# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Infrastructure

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Infrastructure", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

When AI's Bottleneck Is No Longer the Model: Perseus Yang's Open Source Ecosystem Building Practices and Reflections

In 2026, the AI industry's primary bottleneck is no longer model capability but rather the encoding of domain knowledge, agent-world interfaces, and toolchain maturity. The open-source community is rapidly bridging this gap, evidenced by projects like OpenClaw and Claude Code experiencing explosive growth in their Skill ecosystems. Perseus Yang, a contributor to over a dozen AI open-source projects, argues that Skill systems are the most underestimated infrastructure of the AI agent era. They enable non-coders to program AI by writing natural language SKILL.md files, transferring power from engineers to all professionals. His project, GTM Engineer Skills, demonstrates this by automating go-to-market workflows, proving Skills can extend far beyond engineering into areas like product strategy and business analysis. He also identifies a critical blind spot: while browser automation thrives, agent operations are nearly absent from mobile apps, the world's dominant computing interface. His project, OpenPocket, is an open-source framework that allows agents to operate Android devices via ADB. It features human-in-the-loop security, agent isolation, and the ability for agents to autonomously create and save new reusable Skills. Yang believes the value of open source lies not in the code itself, but in defining the infrastructure standards during this formative period. His work validates the SKILL.md format as a portable unit for agent capability and pioneers new architectures for agent operation in API-less environments. His design philosophy prioritizes usability for non-technical users, ensuring the agent ecosystem can be expanded by practitioners from all fields, not just engineers.

marsbit04/13 01:29

When AI's Bottleneck Is No Longer the Model: Perseus Yang's Open Source Ecosystem Building Practices and Reflections

marsbit04/13 01:29

Node Count Drops 70%, This Time Solana Is in a Hurry

Solana's validator count has dropped by 70% from its peak of 2,560 in March 2023 to around 756, accompanied by a 35% decrease in its Nakamoto coefficient, indicating increased centralization. This decline is largely due to the phasing out of the Solana Foundation Delegation Program (SFDP), which previously subsidized smaller validators. Many of these validators were economically unviable without support, controlling only 19% of the total stake, while larger nodes held over 80%. In response, Solana is implementing a new validator policy effective May 1, focusing on infrastructure decentralization. The policy imposes limits: no single Autonomous System Number (ASN) can host more than 25% of staked SOL, and no single data center can exceed 15%. It also enforces stricter performance rules, including faster transaction processing and anti-censorship measures, to improve network reliability and security. Critics, like node operator Chainflow, argue that the rules may unfairly penalize competent smaller validators based on their hosting location rather than performance, potentially forcing them into less reliable infrastructure and accelerating their decline. Amid ambitions to become a "Nasdaq on-chain" for global capital markets, Solana trails Ethereum and BNB Chain in real-world asset (RWA) value but leads in user activity. The network's upgrades aim to enhance stability and reduce finality times, competing with Ethereum's efforts to scale and decentralize further. The success of Solana's new policies is crucial for gaining institutional trust and competing effectively in the evolving blockchain landscape.

marsbit04/10 04:08

Node Count Drops 70%, This Time Solana Is in a Hurry

marsbit04/10 04:08

Non-Dollar Stablecoins Are Winning the Wrong Battle

The article argues that non-USD stablecoins (euros, local currencies) create a misleading impression of challenging dollar dominance by merely changing the currency label, without altering the underlying monetary power structure. True monetary sovereignty is analyzed through three layers: 1. **Pricing Layer (most visible):** The currency unit used for pricing. Non-USD stablecoins win here, but this is a superficial, low-cost change—like changing a shop's sign without changing its ownership. 2. **Settlement Layer (most valuable):** The actual infrastructure (banking, payments, compliance, liquidity networks) through which money moves. This "plumbing" is controlled by existing players. Changing the currency flowing through these pipes doesn't change who owns them. 3. **Freeze Layer (most powerful):** The ultimate authority to freeze, blacklist, or halt transactions. This final control often remains with external entities enforcing KYC/AML and sanctions. The case of Argentina's $LIBRA token scandal is used to illustrate that such initiatives are often not genuine innovation but a symptom of a failing local currency. When a national currency loses its pricing power and trust (e.g., due to hyperinflation), external digital credit (like dollar-based or crypto narratives) rushes in to fill the void. The dependency merely shifts from traditional dollar systems to on-chain dollar networks; the underlying power dynamics remain. The conclusion is that non-USD stablecoins are expanding monetary expression but not rewriting monetary power. The real battle isn't about which currency is used for pricing, but about who controls the settlement infrastructure and the ultimate authority to freeze assets. Until that changes, "de-dollarization" remains superficial.

marsbit04/09 00:08

Non-Dollar Stablecoins Are Winning the Wrong Battle

marsbit04/09 00:08

活动图片