‘Tax headache eased?’ IRS extends crypto relief to end of 2026

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-03-19Обновлено 2026-03-19

Введение

The U.S. IRS has extended temporary tax relief for cryptocurrency investors until the end of 2026, allowing them to use alternative methods to calculate capital gains instead of relying solely on broker-submitted reports. This is the second such extension and aims to reduce tax burdens for investors. Previously, the mandatory FIFO (first-in, first-out) method often resulted in higher taxes by requiring the sale of older, more appreciated coins first. The alternative methods enable investors to potentially report more recent, lower-gain or loss-making sales. The relief also addresses operational challenges for crypto exchanges, which faced significant compliance burdens under the stricter reporting rules. The IRS is gradually phasing in reporting requirements and has proposed making electronic submission the default for tax documents.

The U.S. tax season is here, and there is some sigh of relief for crypto holders using centralized exchanges.

In its latest guidance, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) gave crypto holders a free pass to use alternative methods to identify crypto sales for tax purposes instead of relying on their broker-submitted reports.

This is the second time the watchdog has extended the relief, and it could again help lower the tax bill for crypto investors. Initially, the agency mandated crypto exchanges to adopt the FIFO (first-in, first-out) method to track investors’ buy and sell prices for each coin.

For users, this meant that the oldest coins, which were acquired cheaply and have since appreciated significantly, should be reported first. This would result in a higher tax bill due to a higher capital gains tax.

With alternative reporting methods, however, you could include the most recently acquired coins that haven’t rallied much or are in the red.

Source: IRS

U.S. crypto tax compliance burden

According to Shehan Chandrasekera, head of tax at Coin Tracker, the IRS guidance will offer incredible relief to investors, albeit with a few friction points.

He said,

The IRS just quietly saved crypto investors from a massive tax headache by issuing Notice 2026-20.

The temporary relief will be extended up to the end of 2026. But the move isn’t out of just goodwill from the taxman.

Its strict crypto reporting regime has a compliance burden on operators. Notably, crypto exchanges must report the cost basis for each coin bought by each investor to the IRS, along with other data.

At the same time, a duplicate of the report should be given to the customer or physically mailed if the customer hasn’t opted for digital copies. Most brokers have complained that this would be a massive operational burden.

To alleviate this, the agency opted for phased-in reports, starting with only gross proceeds or total crypto sales in reports submitted in 2025. For crypto assets bought in 2026, cost basis data was included in the submitted reports (Form 1099-DA).

Earlier this month, the IRS proposed scrapping physical copies sent to customers and making ‘electronic submission’ the default for tax reports.


Final Summary

  • The IRS will allow crypto investors to use their reporting methods for crypto taxes until the end of the year, rather than relying on the strict broker-submitted reports.
  • The move comes as the agency grapples with ways of lowering tax compliance burdens for crypto investors and brokers.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat relief has the IRS extended to crypto holders until the end of 2026?

AThe IRS has extended temporary relief allowing crypto holders to use alternative methods to identify crypto sales for tax purposes instead of relying strictly on broker-submitted reports.

QWhy was the FIFO method problematic for crypto investors?

AThe FIFO method required reporting the oldest coins first, which were often acquired cheaply and had appreciated significantly, resulting in higher capital gains taxes.

QWhat is the IRS's motivation for extending this relief, according to the article?

AThe move isn't just out of goodwill; the strict crypto reporting regime places a significant compliance burden on both operators (exchanges) and investors, and the IRS is grappling with ways to reduce these burdens.

QWhat change did the IRS propose earlier this month regarding tax report delivery?

AThe IRS proposed scrapping physical copies of tax reports sent to customers and making 'electronic submission' the default method.

QWhat did Shehan Chandrasekera say about IRS Notice 2026-20?

AShehan Chandrasekera stated that 'The IRS just quietly saved crypto investors from a massive tax headache by issuing Notice 2026-20.'

Похожее

WSJ: Unveiling the Secret Jury That Controls Disputes on Polymarket

Last month, Garrick Wilhelm lost a $567 bet on the Polymarket prediction platform about whether a ceasefire would be reached with Hezbollah. When a truce was announced, some traders argued it counted, but Wilhelm disagreed. The dispute was settled not by Polymarket, but by a decentralized group of UMA token holders who vote on such disagreements. As trading surges, resolving ambiguous outcomes is a growing challenge for prediction markets. Unlike competitors like Kalshi that decide internally, Polymarket outsources dispute resolution to UMA. Its token holders, mostly anonymous and with voting power weighted by holdings, arbitrate cases. Critics argue this system is prone to manipulation, as voters can also bet on the same markets they judge. A Wall Street Journal analysis found that over the past year, at least 60% of active UMA voters had corresponding Polymarket accounts and held positions in disputes they voted on. Voting power is also concentrated among a few large holders. Polymarket says only 0.2% of bets go to UMA and that the system disperses authority. Its founder has acknowledged flaws and promised fixes. UMA's backers deny any proven manipulation, dismissing critics as sore losers. The platform penalizes voters in the minority to incentivize "correct" outcomes. Disputes are rising, covering topics from a streamer's pregnancy announcement to Iran. This model also helps Polymarket argue it's an offshore platform outside U.S. regulation, a shift made after a 2022 settlement with the CFTC. Some losing traders have formed groups to protest, targeting entities like UMA.rocks, which aggregates votes. Its founder says traders often blame UMA for their own mistakes. A recently ousted committee member, Scout, admitted to both betting and voting but argued involved voters research more thoroughly. He highlighted the dilemma: "Either you have conflicted traders deciding, or you have uninformed outsiders voting. There is no perfect answer right now."

marsbit32 мин. назад

WSJ: Unveiling the Secret Jury That Controls Disputes on Polymarket

marsbit32 мин. назад

China's AI Circle Has Just Established a Pecking Order, and Capital Is Already Changing the Rules Again

The article describes how the valuation logic for major Chinese AI model companies has undergone three dramatic shifts between 2022 and 2026, driven by capital's changing priorities. The first phase (around 2022) was **technology-driven valuation**, where funding was based on model performance and benchmark scores. This logic was disrupted when DeepSeek's R1 model demonstrated that comparable capabilities could be achieved at a fraction of the cost, challenging the notion of technical superiority as an unassailable moat. The second phase shifted to **IPO window-driven valuation**. Following favorable listing conditions in Hong Kong, capital flowed to companies like Zhipu and MiniMax with the clearest path to a public listing. However, this focus on liquidity over fundamentals became apparent as their Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) lagged far behind international peers like Anthropic. The third and current phase is **national strategy-driven valuation**. This shift was marked by the state-backed "Big Fund" leading a major investment in DeepSeek, signaling that leading domestic AI models are now viewed as strategic national assets comparable to semiconductor manufacturing. This new logic, combined with soaring US valuation benchmarks (e.g., OpenAI at $850B), propelled the combined valuation of China's top AI firms ("The Four Dragons"/"Five Strong") past 1 trillion RMB. The article presents a "pricing leap model": each shift is triggered by a key event that invalidates the old logic, leading to rapid capital reallocation under a new narrative before its flaws (particularly the gap in fundamental ARR metrics) become evident. It concludes that the next major test for these valuations will be a return to scrutinizing core business fundamentals, specifically ARR growth, suggesting a fourth pricing shift is imminent.

marsbit57 мин. назад

China's AI Circle Has Just Established a Pecking Order, and Capital Is Already Changing the Rules Again

marsbit57 мин. назад

'Stock God' Trump's 3,642 Trades Disclosed: The 'Perfect Closed Loop' of Policy and Portfolio

Summary: Donald Trump's First Quarter stock trades, totaling 3,642 transactions, have been disclosed. While the White House maintains the trades were managed by an advisor and complied with disclosure laws, they reveal a portfolio heavily aligned with his policy agenda. The trades show a rotation away from major tech stocks like Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta, and into semiconductor and AI hardware companies such as NVIDIA, AMD, Broadcom, Dell, and Intel. Notably, Trump's account purchased Dell stock before he publicly praised the company, after which its stock rose. The Dell family also pledged funds to a Trump-affiliated policy project. A critical case is Intel. The Trump administration converted $8.9 billion in CHIPS Act subsidies into a 9.9% equity stake, making the U.S. government Intel's largest shareholder. Months later, Trump's personal account also bought Intel stock. This intertwines national industrial policy with potential personal financial interest. Unlike typical insider trading concerns, this situation creates a "closed loop": policy decisions (e.g., subsidies, tariffs, crypto regulation) can boost the value of his holdings, and those holdings may, in turn, influence future policy directions. This blending of presidential power and personal portfolio, while legally disclosed, raises profound questions about conflicts of interest that current rules do not address.

marsbit1 ч. назад

'Stock God' Trump's 3,642 Trades Disclosed: The 'Perfect Closed Loop' of Policy and Portfolio

marsbit1 ч. назад

Dialogue with Figure Robotics Founder: Behind the $39 Billion Valuation Lies Ambition to Mass-Produce Millions of Units

Title: Figure's Founder on the $39B Valuation and the Ambition to Mass Produce a Million Humanoid Robots In a Sourcery podcast interview, Figure founder and CEO Brett Adcock discusses the rapid rise of his humanoid robotics company. With a valuation that surged 15x in 18 months to $39 billion, Figure aims to create general-purpose humanoid robots for work in factories and homes. Adcock states that the company's primary goal is to make robots that perform real, paid work autonomously. He shares Figure's aggressive scaling plan: producing thousands of robots this year, with an ultimate ambition to reach one million units annually. Adcock explains Figure's vertically integrated strategy, designing its own motors, sensors, and joints to control its supply chain and destiny. He details the challenges, including achieving long-term, reliable, end-to-end autonomous operation—a feat no one has yet accomplished. The biggest risk is executing this complex vision at scale, but Adcock believes the potential market is enormous, representing a significant portion of global GDP. The interview also covers his departure from OpenAI, citing that Figure's internal AI team eventually surpassed OpenAI's capabilities for robotics applications. Adcock concludes by highlighting his focus for the year: large-scale commercial deployment of robots and advancing toward a "general robot" capable of any human task, potentially seeing the first signs of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) in the physical world at Figure.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Dialogue with Figure Robotics Founder: Behind the $39 Billion Valuation Lies Ambition to Mass-Produce Millions of Units

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片