The Day CZ Missed the Best Investment of His Life, Crypto Missed AI

Odaily星球日报Опубликовано 2026-02-09Обновлено 2026-02-09

Введение

CZ, the founder of Binance, famously sold his Shanghai apartment in 2014 to buy Bitcoin—a move that would have yielded nearly $190 million at its peak. But an even bigger opportunity came years later, one that he ultimately walked away from. In November 2021, amid a liquidity crisis at FTX, Binance signed a non-binding letter of intent to acquire the rival exchange. The deal fell through within days, accelerating FTX’s collapse. Unbeknownst to many, FTX held a hidden gem in its portfolio: a $500 million lead investment in AI startup Anthropic, acquired in April 2021 for a 13.56% stake (later diluted to 7.84%). At the time, AI had not yet entered its explosive growth phase. But after the launch of ChatGPT and the rise of Anthropic’s Claude models, the company’s valuation soared. Recent reports suggest Anthropic is raising funds at a valuation as high as $350 billion. At that level, FTX’s stake would have been worth approximately $27.44 billion—more than enough to cover the exchange’s infamous shortfall. After FTX’s bankruptcy, its Anthropic shares were sold off in court-approved transactions totaling over $1.3 billion to traditional financial firms and Abu Dhabi-based investors—not to crypto companies. The article reflects on what could have been: had CZ acquired FTX, or had SBF held on, a major crypto-native entity could have held influence in one of AI’s top firms, potentially fostering deeper integration between crypto and AI. Instead, that opportunity slipped into trad...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Azuma (@azuma_eth)

In 2014, just one year after being introduced to the concept of cryptocurrency, CZ made the most daring investment of his life — he sold his apartment in Shanghai and "all-in" on approximately 1,500 BTC at a three-digit price. Twelve years later, if CZ had never sold, this investment could have yielded hundreds of millions of dollars in profits (peak returns of approximately $189 million).

Compared to his subsequent achievements of founding Binance and rising to become the industry leader, the returns from this investment are insignificant to CZ. But from an external perspective, this idealistic "all-or-nothing" move remains one of CZ's most talked-about actions.

Yet, it is lamentable that even someone as resolute and decisive as CZ once missed, in a highly dramatic fashion, an investment with potential profits a hundred times greater than "selling a house to buy Bitcoin."

Rewind 1555 Days: That Aborted Acquisition

November 9, 2021, was a sleepless night for the cryptocurrency industry.

Just the day before, the then high-flying FTX suspended withdrawals due to a liquidity crisis. Panic quickly spread through the community, and the damp smell of an impending storm began to permeate the market... The rest of the story is well-known: FTX collapsed, triggering a domino effect that plunged the market into a prolonged winter lasting several years.

In a parallel universe, the story could have taken a different turn. In the early hours of November 9, SBF and CZ issued statements announcing that FTX had preliminarily reached an acquisition agreement with Binance.

SBF: Hey everyone, I have some news to share. Things have come full circle. FTX's first and last investors are the same — we have reached a strategic transaction agreement with Binance (pending due diligence).

CZ: This afternoon, FTX asked us for help. The exchange is currently facing a severe liquidity crunch. To protect users, we signed a non-binding Letter of Intent, intending to fully acquire FTX to help address the liquidity crisis. We will conduct full due diligence in the coming days.

However, the acquisition ultimately fell through. Just one day later, Binance officially announced it was abandoning the acquisition, citing "issues beyond our control," which became the final straw that broke FTX's back.

Did CZ ever seriously consider acquiring FTX? Was the hastily concluded acquisition farce a genuine attempt to help or merely a ploy to gauge the opponent's "health bar"? This may forever remain a mystery. From the outcome, CZ personally defeated his biggest competitor at the time, solidifying Binance's position as the industry's top player.

But no one could have predicted that a seemingly insignificant "side bet" in FTX's asset portfolio at the time would rapidly appreciate in value over the next few years, now worth far more than the sum of all other assets involved in that aborted acquisition.

From a "Side Bet" to the Center of AI

In April 2022 (the official announcement date; the deal was actually completed in 2021), FTX made its most important investment in the AI field — leading a $580 million funding round for AI startup Anthropic with a $500 million investment, initially acquiring a 13.56% equity stake, which was later diluted to 7.84% as Anthropic completed multiple funding rounds.

That was an era when AI's potential had not yet exploded. Just six months later (in late November 2022, the same month FTX collapsed), OpenAI's ChatGPT was released, irreversibly ushering the world into the "Age of Exploration" for AI. Anthropic, with its Claude series of products (especially the programming-oriented Claude Code), repeatedly amazed the world, gradually becoming one of the most prominent companies in the AI era.

As Claude continued to evolve, Anthropic's valuation also soared. Capital frantically waved cash, desperate to secure a spot on Anthropic's journey to an IPO. The latest market rumor is that Anthropic is in the final stages of a new large funding round, expected to exceed $20 billion (originally planned to raise $10 billion, but investor demand far exceeded expectations, potentially doubling the final amount), with a valuation possibly as high as $350 billion. The deal could be completed as early as this week.

At the latest valuation of $350 billion, FTX's former stake in Anthropic would be worth approximately $27.44 billion, enough to cover the reserve shortfall that led to its bankruptcy multiple times over... But history has already happened, and the outcome is set.

It's hard not to acknowledge that SBF was a rare venture capital genius (besides Anthropic, he also invested in the now-hot Cursor in its seed round), but he was clearly not a qualified business operator, especially lacking in risk control. CZ's profile is the opposite: he is an absolute master at operating a business, and Binance's dominance is inseparable from his many correct strategic decisions. But CZ often admits he is not a traditional investor solely pursuing returns; he doesn't trade cryptocurrencies and prefers to be a builder in the industry.

A Messy Ending: This Should Have Been the Best Intersection of Crypto and AI

You might wonder, what happened to those FTX shares in the end?

The outcome is straightforward. After FTX's bankruptcy, all assets, including the Anthropic equity, were handled by the FTX bankruptcy estate. In February 2024, the court approved the estate's request to sell these shares; in March and June of the same year, the FTX estate sold 29.5 million shares for $884 million and 15 million shares for $450 million, respectively, totaling over $1.3 billion in sales.

As for the buyers of these shares, they were primarily ATIC Third International Investment from Abu Dhabi, and traditional financial institutions from Wall Street like Jane Street and Fidelity. In other words, no crypto companies got a piece of the pie.

Whether these shares were deliberately sold cheaply or if there was利益输送 (benefit transfer) under the guise of bankruptcy liquidation is no longer important to the crypto industry.

This should have been the best intersection of Crypto and AI. In another timeline, whether these shares were held by SBF or CZ, if the leading enterprises of the crypto world had some influence in the development of the most successful company in the AI world, there could have been more innovative attempts around Crypto + AI, leading to unexpected fruits.

The one slapping his thigh in regret isn't just CZ.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the potential return on CZ's investment if he had not sold the 1500 BTC he bought in 2014?

AThe peak return would have been approximately $189 million.

QWhy did Binance ultimately abandon the acquisition of FTX in November 2021?

ABinance cited that the issues at FTX were 'beyond their control or ability to help' after conducting due diligence.

QWhat was the significance of FTX's investment in Anthropic, and how much was the initial investment?

AFTX invested $500 million to lead a $580 million funding round in Anthropic, acquiring an initial 13.56% stake, which was later diluted to 7.84%.

QWhat is the current estimated valuation of Anthropic, and what is the value of FTX's former stake at that valuation?

AAnthropic's latest estimated valuation is $350 billion, making FTX's former 7.84% stake worth approximately $27.44 billion.

QWho ended up purchasing the Anthropic股权 (shares) from the bankruptcy estate of FTX, and for how much?

AThe shares were sold to traditional financial institutions, including ATIC Third International Investment from Abu Dhabi, Jane Street, and Fidelity, for a total of over $1.3 billion in two separate transactions ($884 million and $450 million).

Похожее

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit2 ч. назад

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手2 ч. назад

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手2 ч. назад

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit4 ч. назад

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit4 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам (2): 2026 может стать годом приложений реального времени, сектор AI продолжает оставаться в тренде

2025 год — год институциональных инвесторов, в будущем он будет доминировать в приложениях реального времени.

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.12.16Обновлено 2025.12.16

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам (2): 2026 может стать годом приложений реального времени, сектор AI продолжает оставаться в тренде

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на AI (AI) представлены ниже.

活动图片