# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Risk Assets

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Risk Assets", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Macro Research Report on the Crypto Market: Under the Warsh Effect, a Tightening Cycle Approaches—How Will Crypto Assets Be Priced?

The crypto market faces a paradigm shift following the nomination of Kevin Warsh—a known monetary policy hawk—as the next Fed Chair. Termed the "Warsh Effect," this event triggered sharp declines across major cryptocurrencies and massive outflows from Bitcoin ETFs, signaling a structural repricing of crypto assets. The core shift moves from a narrative where crypto served as an inflation hedge to one where it is increasingly treated as a high-beta risk asset, highly sensitive to interest rates and liquidity conditions. Under a tightening regime led by Warsh, crypto valuations will be driven by three key factors: liquidity conditions (40% weight), real interest rates (35%), and risk appetite (25%). Historical analysis shows that during past tightening cycles, crypto exhibited delayed but severe corrections, increased correlation with tech equities, and internal divergence—where assets with real cash flows and utility outperform speculative tokens. In this new paradigm, Bitcoin is now more influenced by macro liquidity and institutional flows than its original "sovereign-free store of value" narrative. Investors must adjust frameworks: treat crypto as high-risk growth assets, implement dynamic hedging strategies, and focus on tokens with sustainable fundamentals. The era of easy liquidity is over—value will be dictated by real-world utility and macroeconomic discipline.

marsbit02/05 07:49

Macro Research Report on the Crypto Market: Under the Warsh Effect, a Tightening Cycle Approaches—How Will Crypto Assets Be Priced?

marsbit02/05 07:49

Why Do Bitcoin and Ethereum Fall But Not Rise?

This article analyzes why Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) have underperformed other risk assets like stocks and commodities recently, despite a generally bullish macro environment. The core argument is that the underperformance is not primarily a macro issue, but a result of the crypto market's own structural dynamics and its ongoing deleveraging cycle. Key reasons identified include: - The crypto market is in the late stages of a deleveraging process, which began with a sharp sell-off in October, wiping out highly-leveraged speculative capital (especially from retail traders) and making the market fragile and risk-averse. - A significant amount of retail capital has been diverted to other booming assets like AI-related stocks and precious metals, which are experiencing their own FOMO-driven rallies. - Crypto markets remain structurally isolated from traditional finance (TradFi), with barriers to capital flow between them. - The market is still dominated by retail traders and passive funds (like ETFs), making it susceptible to emotional narratives, market micro-structure manipulation, and high volatility amplified by the use of high leverage (10x-20x) by散户. This creates an environment where concentrated selling in low-liquidity hours can trigger cascading liquidations. - The author draws historical parallels to the deleveraging of China's A-share market in 2015 and compares ETH's current price action to Tesla's in 2024, suggesting both are in a prolonged consolidation phase after a bubble. The article concludes that labeling BTC and ETH purely as "risk assets" is an oversimplification. While they are volatile, they also possess safe-haven qualities. The current sensitivity to negative news and sluggish response to positive developments is a temporary structural phenomenon of the deleveraging cycle, not a failure of their long-term value proposition. Once deleveraging concludes and new capital returns, this dynamic is expected to change.

marsbit01/30 04:44

Why Do Bitcoin and Ethereum Fall But Not Rise?

marsbit01/30 04:44

活动图片