# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Iran

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Iran", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

How to View the Divergence Between Gold and Oil Prices?

The article analyzes the divergence between gold and oil prices following the outbreak of the U.S.-Iran war. While oil prices surged significantly, gold experienced a decline, contrary to expectations given its traditional role as a safe-haven asset during geopolitical crises. Gold serves three primary hedging functions: against geopolitical risk, inflation risk, and U.S. dollar risk. Since late 2023, gold had been in a strong bull market, rising from $1,800 to over $5,000, driven by simultaneous geopolitical tensions (e.g., Russia-Ukraine war, Middle East conflicts), inflationary pressures, and a weakening dollar due to the Fed's premature rate cuts. However, after the U.S. "decapitation" strike on Iran, gold prices fell sharply. This was attributed to two main factors: a shift of capital from gold to oil, as investors repositioned portfolios to capitalize on rising oil prices, and a liquidity crisis in U.S. financial markets that forced large-scale sell-offs of gold—a highly liquid asset—to meet redemption demands. More critically, growing pessimism about a prolonged U.S.-Iran conflict raised fears of sustained high oil prices, potential global economic disruption, and a possible reversal of Fed monetary policy (delayed cuts or even renewed hikes). This expectation of tighter policy caused gold’s dollar-related hedging function to reverse, overwhelming its geopolitical and inflation hedging roles and leading to a severe correction. Oil prices also experienced volatility. They initially spiked to nearly $120 per barrel post-strike, then fell by 30% on Trump’s hints of a quick resolution, but rebounded as market expectations corrected when the conflict persisted and the Strait of Hormuz remained threatened. The outlook for both commodities depends on the evolution of the U.S.-Iran conflict. If it becomes a prolonged war like Ukraine, gold may lack short-term value as monetary fears prevail, while oil and energy assets may benefit. A critical factor will be whether the Strait of Hormuz is reopened, which hinges on geopolitical decisions ahead.

marsbit03/23 02:20

How to View the Divergence Between Gold and Oil Prices?

marsbit03/23 02:20

$7 Billion Iran Bet Forces U.S. to Tighten Rules on Prediction Markets

Polymarket and Kalshi, two prediction market platforms, are reportedly seeking funding at valuations of around $20 billion each. This coincides with increased regulatory scrutiny from U.S. lawmakers and the CFTC, driven by controversial contracts related to Iran. Approximately $529 million was wagered on contracts predicting the timing of an Iranian attack, and $150 million on contracts related to the potential ouster of Supreme Leader Khamenei. Six accounts allegedly profited around $1.2 million from well-timed trades just hours before an attack on Iranian officials. These events have intensified concerns about insider trading, market manipulation, and the use of sensitive or classified information. In response, U.S. legislators are drafting bills to restrict certain event contracts, while the CFTC is advancing new regulatory frameworks. Despite the controversy, prediction markets are gaining traction as information products. Major media outlets like CNBC and Dow Jones have partnered with these platforms to integrate predictive data into their reporting. However, the integration of such data into mainstream media raises questions about fairness, trust, and the potential influence on public perception. The core challenge lies in balancing innovation and growth with regulatory oversight, especially when contracts involve geopolitical events, assassinations, or military actions. The U.S. must decide whether to heavily regulate these markets or outright ban certain contract types to prevent abuse and protect sensitive information.

marsbit03/16 14:41

$7 Billion Iran Bet Forces U.S. to Tighten Rules on Prediction Markets

marsbit03/16 14:41

Why Did the Prediction Market, Which Secured 20 Billion in Funding, Become the Target of Washington's Regulation?

Polymarket and Kalshi, two prediction market platforms, are seeking funding at valuations of around $20 billion each amid growing regulatory scrutiny from Washington. Their rise coincides with political controversy surrounding contracts related to Iran, where approximately $529 million was wagered on the timing of an Iranian attack and $150 million on contracts tied to the potential ouster of Supreme Leader Khamenei. Six accounts reportedly profited around $1.2 million from well-timed trades, raising concerns about insider information and war speculation. While Wall Street sees prediction markets as valuable information tools—evidenced by data partnerships with major media outlets like CNBC and Dow Jones—regulators are moving to impose stricter rules. U.S. lawmakers are drafting bills to restrict certain event contracts, and the CFTC is advancing new regulatory frameworks. The core issue revolves around trust, fairness, and the risk of incentivizing leaks of sensitive or classified information. A lawsuit against Kalshi further highlights challenges: users allege the platform refused to pay $54 million in winnings related to Iran contracts by invoking new exceptions after events unfolded. The tension reflects a broader dilemma: balancing the growth and legitimacy of prediction markets as information products against the need to prevent unethical profiteering and protect national security interests.

比推03/16 13:29

Why Did the Prediction Market, Which Secured 20 Billion in Funding, Become the Target of Washington's Regulation?

比推03/16 13:29

活动图片