Decentralized credit scores: How can blockchain tech change ratings

Cointelegraph发布于2022-04-25更新于2022-04-25

文章摘要

The concept of lending and borrowing is as old as time itself.

The concept of lending and borrowing is as old as time itself. Regarding finances, while some individuals have more than enough for themselves, others barely have enough to get by. As long as there is this imbalance in finance distribution, there will always be a need to borrow and a desire to lend.
Lending involves giving out a resource on credit with the condition of it being returned upon an agreed period of time. In this case, such resources would be money or any financial asset.
The lender could be an individual, a financial institution, a firm or even a country. Whichever the case may be, the lender, oftentimes, needs a sort of assurance that their resources would be returned to them upon the agreed time.
Certain criteria qualify a borrower to take a loan. Among these are the borrower’s debt-to-income (DTI) ratio which measures the amount of money from their income committed to handling monthly debt service, stable employment, the value of the collateral and actual income.
Credit rating plays a crucial role in lending
Generally, most financial institutions and firms rely more heavily on the credit score of the borrower than the aforementioned criteria.
Consequently, credit scores are by far the biggest factor in determining whether a loan should be granted to a borrower. In a world of financial imbalance where loans are quickly becoming necessary, particularly due to recent economic hardships, individuals, establishments and even governments are expected to keep their credit ratings as favorable as possible.
These ratings or scores can be assigned to individuals, firms or governments that wish to take a loan in the bid to settle a deficit. Defaulting in the payment of the loan at the agreed time generally has an adverse impact on the borrower’s credit rating, making it difficult for them to obtain another loan in the future.
In the case of governments, they are likely to face a sovereign credit risk which is the potential of a government to default on the repayment of a loan taken. According to data from Wikipedia, Singapore, Norway, Switzerland and Denmark respectively rank first to fourth among the least risky countries to lend to.
Traditional credit rating is barely perfect
As simple as it sounds, the concept of credit rating is far from perfect due in large part to its centralized nature.
Credit ratings are carried out by establishments commonly referred to as credit bureaus. The credit rating of individuals can be carried out by agencies including Transunion, Experian and Equifax. Companies and governments are likely to be assessed by firms such as Moody’s and S&P Global, to name a few.
While credit bureaus make every effort to assess borrowers’ creditworthiness as transparently as possible, there have been numerous cases of inadequate assessments due to issues such as concealment of material information, static study, misrepresentation and human bias.
In a recent article, Dimitar Rafailov, Bulgarian associate professor at the University of Economics Varna, stressed the importance of an adequate and transparent credit rating.
However, Rafailov noted that credit bureaus perceived inadequacies in these ratings and such failings have “strengthened the negative effects of the global financial crisis, generating additional systematic risks.” He pointed out that the errors plaguing traditional credit rating as made by credit bureaus are often caused by “business models, conflicts of interest and absent or ineffective regulation of their activities.”
The patent need for decentralization
The advent of blockchain technology revolutionized a lot of sectors, especially the financial sector. Decentralized finance (DeFi), as a product of the burgeoning technology, has revealed the possibility of running financial services with a peer-to-peer (P2P) system, eliminating the idea of an intermediary or central authority.
Decentralized credit scoring refers to the idea of assessing a borrower’s creditworthiness using on-chain — at times off-chain — data without the need for an intermediary. The assessment is done on a blockchain run by a P2P system of computers without any central authority or point of control. Moreover, a decentralized credit rating erases the traditional credit bureaus from the picture.
Jill Carlson, an investment partner at Slow Ventures, expressed the importance of a decentralized form of credit scoring. She noted in a 2018 article that “solutions for decentralized credit scoring, therefore, could be extrapolated into larger identity systems that do not rely on a single central authority,” further stating that the issues that have come from a centralized credit scoring concept “have been more deeply felt than ever than ever in the last year,” citing the Equifax hack of 2017.
In 2017, credit rating giant Equifax had a security breach caused by four Chinese hackers who compromised the data of 143 million Americans.
Antonio Trenchev, former member of the National Assembly of Bulgaria and co-founder of blockchain lending platform Nexo, told Cointelegraph that credit ratings, especially as produced by central authorities, are more problematic than solution-based.
Trenchev boasted of how his platform has managed to rule out credit scores via its “Instant Crypto Credit Lines and Nexo Card.”
“In this utopian borrowing-scape we hope to create, credit scores will be a rarity, and when they are used, they will be decentralized and fair.”
Growing into a reality
Two years ago, blockchain lending protocol Teller raised $1 million in a seed funding round led by venture capital firm Framework Ventures to incorporate traditional credit scores into DeFi
Although it was the first of its kind in the decentralized world, credit scores are expected to help with the problem of over-collateralization that plagued lending in DeFi while making sure that eligible borrowers get what they deserve.
In November last year, Credit DeFi Alliance (CreDA) officially launched a credit rating service that would ascertain a user’s creditworthiness with data from multiple blockchains.
CreDA was developed to work using the CreDA Oracle by evaluating records of past transactions carried out by the user across several blockchains with the help of an AI.
When this data is analyzed, it is minted into a nonfungible token (NFT) called a credit NFT (cNFT). This cNFT is then used to assess incentives or rates peculiar to the user’s data when the user wishes to borrow from a DeFi protocol.
Moreover, CreDA was made to operate across different blockchains including Polkadot, Binance Smart Chain, Elastos Sidechain, Polygon, Arbitrum and more, despite being built on Ethereum-2.0.
Recently, P2P lending protocol RociFi labs concluded a seed funding of $2.7 million in partnership with asset management firm GoldenTree, investment firm Skynet Trading, Arrington Capital, XRP Capital, Nexo and LD Capital. This is geared toward expanding on-chain credit ratings for decentralized finance.
Moreover, RociFi works by using on-chain data and AI in addition to ID data from decentralized platforms to determine a user’s rating. The credit rating, like CreDA’s approach, is turned into an NFT called a nonfungible credit score which could range from 1 to 10. A higher score means less creditworthiness.
A plethora of benefits
The judgments made with regard to a borrower’s creditworthiness can have a profound effect on their life. The necessity to have fair and unbiased judgments in this regard cannot be overemphasized.
Nonetheless, traditional credit rating bureaus have failed to accurately assess borrowers’ creditworthiness in a lot of cases, either due to inefficiency or just plain bias.
Decentralized credit rating brings fairness to the table. Borrowers are certain of being assessed accurately because of the fact that these assessments are carried out by AI on blockchains without the control of any central authority.
Furthermore, with decentralized credit rating, the on-chain data of consumers are not collected and stored on a central ledger but scattered throughout a blockchain maintained by a P2P system. This makes it very hard for hackers to steal users’ data, as was encountered in the Equifax hack of 2017.
From DeFi to decentralized credit rating, the blockchain industry has brought security and efficiency to the financial world. Although decentralized credit rating is in its early stages, even with the advancements already made, there’s no doubt about its growth into an even better assessment tool in the future.

你可能也喜欢

美国参议员敦促银行监管机构制定‘公平’的加密货币资本规则

美国参议员呼吁制定“公平”的加密资本规则。由参议院数字资产小组委员会主席辛西娅·卢米斯牵头,多名共和党参议员致信美联储、联邦存款保险公司(FDIC)及货币监理署(OCC)负责人,要求为银行从事加密资产活动建立更清晰、公平的资本框架。 信中批评了巴塞尔银行监管委员会现行的加密资产资本标准,该标准对加密资产施加了1250%的风险权重,参议员们认为这并非基于实际风险评估,而像是一种按资产类别“一刀切”的惩罚,实质上阻碍了银行持有此类资产,与监管机构倡导的“技术中立”原则相悖。 议员们赞赏了监管机构近期关于代币化证券的联合指引,该指引明确了此类资产应获得与其非代币化对应物同等的资本待遇。他们敦促监管机构将这一风险导向原则一致性地应用于其他数字资产,并基于近期在加密市场结构法案方面的进展,开始为银行的资产负债表加密资产活动制定新的资本框架。 与此同时,FDIC、OCC和美联储负责人近期在国会作证时,概述了其转向更“基于风险”的监管方向,旨在改革监管框架以提高效率,并审查过去的监管措施。他们强调,强有力的资本标准对保障银行体系韧性和支持经济增长至关重要,同时监管应促进而非阻碍负责任的创新。

bitcoinist21分钟前

美国参议员敦促银行监管机构制定‘公平’的加密货币资本规则

bitcoinist21分钟前

从以太坊到AI的“CROPS”:Vitalik反复强调的这套“慢变量”,究竟是什么?

以太坊创始人Vitalik Buterin近期频繁强调一个概念——CROPS,它代表抗审查性(Censorship Resistance)、抗捕获性(Capture Resistance)、开源(Open Source)、隐私(Privacy)和安全(Security)。这一理念源于以太坊基金会发布的指导文件,旨在确保用户在数字生活中不依赖单一平台、不丧失最终控制权。 随着AI技术深入钱包和自动化执行场景,CROPS的内涵超越了以太坊的原有范畴,成为AI时代用户能否掌控自身数字生活的关键问题。Vitalik指出,真正的“CROPS AI”应支持多种硬件平台,而不仅仅是“去中心化AI”。当AI成为用户的数字代理人,处理资产管理和链上操作时,确保其抗审查、开放、隐私和安全变得至关重要。 CROPS Ethereum与CROPS AI存在显著交集。例如,通过零知识证明实现付费远程大模型调用和私密以太坊RPC读取,旨在让用户在获取远程服务的同时避免暴露敏感信息。未来,可能出现更多针对以太坊场景微调的AI模型,用于提升智能合约和生态安全。 这一理念将深刻影响Web3生态,尤其是钱包等入口层产品。在市场关注短期热点的背景下,CROPS提醒我们关注那些决定长期方向的技术变量:在AI加速接管数字世界的时代,确保系统可理解、可验证、注重隐私和安全,才是以太坊持续价值的真正体现。

marsbit3小时前

从以太坊到AI的“CROPS”:Vitalik反复强调的这套“慢变量”,究竟是什么?

marsbit3小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片