The FBI Launched a Coin, and It's More Legitimate Than Half of the Crypto Projects Out There

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-05-21Обновлено 2026-05-21

Введение

In an undercover operation dubbed "Operation Token Mirrors," the FBI created a fake cryptocurrency project called NexFundAI on Ethereum to expose widespread market manipulation. Posing as a project team, FBI agents approached several market-making firms—including Gotbit, ZM Quant, CLS Global, and MyTrade—to artificially inflate trading volume. All firms agreed without questioning the project's legitimacy, with one founder admitting on tape that they profited by ensuring retail investors lost money. The investigation, spanning two years and three continents, led to charges against 28 individuals and the seizure of over $25 million in crypto assets. Key cases involved firms like Saitama, which allegedly manipulated its token to a $7.5 billion market cap using coordinated buying and market makers, and Lillian Finance, which promoted a fraudulent charity narrative. Evidence included internal spreadsheets tracking fake versus real trading volume and Telegram chats discussing manipulation tactics. The FBI's fake project website now warns visitors about its investigative purpose and offers a victim compensation portal. Ironically, within 24 hours of the DOJ's announcement, a copycat token based on NexFundAI's contract was launched, netting its creator over $127,000—highlighting how quickly such schemes are replicated in the crypto space.

Author: Curry, Shenchao TechFlow

Two years ago, FBI agents pretended to be the founding team of an investment project at the "intersection of AI and finance," launched a token called NexFundAI on Ethereum, complete with an official website, whitepaper, and business plan, looking no different from any legitimate project on the market.

Then they approached market makers to provide liquidity.

One function of market makers is sometimes to help project teams boost trading volume. The industry term is "volume support," which translates to volume manipulation.

The undercover FBI agents contacted several well-known market makers in the industry one by one, stating upfront: we have a new project and need someone to help boost the trading volume.

According to the indictment released by the U.S. Department of Justice, every single one said, okay.

No one asked if the project was compliant, no one asked if the token had any real utility, no one asked if this was illegal. According to court documents released by the U.S. Department of Justice, four market makers—Gotbit, ZM Quant, CLS Global, MyTrade—all took the job.

During a meeting with an undercover agent, the founder of one of these firms, on a recording device, referred to himself as the "mastermind." He explained in detail how his company used bots to simultaneously place buy and sell orders to create fake trading volume, and how to make the price chart look like a rollercoaster to lure retail investors to jump in.

Then he said something that the FBI recorded verbatim. According to Cointelegraph quoting the indictment, he said:

We have to make them lose money for us to make money.

"Them" refers to retail investors.

The operation was code-named Operation Token Mirrors. According to a U.S. Department of Justice announcement on October 9, 2024, the first batch of 18 people were charged, with over $25 million in crypto assets seized. According to an IRS announcement on March 30 of this year, a second batch of 10 people were charged, with three extradited to the U.S. from Singapore.

Two years, three continents, 28 people. This is the largest market manipulation enforcement action in cryptocurrency history. And it's not over yet.

A Price Quote

How did these market makers operate?

According to the indictment released by the U.S. Department of Justice, Gotbit's founder, Andriunin, maintained a spreadsheet within the company with two columns of data side by side: one labeled "Created Volume" and the other "Market Volume."

To translate, one column was the fake volume they generated themselves, the other was the actual trading happening in the market.

In a 2019 interview with CoinDesk, while still a sophomore at Moscow State University, this 20-year-old was already explaining in detail on camera how he wrote code to create fake volume and helped clients get their tokens onto CoinMarketCap's trending lists. According to the CoinDesk article, he himself said this business was "not entirely ethical."

After the interview aired, he didn't receive any subpoenas; instead, he gained five new clients.

By the time of his arrest in 2024, Gotbit had been operating for six years, serving projects worldwide. According to the U.S. Department of Justice's sentencing announcement, Andriunin was ultimately sentenced to 8 months in prison, Gotbit was ordered to dissolve, and approximately $23 million in crypto assets were forfeited.

Gotbit wasn't the cheapest.

According to a price quote from another market maker disclosed in the indictment, the cost of generating $1 million in daily trading volume was about $200. According to Cointelegraph citing court documents, an employee of ZM Quant explained to an FBI undercover agent on a recorded call: "We use one to two thousand wallets, trading ten times per hour, or ten times per minute, to reach the target volume."

Each transaction cost about $3.

And CLS Global went even further. According to SEC investigation documents, this company registered in the UAE used 30 wallets to execute 740 wash trades, creating nearly $600,000 in fake trading volume, accounting for 98% of the total trading volume of the fake token NexFundAI created by the FBI during that period.

$7.5 Billion of Thin Air

Market makers are tools; the people hiring them are the main actors.

According to the U.S. Department of Justice indictment, the biggest client exposed by this FBI sting operation was called Saitama, a crypto company registered in Massachusetts in 2021, with a peak market cap reportedly reaching $7.5 billion.

What does $7.5 billion mean? It was larger than many legitimate publicly traded companies on Nasdaq at the time.

But how did that number come about, according to the indictment? Starting in July 2021, Saitama's management coordinated actions in a Telegram group, using multiple wallets to place small buy orders, creating the illusion of "a large influx of new buyers."

According to Telegram chat logs cited in the indictment, a core member explained the purpose of the operation: "We want these small buys to look like more buyers, that’s the plan."

The chat logs also included "PUMP IT" emojis and GIFs they sent to each other to confirm buys and celebrate when retail investors followed.

According to the same indictment, Saitama then paid market makers including ZM Quant and Gotbit to conduct large-scale wash trading on exchanges like BitMart and LBank. After the market cap was inflated, the management quietly sold their own tokens, cashing out tens of millions of dollars. According to a DOJ announcement, Saitama's CEO was arrested in the UK, and five former and current employees were charged, with three pleading guilty.

Saitama wasn't the only one.

According to the same indictment, a project called Lillian Finance was founded by 48-year-old Bradley Beatty from Florida. This person publicly claimed to be a defense contractor, stated he had spoken before Congress on cryptocurrency issues, and promised that part of the token sale proceeds would go to charity to help children receive medical care.

According to the indictment, all these claims were fabricated. Beatty pocketed the profits meant for charity.

Defense contractor, congressional speech, children's medical charity—you just need to weave a compelling enough narrative and hire a market maker to paint a pretty price chart, and that's enough to attract some people to FOMO.

Looking back at these cases, what feels most unsettling isn't how sophisticated the scams were, but rather, how crude they were.

The FBI's Coin Was Pretty Legit

After the operation concluded, the FBI did one more thing.

According to a U.S. Department of Justice announcement, the NexFundAI website is still up, but now with a banner at the top that reads: "This website was created under the direction of the Federal Bureau of Investigation as part of an investigation into cryptocurrency fraud and market manipulation." Below the banner is a link to the full DOJ indictment.

The FBI also specifically opened a victim registration channel. According to the DOJ announcement, anyone who lost money on NexFundAI or related tokens can fill out a form to apply for compensation and legal protection.

The FBI launched a token, proactively disclosed information after the operation ended, and even opened a compensation channel for those who lost money; compared to the projects caught in this sting, the process was arguably much more legitimate.

The most absurd part is yet to come.

According to a report by blockchain analytics firm TRM Labs, within 24 hours of the DOJ announcement, someone cloned the FBI's NexFundAI smart contract and launched a copycat token. This person started with about $2,300, cashed out over 52 ETH within 24 hours, worth approximately $127,000 at the time.

The FBI used a fake token to prove market maker manipulation; the day the news broke, someone used the same tactic to launch a new meme and make another profit. Law enforcement took two years, but the market digested and absorbed the entire event in two hours, by launching yet another new shitcoin.

So next time you see a meme coin suddenly skyrocketing, you might want to think about whether it's a performance or real trading.

Of course, it could also be the FBI.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QAccording to the article, what was the primary tactic used by the 'market makers' exposed in the FBI sting operation?

AThey used automated bots or a network of wallets to place simultaneous buy and sell orders, creating fake trading volume to make a project appear more active and legitimate, thereby attracting real investors.

QWhat was the name of the fake project the FBI created, and what action did they take regarding its website after the operation concluded?

AThe fake project was called NexFundAI. After the operation, the FBI added a prominent banner to its website explaining it was a law enforcement investigation tool and provided links to official documents and a victim compensation form.

QWhich major project with a peak claimed valuation of $75 billion was implicated as a major client of the exposed market makers? What was the alleged method they used to inflate its value?

AThe project was Saitama. Its management allegedly coordinated through Telegram groups to place numerous small buy orders from multiple wallets, creating the illusion of widespread organic buying demand to pump the price before selling their own holdings.

QWhat ironic event occurred shortly after the Department of Justice announced the results of 'Operation Token Mirrors'?

AWithin 24 hours, someone cloned the NexFundAI smart contract and launched a copycat memecoin. Starting with about $2,300, the creator cashed out over 52 ETH (approx. $127,000 at the time), demonstrating the very market behavior the operation aimed to expose.

QWhat specific, self-incriminating quote from one of the market maker founders did the FBI record and highlight in the article?

AThe founder said, 'We have to make them lose money for us to make money,' where 'them' referred to retail investors.

Похожее

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

**Summary: How Wealthy Chinese Circumvent $50,000 Annual Foreign Exchange Limits** Despite China's strict capital controls, including an annual $50,000 per person foreign exchange quota, an estimated $150 billion in funds still leaves the country annually via various gray and underground channels. This report outlines the evolution of China's "capital wall" and the methods used to bypass it. **The Evolving Capital Controls:** * **Foundation (1994):** The system of "current account convertibility with strict capital account controls" was established. * **Quota Set (2007):** The $50,000 individual annual forex purchase limit was formalized. * **Crackdown Begins (2015-2017):** Following market volatility, enforcement tightened. Banks were required to scrutinize transactions, and channels like using UnionPay cards for Hong Kong insurance premiums or buying overseas property were blocked. * **Digital & Legal Upgrades (2024-2026):** Enhanced algorithms now flag suspicious patterns (e.g., "smurfing"). The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) provides Chinese tax authorities with data on citizens' offshore accounts. Unlicensed cross-border brokers have been targeted. **Five Primary Methods for Moving Capital:** 1. **Underground Banking / "Hawala" (Duiqiao):** The largest-scale method. No money crosses borders. Clients pay RMB to a domestic account; an overseas associate deposits equivalent foreign currency into the client's offshore account. Risks include high fees, account freezes, and legal penalties. 2. **"Smurfing" or "Ant Moving":** Using multiple individuals' $50,000 quotas to pool funds for one offshore recipient. Increasingly detected by anti-money laundering algorithms. 3. **Trade Invoice Manipulation:** Businesses over-invoice imports or under-invoice exports via offshore shell companies, creating a pretext to transfer excess funds abroad under the guise of trade. 4. **Channel Migration:** After a crackdown on internet brokers, funds flow toward more compliant but costly channels like major banks' cross-border wealth management services or Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) quotas. 5. **Structural Arrangements:** High-net-worth individuals use complex, high-cost legal structures involving offshore trusts, insurance, and investment migration programs to transfer asset ownership. **Regulatory Response: Focusing on People, Not Just Money** The current strategy extends oversight from enterprises to **individual residents**. Tools like CRS allow retroactive visibility into offshore assets. Cryptocurrencies, once seen as a potential loophole, are now actively monitored and prosecuted as an illegal channel. The underlying driver remains: with significant wealth concentrated among millions of affluent households seeking diversification amid domestic economic shifts, the incentive to move assets offshore persists despite regulatory barriers.

marsbit7 мин. назад

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

marsbit7 мин. назад

Ethereum's Ballmer Moment: As Everyone Is Bearish, the Circulating Supply Is Disappearing

"Ethereum's Ballmer Moment: Circulation Shrinks Amid Bearish Sentiment" Amid widespread bearish sentiment, with prominent figures like Bankless founder David Hoffman selling ETH and young developers flocking to Solana, some argue Ethereum is entering its "Ballmer era"—akin to Microsoft's perceived stagnation under Steve Ballmer. While surface-level criticisms about slow protocol development, cautious leadership, and competitive pressure are valid, underlying fundamentals tell a different story. Approximately 30% of ETH is staked, major holders like BitMine are accumulating, and spot ETFs continue to absorb supply. Regulatory clarity, including the SEC/CFTC's March ruling on staking rewards and the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, is transforming crypto from a regulatory threat into a legitimized framework. This institutionalization, alongside a shrinking circulating supply (with net issuance around 0.23% annually), creates significant buy-side pressure independent of fee-based value capture. The broader crypto total addressable market is expanding through regulated stablecoins, tokenized assets, and institutional adoption. While public chains face competition from permissioned alternatives, the winning model appears to be permissioned assets settling on public chains like Ethereum and Solana. The author advocates a non-maximalist, barbell strategy: holding ETH for its institutional role and supply squeeze, SOL for consumer/throughput trends, BTC as a macro hedge, and a basket of next-gen L1s. Key bullish drivers for ETH include rapid circulation shrinkage, potential Q2 staked ETF approvals, regulatory tailwinds solidifying its role as a default settlement layer, and the optionality of an eventual "Satya moment" leadership shift. Despite bearish consensus, the current setup—where crypto is "not hot" and regulatory groundwork is being laid—presents a compelling investment opportunity. The crypto cycle's focus may have shifted to AI, but blockchain infrastructure is gaining a legal and institutional foothold precisely while attention is elsewhere.

marsbit7 мин. назад

Ethereum's Ballmer Moment: As Everyone Is Bearish, the Circulating Supply Is Disappearing

marsbit7 мин. назад

Claude Code Introduces Dynamic Workflows: Enabling AI to Form Teams and Collaborate

Claude Code introduces dynamic workflows, enabling AI to coordinate teams of specialized agents for complex tasks. This transforms Claude from a code assistant into a programmable workbench. Workflows address key limitations of single-agent systems: agentic laziness (premature task completion), self-preferential bias (favoring own outputs), and goal drift (losing sight of original objectives). The system allows Claude to dynamically create execution frameworks using JavaScript. It can split tasks, dispatch parallel agents for isolated work (e.g., in separate worktrees), implement adversarial validation, run tournaments, and synthesize results. This multi-agent approach is valuable for tasks requiring deep research, factual verification, code migration, root cause analysis, large-scale triage, and qualitative sorting. Key patterns include: classify-and-route, fan-out-and-synthesize, adversarial verification, generate-and-filter, tournaments, and loop-until-done. While token usage is higher, workflows excel where tasks resemble programming—needing problem decomposition, isolated context, hypothesis testing, and handling many details. They extend Claude Code's utility beyond technical work to areas like business plan review, resume screening, and naming brainstorm. The feature is not a universal solution but points to a future where AI tool competitiveness depends on organizing reliable, reusable, and auditable execution flows for complex goals.

marsbit48 мин. назад

Claude Code Introduces Dynamic Workflows: Enabling AI to Form Teams and Collaborate

marsbit48 мин. назад

Hyperliquid, Wall Street's 24/7 Trading Convenience Store

Hyperliquid: The 24/7 Trading "Convenience Store" for Wall Street Hyperliquid, a decentralized cryptocurrency exchange, has become a go-to platform for Wall Street traders seeking to trade around the clock, especially during traditional market closures. Founded by Jeff Yan, a former quantitative trader, after the FTX collapse, the platform emphasizes user self-custody of assets. It offers a wide range of perpetual contracts—leveraged derivatives with no expiry—on assets from Bitcoin and crude oil to the S&P 500 and even pre-IPO companies like SpaceX. A notable example involves a hedge fund trader who capitalized on geopolitical news over a weekend, securing a 243% return on oil derivatives before markets reopened. The platform, run by just 11 employees, generated approximately $800 million in revenue last year, and its native token HYPE has seen significant growth. Its rise highlights the merging of traditional finance and crypto. While U.S. users are currently restricted, recent CFTC rule changes could open access. The platform is known for its transparency, having processed $10 billion in liquidations during a market crash while competitors faltered. Regulators warn of the high risks and complexity of perpetual contracts for retail investors. Key to its appeal is a strong community culture, direct engagement with founders, and a simple interface. Despite rules against VPN use, it attracts global users with its permissionless approach. Hyperliquid plans to expand into prediction markets and options, aiming to eventually host all financial activity.

marsbit49 мин. назад

Hyperliquid, Wall Street's 24/7 Trading Convenience Store

marsbit49 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить F

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Synfutures (F) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Synfutures (F).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Synfutures (F)После приобретения вами Synfutures (F) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Synfutures (F)С легкостью торгуйте Synfutures (F) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

513 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2024.12.21Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить F

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на F (F) представлены ниже.

活动图片