有能力将Token价格再降80%,这将给竞争对手带来严峻挑战。 关于终局,文章认为存在两种可能:一是“互联网服务”剧本,通过补贴实现垄断后涨价;二是“水电煤”剧本,Token成为标准化基础资源,价格被压向成本线,利润率趋近于零。由于Token缺乏锁定效应,第二种可能性更大。这意味着AI竞争可能是一场没有明确赢家的“无限游戏”,参战者的核心目标是确保自己始终留在牌桌上,通过竞争共同推动技术普及和生态壮大。 最终,AI可能像电力一样,成为一种任何公司都无法独占的公共基础设施。这对用户而言或许是好事,只要补贴战持续,就能以极低成本享用强大算力。但对OpenAI和Anthropic等公司而言,它们所追逐的靠AI赚取暴利的梦想,可能从结构上就难以实现。

marsbit40分钟前

AI 巨头的「Token 补贴大战」,快打完了吗?

marsbit40分钟前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片