# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Liquidity

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Liquidity", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Primitive Ventures: Why Are We Bullish On On-Chain Perpetual U.S. Stocks?

Primitive Ventures argues that on-chain perpetual contracts for US equities represent a pivotal convergence point for crypto and traditional finance, poised to absorb global liquidity. The trend is driven by crypto's innate preference for volatility and key infrastructure upgrades: crypto in-kind margin acceptance by CBOE/CME, DTCC's potential on-chain settlement integration, and the emergence of tokenized equities as collateral enabling systematic basis farming. The dynamic involves "onshore issuance, offshore distribution." While entities like Ondo focus on compliant tokenized stock issuance, demand flows to platforms with superior distribution and trading interfaces, predominantly on BNB Chain. On-chain perps attract global professional traders seeking 24/7 access, high leverage, cross-margin efficiency, and DeFi composability, bypassing traditional broker limitations. The stack is maturing with infrastructure (HIP-3/HyperCore, Orderly, Chainlink), trading platforms (Trade.xyz, Ostium), and terminal frontends (Based, Phantom). The future is a unified global "margin network" where diverse assets serve as interoperable collateral. However, the window is narrowing. The primary threat is not demand but regulatory approval of onshore products, which could rapidly shift activity back to established brokers (e.g., Robinhood with 0DTE options). With the SEC/CFTC actively studying perps and compliant entrants like Bitnomial emerging, offshore/on-chain players must quickly capture liquidity and shape rules before standardization occurs. The race is on to leverage crypto's distribution power and capital efficiency to rewrite traditional finance's operating model.

marsbit01/30 08:19

Primitive Ventures: Why Are We Bullish On On-Chain Perpetual U.S. Stocks?

marsbit01/30 08:19

Discourse Power, Internalization, Positive Externalities: Understanding Binance's Triple Dilemma and 'Original Sin'

An article titled "Discourse Power, Internalization, Positive Externalities: Understanding Binance's Triple Dilemma and 'Original Sin'" critiques Binance's dominant role in the crypto industry. It argues that Binance's near-monopoly on "discourse power" allows it to dictate which projects succeed, stifling genuine innovation as builders and VCs focus on pleasing its listing committee rather than users. This leads to a "blackout" effect, hindering organic growth. Furthermore, Binance's strategy is described as extreme "internalization." Its Launchpad model, featuring high Fully Diluted Valuations (FDV) and low circulation, functions like an internal capital vacuum. This, along with activities on BNB Chain, turns the market into a "slaughterhouse" where insiders profit while retail investors lose, preventing mass adoption and consuming user trust. Finally, the article highlights Binance's lack of "positive externalities." Unlike competitors like Coinbase (contributing to compliance and ETFs) or the Ethereum Foundation (advancing core technology), Binance's actions are seen as self-serving. Its focus on memes and a closed "walled garden" ecosystem, instead of fostering real innovation or open infrastructure, fails to benefit the broader industry. As the industry leader, this perceived lack of responsibility and担当 (dāndāng, bearing responsibility) creates a "virtue-position mismatch," making it a target of criticism. The solution isn't PR but ceding discourse power to the community and channeling liquidity to support genuine technological progress.

marsbit01/30 04:45

Discourse Power, Internalization, Positive Externalities: Understanding Binance's Triple Dilemma and 'Original Sin'

marsbit01/30 04:45

From Geopolitical Tensions to Liquidity Tightening: BTC Dragged into Uncontrolled Market Conditions

This analysis examines the sharp, multi-asset cryptocurrency downturn on [date], with Bitcoin (BTC) falling over 7% to briefly under $81,200. The decline was not triggered by a single event but by a confluence of factors leading to a broad market de-risking. Key drivers included a significant escalation in Middle East geopolitical tensions, marked by a US aircraft carrier group going silent and Iran's leadership adopting a war-ready posture. This created immediate uncertainty, prompting investors to reduce risk exposure. Simultaneously, the latest FOMC meeting delivered a hawkish hold, dashing remaining market hopes for near-term rate cuts. This forced a repricing of liquidity expectations, removing a key support for risk assets. The sell-off was not isolated to crypto. US equity indices (Nasdaq, S&P 500) fell, and traditional safe-haven assets like gold and silver also saw sharp pullbacks, indicating a market-wide flight to reduce overall risk exposure, not a rotation into other assets. Compounding these issues, Bitcoin ETFs recorded consistent, significant outflows over the preceding week, totaling over $1 billion. This lack of institutional buying pressure left the market without a buffer, causing prices to fall rapidly to find new equilibrium levels after breaking key technical supports like the 100-week moving average (~$85,000). In essence, this was a concentrated release of pent-up risk, driven by geopolitics, tightened liquidity expectations, and weak market structure, forcing a deleveraging event. True stability depends on reclaiming key technical levels and the return of risk capital.

Odaily星球日报01/30 02:14

From Geopolitical Tensions to Liquidity Tightening: BTC Dragged into Uncontrolled Market Conditions

Odaily星球日报01/30 02:14

活动图片