SFC consults on proposals to regulate virtual asset trading platforms

SFC发布于2023-02-20更新于2023-02-20

文章摘要

The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) today launched a consultation on the proposed requirements for operators of virtual asset trading platforms.

The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) today launched a consultation on the proposed requirements for operators of virtual asset trading platforms.

Under a new licensing regime to take effect on 1 June 2023 (Note 1), all centralised virtual asset trading platforms carrying on business in Hong Kong or actively marketing to Hong Kong investors will need to be licensed by the SFC.

The SFC’s proposed regulatory requirements for virtual asset trading platforms are based on the regulatory requirements of the existing regime under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Note 2) and are comparable to those for licensed securities brokers and automated trading venues (Note 3). The SFC has also taken the opportunity to propose modifications to some requirements of the existing regime.

As part of the consultation, the SFC is seeking views particularly on whether to allow licensed platform operators to serve retail investors, and if so, the measures to be implemented in addition to the proposed range of robust investor protection measures, which include ensuring suitability in onboarding clients and token admission (Note 4).

“As has been our philosophy since 2018, our proposed requirements for virtual asset trading platforms include robust measures to protect investors, following the ‘same business, same risks, same rules’ principle,” (Note 5) said Ms Julia Leung, the SFC’s Chief Executive Officer. “In light of the recent turmoil and the collapse of some leading crypto trading platforms around the world, there is clear consensus among regulators globally for regulation in the virtual asset space to ensure investors are adequately protected and key risks are effectively managed.”

Operators of virtual asset trading platforms which plan to apply for a licence, including pre-existing platforms (Note 6), should begin to review and revise their systems and controls to prepare for the new regime. Those which do not plan to apply for a licence should start preparing for an orderly closure of their business in Hong Kong.

The SFC intends to publish lists on its website to inform the public of the different regulatory statuses of VA trading platforms, and will continue working with the Investor and Financial Education Council to enhance investor education for the Hong Kong public.

Interested parties are invited to submit their comments to the SFC on or before 31 March 2023 via the SFC website (www.sfc.hk), by email to [email protected], by post or by fax to (852) 2293 4004.

End

Notes:

Under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing (Amendment) Ordinance 2022, any person who carries on a business of providing a virtual asset service (ie, operating a virtual asset exchange), or holds itself, himself or herself out as carrying on such a business, is required to apply for a licence from the SFC.

In 2019, the SFC introduced a regulatory framework for centralised virtual asset trading platforms which provide trading services in at least one security token. Please refer to the Position Paper: Regulation of virtual asset trading platforms issued by the SFC on 6 November 2019.

The requirements cover key areas such as safe custody of assets, know-your-client, conflicts of interest, cybersecurity, accounting and auditing, risk management, anti-money laundering/counter-financing of terrorism and prevention of market misconduct.

In addition to ensuring suitability in onboarding clients and token admission, the other key proposals relate to token due diligence, governance and disclosures.

The SFC has identified since 2018 that the risks associated with virtual asset activities are not limited to money-laundering but also include investor protection concerns. Please refer to the Statement on regulatory framework for virtual asset portfolios managers, fund distributors and trading platform operators issued by the SFC on 1 November 2018.

Virtual asset trading platform operators are considered “pre-existing” if they are operating in Hong Kong with a meaningful and substantial presence prior to 1 June 2023.

.

Original Article Link

你可能也喜欢

埃里克·特朗普设定一个“超越灾难”的标准来出售比特币——我们离那有多远?

埃里克·特朗普(Eric Trump)作为美国比特币公司(American Bitcoin Corp.)的联合创始人兼首席战略官,近日在接受采访时明确了他的比特币出售条件——门槛被设定为“超越灾难性”的事件。这意味着,在几乎所有可预见的市场情景下,他都不会出售比特币,这更像是一个长期持有的哲学承诺,而非风险管理政策。 特朗普指出,比特币储备领域存在两场竞赛:一是争夺最大比特币持有量,二是追求最低获取成本。出售比特币会立即在第一场竞赛中失利,并破坏第二场竞赛的逻辑。该公司的核心指标是提升“每股聪数”,即每流通股所代表的比特币数量,而出售会稀释这一指标。只有持续挖矿并保留比特币,才能使积累模型发挥作用。 特朗普赞扬了迈克尔·塞勒(Michael Saylor)在比特币储备领域的开拓作用,但也指出了关键区别:塞勒近期暗示微策略(MicroStrategy)可能出售部分比特币用于支付股息,显示出积累模型的一定灵活性;而美国比特币公司则通过挖矿以声称低于现货约53%的成本获取比特币,并严格执行“永不卖出”的策略。对于一家矿业一体化的储备公司而言,这种不卖出的立场在运营上更具可信度,因为其新增比特币的边际成本更低,资产负债表变现压力也更小。 目前比特币价格约为82,000美元,美国比特币公司持有超过7,000枚比特币,并继续执行其创始人公开描述的、近乎无条件的积累战略。他的“超越灾难性”出售门槛,为本周期内上市公司高管最明确的长期积累承诺树立了标杆。市场最终会奖励这种信念还是惩罚其僵化,将取决于未来几年比特币的价格走势。

bitcoinist3小时前

埃里克·特朗普设定一个“超越灾难”的标准来出售比特币——我们离那有多远?

bitcoinist3小时前

DeFi 到了最危险的时候:真正的漏洞不在代码里

2026年4月,DeFi行业遭遇了历史上被黑最严重的一个月,累计损失超6.25亿美元。关键在于,这些重大攻击(如Drift Protocol损失2.85亿美元、KelpDAO损失2.92亿美元、Wasabi Protocol损失450万美元)均非利用智能合约代码漏洞,而是针对其“运营底座”——包括管理员私钥、跨链桥验证者、多签配置和社会工程。 文章指出,行业长期笃信“安全即代码问题”,但如今威胁已迁移至智能合约之外的信任环节。这些事件暴露了DeFi(实为“OpenFi”)的真相:系统虽开放可审计,却在关键节点依赖少数受信方(如安全理事会、单一验证者、特权管理员)。这种中心化的运营杠杆如同“关闭开关”,既能用于紧急响应(如Arbitrum冻结被盗资产),也可能被攻击者劫持造成灾难。 KelpDAO事件尤其凸显了“非对称蔓延”风险:一家小协议的跨链桥配置错误,竟引发Aave等大型协议超过130亿美元的资金外流,暴露了可组合性下的系统性脆弱。 文章结论认为,行业心智模型已然破裂。前路在于诚实披露信任假设、将运营安全提升至与代码审计同等地位,并建立可被机构定价和承保的风险模型。未来能存活并吸引机构资金的协议,将是那些能清晰定义并管理自身中心化权衡的协议。

链捕手3小时前

DeFi 到了最危险的时候:真正的漏洞不在代码里

链捕手3小时前

Vitalik 发文强调以太坊必须“令人惊叹”,但基金会不是中心

以太坊创始人Vitalik发文回应近期社区对以太坊基金会的批评,强调以太坊必须保持“令人惊叹”的愿景,并澄清基金会并非生态中心,而是有明确目标的节点。文章承认,由于ETH价格疲软(一年内最大跌幅超64%)及生态表现落后于Hyperliquid等竞争者,社区将矛头指向基金会,批评其战略模糊、高层动荡、持续抛售ETH且利益未与持币者对齐。 Vitalik以谷歌为例,警示以太坊应避免从理想主义滑向平庸与腐败,坚持“不作恶”初心。他明确基金会定位:不再作为“以太坊的中心”,而是聚焦于推动对以太坊抗审查、安全、隐私等核心属性至关重要的长远工作,并承诺将大幅减少ETH出售。 对于发展路线,Vitalik反对盲目追求高TPS,认为那将导致平庸。他提出以太坊应在“CROPS”维度做到极致:实现可证明无Bug的以太坊(借助AI形式化验证)、保持高可用的链共识、彻底消除交易中介(达到100%中介最小化)。这些技术坚持旨在通过建立极致确定性来获取高级资本溢价,回应了对其忽略通证经济学的批评。 最后,文章指出,在基金会缩减职能后,如何创建一个与以太坊经济利益真正对齐并负责的新组织,仍是生态需要解决的关键缺口,这也可能是ETH扭转颓势的重要一步。

链捕手4小时前

Vitalik 发文强调以太坊必须“令人惊叹”,但基金会不是中心

链捕手4小时前

BTC市场脉搏:第22周

比特币上周交易走低,价格从7.9万美元跌至7.4万美元附近的局部低点,随后反弹至约7.7万美元。价格动能下降21.7%,反映出行情疲软和抛压上升。然而,现货与永续合约的CVD指标分别大幅增长77.2%和35.5%,表明抛压正在缓解,市场情绪趋于平衡。整体活动有所降温,现货交易量下降10%,期货未平仓合约减少3.5%,指向投机兴趣减弱和市场背景更趋谨慎。 尽管如此,风险偏好重现的迹象正在浮现。多头资金费率飙升135.4%,突显了强烈的多头敞口需求和看涨情绪的改善。在期权市场,25-Delta偏度小幅上升,显示对下行保护的需求略有增加,而未平仓合约大体稳定,表明仓位保持完好。 在传统金融领域,美国现货ETF的MVRV上升0.69%,表明ETF持有者的未实现利润略有增加。同时,ETF资金净流入改善28.9%,指向资本外流缓解和情绪稳定,尽管ETF交易量下降了22.9%,暗示投机活动放缓。 从网络活动看,每日活跃地址数和实体调整后的转账量略有减少,暗示市场可能进入盘整阶段或投资者活动减弱。流动性指标显示市场流动性状况更趋稳定,市场特征表现为信念更强而投机活动更低,进一步支持盘整阶段的判断。 然而,盈利指标提示市场压力可能增加。净未实现盈亏比显著下降,而已实现盈亏比表明实现亏损相对于获利了结有所增加,反映出谨慎且可能偏空的市场情绪。 总而言之,市场显示出温和与盘整的迹象,其特点是活动减少、情绪谨慎以及风险偏好复杂交织。这一微妙局面凸显了持续密切关注市场动态和投资者行为的重要性。

insights.glassnode4小时前

BTC市场脉搏:第22周

insights.glassnode4小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片