When AI Companies Are Frantically Hiring Asian Girls, Attention Is Winning the World

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-01-31Обновлено 2026-01-31

Введение

In the attention economy, AI startups are racing to hire "ABG" (Asian Baby Girl) marketers—young Asian women skilled at creating viral social media content—as Chief Marketing Officers. The trend highlights a shift where viral reach and engagement often trump traditional metrics. Venture capital increasingly chases "traffic signals" over financials, fueling a feedback loop: more attention brings more funding, raising marketing standards, and pushing talent toward content creation. The controversial startup Cluely exemplifies this. It mastered narrative (a founder’s “cheat everything” backstory), built a viral machine with 700+ performance-paid editors, and used a formulaic mix of provocative content, lifestyle flexes, and platform-specific strategies. Results included billions of views at low cost—but without a real product. Cluely became a symbol of marketing-first, product-last ventures. The core insight: attention is the new currency. The best product won’t win; the best story will. Founders must be their own CMOs, and the next wave of successful startups will be built by those who can both code and market.

"If your startup isn't a YC-backed B2B SaaS + GPT wrapper company, and you haven't hired an ABG as your Chief Marketing Officer, then you're basically doomed."

I've heard similar statements from countless AI company founders, each dreaming of finding the next Cluely: effortlessly gaining millions of views, always staying in the spotlight with buzz. (Editor's Note: Cluely is a highly controversial AI startup that pioneered a new paradigm of 'viral marketing,' detailed later.)

ABG = Asian Baby Girl. In Silicon Valley, it has become a term for young Asian women who are savvy at social media marketing. They are particularly skilled at creating eye-catching content, publishing viral posts, and marketing in a highly personalized way. Suddenly, all AI startups are scrambling to hire them as Chief Marketing Officers.

Why? Because one viral post can be more effective than a $50,000 advertising campaign.

Months of painstakingly building a 'thought leader' persona on LinkedIn can garner less attention and engagement than one sharp commentary or a selfie posted on X.

Are Asians naturally good at marketing?

No, and I want to clarify: this has nothing to do with race (people of every race are equally capable). This reveals some deeper issues in the evolution of the startup market.

The Feedback Loop in the Tech Market

Looking at past viral success stories (like @cluely), we can see that VCs chasing 'traffic signals' has surpassed traditional financial metrics, leading more capital to flow into more personality-driven, social-first projects.

Now, more college students are choosing to be content creators rather than taking $200,000 salaried jobs at big tech companies. Consequently, more startups are hiring "ABGs" for marketing, raising the overall standard of tech marketing, and thus creators gain access to better market resources.

Social media engagement data has become the sole standard for marketing effectiveness.

And this feedback loop is accelerating: more attention means more funding, which raises the bar higher, attracting more talent to shift careers, until it forms a stronger monopoly on attention.

Likes, views, and reposts are no longer just vanity metrics; they have become the new standards for investment due diligence.

The core issue isn't ABG; it's the attention economy.

How to Capture Hearts and Minds? Cluely Submitted the Perfect Answer Sheet

· Narrative: "Cheat on Everything" — perfectly aligned with founder @im_roy_lee's story (expelled from Columbia University/Harvard). This wasn't just a slogan; it was a carefully crafted origin story.

From "a complete loser" to "using AI to cheat his way into big tech, Y Combinator, and A16Z." This underdog-to-top-dog narrative often ignites both aspiration and outrage simultaneously.

· Industrial-Grade Viral Machine: They recruited over 700 "editors" — mostly micro-creators from TikTok/Instagram. The model was: pay-for-performance. $1 per thousand views. Zero upfront cost.

· Formulaic Content: Nonsense tweets + attractive looks/borderline content + lifestyle flexing. Party videos (like the shutdown "$1.5 million rager"), the "genius Intern" persona of founder Roy Lee, flaunting wealth, scoffing at traditional education. This marketing makes you think: "I really want to join these cool kids."

· Full-Platform Domination: X for building the thought leader persona (150k+ followers), TikTok/Instagram as the main battleground, LinkedIn/Reddit for generating native controversy.

The result? Over 10 million daily views, garnering 1 billion views in 3 months, at a cost far lower than traditional advertising. Traditional CPM (Cost Per Mille) is around $4; they only needed about $1.

But the fatal flaw was: The investment in marketing far exceeded the product; they essentially didn't develop a decent, market-ready product. Viral spread wasn't a byproduct; it was their only product.

When Cluely pivoted to an "AI note-taking tool," the entire web mocked them. People wondered where all that money had gone.

Some even suggested: since they're so good at this, why not just become a marketing agency for other AI companies?

But the most incredible part is: They did capture a certain truth. In an era of scarce attention, "any publicity is good publicity."

The irony: Everyone laughs at Cluely, everyone wants to be Cluely.

(If you hate me but still keep up with my updates, then you're my fan)

What Is the Truth, Really?

Attention is winning the world.

Capital flows to companies that capture consumer mindshare, not just market share. Nowadays, the best product doesn't necessarily win; the product with the best story does.

Every founder must also be their own CMO, building their own IP. The product is important, but if you neglect marketing, no one will know about your product.

The next wave of successful startups won't be built by the best engineers. They will be created by those who "can code and market."

Welcome to the new game.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat does ABG stand for in the context of AI startups, and why are they being hired?

AABG stands for 'Asian Baby Girl,' a term used in Silicon Valley to refer to young Asian women who are skilled in social media marketing. They are being hired by AI startups because they excel at creating eye-catching content, generating viral posts, and conducting personality-driven marketing, which often yields better results than traditional advertising campaigns.

QWhat is the core reason behind the trend of hiring ABGs, according to the article?

AThe core reason is not about race but the attention economy. The trend reflects a shift where venture capitalists prioritize 'traffic signals' over traditional financial metrics, leading to more funding for personality-driven, social-first projects. Attention and engagement on social media have become new standards for investment due diligence.

QHow did Cluely achieve viral marketing success, and what were its key strategies?

ACluely achieved viral marketing success through a compelling narrative (e.g., 'Cheat on Everything' tied to the founder's backstory), an industrial-scale viral machine (hiring 700+ micro-creators paid per thousand views), formulaic content (combining provocative posts, lifestyle炫耀, and controversy), and multi-platform dominance (X, TikTok, Instagram, LinkedIn, and Reddit). This resulted in over 1 billion views in three months at a low cost.

QWhat was the major flaw in Cluely's approach, as highlighted in the article?

ACluely's major flaw was that their investment in marketing far exceeded their product development. They did not created a viable, market-ready product; viral marketing was their only product. When they attempted to pivot to an 'AI note-taking tool,' they faced widespread ridicule and questions about their spending.

QWhat does the article suggest about the future of successful startups in the attention economy?

AThe article suggests that successful startups will be built by individuals who 'both code and market,' rather than just the best engineers. Founders must act as their own CMOs and build their personal IP, as capturing consumer attention through storytelling and marketing is crucial, even if the product itself is not the best.

Похожее

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

Hyperliquid, a cryptocurrency derivatives platform, is facing formal complaints from two major traditional exchanges, CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange) and ICE (Intercontinental Exchange, parent company of the New York Stock Exchange). The firms have jointly approached the U.S. Congress and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission), urging stricter regulatory oversight of Hyperliquid's operations. The action highlights growing tensions between established traditional financial institutions and emerging crypto-native platforms in the derivatives market.

链捕手2 ч. назад

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

链捕手2 ч. назад

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit3 ч. назад

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit3 ч. назад

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手3 ч. назад

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手3 ч. назад

Bitcoin Short-Term Holder Basis Remains High Within Biggest Supply Cluster

Bitcoin's recent recovery from February lows is approaching a critical supply cluster between $84,000 and $88,000, which holds the largest concentration of Bitcoin supply on the current chart. This zone represents the cost basis for short-term holders (investors who bought within the last 155 days) and is stacked with "trapped" sellers who bought near those levels and are now at breakeven. Technical analysis suggests the rally faces significant resistance in this area. Two primary scenarios are outlined: a direct push into the $84k-$86k zone followed by a rejection and pullback to $70,000 support, or a more volatile path involving a dip before testing the supply cluster. A weekly close above $84,000 would weaken the bearish rejection case, but a decisive break above $86,900-$88,000 is needed for a stronger bullish confirmation. Bitcoin is currently trading around $80,430.

bitcoinist3 ч. назад

Bitcoin Short-Term Holder Basis Remains High Within Biggest Supply Cluster

bitcoinist3 ч. назад

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit5 ч. назад

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit5 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам (2): 2026 может стать годом приложений реального времени, сектор AI продолжает оставаться в тренде

2025 год — год институциональных инвесторов, в будущем он будет доминировать в приложениях реального времени.

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.12.16Обновлено 2025.12.16

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам (2): 2026 может стать годом приложений реального времени, сектор AI продолжает оставаться в тренде

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на AI (AI) представлены ниже.

活动图片

Топ вопросы

Популярные категорииright-arrow

Популярные тегиright-arrow