# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Governance

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Governance", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

A Decade-Old Coin: Zcash Also Faces a Midlife Crisis

Zcash, a nearly decade-old privacy-focused cryptocurrency, faced a major crisis when its entire core development team, the Electric Coin Company (ECC), collectively resigned on January 7. The team, led by CEO Josh Swihart, left due to a governance dispute with the board of the non-profit Bootstrap organization, which oversees ECC. The conflict centered around Zashi, a privacy-first mobile wallet developed by ECC. The team wanted to privatize Zashi to attract external investment and operate as a nimble startup, but the board opposed, citing legal and compliance risks associated with converting a non-profit asset into a for-profit entity. This disagreement escalated into public accusations, with Swihart calling the board’s actions “malicious governance” and accusing them of making working conditions untenable. The board members, referred to as “ZCAM” (Zaki Manian, Christina, Alan, Michelle), were criticized—particularly Zaki, who had prior controversies in the crypto space. Following the resignation, the former ECC team announced a new venture, CashZ, and plans to launch a new wallet based on Zashi’s codebase, allowing seamless migration for existing users. The incident highlights recurring tensions in crypto between non-profit foundations and entrepreneurial development teams, especially as projects mature and face valuation pressures. Zcash’s token ZEC had surged nearly 800% in late 2025, making governance and control over key assets like Zashi increasingly contentious.

marsbit01/09 05:13

A Decade-Old Coin: Zcash Also Faces a Midlife Crisis

marsbit01/09 05:13

6th Man Ventures Founder: How to Find the Most Valuable Crypto Projects?

Founder of 6th Man Ventures discusses the viability of the "dual-token + equity" structure, emphasizing that there is no one-size-fits-all answer. The key is backing an exceptional, long-term-focused team committed to building a founder-led, enduring enterprise, similar to Binance’s Changpeng Zhao. He argues that for application-layer projects requiring sustained leadership, tokens often underperform equity. Many DeFi 1.0 founders have departed, leaving DAOs and part-time contributors in "maintenance mode," struggling with slow and ineffective decision-making. In contrast, equity isn’t always superior—tokens enable unique utilities like fee discounts, staking for airdrops, and access rights, which equity cannot easily replicate. "Ownership tokens" currently face limitations in product integration and legal recognition in the U.S. due to regulatory gaps. However, a hybrid model is proposed: an equity entity operates on a "cost-plus" basis to serve a token-driven protocol, aiming to maximize token and ecosystem value rather than corporate profits. This structure benefits token holders with a well-funded Labs entity for development and a core team heavily incentivized via token holdings. Success hinges on trust in the team’s execution and vision, as token holders lack strong legal protections. Ultimately, team quality, credibility, and execution determine value. Over time, consistent delivery and clear value accrual to tokens—through buybacks, governance, and utility—will allow the best tokens to thrive by 2026, even with equity/Labs entities.

marsbit01/08 08:59

6th Man Ventures Founder: How to Find the Most Valuable Crypto Projects?

marsbit01/08 08:59

Who Defines the "Facts"? The Truth About Power and the Potential for Malice in Polymarket's Resolution Mechanism

Polymarket, a prediction market platform, faces renewed criticism over fairness following its intervention in a market regarding a potential U.S. invasion of Venezuela. On January 4, Polymarket issued a clarification stating that the U.S. operation to capture Venezuelan President Maduro did not qualify as an "invasion," causing a sharp drop in the value of "YES" shares for the event occurring by January 31 and impacting user profits. This is not the first such incident. The article explains Polymarket’s resolution mechanism, which relies on the oracle protocol UMA. Each prediction market has predefined rules, but Polymarket can issue additional clarifications for unforeseen events, as in this case. The resolution process requires a whitelisted address to propose an outcome with a security deposit. If unchallenged, it is accepted. If disputed, a debate and UMA token holder vote occur, with unbalanced incentives favoring the challenger to ensure proposal quality. The core issues are ambiguity in rule interpretation and the centralization of power. Rules are inherently interpretable, and platform neutrality is complicated by its U.S. base and geopolitical biases. Furthermore, the UMA voting mechanism, though economically incentivized, remains vulnerable to manipulation by large token holders, as seen in a past incident where a $7 million market was inaccurately resolved. Ultimately, users are not betting on real-world outcomes but on how rules will be interpreted and enforced.

Odaily星球日报01/08 03:55

Who Defines the "Facts"? The Truth About Power and the Potential for Malice in Polymarket's Resolution Mechanism

Odaily星球日报01/08 03:55

活动图片