XDC stalls below $0.051 – Why THIS price range matters next

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2025-12-24Обновлено 2025-12-24

Введение

XDC Network (XDC) continues to trade in a bearish trend, facing rejection at the key $0.051 resistance level on December 20th. The price has been consolidating between $0.045 and $0.051, with a break below $0.046 potentially leading to further declines. A daily close above $0.0518 is needed to signal a bullish shift. Weak buying pressure and Bitcoin's rejection at $90k have contributed to XDC's stagnation. Key resistance levels to watch are $0.0489, $0.0496, and $0.0506, while bearish targets lie at $0.0446 and $0.0424. The overall structure remains bearish unless buying pressure increases significantly.

XDC Network [XDC] faced rejection at the $0.051 local resistance zone on the 20th of December. An earlier AMBCrypto report pointed out that the long-term trend was bearish and that the $0.051 was a local supply zone.

This observation has been correct so far, but XDC has not progressed its downtrend. Instead, it seemed to be trading within a short-term consolidation phase. The $0.045 and $0.051 levels were the ones to watch out for in the coming days.

The Bitcoin [BTC] price action gave no boost to XDC. Bitcoin faced rejection at the $90k psychological round-number resistance. A lack of market-wide bullish strength and weak buying pressure on XDC helped explain why the altcoin continued its decline.

Exploring if the downtrend has stalled

The 1-day structure remained bearish. The evidence for this came on Sunday, the 14th of December, when XDC made a new lower low. Since then, another bearish break on the 1-day chart has not arrived.

A move below $0.0460 would result in a bearish continuation. On the other hand, a rally back above the local high at $0.518 would see a bullish structure shift. This nearly occurred on Saturday, the 20th of December.

It was not to be. A day later, XDC saw a 9.81% loss, falling back to the $0.0460 level. This reinforced how important these two swing points were.

Mapping the possible bullish XDC route

The move that cemented the bearish continuation on the daily chart was used to plot a set of Fibonacci levels. At the time of writing, the 50% retracement level acted as resistance, halting the XDC bounce.

The $0.0489, $0.0496, and $0.0506 resistance levels can rebuff bullish advances. The OBV on the H4 chart was trending higher- if the buying pressure continues to rise, a bullish structure shift is possible.

Traders, look for THESE short position entries

The Fibonacci retracement levels plotted above, and the swing high at $0.0518, were clear invalidation levels for bearish traders. To the south, the $0.0446 and $0.0424 levels remained the bearish targets.

Final Thoughts

The XDC Network token price remained in a bearish trend, despite the volatility of the past week.
Traders can remain bearishly biased until the $00518 level is breached on the 1-day timeframe, which would signal a bullish structure shift.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the key resistance level that XDC Network faced rejection at on December 20th?

AXDC Network faced rejection at the $0.051 local resistance zone on December 20th.

QAccording to the article, what are the two price levels to watch out for in the coming days for XDC?

AThe $0.045 and $0.051 levels are the ones to watch out for in the coming days.

QWhat would signal a bullish structure shift for XDC on the 1-day timeframe?

AA rally back above the local high at $0.0518 would signal a bullish structure shift on the 1-day timeframe.

QWhat are the identified bearish targets for XDC to the south?

AThe identified bearish targets to the south are the $0.0446 and $0.0424 levels.

QWhat does the article cite as reasons for XDC's continued decline?

AThe article cites a lack of market-wide bullish strength, weak buying pressure on XDC, and Bitcoin's rejection at the $90k resistance as reasons for XDC's continued decline.

Похожее

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit18 мин. назад

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

In a candid interview, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang challenged competitors like Google and Amazon, admitted past strategic errors, and criticized U.S. export controls on AI chips. He framed Nvidia’s role as turning “electricity in, tokens out,” emphasizing the complexity and value of AI inference. Huang dismissed rival custom chips like Google’s TPU and Amazon’s Trainium as inflexible and niche, claiming their growth relies heavily on clients like Anthropic. He also acknowledged missing early investment opportunities in OpenAI and Anthropic. On China, Huang warned that export restrictions risk pushing the country toward self-sufficiency and could cost U.S. leadership in AI. Finally, he explained Nvidia’s acquisition of Groq as a move to serve premium, low-latency token markets. Throughout, Huang emphasized ecosystem trust and Nvidia’s central role in global AI infrastructure.

marsbit23 мин. назад

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

marsbit23 мин. назад

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

ARK Invest, a major investor in SpaceX, provides an analysis following SpaceX's confidential IPO filing on April 1, 2026, targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation and up to $75 billion in funding for a Nasdaq listing around June 2026. This would be the largest IPO in history. The valuation implies a price-to-sales ratio of ~95x based on ~$18.5B in projected 2025 revenue. ARK argues this reflects future potential, not current reality. Key drivers include Starlink, with over 10M users and $20B+ in 2026 revenue, launch services which have reduced costs by ~95% since 2008, and the strategic merger with xAI in February 2026, enabling vertically integrated AI and orbital computing. ARK’s investment thesis is based on SpaceX's proven execution of ambitious goals, like reusable rockets and global satellite internet. The firm notes that significant value creation often occurs pre-IPO, and its Venture Fund offers exposure to SpaceX’s earlier private stages. Post-IPO, the fund will manage the position per standard lock-up and rebalancing processes, maintaining flexibility to reinvest in other private innovations. The analysis is based on public estimates and ARK research; the S-1 filing is not yet public. This is not investment advice.

marsbit25 мин. назад

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

marsbit25 мин. назад

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

The article discusses the legislative stalemate in the US over the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (CLARITY Act), which aims to regulate crypto assets. A key point of contention is whether stablecoins should be allowed to pay interest, with crypto companies opposing a ban and banks supporting it. Moody's analyst Abhi Srivastava states that, for now, stablecoins do not pose a significant threat to traditional banks due to existing efficient payment systems and the current prohibition on yield-bearing stablecoins. This limits their appeal for pulling deposits from banks at scale. However, with the stablecoin market cap exceeding $300 billion and growth in tokenized assets, banks could face future pressure from deposit outflows. The crypto industry warns that failure to pass the bill could lead to stricter regulatory crackdowns. Negotiations continue with little progress, despite both sides desiring a resolution.

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

Not a Price Hike, but a Supply Cut? Oil Prices Have Crossed the Tipping Point

The global oil market has passed a critical point, shifting the focus from price increases to potential physical supply shortages. The core issue is a time mismatch: even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens, shipping disruptions have already caused significant delays, which will continue to deplete onshore crude inventories for weeks. Refinery behavior acts as an amplifier. Reduced runs in Asia and Europe don’t reflect weaker demand but instead shrink product inventories, raising fuel prices and refining margins, which in turn encourages higher runs—creating a self-reinforcing cycle. If the Strait remains closed beyond April, traditional pricing models may fail. The market could face an unprecedented physical shortfall of 11-13 million barrels per day—roughly four times historical disruption levels. In such a scenario, price becomes an inadequate balancing tool. The only way to rebalance the market would be policy-driven demand destruction, similar to COVID-era lockdowns. Current prices around $95/barrel are insufficient to balance the market. Key signals to watch include inventory levels, policy announcements, and the pace of involuntary demand contraction. Geopolitically, the situation appears likely to worsen before improving, with little room for compromise between the US and Iran.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Not a Price Hike, but a Supply Cut? Oil Prices Have Crossed the Tipping Point

marsbit2 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот

Фьючерсы

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на XDC (XDC) представлены ниже.