The Exquisite Self-Interest of Former OpenAI CTO Murati: Personally Handing Over the Knife and Then Being the First to Seek Reconciliation

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-05-11Обновлено 2026-05-11

Введение

Court documents from Elon Musk's lawsuit reveal OpenAI's former CTO, Mira Murati, played a central and seemingly self-interested role in Sam Altman's November 2023 ouster and reinstatement. As early as 2022, she complained to Altman about his shifting priorities and pressure to prioritize revenue. By 2023, she privately supplied co-founder Ilya Sutskever with extensive internal evidence against Altman, which became a key 52-page memo for the board. She was appointed interim CEO after Altman's firing and informed Microsoft. However, text messages show Murati simultaneously relayed the board's stance to Altman while secretly urging Microsoft's CEO to help reverse the decision. Once employee backlash mounted, she refused to publicly defend the board's move she helped engineer. She then became the first signatory on the employee petition demanding the board resign and reinstate Altman. A former board member testified Murati was "waiting to see which way the wind blew," not realizing "she herself was the wind." The evidence depicts her actions as consistently aligning with her own interests throughout the crisis.

Court evidence and testimonies in Musk's lawsuit against Altman reveal the complete role played by former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati (now founder of AI startup Thinking Machines Lab) during the November 2023 coup: a key behind-the-scenes force driving the dismissal, and also the first to sign for Altman's return after the winds shifted.

The root of the conflict dates back a year before the coup. An internal document from September 2022 shows that Murati directly handed a complaint list to Altman. OpenAI's primary target at the time was $100 million in revenue. Altman's attitude was "must achieve by any means necessary," but Murati wrote, "Making what users want is not in OpenAI's DNA." A research-focused company being pressured to chase revenue put the executive team in a difficult position. She complained that Altman constantly shifted priorities, created panic, often urging "we're not fast enough" while also saying "I'm not sure about the situation either, maybe I'm mistaken," essentially pressuring the team based on incomplete understanding.

By 2023, Murati began providing screenshots, Slack records, and internal documents in bulk to co-founder Sutskever, also informing him that Altman had management issues during his time at Y Combinator. Sutskever compiled these into a 52-page memo for the board. In another piece of court testimony, Murati stated that Altman had also lied to her about AI safety review issues: Altman claimed the legal department deemed a certain model didn't need to go before the safety committee. Upon checking with Chief Legal Officer Jason Kwon, she found the story didn't match, so she submitted the model for review herself. Former board member Toner testified that the materials provided by Murati and Sutskever "greatly facilitated" the board's decision.

On November 16, the four board members unanimously signed the document to dismiss Altman. Murati was appointed interim CEO and volunteered to notify Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella.

The court released 78 text messages between Murati and Altman, spanning from Sunday evening to early Monday morning. Murati relayed the board's tough stance to Altman: they "don't care if everyone resigns," they just "don't want you touching AGI," and had already found "someone from Twitch" (former Twitch CEO Emmett Shear) as the new CEO. Yet, within the same batch of texts, Murati also told Altman, "I hope Nadella can help overturn this." As the board-appointed interim CEO, she was already secretly seeking external help for the person whose dismissal she had helped engineer.

The turning point came when Murati judged the board couldn't hold out. On Sunday, the board issued a statement "firmly supporting the dismissal decision." Murati texted Nadella: "I won't be signing this." Early Monday morning, she informed Microsoft CTO Kevin Scott: "The board is about to resign." Scott replied, "For real this time?" She answered, "Seems like it, Ilya signed our petition." Subsequently, 750 employees signed a petition demanding the board resign and Altman be reinstated; Murati's signature was the first on the list.

Toner's assessment in testimony was direct: Murati was "extremely uncooperative" and "incredibly negative" after Altman's dismissal, "completely unwilling to tell the team that her conversations with the board significantly contributed to the decision to fire Altman." She was the only one who could have defended that decision, but she refused to step forward. As a result, employees thought it was a sudden move by a few external board members and quickly sided with Altman. Toner's exact words: "She was waiting to see which way the wind was blowing, but she didn't realize she herself was the wind."

From secretly handing over materials to push for the dismissal, refusing to endorse it after the fallout while turning to pull in Microsoft, and finally leading the signing of the petition to demand Altman's return, Murati stood only on her own side throughout the entire coup.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat key role did Mira Murati play in Sam Altman's ouster from OpenAI in November 2023, based on the court documents?

AAccording to court evidence and testimony, Mira Murati played a central role by actively providing internal documents, screenshots, and complaints about Altman's management to co-founder Ilya Sutskever, who compiled them into a key memo for the board. This material was described as "significantly driving" the board's decision to fire Altman.

QWhat actions did Mira Murati take as interim CEO immediately after Altman's dismissal?

AAs the board-appointed interim CEO, Murati took on the task of informing Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella about Altman's firing. However, she also simultaneously began secretly texting Altman, relaying the board's stance while expressing hope that Nadella could help overturn the decision, effectively working against the board that appointed her.

QHow did Murati's position change when she sensed the board was losing support?

AWhen Murati judged that the board could not withstand the pressure—particularly after Ilya Sutskever signed a petition for Altman's return—she switched sides. She refused to sign a statement supporting the board's decision, informed Microsoft executives the board was about to resign, and became the first signatory on a staff petition demanding the board resign and reinstate Altman.

QWhat was former board member Helen Toner's critique of Murati's behavior during the crisis?

AHelen Toner testified that Murati was "extremely uncooperative" and "incredibly passive" after Altman's firing. She refused to tell the team that her conversations with the board had significantly contributed to the decision. Toner stated Murati was "waiting to see which way the wind blew" but failed to realize "she was the wind," meaning her actions created the situation but she wouldn't defend the outcome.

QWhat internal conflict between Murati and Altman predated the 2023 coup, according to the article?

AAn internal document from September 2022 shows Murati directly complained to Altman. She criticized his relentless focus on hitting a $100 million revenue target, stating "making what users want is not in OpenAI's DNA." She also complained about Altman's shifting priorities, creating panic, and pressuring the team based on incomplete information, which planted the seeds of later conflict.

Похожее

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit4 мин. назад

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit4 мин. назад

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit34 мин. назад

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit34 мин. назад

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX Learn36 мин. назад

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX Learn36 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить S

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Sonic (S) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Sonic (S).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Sonic (S)После приобретения вами Sonic (S) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Sonic (S)С легкостью торгуйте Sonic (S) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

1.4k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.01.15Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить S

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

Он решает проблемы масштабируемости, совместимости между блокчейнами и стимулов для разработчиков с помощью технологических инноваций.

2.3k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.09Обновлено 2025.04.09

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

HTX Learn — ваш проводник в мир перспективных проектов, и мы запускаем специальное мероприятие "Учитесь и Зарабатывайте", посвящённое этим проектам. Наше новое направление .

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.10Обновлено 2025.04.10

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на S (S) представлены ниже.

活动图片