U.S. CFTC Approves Bitcoin Futures Platform Bitnomial's Derivatives Clearing Application

CoinDeskPolicy发布于2023-12-12更新于2023-12-13

文章摘要

The commissioners discussed issues like conflict of interest before ultimately voting in favor of the margined bitcoin futures company.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission granted crypto derivatives company Bitnomial approval to register as a derivatives clearing organization in the U.S., letting it settle margined futures and options contracts.

CFTC commissioners voted 2-1 in favor of the application by Bitnomial, a four-year-old company that wants to offer margined bitcoin futures as well as options tied to bitcoin futures to U.S. investors. Commissioner Kristin Johnson and Chairman Rostin Behnam voted to approve the proposal, while Christy Goldsmith Romero was the lone no vote. Caroline Pham and Summer Mersinger concurred – essentially an abstention.

17K

Bitnomial already had approval to operate as a designated contract market, which let it list the futures and options contracts, and as a futures commission merchant, which lets it trade with customers.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Commissioners debated issues like conflicts of interest during an open commission debate on Wednesday before ultimately voting in favor of the company's application.

In a statement, Bitnomial CEO Luke Hoersten said the company wants to offer "a broad spectrum of physical and digital commodities."

"Unlike other businesses that have attempted to disintermediate the brokerage industry, our FCM offers wholesale digital asset-related services and support to our brokerage partners, institutions, and dealers," he said. "Now that the licensing process is complete, we can shift our focus to expanding Bitnomial's product offering and customer base."

Edited by Nick Baker.

你可能也喜欢

美国大模型走向封闭,以安全之名

2026年6月,美国政府以安全为由,对前沿AI模型的发布实施管制。Anthropic的最强网络安全模型Mythos 5被要求下架后,仅获准有限恢复至约100家美国机构,其公众版Fable 5恢复时间未定。同时,OpenAI发布的新模型GPT-5.6系列也只对经政府审批的合作伙伴开放API。此事标志着美国政府首次成功介入商业AI模型的发布审批。 然而,涉事公司的安全评估显示,模型并未越过其自设的风险红线。OpenAI评估其模型不具备自主实施端到端网络攻击的能力;Anthropic则反驳政府的担忧基于一个狭窄、非通用的漏洞。行业批评政府的决策缺乏清晰的技术标准和透明的流程。有观点认为,管制行动的背后是模型能力的“可演示性”引发了政治担忧、竞争对手的举报以及新AI行政令寻求执法案例的需求。 文章回顾了上世纪90年代的“密码战争”,当时美国政府试图管制强加密技术的出口,最终因技术扩散无法遏制、损害美国企业竞争力而失败。历史镜鉴提示,对前沿AI的类似管制可能阻碍技术创新与产业投资,并将市场优势让位于以开源开放策略发展的竞争者。 评论指出,一个没有明确标准和时间表的审批流程,可能动摇前沿AI产业的商业逻辑,并将强大工具的访问权集中于少数特权机构,反而可能增加风险。全球开发者社区开始怀念模型自由发布、快速创新的时代,并将更多期待转向持续开放的中国大模型。

链捕手22分钟前

美国大模型走向封闭,以安全之名

链捕手22分钟前

交易

现货
活动图片